"Taggart" Flesh and Blood Part Three (TV Episode 1989) Poster

(TV Series)

(1989)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Flesh and Blood Part 1-3
Prismark1019 January 2020
Taggart attends a wedding between a prisoner doing time and a social worker Jane Ross. She is a daughter of well to do parents, her dad was a Lt Colonel in the army and was based in Northern Ireland once.

Elsewhere two young men hold up a lorry, to their surprise the loot contains explosives.

This piques the interest of the IRA and they send an enforcer to Glasgow.

When Jane Ross is found dead after attending a Dungeons & Dragons role play event. Taggart finds that Christmas in Glasgow is going to be grim as the dead bodies pile up.

There is a lot happening in this three parter and it does sag a bit. At one point I did wonder how will this ever come together. A wealthy eccentric old lady who had her child snatched many years ago. The IRA enforcer who is using violence to obtain information on the explosives and might have a motive to take action against the Colonel. A safecracker who has his eyes on a big job with the stolen explosives.

It all gets very convoluted. Through it all Taggart goes about in a manner of someone dour and dismal as the Glasgow weather. Yet he does show flashes of humour.

At the end, the story does make weird sense as well as the motive for the killings. A cold blooded murderer has played the long game and it is not Dungeons and Dragons.

There is certainly an element of Glasgow Noir in these early years of Taggart exploring a dark underbelly.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Convoluted but fun
keysam-026104 June 2024
Warning: Spoilers
This is an excellent, convoluted tale involving several characters who are up to no good and others who appear to be suspicious but who aren't.

It also contains what must be one of the earliest fictional inclusions of DNA 'fingerprinting' as a plot point. Much is made of McNight having planted the letter claiming his son was really the missing heir to the fortune several years beforehand, but the existence of DNA testing means his scheme fell apart almost immediately. Was he scamming his son too, knowing the police would be able to disprove the story straightaway? Or was he hoping to string it out and that they really would be able to claim the fortune eventually, not anticipating (because who could back then?) the development of an easy method of proof?

There are several scenes in the story in which young people either do refuse to spend Christmas with their parents, or try to. In all instances, you can't help thinking the parents should just let the kids go. They're not creating any sort of Happy Christmas by forcing attendance!

Poor Janie the social worker turns out to have been a case of wrong place, wrong time (more or less). Her game playing friends seemed a bit suspicious but turned out not to be. Her rebellion against her parents goes further than most, and at the age of 26 is a bit pathetic. Just move out FFS!

There are a fair few young actors in the story who went on to be relatively well known. Duncan Bell, Michael Nardone and Robert Cavanah among them.

Anyway, it's an entertaining story, not least because of Taggart's bah, humbug approach to the festive season.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed