The storyline of oversimplification of facts and shaping of a narrative in media was very compelling. However, when it comes to the actual UNC scandal portion, this film is guilty of the same sin of which it accuses news media: oversimplification of a complex story and set of issues, and shaping a narrative to fit a preferred conclusion. The documentarian chooses to only interview those he knows will agree with his view of events, regardless of the facts. This "do as I say not as I do" attitude is a bit frustrating.
Additionally, the way this film is organized is a bit jarring. It would be nice to learn the facts and opinions surrounding the UNC scandal at the beginning of the film, then refer back as necessary while we explore his media storyline. Juggling two incomplete story lines at once gets confusing.
Additionally, the way this film is organized is a bit jarring. It would be nice to learn the facts and opinions surrounding the UNC scandal at the beginning of the film, then refer back as necessary while we explore his media storyline. Juggling two incomplete story lines at once gets confusing.
