666: Kreepy Kerry (2014) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
Not a horror film
gallifreyent20 May 2016
I am a straight woman who enjoys horror films and beautiful adult men. This monstrosity offered neither. The males in this gathering were too physically immature to be of interest, and the film had no plot. It consisted mainly of these boys touching themselves in a matter as though they were applying sunscreen to their chests in the most boring way possible. It was not sexual touching, it was monotonous and repetitive. I suppose if you want to watch somewhat fit teen-looking guys pose for the camera while moving in a way that even bores them, this is the film for you. I'm sure there's a market for that, but this mess does not belong among films identified as horror. The only horror here is the time one wastes waiting to get through the ridiculous undy shots to discover there is nothing else in the movie.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What The Hell??
jaimedance36 June 2018
Don't Waste Your Time On This Film With Horrible Acting ~ And if You Waste Your Time Watching A Guy Take A Shower For 5 Min or A Guy Exercising For 5 Min. Both Shirtless With Scary Music In The Back Ground And Nothing Happening ~ A Total Waste Of Anyone's Time To Even Sit Thru This Film Two Thumbs Down.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
simply terrible
khaoskane093 January 2015
I actually signed up just to write this to warn others, life is too short to waste it watching movies like this, the acting was atrocious, I've seen better on television adverts, also at one point I thought i had fallen asleep and woke up watching a gay porn channel, the cameraman seemed very obsessed with the young naked male torsos and a lot of scenes were drawn out and unnecessary IMO, I was almost as if the director just thought "hey I'll get some young fit guys together and make them rub themselves, if you are foolhardy enough to watch it you will see what I mean....the $1m budget was probably spent on hiring the house, because actors that bad do not deserve to be paid, the movie is 75 minutes, well that is time i will never get back
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
gay softcore porn
mortie-853-77617919 March 2015
I have to confess that I have not expended a great deal of time or effort in attempting to come to terms with the intricacies and subtleties of this movie's deftly nuanced plot. But, so far as I can gather, this is the essence of it.

Kerry (Conner Sorensen) has recently joined Bradbury Academy, an educational institution based in very up-market residential premises and populated by exceptionally handsome young men. But, with the exception of George (Chase Clarke) - who seems to have the hots for young Kerry - the other male residents (Whitman, played by Torran Kitts; Richard, played by Justin Michael Johnson; Chuck, played by Kyle Dondlinger; and Ted, played by Kirk Krause) make it their business to pick on Kerry and bully him, at least when they are not working out or taking very prolonged showers.

Little do they know that Kerry is possessed of supernatural powers, which he employs to exact retribution. Basically, he has the ability to give another person a telepathic orgasm, merely by thinking about him (or her) while he masturbates. So Kerry slowly works his way through all the other members of the household, causing them to blow their loads one by one. Whether or not this makes them think twice about bullying Kerry again is an issue which the movie does not explore in any depth.

What it requires, however, is for Conner Sorensen to spend a large portion of the film on his bed, in "tighty whities", assiduously playing with himself. It also requires the other members of the cast to experience orgasms when they least expect it, but generally when they are already in a state of partial or total undress.

Only a cynic would suggest that this sophisticated story-line exists simply as a pretext for getting six hot male actors to disport themselves in front of the camera while semi-naked and writhing in orgasmic ecstasy. But if anyone can come up with a more plausible explanation, I should be interested to hear it.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What on earth did I just watch?!
DeaditeGaz9220 January 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Okay. Let me start this review by saying I love low budget horror movies that are so bad to the point they're hilarious and fun to watch. This low budget horror movie however wasn't even funny and if I'm honest even the word bad doesn't begin to describe it.

Now let me explain a bit about the plot. There isn't one. The end.

I have just wasted 75 minutes of my life on this garbage, 75 minutes I will never get back. The entire movie consisted of the director perving on young guys. Seriously at times I was questioning whether I accidentally put on some gay porn instead of a horror movie. WHO GREENLIGHTED THIS?!?!?! I'm sure there are a ton of great horror films that could have been greenlighted instead of this junk.

Overall, save yourself the torture, go watch videos on YouPorn for 75 minutes instead. They're guaranteed to have more of a plot and be more entertaining than this. 0 of 10
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Good if you like young guys in tight white underwear
Leofwine_draca12 January 2018
Warning: Spoilers
666: KREEPY KERRY is another slice of softcore nonsense from B-movie director David DeCoteau. A real film it isn't. The story sees a bunch of the usual young and buff characters being assailed by a telepath which causes them to have psychic orgasms. The whole film is an odyssey of rubbing, caressing and self-gratification, with negligible plotting and terrible acting everywhere you look. It's good if you like tight white underwear, junk if you don't.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Not what you expect on face value.
damnnative10 July 2018
I saw a cool-looking cover with "666" and "supernatural powers" on it so I expected darkness and cool demons but it was definitely not that.

After 10 to 15 minutes I realized I was mistaken. The awkward length of semi-naked man scenes revealed to me that this is some kind of b-grade homoerotic soft porn garbage with terrible acting and poor sound quality.

10/10 NOPES!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
More male beauty appreciation, than a horror!
briangaywood17 August 2022
Being directed by David DeCouteau, I was expecting there to be lots of young shirtless men in this film.

For me, I was very pleased with admiring the shots of guys showing their physiques, and using intimidation to bully poor Kerry.

I think the voice over for the demon was a little hard to understand at times.

For me, this was an entertaining 1 and quarter hour of silliness (I watch this when I am bored hehehehe)
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed