Thicker Than Water (2014) Poster

(I) (2014)

User Reviews

Review this title
1 Review
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
Critique
Artemorticia19 December 2014
I'm not trying to be rude, but this film is obviously budgeted, and everybody looks super photogenic and clean, in yet the producers have it set around western times in 1920s. The 1920s especially during the depression and in western times while doing farm work is supposed to be dirty and messy and it looks like the actors were afraid of getting dirty.

The two actors Thornton and springborn have potential but the guy who plays Clayton was obviously trying too hard to act in the film, and anybody who says otherwise, obviously hasn't been paying close enough attention to be able to give constructive criticism.

I couldn't even finish the film because it was that much crap.

Everything from the facial expressions, to the western accent was totally fake and obvious acting. Would suggest to the actor not to think too much on the fact that he is acting and playing a role- there is an expression on his face that tells me that he feels stupid because he is acting and questions his abilities. When people watch a movie, they want to get lost in the movie because it seems real and not obviously acted out. Food for thought.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed