The Lighthouse (2019) Poster

(I) (2019)

User Reviews

Review this title
1,604 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
More an experience than comprehensible movie.
planktonrules17 August 2021
"The Lighthouse" is one of the strangest films I've ever seen. Describing it or even knowing whether or not I liked it is pretty difficult. Suffice to say, it was is a very, very unique movie...one that is quite haunting and difficult.

The story is set in the late 19th century and a lighthouse keeper (Willem Dafoe) and his assistant (Rob Pattinson) arrive at the facility for their tour of duty. At first, things seem pretty mundane, though over time they both seem to be losing their minds...Pattinson's character in particular. Where it goes from there is ugly, disturbing and weird.

This is definitely NOT a film for everyone. In fact, I'd go so far as to say most people probably would not like the film....and fewer yet would really enjoy it. But it also is a wholly original viewing experience and I can respect the folks who made it. The acting is good....and it feels much like peeking inside the mind of a madman. Overall, not enjoyable but also pretty amazing.
324 out of 364 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"You ain't even human no more."
classicsoncall7 August 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Bleak and brooding, "The Lighthouse" is a study of the descent into madness of two lighthouse keepers, stranded beyond their original four week assignment, and despairing in the fate of their existence together. Thomas Wake (Willem Dafoe) and Tom Howard (Robert Pattinson) are alternately at each others' throats or gleefully imbibing their way into a state of stupor, at one point suggesting a homoerotic encounter, but quickly devolving into yet another fit of pique. Of the two, it's Pattinson's character who eventually experiences visions and nightmares as he goes about his daily chores, subservient to the demands of his nominal supervisor Wake. Cinematically, the picture reminded me of all those great black and white films of the Thirties and Forties emanating from the silent era. It even has a 'B' quality look, though the subject matter goes beyond the simplistic efforts of early film, and challenges the viewer with a myriad of interpretations one could assign to the story. That the fate of the two men ends so tragically is no wonder given the exposition, and you'll come away convinced that it's bad luck to kill a seabird.
53 out of 65 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Let's just be honest here
P-Sibencus24 December 2019
This is precisely the type of film that will garner equal amounts of unbridled praise by the arthouse diehards, as well as criticism (and likely rejection) from a lot of other viewers. My opinion lies somewhere in the middle. I give it 6 stars for the undeniably outstanding acting (obviously, Dafoe)... and Pattinson is very impressive. Something new, yes. Effective at mood-setting, check. The b&w filming, the shots, the scenery itself... even the set, the old dilapidated coastal shack, all excellent. The dynamic between the two characters is raw and real. Is it a thought-provoking free-fall into insanity? Maybe. But... there is a such a fine line between "arthouse", trying something different, leaving much up to subjectivity and imagination, and... just trying a bit too hard. Mermaid labia? Hmmm. But, if part of the definition of a cinematic "success" is evoking emotion, then mission accomplished. Total despair, pity, fear, disgust, and a general feeling of creepery, all there.
506 out of 693 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very much about tension and performances more than anything else
bob the moo16 August 2020
For much of The Lighthouse, I was not wholly sure what was going on, which I guess is deliberate as it is never quite clear what is what. What is consistent though is the sense of dread and claustrophobia that comes from the limits of the location and the fear of this unknown threat - whatever it may be. This is not quite good enough to carry the film for its full 110 minutes, because it is a bit too long, but it is enough to grab the viewer and more or less keep them there until the end - more or less.

The narrative isn't much to talk about, but the tone and tension is what works - if it works for you. The manner of delivery of this is an oppressive approach, making the viewer feel uncomfortable and not giving space to get away from it. I thought this aspect of it was done well in many different ways. The selection of the ratio, keeping the shot tight no matter what shot it was; the noise of the sea and sight of the waves; but even the dialogue - which was distracting in some ways but effective in others. The fruity accents and gruff delivery makes it hard to catch every word, but it did cause me to lean in. The performances come with an intensity and realism that sells the film even when so much of it is hard to accept on the face of it.

I do think that for a lot of viewers it will be a reasonable reaction to be put off the film - mainly because feeling uncomfortable for several hours is not an easy experience to sell. For myself I felt a bit of that - at the end that I more appreciated what it did well and how it did it than I actually 'enjoyed' the film as a film. One of those where I'm glad I watched it but am really unlikely to ever watch it again.
118 out of 129 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
An incomparable vision of Hell on Earth
c-kelsall2 March 2020
Robert Eggers' second (?) feature is a superb piece of mind-bending cinema. There are parallels with his earlier film, The Witch, elements of psychological horror which Eggers clearly finds interesting and hopefully hasn't finished exploring just yet. The decision to film in black and white is a stroke of genius. Every scene is filled with ominous portent and obscuring shadows. The film plays with our perceptions and moods throughout. There are moments of comedy amongst the gloom, the two men stranded on the rock endure a tumultuous relationship, by turns suspicious, angry and even savage, then there are unexpected moments of comradeship fuelled by alcohol. We are forced to question constantly who is mad, or perhaps madder? Are they in the grip of a storm, or are they in Hell? And the soundtrack! No one I can think of uses sound to create atmosphere quite like Eggers. Foghorns, the relentlessly howling wind, the seagulls; is it any wonder if they were as mad as a box of frogs? Willem Dafoe is absolutely fantastic in The Lighthouse. He really should be considered for an Oscar for his turn as the saltiest of old seadogs, spouting rage-filled Melville-esque invective straight from Davey Jones' locker, at sporadic intervals. I don't think there are many actors who could've pulled off that performance with such aplomb. He chews the scenery mercilessly, but it is exactly what the role requires; his Thomas Wake is a force of nature in human form. The Lighthouse won't be to everyone's taste, and it would be a mistake to view it as a moody twin sister of The Witch (which was a genuine horror); but I found it to be mesmerising and intriguing, and a fabulously well-crafted psychological drama with trimmings of horror.
294 out of 361 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Well crafted.. but bit empty with story
prberg230 October 2019
Really well made movie. Great acting and I was really transported to another place and time. Well crafted for sure.. but in the end I'm not quite sure what the point of it all was. But maybe that was what the director was going for. Seemed like chaos for chaos sake. A strong film for sure though...
626 out of 863 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Hard to watch
willamanah4 November 2019
Both characters have few if any redeeming qualities, which makes this mind twisting movie difficult to get behind. The cinematography was good, the acting was on point, the writing was quotable but I wanted in to be over half way through. I'm still confused as to what the point was, other than to convey discomfort.
531 out of 765 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Best Film At Cannes 2019
na-pictures25 May 2019
THE LIGHTHOUSE was the best film I've seen at Cannes so far, an incomparable hysterical nightmare epic with Pattinson potentially delivering the best performance of the year. It takes its time, digs deep under your subconscious and won't leave till you've picked apart every frame - 9/10
596 out of 902 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Now, That Was Pleasant!
Hitchcoc17 May 2020
So many have commented already, I'll keep it short. I remember when I saw "Taxi Driver." I was amazed at DeNiro's performance, the incredible visuals, and the wonderful direction. We watched a man fall into a darkness that none of us could possibly survive. But what i remember to this day is being dragged through the world the film presents. There is a line where it is thought that one should take a part of the city and pour concrete over it, destroying the sickness and covering it forever. As I watched the really amazing, frenetic performances in this film, I had some of the same feelings. I reached a point where I wanted cleanliness and daylight. The cruelty from the beginning that never dissipates is all once can hold. It's about human destruction in a claustrophobic world, a living hell.
75 out of 105 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Lighthouse - BFF review
louis_southwood7 October 2019
Film festival sweetheart The Lighthouse is a movie that a lot of film buffs have been looking forward to. The buzz has been real since it's premiere at Cannes festival and has been my personal most anticipated movie of the year for a while now. I'm more than happy to report that this movie lived up to my expectations in every way imaginable and is probably the best movie from 2019

By far the most interesting thing about this movie is it's technical aspects. The movie is shot in 35mm black and white film at a 1,19x1 aspect ratio, basically the Lighthouse is shot to look like something that came out in the 1910s. Robert Eggers and his team have done such a phenomenal job here recreating this time period. And it works asolutely perfectly beacuse not only is it fitting for the time period that the movie is set in but it also adds to the claustrophobia and the atmosphere of the setting. Alot of thought was clearly put into shot composition as every single shot in this movie is breathtaking. Seriously there is some gorgeous cinematography on display here, some shots will stay with you long after you see the movie. Whilst the film is made to look and feel like a movie from the early 1900s, it's also not afraid to implement modern elements into the film aswell. camera movements and music composition add a unique modern spice that really adds to the movies unique presentation, there is truly nothing quite like this.

With the setting and the premise, for this movie to work it it needed two actors to pull this all together. Which is where Willam Dafoe and Robert pattinson come in, who both give career best performances. Both actors are given such brilliant material that allows them to go parody level insane, but it works beutifuly for the world in which they inhabit. Dafoe especially is hamming it up to cartoon levels of parody (Which the film does address) and it's absolutely amazing. Pattinson also continues to prove himself as one of the finest actors working in the industry.

Overall this is nothing short of spectacular. I truly cannot think of a single flaw. This is one of those movies that completely transcends you into its world and by the time the credits roll you will just want to go back in.
320 out of 524 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
What did I just watch
fjdangelo30 October 2019
Warning: Spoilers
I can't necessarily say this was a bad movie but I can say I have no idea what I just watched. The movie was shot beautifully and visually appealing in most scenes. The acting was a 10/10 for both Defoe and Patterson as they both had outstanding performances. This was a very strange film. A lot of random stuff goes on at that light house that makes you wonder if it's happening or if it's one of Patterson's delusions. This was a very different movie considering the strange aspect ratio and the old school black and white look coming back. I enjoyed The Witch which is what lead me to see this film and they were two very different movies. This was a very strange film.
472 out of 723 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Wickies on the rock
ferguson-617 October 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Greetings again from the darkness. The opening sequence plays like something from 1920's era cinema. The chug-chug-chug of a boat slamming against the waves of an angry sea while birds flap and chirp alongside. We hear the wind and "feel" the severe ocean spray. Several minutes elapse before any word is spoken. Immediately noticeable is the nearly square aspect ratio ... the rarely (these days) seen 1.19:1 frame, making the black and white images appear both surreal and ominous.

All of the above makes perfect sense when we realize this is writer-director Robert Eggers' first feature film since his 2015 indie horror gem THE WITCH won dozens of festival awards. Mr. Eggers obviously has his own vision for projects, and his approach borders on experimental, eschewing conventional. He co-wrote this script with his brother Max, and evidently much was drawn from the actual journals of lighthouse keepers ... something that is evident in the vocabulary and the effects of solitude.

4-time Oscar nominee Willem Dafoe stars alongside Robert Pattison as the two men charged with a 4 week assignment of tending to a lighthouse. The film is set in 1890, and Dafoe plays Thomas Wake, the epitome of a salty old sea dog, replete with bad leg, hardcore Atlantic accent, and upside down pipe. Pattinson is Ephraim Winslow, the assistant Wickie, who faces non-stop demands from Wake, and initially maintains a quietness as he goes about his duties ... what Wake calls the 'doldrums.' We learn little about either man's past. For Wake, other than knowing his previous assistant went mad, the clue is when he mentions "13 Christmases spent at sea" costing him a family. For Ephraim, when Wake asks, "Tell me what's a timberman want with being a Wickie?" we get some insight into Ephraim's desired future.

Eggers has delivered the anti-buddy movie. It's a bleak, slow-motion race to insanity caused by being isolated with only one other person ... a person you aren't fond of. Only this is not a director or a film content with showing two men stuck on a storm-battered rock, as they slip towards insanity. No, we viewers are forced to experience some of these same feelings - how much of what we see is actually happening? It's mesmerizing and hypnotic, and the above-mentioned narrow screen aspect purposefully emphasizes the sense of confinement and claustrophobia.

With no color and only a couple of characters ... OK, 3 if you count the mermaid ...OK, 4 if you count the seagull ... the film still manages to pound us with sensory overload. We can barely process all we are seeing, despite relatively minimal 'typical' action. The black and white images are mostly just various shades of gray, and sunshine is non-existent. Cinematographer Jarin Blaschke (THE WITCH) embraces the dreariness by allowing the fog, lanterns, candles, wind, rain, and harsh elements to become characters unto themselves. However, nothing is in sync with our two leads. Composer Mark Korven fills the many lapses in dialogue with sounds and tones we haven't heard before, yet they fit perfectly here. This is also quite likely the first film to utilize farts and foghorns in harmony.

Director Eggers filmed this on Cape Forchu in Nova Scotia, and the extreme weather and less-than-welcoming terrain create quite the visuals - as do the faces of our two lead actors. Dafoe may never have chewed scenery so delightfully as he does here, and Pattinson starts slowly before delivering his best work - including a ferocious rant that is fascinating to watch and contrast to his character's first meal with Dafoe. Is this a horror film? A fantasy? Macabre comedy? There is simply no way to describe this other than bizarre. It's truly miserable cinema, and I loved every minute of it.
147 out of 238 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Disappointing and narratively incoherent
thatcherwoodes23 October 2019
I expected so much more from the movie, as the director's prior movie, The Witch, was an excellent film. Additionally, the trailer for this movie immediately intrigued. However, upon seeing it, I left the theater initially confused but then after realizing it wasn't worth much energy, I just accepted the reality of my reaction: disappointment. It was underwhelming. The first hour or so was intriguing and certainly set things up in an intriguing manner but what was set up was ultimately neglected in a pursuit for style and atmosphere over substance. The movie is most definitely a play at metaphors, symbolism, hidden meaning, references to seafaring myths, The Rime of the Ancient Mariner, Greek myths (a seeming melding together of Sisyphus and Prometheus), and so on but the muddled execution made me suspect that there wasn't nearly as much going on as the cinephiles and movie theorists will invent for it.

Essentially, after the first hour this became narratively unclear and focused instead on repetitive fever dream scenarios and bombastic speeches and emotional conflict between the two characters - all of which were well done and well executed but only raised question marks without a clear story or message. Perhaps it is possible to decrypt it but nothing about the themes or the atmosphere or the story was compelling enough to merit the effort of seeking deeper meaning in this movie. The movie was cinematographically fantastic, well acted, well made, and so on. But the script and story failed after the first hour.
616 out of 978 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Didn't work for me.
parry_na18 July 2020
I've long since wanted to see 'The Lighthouse'. A slow burning story, with elements of Lovecraft and David Lynch, featuring two powerful actors in an isolated, secluded location sounds exactly my kind of horror.

I'm glad I have seen it. It satisfied my curiosity about what the director of 2015's terrific 'The Witch' would do next. Sadly, as a film, it failed to make any connection with me, or I with it. It isn't a bad production - the images are stark and beautifully filmed in black and white. The acting, mainly from Robert Pattinson and William Defoe, is intense and convincing - but I couldn't detect any real emotion, other than the rage that comes with being cooped up with another.

The direction clearly wants to provide us with weird and unsettling images, which it does, but that only goes so far when there isn't any kind of story, or development, going on - other than bouts of madness, which manifests itself in moments of screaming violence.

Despite everything, all I could see were two men, neither of whom are particularly likeable, shouting at each other, fighting or indulging in grubby personal habits. There are some interesting moments, mostly toward the end, but ultimately, there was nothing here I found frightening in any way. Nor did I find anything funny, or witty or particularly satisfying.

I won't slate the film because I can see it was well made and performed. It just didn't have any resonance with me personally. As such, I just found it rather dull and noisy. My score is 3 out of 10.
112 out of 150 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Nerve Wracking Plunge into Madness. Like Nothing I've Seen Before
Joetampa9020 October 2019
Wow. Eggers follow up to The Witch knocks it out of the park. The Lighthouse is a masterful piece of art like nothing I've seen before. Following Defoe and Pattinson as they tend a Lighthouse. The film wastes no time turning into a disturbing submersion into insanity.

The Lighthouse is undoubtedly an unconventional and bizarre film. Giving the viewer nothing more than two men in one location. The movie manages to pull it off masterfully. Defoe's acting is really one of, if not the strongest aspects of The Lighthouse. His scary ramblings, his facial expressions, his level of commitment to the role are all second to none. I believe so far from what I've seen he deserves the oscar for what would be Best Supporting Actor. A24 recently said they will campaign Pattinson for best actor. Make no mistake, Pattinson absolutely kills it too. However for me, Defoe is the true tour de force performance.

Despite not having a conventional plot, their are some plot points and it's all this film needed to stay cohesive. The imagery in the film is very unsettling and surreal. The dialogue is expertly written and pungent. The score and the sound of The Lighthouse is another strong point, loudly ominous... it works perfectly. The cinematography is beautiful. Everything is firing on all cylinders and it creates one hell of a ride.

The Lighthouse is surely a one of a kind work and one of the best psychological horror films in recent memory. It falls just short of a 10/10 masterpiece for me due some pacing issues and certain events in the film feeling meaningless and repetitive. That being said, The Lighthouse is a true achievement in cinema and currently the best of 2019 for me. I can't wait to see it again. 9.5/10.
232 out of 401 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Succes D'Estime
boblipton8 January 2020
Wileman Dafoe and Robert Pattinson are two lighthouse keepers on a small, isolated island off the coast of Maine - actually shot in Nova Scotia. As a storm rages about them, they go slowly mad.

Robert Eggar's film is based in part on two Welsh lighthouse keepers in 1801, the Smalls Lighthouse tragedy. It is a peculiarly designed movie - Eggars, besides directing two movies, has worked on several other films as a production designer. The set is claustrophobic, the screen frame is just about square at 1.19:1, and the film is black and white. Dafoe uses an accent that is almost cartoonish, based on 19th century fishermen.

It's a striking-looking film, that's for certain, but despite the acclaim it has received, I think these details are more likely to appeal to those with a technical understanding and appreciation of antediluvian film making. I was certainly fascinated, but I have my doubts that it will appeal to a general audience; despite its High Art merit, film remains a medium that must appeal to tens of millions to be deemed a success. While the revival of antique techniques and extinct accents may please the cognoscenti, it won't play in Peoria.
46 out of 73 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Not surprised by both of their talents
ss-303463 June 2022
Dafoe and Pattinson just killed it. This has gotta be the most depressing, disgusting and disturbing film, and I'm here for it. Although I didn't knew that this movie was rated R. I just freaking love R rated movies. Feels more realistic. I did not watch the movie, I felt it.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Beautiful shot, experimental, but story was incoherent
Hopedoesnotdie18 October 2019
This movie was visually stunning and I loved the use of movement and Willem Dafoe's intense dialogue and use of soliloquy's but some of the other elements felt contrived. Also the story is all over the place, I felt like the director just came up with stuff on a whim and just started shooting and just decided to throw a bunch of stuff together in the editing room. The tears in the movie felt contrived and some parts just didn't feel organic. But visually it's beautiful.
115 out of 207 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Must see. Oscar worthy performances from both men
myselfie-6168314 September 2019
I saw this at TIFF and I was go glued the whole time. This film must have taken a physical toll on the actors, knowing Nova Scotia's harsh conditions, & it was mesmerizing to watch onscreen. Dafoe was good as expected but its Pattinson that really surprised. It would be a tragedy if these men didn't get nominated for awards. Cinematography nomination is a certainty. This film was just beautiful & artistic & amazing on all fronts. Well done Eggers
181 out of 338 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
1hr45mins with no payoff
0w021 December 2019
What's the point of making a movie that has no conclusion? You spend almost 2hours watching a movie, building towards a climax, only for the climax to never happen? It just left me feeling let-down at the end tbh.

The performances by Willem Dafoe and Robert Pattinson both were very good and they both did excelent jobs making me believe each of their characters. But yeah, the ending of the movie really should have had a conclusion. It knocked this movie down from an 8/10 to a 6/10 just because of that.
17 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Piece of Art - Film Festival Gent
vyrondiamind9 October 2019
Nothing is what it seems at the uncanny lighthouse where Robert and Willem deliver a performace from beyond. The chemistry between both of them grabs you on every emotion, from laughter to discomfort, and never seems to let your attention go. Since I'm no horror fanatic myself it's worth to mention Lighthouse is more categorised in the psychological sector where the atmosphere does a excelent job to make you feel uncomfortable and suspenseful. Absolutely amazing movie, or should I say a piece of art, on every level.
149 out of 283 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Art house most decidedly
jmbovan-47-16017319 April 2020
Eggars is decidedly a dedicated director to the craftmanship of film. He has shown his skill at creating atmosphere with setting, sound, and a story. He is an actors' director and is malleable to each and every method of acting. From this, he is able to elicit exciting performances that highlight the excellence of his actors. The downside to his films is the focus on the craft of making and focus on a return to the aesthetics of film making. This leaves me wondering what he is trying to tell me with his films, as the esoteric nature of his "slowburn" approach dilutes much of the intensity of what he can create. In this film, he circles around and around again to show the descent into madness of characters that were mad at the beginning. So what was the point of the 2 hours of watching this film. Aesthetics? Craftmanship? Acting excellence? This he does. But these are not enough to build a film and enhance storytelling (which is different than setting a story). I wish Eggars would take a bit more time to create the "whole" versus intense focus on the minute details that, while showcase his talent, leave the film without a center upon to build a whole.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Stranded nowhere
witz-215 March 2020
Great cinematography and acting. The story goes nowhere and stays there.
409 out of 602 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
a puzzle
Kirpianuscus22 March 2020
I discovered this film as a large puzzle. Different pieces , from the atmosphere to the acting and flavor of old fashion Gothic stories are pieces of this dark, profound, bitter not comfortable but inspired in each scene film. A film about loneliness. And one of films with the main virtue to be a return to a form of cinema who can be defined as good refuge. So, a puzzle. An admirable one.
71 out of 112 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Are you a dullard? Could have fooled me.
manicmotionman3 November 2019
Warning: Spoilers
You may read among these opinions terribly miscast as "reviews" how "boring" this film is, or how "silly things" happen that "confused" the writer, or how "nothing happens". I'm here to tell you that those are wrong. Period.

Look; just because one doesn't understand the actions before them, or the meaning and cadence of 19th century English, or cannot fathom the consequences befalling characters or their predicaments, does not mean that such complaints are justifiable when clearly the issue is the inability to comprehend the material. I'm sure, for instance, that some would look on the Mona Lisa and pronounce the piece amateurish and without much to merit it's fame. This is the case regarding these misrepresentations of The Lighthouse. Every detail of this story is supported by either dialogue, action or imagery, the plot has no ambiguity, and all contrivances are derived from the environment the characters inhabit or the history they have brought with them.

*** Spoilers ***

Simply explained, this is a Promethean tale: Dafoe is the Zeusian taskmaster under the influence of the worldly and otherworldly, while Pattinson, haunted by his conscience, covets what is forbidden. However, it is much, much more than that.

Pattinson plays convincingly a godforsaken Maine transient, a timberman of late, looking for anonymity in becoming a wickie, a lighthouse keeper, and Willem Dafoe will most certainly receive the Oscar for Best Actor (if there remains any integrity in the Academy's process of selection) for his salty portrayal of the current keeper of the flame, a Protean Old Man of the Sea. While none of the sub-themes are particularly original (solitude and madness, heavy consciences), it is the telling of them that impresses viewers (after all, there are only 7 archetypal storylines, the themes of which have been visited and revisited endlessly) and Eggers proves masterful at his craft yet again.

Besides the outstanding performances from both actors, the incredible sound design fosters the idea that the lighthouse itself is alive, an unmoving, evil kaiju, not unlike Ishiro Honda's Godzilla in some regards and, coupled with another excellent unsettling Michael Korven soundtrack, gives an overwhelming sense of dread at times. The gorgeous black and white photography, filmed in Movietone ratio (1.19:1, popular in the 1920's, it was 1.33:1 that lost ratio due to a synchronized soundtrack) at once recollects German expressionism (as does the set design), and hints at the foreboding and murderousness of Fritz Lang's "M".

The film is as simple as it is complex, imaginative as it is familiar, psychological as it is physical, and every bit as entertaining as it is horrifying. I'm thrilled as can be by Mr. Eggers' storytelling and anticipate further greatness from him.
77 out of 141 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed