Winter (TV Mini Series 2015) Poster

(2015)

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Better than I expected, a good series
BeneCumb9 November 2020
Being a fan of mostly UK and Scandinavian crime series, I sometimes like to widen my horizons and find out what other countries have to offer in a similar area. Prior to start watching Winter, I had some qualms regarding approach and possible easy solution, but it soon turned out to be a versatile story having its twists and turns throughout the 6 episodes.

True, there were some common leitmotifs and predictable character relations, but as I did not surmise the wrongdoer and potential crime motives, I am pleased that I took/found approx. 5 hours for this Series.
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Double plot sometimes confuses
jax71329 April 2019
There are two parallel plots that sometimes gets in the way of this otherwise engaging police procedural. The solid acting and direction is why I upped my rating from what I really think (6.5) to 7.0. The effort to keep both the local and federal investigations in the center of the story often creates tangents that dilute the suspense. Also, the police in both camps commit mistakes that I don't believe would happen in real life but are used here to simply insert action and use up time. Minor flubs made me shake my head such as why a criminal would mount the timer for a car bomb in full view on the dashboard. Or why a police artist's sketch of a suspect would not *immediately* be electronically circulated to all involved. However, despite these little things and the slightly irritating over-development of some peripheral characters whose demise and/or personal dramas serve little purpose, I wanted to follow this to the end because there were a few central questions to be answered. And, oddly, this was the first time I've been constantly distracted by an actor's mustache or non-mustache. What is up with Lachlan's unattractive shadow above his lips?
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Keeps You Guessing
aphillips-4305723 January 2019
My wife and I thoroughly enjoyed this series. Don't understand the many negative reviews. It is pretty well plotted and acted. Yes, the murders pile up, but they keep you guessing as to who did it and also create a lot of tension surrounding the suspects. I would like to give it a 7.8, but can't so it gets an 8.0.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Maybe the Best Aussie mini-series we have seen yet...
canuckteach9 August 2016
Contrary to other opinions here at IMDb, we found Winter to be a superb production, well-acted and well-written. British mysteries sometimes are heavily-weighed for character-development, leaving nifty plot developments as a secondary consideration. We haven't quite finished the series, but we are pleased that some mysteries are slowly coming to light, and others will be revealed in the final episode.

There's a nice bit of coincidence in the plot, a tool that can be used or overused. In this case, it ties some loose plot-ends together nicely and shows that the hunch of one key detective was off-base, a rare outcome in a mystery story. Rebecca Gibney is excellent as the lead detective 'Winter', very reminiscent in looks and style of Amanda Burton, from the British 'Commander' series (maybe a little prettier, and not so tragically-flawed).

WE caught this on Acorn TV - but we would part with the price of a DVD set to see it again.
21 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Twisting till the end
nstssafety10 April 2019
Like the book you don't put down... it was the day I got nothing done. Just when you have your puzzle pieces almost together the wind comes up and blows them around adding new color. Absolutely loved it. I want another crime from this team.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Engaging
evakubin7 February 2021
Twists and turns neatly wrapped up by the end. Keeps you engaged and surprised.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Leaves Shyamalan in the Dust
sagar-438604 July 2018
"Winter" is an odd one - the cinematography shows occasional spots of brilliance, but is, mostly, simple and functional; the acting is on the spot, with each actor playing their characters efficiently, not missing a beat; the direction is crisp, and so is the editing; this is one of those shows where everything except the plot is good.

Twists abound in the end, and the finale is one to be watched, because it is just so good. However, the red herrings thrown in here and there were never convincing enough - the ideal red-herring is one that is well-justified, but not for the reason we think it to be, and masks the hints that foreshadow the real fact; in this case, though, there are no hints whatsoever to be masked, and some reveals are just like "Uh huh. Ok." instead of "How did I not see that coming??"

In addition, the characters are actually nothing so special. Take Castle. Castle himself is quirky, has a sense of humor, loves adventures, and is basically a big kid. But he also has the ability to show pathos towards his fellow investigators and has good observation skills, which make sense given his novelist background.

Consider House, M.D. He's sarcastic, caustic, permanently ticked-off, insulting, brash, ingenious, playful (to the extent of causing harm) but committed to his work as a doctor.

Now consider Eve Winter. Nothing special, just the typical cop with a haunting past, who is trying to do justice by the victims who keep her work coming. Nothing to write home about.

Consider the Fed, Jake. He just wants a confession and keeps getting into loggerheads with Winter. Nothing special there, either. The only one with a hint of personality is Indiana herself, and thank God for that, because otherwise the entire cast could be replaced by everymen and the story wouldn't change much.

Regardless, I'm giving this an 8/10 for an overall solid show. Good entertainment, but don't expect to be hooked until the penultimate episode.
13 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Too many subplots to make it interesting!
qui_j8 October 2016
This is a TV series that goes all over the place with its story line. There are so many subplots that are loosely held together that its difficult to know what the main focus of the series was all about. Everyone has a secret, everyone is a suspect is something or another, and at the end, everyone lives happily ever after. The scenes jump around due to poor editing, and sometimes appear in a random order. In the last episode it was as if there was a lot of pressure to wrap things up quickly, so problems were quickly solved, and an all too predictable end finally reached.

The acting comes across as very "tongue-in-cheek", almost as if the actors really didn't believe the words they were saying. This may just have been due to a poor script, or their desire to get to the end of the story and move on to something else.

There are some really good Australian productions. This is just not one of them!
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Might make a good drinking game
puppen19 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
There are so many clichés in this series that its main value might be as a drinking game: hooker with a heart of gold (have a drink), professional conduct hearing as a means to derail the investigation (have another drink), bickering detectives who are actually hot for each other (drink), person killed because he/she is wearing another person's clothing (drink), staged press conference to bring out the killer (drink), vital information leaked to the press due to pillow talk (drink), etc. I am not mentioning the clichés that give away major plot points (and there are many more), but you get the idea. It really is as if the writers intentionally tried in insert as many overused police procedural tropes as they could into one script.

The problem is that the acting is uniformly excellent. I cannot single out one performance because from the leads to the smallest part, the acting is top notch. It really is a shame that the actors did not have a better script with which to work.
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Well... it's decent background noise.
buttyheaddy18 February 2015
*sigh* Well I was hoping to cove something else in my first review but I suppose this will have to do.

I think it's biggest problem is quite simply the fact that it's no different than EVERY OTHER POLICE DRAMA EVER! Well apart from the Australian accents (although it does remind me a little of City Homicide back from 2011 and seems to suffer from dullness, anyway I digress).

Almost all of the scenes contain the protagonist played by Rebecca Gibney and a lot of the series would rest on her acting ability. Well... it's not bad, but she's trying so hard to be the tough independent female that her character seems to be a little bit of a mary sue just because she's so one-note. Probably more of the writing and directing at fault to be honest and it's causing the lead role to perform in an almost satire of her character. Maybe her character will be more flushed out in the future but this should have happened in it's predecessor The Killing Fields.

I'm not sure why Channel 7 is trying so hard for this show to succeed putting it in a prime time slot but it saddens me that something with a little more spice could have been put there.

I'd probably would have criticised it a lot more if there was anything to criticise.

TL;DR It's bland, so bland it's hard to call bad. Even bad can be entertaining.
16 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Winter is a dull season for most of us
pensman29 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I doubt if I (we) will finish this series. We watched the pilot and all we did was a back and forth on how incompetent the cops were. But the series is on Acorn, so we said let's see if we do a binge watch to find out if the writers get better.

They didn't. These cops don't jump to conclusions; they take running leaps.  Detective Sergeant Eve Winter tries to run a serious investigation but Detective Inspector Lachlan McKenzie (Peter O'Brien) decides he has the killer of Karly Johansson, Paul Paget whose wife was murdered eight years earlier; and McKenzie is adamant that Paget did it. McKenzie threatens him, follows him, and decides his Javert made Paget take his own life. But Paget was murdered. Rats, wrong again.

Next McKenzie decides Johansson's husband Luke did it. Nope, wrong again. Luke is just a hapless drug dealer. And the Australian feds are involved as Federal Agent Jake Harris is trying to tie up a drug case using Indiana Hope as a witness. But someone is trying to kill Indiana and she tries to hide by having her friend Sharni help her.

Then there is the big twist: Indiana Hope isn't Indiana Hope but Hope Ziegler the daughter of Peter Ziegler, the Director of Public Prosecutions. And Peter dumped his daughter off to be raised by another family as she was always getting into trouble and embarrassing him.

Winter decides there is a leak in her task force and unless she finds out who, Indiana will be killed. And when Detective Inspector Lachlan McKenzie is shot, she knows she is right. This is where I gave up and went to bed. My wife finished it but won't watch a second series should one be approved. She says the cops are so incompetent that they make her cringe. She will admit that she likes Detective Alesia Taylor; but that is it.

There is also a subplot involving Eve Winter's nephew Harry Winter who is a bit of a 14 year old idiot, and Eve's sister Melanie Winter who is a bit of a you are always picking on me for being a bad mother; which she is.
7 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Terrible portrayal of police work
rainoleik1 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Have only watched episode one, and will leave it there. The series may get better, but I'll never know. The storyline for episode one was interesting, but the portrayal of the investigators of serial murder were so ridiculous I won't give this any more attention. Top notch investigators are brought in to help the small community with a history of missing young women. These experts interview a suspect and examine his vehicle on the street in the presence of many angry men. Men who later beat the suspect to a pulp as they are led to believe he is the murderer. But of course he is not. Investigators view a victim, teenage girl's video strip tease on laptop in a public restaurant setting. These same people interview a dance instructor, once married to the killer, as she is conducting her dance class, In front of the teenage dance students. And four investigators discuss sensitive homicide information while seated on bar stools in a local tavern. The writers either have no idea about protecting individual rights and privacy, or they intentionally want to portray police members as idiots who have no respect for protocol.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed