Laundry Man (2016) Poster

(2016)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
2/10
Laundry is and will always be a boring affair...
paul_haakonsen2 January 2021
Sometimes you just got to stop and check IMDb for a movie's rating and then go with the gut feeling you get from the movie's rating. And the 2016 horror movie titled "Laundry Man" from writer and director Johan Vandewoestijne is one such movie.

Yeah, I should have heeded the warning signs and just skipped on this movie. Horror movie might be stretching it in terms of slapping a genre label on it. This was nowhere near being anything even remotely scary.

The storyline told in "Laundry Man" is not only incredibly boring, but it is also unfathomably slow paced and pointless. Some qualities which made it a very difficult movie to sit through. And truth be told, I gave up about one-third through the ordeal known as "Laundry Man".

The acting in the movie was as to be expected from a movie of this caliber. However, I will say that the actors and actresses were actually performing well enough, but they were just hindered and held back by an atrocious lack of proper script, lack of interesting characters and a horribly slow paced progress all together.

"Laundry Man" came and went without leaving a lasting impression, much less even managing to leave a dent in the horror genre. The movie felt like a low budget home movie project, to be bluntly honest.

My rating of "Laundry Man" is a generous two out of ten stars.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
That's it
staunton-gary1 January 2021
All I can say is, don't bother. Another reviewer suggested that the film industry in Belgium is flourishing, especially in the last 5-10 years. I am assuming that in Belgium, your taste in movies is sub-par. The story and acting could have more polish (and not with a capital P type). So yeah, nah to this one.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Wish I didnt
chancegb14 October 2021
Normally I don't base my movie watching off of how the score is but.. for this I should of! First off, I couldn't tell what accent the actors had nor the place of where it was being placed; literary the first 5 minutes I was confused.

Though I like the story of the movie, but the acting could of been ALOT better.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Greetings from Belgium; home of the insane and perverted!
Coventry7 April 2016
Warning: Spoilers
This obviously can't be known in the rest of the world but, for such a small and insignificant country, the film industry in Belgium is very flourishing and especially since the last 5-10 years. There are lots of Belgian – and particularly Flemish – movies coming out each year and they are practically all popular and lure massive amounts of people to the theaters. Some lucky Belgian directors even begin to attract the attention of big Hollywood producers, like for example Eric Van Looy ("Loft"), Michaël Roskam ("Rundskop"), Geoffrey Enthoven ("Hasta La Vista") and Felix Van Groeningen ("The Broken Circle Breakdown"). It's good to know that mainstream Belgian cinema is doing well, but in case you're a fan of horror, cult and exploitation movies, it's even more interesting to know that Belgium also has a genuinely hardcore grindhouse underworld. The uncrowned king of the Belgium B-Z movies is definitely writer/director/producer Johan Vandewoestijne – a.k.a James Desert. He made himself immortal, at least to a selected group of people worldwide, with the class-sick "Lucker the Necrophagous" in 1986. "Lucker" is a film about a dangerously disturbed serial killer/necrophiliac who's loose on the streets, and judging by the plot synopsis and themes of the new film "Laundry Man", well … Mr. Vandewoestijne's favorite subjects and personal interests clearly haven't changed much in nearly 30 years.

"Laundry Man" handles about – surprise, surprise – a dangerously disturbed serial killer/necrophiliac who's loose on the streets, but admittedly the Vandewoestijne's screenplay is slightly more ambitious and attempts to insert several sub plots and relevant social themes this time. The killer's modus operandi to get rid of bodies is loosely inspired by Andras Pandy, who dissolved the bodies' of his victims in acid bath and he takes on the false identities of a female dominatrix and her docile slave in internet chatrooms in order to lure new victims. There even is a fun but totally pointless little sub plot about the killer being a stingy bastard, since he urges a prostitute to finish her drink before they leave the bar and because he does his laundry in washing rooms of other people's apartments. The director also implements a narrative structure that alternately exists of interrogation sequences at the police station and the actual murder crimes committed by psychopath Jeff Damen.

When Johan Vandewoestijne introduced his film at the Brussels International Festival of Fantastic Films, he particularly emphasized the fact that he never gets any financial support from the Belgian government or subsidies from any cultural funds. To be honest, I would find it very weird and inappropriate if our government spends the tax payers' money on sick-spirited horror movies that features scenes of lunatic using a severed female head to conduct fellatio on himself. This meant that Vandewoestijne had to look for investors elsewhere and found them overseas, but unfortunately this also led to the film's main default. Because the investors don't like to read subtitles, the entire film is spoken in English instead of Dutch and it makes the actors/actresses come across as unnatural, forced, unpersuasive and sometimes even downright amateurish. It looks and sounds as if the entire cast is just reciting words rather than having actual conversations and some lines are even literally translated from Dutch into English and don't make a lick of sense. I can't blame Vandewoestijne for indulging to the will of his American/Canadian producers, but the language and acting are two elements that often make "Laundry Man" incredibly difficult to endure. There are more defaults, in fact, most notably that the film is too long and slow-paced, and the camera work is too monotonous and uninspired. The violence and bloodshed is extreme but not too shocking. The undertones and insinuations, on the other hand, are depraved and disgusting. Johan Vandewoestijne made two different films with detailed and explicit footage of necrophilia, so if I was part of his circle of friends I would be severely worried…

One last note on the Belgian underground film industry: apparently someone by the name of Steve De Roover is currently working on a documentary called "Forgotten Scares: An in-depth look at Flemish Horror Cinema" that will bring all the rarely seen horror/cult flicks from my beloved country together. Who knows, maybe it'll do for Belgian horror what "Not Quite Hollywood" did for Australian exploitation. One thing's for sure already, though… Johan Vandewoestijne and his movies will certainly play a prominent role in this documentary!
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
He may not have to pay, but you do
kosmasp26 August 2022
Be it money wise or at least time wise. That is if you decide to give this a go. Maybe you shouldn't - unless like me you are a glutton for punishment. Than be not just my guest but really go for it (no puns intended).

The laundry man - it starts off with the now and it supposedly is a riff on Dahmer and some priest or something like that. I think it is best to stick with the "originals". Although maybe not even those - do we need to watch any of it? Surely not and no I am not calling you Shirley.

Jokes/puns from other movies aside, this is as serious as heart attack - something I wish upon no one of course. Same is true about the movie ... ok enough puns, there are some saving graces I assume for some. Be it effects/blood or nudity ... your pick of the litter/gutter.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Torture isn't for everyone
sahlgoode22 December 2019
Warning: Spoilers
You really have to be a fan of torture ala Hostel, Wrong Turns, Wolf Creek...etc to get any sort of entertainment from this flick. Unlike the afore mentioned films, this one had some holes in the script that left you using your imagination to fill in the blanks. I don't mind doing that from time to time, so it really didn't effect my overall enjoyment.

However: The one giant hole that can't be explained away, is why Laurie was even written into the script? I'd like to think her testimony would have given the film a whole different ending. She's a major character, but they dismiss her role completely with the verdict they come up with.

Otherwise, the acting was good, the plot was well intentioned, the gore was pretty good. If you're into this sort of flick, it's worth at least a watch.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed