Shark Lake (2015) Poster

(2015)

User Reviews

Review this title
58 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
Dolph Lundgren vs. A Shark! Looks like Sharnado on 4 instead of 11.
subxerogravity7 October 2015
As a kid from the 80's growing up in Lundgren's prime, I still find the man massive on the screen, especially when he's not doing a movie that evolves other action heroes, which I have not seen him do in a while.

The big man plays a convicted wild life trafficker trying to make contact with his daughter who's being protected by a small town sheriff who took her in after he went to jail. Now it seems only Lundgren can stop a shark infestation happening on the lake they all live on. I make it sound more action packed than it really is.

It's the most original antagonist Lundgren has ever faced. It's too bad the special effects on his antagonist was so crappy or they could have really had something good here.

It tries to be Jaws but nothing can top that. It rips of Piranha 3D, but at least those movies are not trying to be something they are not.

Although Shark Lake did have it's fun moments, like a Steve Irwin type who hunts down fish for the BBC, it's funny for all the wrong reasons.

With that said, It does have a, so bad it's good, quality to it, and is worth watching just to smile at how horrible it is.
20 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Mix the love part and a better horror element and maybe....
jackmeat19 November 2015
My quick rating - 3,5/10. Really bad. I do appreciate the CGI swimmers against a underwater backdrop that has to be public domain video at this point. The movie is laughable to that level and the only shimmering glimpse of hope is the story? Did I really just say that? If you take away the stupid supposed horror element of normal sized bull sharks hanging out in a lake you actually have a somewhat interesting idea. The romance involves the dealer that sells exotic animals and something he lets lose in the water happens to have babies and is a shark. OK, dumb there, but when it is revealed for other purpose just seemed like the story warped two together since he did so to get back with his ex. OK, sounds dumb, but I saw a glimmer of hope, didn't say it was great. Either way, avoid this movie but maybe Jerry Duggan has something up his sleeve(if he hangs onto his screenplay writer) for something better.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
B without the bite.....
s327616915 December 2015
Shark Lake is a B grade flick without the bite found in mainstream films like Jaws.

This film relies too much on munch-able eye candy in the form of scantily clad men and women, where a proper storyline, lots of action and accompanying quality creature effects, would have taken it so much further.

The acting ranges from average through to awful. This film would have been much better, for example, without the fake English shark hunter. A clichéd characterization that would make any real Brit wince.

So is there any basis on which on recommend Shark Lake? Well, its not utterly dreadful but its action scenes are so watered down (pardon the pun), that what should have been the driving force, in a film of this kind, is mostly absent. Three out of ten from me.
12 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Opposite of Jaws
jamdifo3 October 2015
Warning: Spoilers
It amazes me that Jaws was made 40 years ago and its still the best shark movie ever made, even though effects have come a long way since then. While Jaws did everything right, this movie did everything wrong. With Dolph Lungren in this movie, I thought at least the special effects would be good. They are atrocious! The attacks are atrocious! The suspense is atrocious! And the acting is a bore! If I could have given a zero, I would. Totally forgettable.

One of the worst scenes was a shark barreling into the boat and the effect of water pouring in was laughable. Why did I waste 90 minutes of my life for this. Learn from my mistake and don't do the same.
36 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Pretty bad
waynesk7 December 2015
It's not the worst movie ever made, but it may feature the worst CGI ever. At least movies like Sharknado don't take themselves seriously, and for that reason, they succeed in being entertaining at least.

Shark Lakes budget clearly went into paying Dolph Lundgren and while he's not exactly known for his acting abilities, this is probably the worst movie he has ever appeared in.

This movie has no humor, no likable characters and when you see the shark you will most likely want to turn off like I did. There is no reason to watch this movie, ever!

Do yourself a solid and just watch Jaws again if your looking for your shark fix!
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
What is the cop's problem?
awesomekickball14 May 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I enjoy low-budget movies. Especially ones that involve sharks. But seriously, I cannot get past how arrogant and pompous the main cop woman is. She somehow adopts this kid while her father is in prison, then freaks out about him wanting to see his daughter. She then breaks into his house, gun drawn, attempting to find dirt on him. Like, are we supposed to be rooting for this woman?
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Poor Dolph....
jackstupidjack5 January 2016
When he was in his heyday in the mid to late 1980s, with a Bond and a Rocky smash behind him, it must have seemed to Lundgren that he would wind up in the 'Stallone/Schwarzenegger' bracket with strings of mega smash box office hits and multi million dollar contracts. Sadly for him, it didn't quite pan out that way with a stream of dreadful B movies coming his way instead from studios desperate to get a smash on their hands. If I were him I'd be looking to dish out a Drago style beating to my handlers for landing me a load of crappy roles in films with 'The XXXXX' in the title... A plus for him is that he isn't the worse performer in this pile of doo doo, which must be the dreadful female lead. The film is surprisingly good fun with all the silliness, cheese, and dreadful acting and ludicrous scripting you'd expect. The cinematography is also worth a mention, some of the nature shots are quite stunning. Harmless inoffensive twaddle at best.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
UTTERLY CRAP
lukem-5276016 December 2021
I couldn't even finish this trash.

I like Dolph Lundgren & i like Low-budget B-movies & i like the Killer Shark genre but this was a joke.

Absolute Crap.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Swimming with the fishes
danielharden20 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
In movies, we've seen Sharks deep underwater, we've seen sharks on beaches, we've even seen sharks in a God damn tornado not once, but 4 times. And now, we have Sharks in a lake? Shark Lake is a Dolph Lundgren B movie that fails in every single way you can possibly imagine. Now, where to begin? Firstly, the film is really dumb and cringe worthy, and not in a fun way. For example, this character called Peter is introduced to us as a guy with a PhD... Yet he has to ask the lead is they are a cop when they are IN UNIFORM WITH A PATCH ON HER SHOLUDER SAYING "SHERRIFF DEPT". That is just one of the many straight up idiotic moments in this terrible movie.

This film is unintentionally funny in everything it attempts. Whether its is the sheer patheticness of the old lady at the first attack, or the jet ski collision from outta nowhere, or every moment the shark is on screen. There is one shot I found hilarious where the camera has a birds eye view of the water as if to show how big the killer shark is.... And then this tiny little shark silhouette appears under the water. My god this film is funny for all the wrong reasons.

Being a B movie, the film isn't going to have a lot of money to work with, and you really feel it in this film. The sound is poor as well as the lighting at times. Some scenes are too dark and the police lights at the start of the film are so intense, they could possibly trigger an epileptic fit. But I'm not a doctor so don't take my word on that. The film also doesn't contain Dolph Lundgren much at all. It's not that its a bad thing, it's just that the films lead just doesn't do anything in this film and is almost misleading if you think you are going to get 90 minutes of Dolph vs Shark because you get about 2 minutes probably. But wait there's more, the script is also bad. The characters aren't likable, for example the real lead in this film, Hernandez, is a terrible cop and a finger pointer when it comes to blame (well only to Dolph Lundgren).

Speacking of a terrible script, Dolph 's story with the mob boss guy gets completely forgotten about. The guy more or less comes in and says "get my shark or my money or I kill you daughter" and the next time you see him is in the back of some car ( A police car? I don't know the framing didn't reveal that) and Dolph makes a comment and boom its all happily ever after... It's like the writers literally forgot about this part of the story and so squeezed it into the ending. Like seriously?

Overall, Shark Lake is a unintentionally hilarious Dolph Lundgren B movie. The film is of the quality you would expect of B, C, D all the way through to Z movies. One thing still bugs me about this film... What is the third thing that all living things do? Like, Peter with the Phd says there are 3 things... And then only lists 2 things... So what's the third thing? Anyway this film is not good and I don't know what the point was with it. Porr Dolph is left swimming with the fishes with this one.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Terrible Jaws wannabe with awful production and Dolph Lundgren shoehorned into it
quincytheodore6 December 2015
You have to appreciate Dolph Lundgren's tenacity to make movies, he churns out robust quantity of them in last year alone. Unfortunately, in Shark Lake he seems like just a famous name slapped into the title and poster, while being almost completely isolated from the main plot. The movie itself is appealingly bad, this is the level of sloppy presentation equal to random death scene in telenovela with silly fake shark fin, which admittedly surprising to see outside cartoon.

It all goes down in a formulaic monster movie plot, if you haven't predicted it already, there's a lake and shark on it. Cue the montage of silly party girls, stupid death scenes, incompetent authority figure, but wait, it has Dolph Lundgren. However, he's more of a subplot, separated from the rest. It's almost like an average action portion glued to a monster movie.

This is pretty disappointing since the best spark the movie has is the simple family drama. No one would form connection to plastic shark, but audience may relate to Dolph Lundgren as the ex-con trying to bond with her estranged little daughter. It is the closest to sincerity on this movie, yet it occurs too little too late.

Concerning the actual threat, it's undeniably horrible. The visual is incredibly bad, using cheap editing, poor animation effect and actual fake shark fin. The corpse of mechanical Jaws rolls on its watery grave. One can even see the drop in quality when transitioning from day to night. It looks so fake that it would've worked as parody, yet the movie insists on the gritty dark look, it's a bit sad really.

Shark Lake is, by no intention of itself, a parody of Jaws. The brief appearance from Dolph Lundgren can't save it and merely serves as timid advertisement.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I enjoyed the movie
donumdei24 January 2021
I know what I get myself into when I watch this types of movies. When I saw Dolph in a shark movie as an animal smuggler. I got excited, it's like Nick Cage In Primal. People gotta understand just because the movie isn't made by big companies doesn't mean it's a bad movie. Just don't be critical and you will enjoy it.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Ok...It's really not THAT bad....
Rachaels_Apocalypse6 November 2018
Wow. People have shredded this movie - from the actors, to the script, to the sharks. The only truly valid point is the sharks. I suppose not that big enough of a budget to get some really great effects - but we still are able to get the visual point. And, really, it's a B movie people. Other than the sharks, the rest was enjoyable. Plenty of good ol' roll your eyes moments, but then a few quality honest to goodness surprising happenings as well. I thought the acting was fine, only once or twice was I tossed from being engrossed in the movie. I think mostly when the reality tv guy was there. Of course the setting was beautiful. Lots more I could say, but it would get into the land of spoilers.... Bottom line - if you love shark movies, are running out of them lol, this is your next top choice. It's all downhill from here.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Shark week anyone?
pdyner15 August 2021
Look-when you see tha stars and read the plot, you know what you signed up for. Sharknado meets Lake Placid. Dolph mumbles and the graphics look like they came off a Commadore 64.

Not the best.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not bad
brettbentman30 June 2021
It's not Jaws, but it doesn't need to be! Get over it. For what it is, I liked it.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Beyond Dumb
danny-prichard24 November 2020
Quite possibly the dumbest collective group of people ever featured in a movie. The shark was easily the smartest creature of the bunch. Sara Maluka Lane's character couldn't have been more unlikable if the intent of this movie was solely to make you hate her. Shark flicks are usually reliable time-killers but this seemed to take forever to end. God Dolph Lundren must have really, really needed a paycheck.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
if even "just some divers swimming" is faked...
bart-1026328 September 2018
Like my title says, even when some divers are underwater swimming, you can clearly see how fake this is.. I mean, people who make movies should know about motion tracking??? Also the movement of the sharks was very unnatural. I think the CG was better in jaws II, and yes, i am dead serious.

The fakeness of the CG in this movie made it unwatchable for me. i can not tell a lot about the story, because i really could not waste more time on this pile of crap.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Haa, what a joke!
Patient4448 December 2015
Man I can not believe in 2015 those CGIs are still allowed to appear on screen. I do understand that sometimes you're on a tight budget, but come one, if you going to make a movie about a shark, well...these guys right here couldn't even make a decent flipper. I mean seriously, even that is pc made, which makes this movie, quite a joke.

There is a plot to it, there is an well known actor but not the star of the movie, and a quarter of execution here, as well as all the boredom you can imagine. It wanted to be a shark movie, and it failed by all means possible, and the shark... it was bad.

I mean, I'm going to recommend you Shark Night 3d, or Bait, both cheesy movies that are so bad they're fun, and of course, little baby Jaws compared to Shark Lake.

Cheers!
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Terribly Written
lovettstough9 December 2018
I really like Dolph Lundgren as an action movie star. This movie was terribly written & could've been way better. The girl sheriff deputy/police woman part was terribly horribly written more than anything else. I could easily explain and describe what was terribly horribly written in her part which is almost all of it but I don't want to put in any spoilers in this review. It's funny that in a couple few years Dolph Lundgren plays in SharkNado 5 though.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
I liked the idea, but the realisation wasn't good.
Sleepin_Dragon4 September 2018
It's not as bad as some, I've sat through some horrifically bad shark films, films where you really hope the plastic shark runs amok eating everyone and everything in sight. This film doesn't quite fall into that bracket, as it's semi watchable nonsense. The idea is quite intriguing, but after a rather decent start it begins to fall apart a little. The special effects are really bad, any hint of threat is removed by the poor special effects, but worse still is the acting, I will always watch a film with Dolph Lundgren, a bit of an 80's legend, and his acting is fine, but everyone else is so wooden. I wonder if most of the $2m budget went on his fee, rather then wages and special effects budgets. There's not much else to say to be honest, it's not abysmal, but it's far from good. 4/10
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Laughably terrible on many levels!
ccunning-735873 August 2020
Laughably terrible on many levels! As repeatedly mentioned in other reviews the CGI (CGI is nothing more than modern day Saturday morning cartoons!) was terrible. Look close on the opening scene to see the CGI shark swimming from the sinking van with Dolph. Then the really sad shark silhouette trailing the boat pulling the two girls on parachutes. How does the shark know when the one girl is going to drag her foot in the water at high speed? Impossible & hence stupid. Lane is terrible in her acting. She is stiff in all her movements, like maybe she is uncoordinated/nonathletic. They do not develop at all that she somehow adopts Dolph's daughter while he is in jail. She does everything wrong in her part as a cop. Repeated illegal searches of residences (i.e. no warrant), resulting in illegal seizure of evidence which is inadmissible. She and her partner abandon/leave the 3 year old girl alone in the house full of wild, dangerous animals, in the opening scene to chase Dolph. She shoots Dolph in the opening scene with zero justification for the shoot. If Dolph was black ANTIFA & BLM would destroy another 14 billion dollars in property & kill another several dozen people. Did they not have a law enforcement technical advisor on set?!? Dolph does a decent job but can't carry this abomination of a movie. Not enjoyable. Save yourself and hour and a half and let this one go by...
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Ugh, this shark movie makes some of those SyFy shark movies seem great by comparison
Aaron137524 October 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I thought this one might be pretty good as it was not brought to us by the SyFy station home to all things shark. It had Dolph Lundgren in it, so I thought, Dolph versus sharks, that may be pretty cool! It is not, not at all. It is a boring and stupid film filled with idiotic subplots and an annoying main character who isn't Dolph! The sharks also look incredibly bad, I once watched a shark film that was on SyFy called "Five Headed Shark Attack" and the shark in that one looked more real than the bull shark in this one!

The story has a guy who finds rare animals and is trying to deliver something in his van while these two officers are chasing him. The female is a horrible cop who shoots Dolph who is unarmed as he is trying to get out of a lake. You can't get down while your in the water! She then takes his child and raises it as her own and when he gets out she refuses to let him see it. I would say that is a major conflict of interests, but this is a cheap movie. So when we are not doing the Lifetime channel movie thing, there are sharks in the lake and they are just little bitty sharks, nothing special about them and they have everyone flipping out. Just stay out of the water for crying out loud! Of course, there just happens to be a shark expert in town, what are the odds?

So this one is pretty bad, the sharks look like crap, the shark attacks look like crap and there are a lot of head scratching moments. They blame bears at first and still seem dubious of sharks being the culprits even when a woman's leg is bitten off right in front of everyone. The whole mafia type guys going after Dolph was just filler and in the end I was left disappointed that the female deputy was not eaten!

Not a good film by any means. The plot had potential, but having regular sized sharks in a lake was just not frightening. We are also supposed to believe that the sharks have been in the lake for five years and just start going crazy eating people just as Dolph's character gets out of prison. I almost want to say leave the bad shark movies to SyFy because theirs are at least more entertaining than this, but then they did make the super horrible Planet of Sharks too...
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Greatest Film Ever Made
brandonleeeberhart4 November 2016
A mind-shattering masterpiece, assuming you have a mind to shatter.

Dolph.

What more needs to be said? 5 more lines? OK!

Take Ghostbusters, remove the ghosts and the buses, add in a dash of Apocalypse Now and Total Recall, then remove the jungles and mars, and you get Twister. But add Twister to Deep Blue Sea and you get Sharknado. I'm not even joking there, that was a real thing they made like 6 of them.

Anyway, this move has sharks and Dolph, maybe nimature golf. I don't know.

1652381/14
5 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Better Than I Expected
brandonleeburns12 April 2020
Let me start off by saying that Shark Lake is a good movie. It's entertaining, exciting, and for the most part the acting is good. That being said, the sharks and gore look really fake, and the police characters are bad. They don't follow any kind of police protocol I'm aware of and they seem entirely incompetent. There also isn't enough Lundgren vs. shark which is the whole reason I watched the movie, but I love shark movies and this one is pretty decent so I'm happy I watched it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
You Get What You Expected
chrisjwilson15 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I came in with very low expectations and they were just about met. I was just browsing Netflix and thought I would give this a try. The reviews didn't seem good and the plot didn't seem all that great. Not the worst movie I have watched, but it was definitely up there. The story just didn't make any sense. Somehow Dolph Lundgren had a bull shark in the back of his van. At least I am assuming that is how the shark got in the lake. I don't understand how the shark was in the back of the van with no water and it seemed to be sitting there for a while. Then the first guy that was killed was killed in an inch of water. The water didn't even go up to the guy's heel and somehow the shark killed him. Basically all the shark kills, besides the BBC guy and his cameraman were in water that was way to shallow for that big of a shark to be in. Also, somehow three sharks went undetected for five years in this lake. I think they said it was like a 20,000 square lake or something, but still you would expect at least one person to be attacked by one of three sharks in 5 years. I did not like the actress. I did not think she did that good of a job. I thought the doctor might have been the best in this so I was pretty sad when he died especially because the lady detective had a gun and for some reason didn't shoot the shark that went after him. Dolph Lundgren was pretty good, the sheriff was good and the BBC guy was good for the short time he was there. I also don't understand how they caught the crime boss. They never showed him being caught so I have no clue why he was arrested. The only thing that would have made this worse is if at the end of the movie they showed another shark in the lake teasing a sequel. I totally thought that was going to be the ending. Also, does a lake like this exist in Nevada? This totally looks like an ocean and not a lake.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nice location with Dolph Versus shark
amesmonde6 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Swimmers and land-lovers begin to become part of the food chain In a quiet town on Lake Tahoe.

After Legendary (2013) Dolph Lundgren returns to another creature features themed film in this slightly better than a Syfy feature thanks to some murky CGI. Lundgren with limited screen time plays a black-market exotic species dealer named Clint, I kid you not.

With a setting reminiscent of Lake Placid, there's plenty of fake blood, CGI and attacks in two feet of water. It warms up slightly in the last twenty minutes and as the water gets deeper, but don't go expecting Jaws or The Reef, as Dolph and company thump their way to survival. It's played straight and the actors do there best, notable is the young actress Lily Brooks O'Briant and Sara Malakul Lane as cop Meredith Hendricks.

To director Jerry Dugan's credit the fantastic location gives it some atmosphere and the night-time scenes hide much of the production's low budge short comings. With an air of seriousness it's better than the endless amount of CGI shark versus... fill in the blank, or spoofs doing the rounds. Its not good or memorable enough to achieve cult status, a lot of effort has gone into this but it's probably no coincidence they're hunting a Bullshark.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed