Reviews

32 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Wow, do i take back my previous review! I love this show!
1 December 2004
Ya know, I'm watching an episode of Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy right now where Billy has turned himself into chocolate. And now i realize how much I like this show. It's funny, weird, and good.

In my last review i did something very stupid and kept comparing this to another show. While I still think Billy and Mandy could use a darker, more twisted edge, the shows sweet weird edge is more than enough to make it better than most other cartoons. I repent! I really like this show! Forgive me!

Anyway, why do I like the show more now? Well I stopped trying to compare it to Invader zim. Zim's a great show, but it's not Billy and Mandy, and neither is Billy and Mandy Zim. I realized i needed to respect the show on it's own merits. I still may not love it as much as Zim, but man do i see the error of my ways and like the show for what it is: crazy, cool and funny!
28 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Second Best of the Millennium Series!
25 March 2004
Warning: Spoilers
*Warning: Mild spoilers*

"Godzilla x Mechagodzilla" had a tough act to follow; the nearly perfect "Godzilla, Mothra, King Ghidorah". And, while good, "GMK" is still the high water mark of the Millennium series, probably including the Hesei series as well, so expectations and comparisons are hard to ignore. However, director Tezuka definitely picked up a few new tricks since the just-okay "Godzilla x Megaguirus", and follows up "GMK" excellently.

In short, like the other Godzilla Millennium series, this one starts the G mythos over from square one with only the original binding it. However, unlike many other movies, in this one, the original Godzilla actually was killed by the Oxygen Destroyer, and the current Godzilla is just a new one (where he came from, however, they never reveal, a matter I'll discuss later). So, to counter this new threat, the "Anti-Megalosaurus" division of the JSDF builds a new weapon, named Kiryu, nicknamed Mechagodzilla, out of the bones and DNA programming of the old Godzilla's bone remains. It quickly proves itself a match against the new G, but later the original G programming in the DNA runs amuck. But, after that's taken care of, and Godzilla himself appears on land, Mechag is rearmed and ready for a final battle!

First, the good: And get ready, 'cause it's a long list.

The story dangerously treads ground similar to the stories of the main human protagonists in "G 2000" and "G x M". However, here they're used in unique and different ways. The story of Akane, the main pilot of MG who messed up an early battle with Godzilla and got several fellow soldiers killed, is similar to the one of the main character from "G x M". But, instead of out for vengeance against G, Akane is out to find a reason to live and prove to herself she can do a good job. And Professor Yuhura and his daughter are much like the scientist and daughter of "G 2000", but don't follow G around. And those three characters interact in interesting ways. And most importantly, the story between them and for each one individually was strong and well acted, particularly Yumiko Shaku as Akane, who is great in this movie (and good looking too). The supporting characters, from the pilot who lost a brother to Akane's mistake, to the political leaders, do good jobs as well.

The story is serious without being too grim (although that works really well in "GMK"), and I really felt for the characters. However, they really only started to come together at about the 45 minute mark, and could have used a little more closure. Nevertheless, the story and characters are strong, especially for a Godzilla movie, but don't quite match the drama of "GMK". Another interesting fact is that I actually felt for Mechag as a character! Knowing that his history is actually as the resurrected first Godzilla, forced to fight against one of his own, and eventually having something of a life and working with the distressed and determined Akane made all the cool moves, damage and things he does during the final battle make him that much cooler. He's also, I think, the best-looking Mechag to date: the personality of the first one (only not evil), plus the cool weapons of the second one to the tenth power!

Also nice about the story is that it fleshes out the new world, what with talking about previous monster attacks, and giving the new "AM" division of the JSDF some history as to why they have maser weapons and the technology to develop something like Mechag.

And speaking of which, the special effects are great. The suits and models move well, the missiles and masers are cool, and computer effects are used to enhance reality instead of contrast with the models. This is also the best incarnation of the Millennium G suit; it goes back to black and gray coloring, his fire is blue, and he's more mobile and shows more expression than ever. And of course, combine all this with great, cohesive effects, and you get a near-perfect final battle! This is one of the best, most knock-down, drag out monster fights of any Kaiju movie, ranking up there with "Gamera 3: Revenge of Iris" (but more gratuitous) and the final battles in "GMK", "Destroy All Monster" and "Godzilla vs. Hedorah" in my opinion. The great directing, cinematography, and special effects all combine to form one great fight.

And finally, Godzilla himself is really good, but not great, in this movie (this will lead into the movie's faults). As said, the new version of the G Millennium suit is the best, although the eyes are a little too big. And it's nice that his colors are back to normal too. But, as many have said, G himself is little more than a MacGuffin, something the other characters react to in this one. I have to say, that while I do prefer it when G motivates the story, the coldness to him kind of works here, as it's like he's just an impersonal force of nature they're reacting to. However, that does somewhat reduce the story to nothing more than a reaction. Plus, the people don't react quite emphatically enough to the appearance of a new Godzilla: they don't even question where he came from!

Also, during the first fight with MG and some battle scenes, G just stands there when he's getting hit by missiles and weapons like an empty suit! They fix this for the last battle, but it's still annoying. Also, the movie does falter a bit, as G is much weaker in this movie than he was at the tip top of evil-ness in "GMK".

But, Godzilla is far from a pushover. He takes cheap shots at MG, tears up the town, and there are some beautiful shots of him in this movie that just capture the essence of what I love about Godzilla. To me, the best of these is when Godzilla has just attacked a squadron of planes, and he's walking towards the camera, smoke billowing behind him, and a piece of debris from a jet falls in front of him, hits the ground, explodes, and lights up beneath him. G looks so malevolent and powerful...man, it's gorgeous! And the movie is just filled with "Woah!" moments like that, like when Mechag flies in and slams into G.

However, the movie owes a lot to "GMK" for some of that, because there are some scenes, such as the "night-vision" view of G from the tanks, or Godzilla attacking the airplanes, that are almost lifted straight out of "GMK", and are down with less impressive effects, and thus feel less powerful (although, in a nice addition, when G blows up the planes, he does it from far away, and you can see people scurrying in the foreground). Also, the ending is kind of sweet and sour, because while they do defeat Godzilla, he just kind of wanders off like he's tired of fighting. However, that does tell you just how powerful Mechag is!

Finally, as many have asked, why do we need a new Godzilla vs. Mechagodzilla when it's been less than ten years since the last one? I'm afraid they have a point, and Toho gets points deducted for not being original. However, this one is so much of an improvement over the previous ones, even without secondary monsters (including Rodan), that I'm willing to excuse a lack of originality in concept for originality and cool-ness in the final battle.

All in all, "Godzilla x Mechagodzilla" is a more gratuitously destructive, "popcorn" movie than "GMK", and is easily the second best of the Millennium series. It's not perfect, or as dramatic as "GMK", but is to me the second best of the Millennium series, and possibly better than any of the Hesei. An enthusiastic 7/10!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Monster (2003)
The real Monster of this movie? The soundtrack! Hooooooooh!
5 March 2004
Okay, seriously, i needed a bit of comedy before reviewing this dark, serious movie about murder and human nature.

"Monster", as most of you know, is the story of serial killer Aileen Wuornos, physically ugly; abused as a child, living as a prostitute, falling in love with another woman, and killing men. An upbeat film this is not.

As much has been said about Theron's performance as Aileen, I won't comment too much. I will, however, make the joke that she got an oscar just for looking ugly! Seriously though, she doesn't just look like Lee, but she lives and breathes as Lee. Just watching the littlest facial quirk, the way she holds and moves her body, all I could think of wasn't who was playing her or how amazing the make up was, but just about the character. That's why she's so good in this. The rest of the cast is okay, with Christina Ricci playing against type as a needy lesbian who stands by and allows Lee to kill, becoming something of a monster herself.

Another thing to comment on, is that this isn't called "Monster" because Godzilla's in it. My friends and I commented that there were maybe 2 nice people in the entire film. This movie is dark and depressing. Now, we've got a macabre sense of humor, but after seeing this, it took a while for some jokes to seem funny again.

Of course, this leads into just how realistic is the movie to life and the events surrounding it? Some people have claimed that the film misinterprets some of the victims, and that it over-sympathizes with Lee. And then there's what I said about there being maybe 2 redeemable human beings in the whole thing, with self-righteous religious stereotypes in it as well.

I believe the movie is that way for a purpose. I can't defend the misinterpreting of some of the victims, but other things I can. Notice how the film is narrated from Lee's point of view. And since it's from her messed up, murderous point of view, wouldn't most of humanity seem irredeemable? And wouldn't she play us, the audience, her jury, for sympathy?

This movie is so successful because when I left the theater, I was made because I figured I had just seen another psycho-liberal movie bashing religious people and the death sentence, among other things. But as I left and talked with others, I realized that that's how I'm SUPPOSED to feel: the movie is told from Lee's point of view, of her trying to justify her horrible actions by making people see her view of how bad the world is and how much a victim she is. The filmmakers want me to get mad at her, to not agree with her. If they didn't, if the filmmakers really wanted people to feel sorry for Lee, they wouldn't have called it "Monster". Looking back on it, i see how the directing, the writing, and the few really innocent people in the film were put there to make me feel a certain way. Excellently done! They were so successful I didn't notice until long after the movie was over.

That said, aside from being depressing enough to bring down a guy high on ecstasy, the movie's main flaw is the music. The orchestral music is okay, but some of the songs, like the one they play when Lee and Selby are cuddling, made me want to kill someone! And the guitar sound that starts to play before their tastefully shot sex scene sounded like 70's porn music, i kid you not. But man, if that was meant to be funny, i sure needed it, because nothing else in this movie is a laughing matter.

Alltogether, sorry Lee, but I only empathize with you. I would probably found you guilty as well. If the way you were treated by the first guy was accurate in the film, and you had turned yourself in, I'd have found you not-guilty, it being self defense. But you couldn't stop, or wouldn't, and tried to hide it. Besides, lots of people who do get raped and abused as kids don't go out and kill.

"Monster" is an incredibly, subtly effective film, but definitely not for the faint of heart. It's more "Henry" than "Hannibal". But, for those who can take it, or enjoy studying the darker aspects of humanity in a serious light, gather your courage and see "Monster".
17 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cool Idea Ruined by Uninspired Execution
4 March 2004
"The Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy" starts out with a cool idea: what if two kids gain control of the Grim Reaper? In the right hands, hilarity would ensue, right? Well, unfortunately, not here.

The shows strengths and weaknesses are obvious from the start: You can't get much cooler than the Grim Reaper, and having him out of his element and actually living with two kids should be hilarious.

Then you see the people he's stuck with, and the humor dies. The kids who own Grim, Billy and Mandy, are, to say the least, uninspired and lame. Billy's the typical happy idiot and Mandy's the dark humorless cynic. These archetypes have been done to death. That doesn't mean they can't be done well though: Look at "Gir" and "Gaz" from "Invader Zim"! (of course, Gir is funnier than Billy because he's insane, not annoying, and Gaz is better than Mandy because the archetype of the character would naturally be a loner who people wouldn't want to spend a lot of time around, so why does Mandy hang out with Billy, even if it is for someone to manipulate, and get a half hour of show time?) Of course, the creators of Zim realized that Gir and Gaz work better as supporting characters, which is another problem. Who wants to spent half an hour watching an annoying idiot and mean jerk hang around? Well, with "Ren and Stimpy" I would, and with Zim i would too, but that's because they had chemistry. Billy and Mandy seem to hang out just because the story needs them to.

Then there's Grim, a big batch of unrealized potential. He tries to be dark and evil, but often gets stopped by the kids or those around him. This would, and should, be funny, but it usually just falls flat. There are times when the cool, dark ideas of sick, twisted humor show up through him or characters like Nergal and Aeris or the great musical brain-eating meteorite, but they're few and far between, and end up getting dragged down by boring writing and settings.

The thing is, the show has no real creative or unique spark to bring it to life. It's mostly just running the characters through different situations, which again, can be funny, but isn't here, because of the lack of that said spark. What spark? Well, look at "Invader Zim" or "Ren and Stimpy": Zim had dark, sci-fi edge and insanity, and R&S had great chemistry and gross-out humor. "Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy" has a humdrum design and style that looks like a dozen other generic cartoons: it looks like it could have been drawn by anyone! It seems that the show wants to stay in the confines of a normal cartoon and still do weird things. And again, that could work great, but just not here. Here the two don't meld or play off each other in cool ways, and things fall flat. It's about as much fun as watching the idiot, jerk, and goth people you went to high school with hang around and act like themselves, but not react to each other. And even when they get into cool settings, like Nergal's amusement park or Father Time's house, it's done like any and every other cartoon would do it and has done it! In fact, take the musical meteorite episode, one of the shows better ones: It's pretty good, but imagine how much better it would be done on Zim or R&S.

And that's really the show's problem: it can't take the leap to fulfill it's potential, and it has a mucky base to begin with. It's better than some tamed-down Nicktoons, but that's not saying Much. The show's original companion, now its own show, "Evil Con Carne", is much better, in that it uses the generic cartoon setting for unique, likable characters. Until this cartoon can embrace the darkness and evil within, and make us like it, it will just be mediocre.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hulk (2003)
9/10
Big Green Soul
29 October 2003
Warning: Spoilers
*WARNING* SPOILERS

What happens when, expecting a big, loud, dumbed down summer action movie, you get something that is character driven, well acted, and has even better action than any of the other summer movies?

According to most people, it seems you get disappointed.

To me, "Hulk" is a wonderful film (although I still wish it had the words "The Incredible..." before it). I love it to death. I saw it four times in theaters, loved the story, and felt what it was like to be the Hulk. However, it's NOT a summer movie. The acting is too subtle, the script too rich, and the film's overall soul too deep to be widely accepted by people looking for a quick escape during the summer (not to knock other summer movies though).

I won't recap the plot, as it has been done over and over. What I will say is that the makers of the film weave the story of poor old Bruce Banner in a weird, intriguing way.

The script plays the characters like chords on a dying violin. However, one of those strings vibrates so loud it shakes the whole instrument. All the characters are well written, with distinctive dialogue, and little hints at each of their lives. It is like a subtle, yet vibrant, symphony.

The acting is near perfect. From the second I saw him in the dorky bike helmet, Eric Bana was Bruce Banner. However, as good as he and the rest of the cast are, sometimes they are too subdued (sometimes with Bana and a little too often with the great Jennifer Connelly) or too emphatic (Nick Nolte, although perhaps I not seeing just how clearly insane he was). Josh Lucas was a bit too one-dimensional in his portrayal of Glenn Talbot, but perhaps that's the scripts fault for giving him a slimy weasel to play in a soulful film. However, Sam Elliot strikes all the right notes as good old General Thunderbolt Ross. But, nonetheless, I felt for everyone in the film...except really for Talbot (but, strange as it sounds, especially for David Banner).

The special effects are as top notch as you'd expect them to be in a big budget movie, but it's what Ang Lee does with them that makes them special. Instead of just pointing the camera at the effects (as, to me, was what it felt like watching "X2", even though I do like that movie) he shifts focus around things, letting the camera fly as the Hulk jumps, bringing the experience of the film to life. Even in the quiet moments, when Hulk is just looking at Betty or a desert flower, I still enjoy looking at him. But, he's still more fun when he's throwing tanks around.

Danny Elfman's music perfectly sets the mysterious, violent, and deep tone of the film, with excellent uses of bombastic tones and quiet, sad vocals that help bring out the soul of the movie. However, considering this is from the man who made the great `Batman' score, is it too much to ask for a little Hulk theme music?

And then, of course, there's the famous (or infamous) editing. To me, it made otherwise boring things, like Bruce and Betty's lab, interesting. However, it did get unnecessary a time or two (do we really need to see the helicopter carrying Bruce into the desert from five different angles?) Also, it wasn't used as much during the Hulk action scenes, where I think it could have made cool scenes even cooler. Imagine seeing Hulk fight the dogs from five different angles!

All these things on their own are great, but it's when they're all added up that the movie gets its great, big soul. I felt all the pain David and Bruce felt for their lives when David talks about how he accidentally killed his wife, heightened by the great acting, editing, and the music that made the whole scene seem to cry. I longing between Betty and her father for the great relationship that could have been. But all that just makes me care more for the movie. What made me love it was the feeling of being the Hulk as he jumped for miles at a time. I still get teary eyed at the pure joy of that one, long shot as Hulk just runs and jumps over the canyons, the music of pure freedom playing behind him.

Without the soul of the movie, it would be a great package of great parts of acting and special effects and all that. With just that, I'd give it an 8 out of 10, since it still has a few faults. But it's with that soul, that big green Hulk soul that has all the basic human emotions wrapped up in their purest, most exciting forms and put on screen, that I love this movie dearly, and look past it's faults to give it a 9, or even a 9 and ½ or a 10. But numbers can't measure love very well, so I guess I shouldn't try.

Knowing how great the film is now, I know it would have been torture to have to wait for it to be released at a more opportune time, like in the winter, when most of the other, more thoughtful movies are usually released with a chance at the box office. However, I think Universal should have pushed it for Christmas with an advertising campaign that focused on the soul of the movie instead of the action, which as I saw firsthand, made some people think it would be too corny. Maybe then it would have been accepted better. But, maybe by choosing Ang Lee, the film was destined receive mixed views, as those expecting a mindless action `Hulk' would be disappointed and those wanting a deep character study would not like the action. Lee said in an interview (and I'm paraphrasing here), that he saw little difference between dialogue scenes and action scenes, as both served ways of progressing the story. I guess most moviegoers couldn't see it that way. But, I feel fortunate to have `gotten' this movie, because it touched me with its heart, and rocked me with its muscle. Maybe the summer during a major war wasn't a good time for a deep, thoughtful, big budget movie to be released. Maybe it will be better accepted in the future when people can look back and reflect on it, who knows. But I sure know now that I love this movie to death, and no mixed reviews can take that away from me.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Spider-Man (2003)
Beats the symbiote off the other series in terms of animation, but lacks in great voice personification.
12 August 2003
Hi all. Relatively new Spidey fan (the Straczynski run), and long time animation fan here. First off, like many, I was afraid of the idea of a Spider-Man cartoon being on MTV, for fear they might needlessly make the characters more "hip" and "cool" (see: X-Men: Evolution, and comic book Ultimate X-Men) to appeal to those darn kids nowadays. Thankfully, this show does not do that. What it does do is break most of the censoring that has held back dramatic effects in cartoons for a while now by allowing characters to bleed and die, and given Spidey a form of animation that perfectly captures him. Now, while some may be taken aback by the cel-shaded look of the show, I must say I find it works well for the effect (then again, I am one who took to Legend of Zelda: Wind Waker's graphics without a complaint - make of that what you will).

One minor complaint I have of the show, however, is needless recasting the parts of the characters with so-called more "respected actors" like Neil Patrick Harris, when the people who did the voices for the series of the early nineties and several of the video games still work perfectly. I find it just a bit of a cheap ploy to mistakenly get what the producers may see as "real talent". While i'm not complaining on NP Harris' part (he's good, but he's no Christopher Daniel Barnes), does Lisa Loeb really need to be Mary Jane? And whoever played Talon was woefully miscast, her voice and animation contrasting way too much and taking me right out of the mood the show had set. Now while Rob Zombie as the lizard I can kind of understand, it just seems like MTV is using the "Music" in it's name to cast musicians in the show gratuitously. Please, don't use famous people for cartoons when their voices will pull you out of the moment when lesser-known voice and character actors can pull you in, and keep you there. That being said, it's too bad Doctor Octopus is going to be the villain for the next movie, because a fight with him and Spidey on this show would need to be a 2-parter for how cool the fight would be. The same can probably be said for Venom, who they might be saving for movie #3.

But, that medium sized, rarely appearing quibble aside, this show has great promise. Aside from trying to have "hip" voice actors, the show doesn't bother trying to appeal to any target demographic outside of the one that just wants a great Spider-Man cartoon. And, with Brian Michael Bendis on board producing and writing, saying no is nothing easy to do. Even if it means committing a minor sin by turning on MTV, it's worth it.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Spider-Man (2003)
Beats the symbiote off the other series in terms of animation, but lacks in great voice personification.
12 August 2003
Hi all. Relatively new Spidey fan (the Straczynski run), and long time animation fan here. First off, like many, I was afraid of the idea of a Spider-Man cartoon being on MTV, for fear they might needlessly make the characters more "hip" and "cool" (see: X-Men: Evolution, and comic book Ultimate X-Men) to appeal to those darn kids nowadays. Thankfully, this show does not do that. What it does do is break most of the censoring that has held back dramatic effects in cartoons for a while now by allowing characters to bleed and die, and given Spidey a form of animation that perfectly captures him. Now, while some may be taken aback by the cel-shaded look of the show, I must say I find it works well for the effect (then again, I am one who took to Legend of Zelda: Wind Waker's graphics without a complaint - make of that what you will).

One minor complaint I have of the show, however, is needless recasting the parts of the characters with so-called more "respected actors" like Neil Patrick Harris, when the people who did the voices for the series of the early nineties and several of the video games still work perfectly. I find it just a bit of a cheap ploy to mistakenly get what the producers may see as "real talent". While i'm not complaining on NP Harris' part (he's good, but he's no Christopher Daniel Barnes), does Lisa Loeb really need to be Mary Jane? And Eve playing the Black Cat was woefully miscast, her voice and animation contrasting way too much and taking me right out of the mood the show had set. Now while Rob Zombie as the lizard I can kind of understand, it just seems like MTV is using the "Music" in it's name to cast musicians in the show gratuitously. Please, don't use famous people for cartoons when their voices will pull you out of the moment when lesser-known voice and character actors can pull you in, and keep you there.

But, that medium sized, rarely appearing quibble aside, this show has great promise. Aside from trying to have "hip" voice actors, the show doesn't bother trying to appeal to any target demographic outside of the one that just wants a great Spider-Man cartoon. And, with Brian Michael Bendis on board producing and writing, saying no is nothing easy to do. Even if it means committing a minor sin by turning on MTV, it's worth it.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Hilarious Idiocy that Rings Your Bones and Tongue
27 January 2002
Warning: Spoilers
*Slight Spoilers of Great Jokes and Minor Plot Points Ahead*

With silliness that lasts from beginning to end, and a streamline of hilarity that sent me gasping for air and drying my eyes every five seconds literally, "Kung Pow: Enter the Fist" is the dumbest, and funniest movie I've seen in a while. Sure, it doesn't have as much intelligence as MST3K, or as much witty dialogue as a Kevin Smith movie, but "Kung Pow" resonates with tear jerking insanity.

Taking and old kung-fu movie, re-editing and re-dubbing it, Steve Odekerk ("Ace Ventura: When Nature Calls", "Thumb Wars") creates a light hearted, well meaning, silly film.

The plot (if you want to know) concerns The Chosen One, played by Odekerk himself. Born with the mark of the Chosen One (his tongue), Chosen's family is killed when he is a baby by the evil Master Pain (a.k.a. Betty). However, when Pain attempts to kill the newborn, Chosen jumps out of his cradle and unleashes major CGI assisted butt.

After escaping Pain and being raised by rodents in the wild, Chosen continues to run into random people who want to kill him. So, he goes to a Temple to learn how to defeat Pain. He meets and falls in love with local babe Ling, gets annoyed by Wind-Blows and his dubbed squeaky shoes, and endured the oddities of the dubbing of his trainer ("Taco Bell, Taco Bell, product placement for Taco Bell!")

Chosen goes on to fight Pain, evil henchmen, a CGI cow (in my opinion, the movie's one slow spot, what with an outdated, but silly, Matrix parody), and other weirdness.

The filmmakers were smart enough to know how far silliness can be taken. After starting off with some funny dubbed voices, they keep the voices, but add on to them, with funny dialogue (not K. Smith quality though), weird characters, and other things that just wring humor out of every possible aspect (The "Ventriloquists", Ling and her weird noised, Wind-Blows and his squeaky shoes). The filmmakers even use bad editing as a joke!

Another good thing about "Kung Pow" was it's good hearted nature. It is never vulgar or obscene, or use gross-out jokes as a crutch like many other "comedies", and is not trying to be mean to its audience or the films it parodies. The filmmakers obviously have a love for kung-fu and action movies, and it shows through this good natured parody. While not really appropriate for younger kids, this film is great and not very offensive.

And for anyone who says this movie is offensive intellectually, remember another movie with just as much silliness called "Monty Python and the Holy Grail"? This movie is silliness on a grand scale. And I laughed almost as hard during this movie as I did in "Holy Grail".

So if you're one of those people who hate a movie for just trying to entertain and be silly, laugh at your own seriousness and lack of lust for the idiocies and of life. I agree that stupidy can reach annoyance (see "Fast and the Furious"), but for me, it sure didn't happen here. So c'mon and laugh! Or better yet, go watch "How High", and realize just how mean spirited, talentless, and unfunny a comedy can be.

But for anyone who loves Monty Python, Ace Ventura, MST3K's sillier moments, and Kevin Smith's works (especially the "Clerks" Cartoon in the case of a movie like this), "Kung Pow: Enter the Fist" is for you.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
She Creature (2001 TV Movie)
Good, above average TV remake of a below average MST3K film
9 October 2001
Warning: Spoilers
*Warning: Contains Spoilers about Remake and Original Films*

Are there any Mystery Science Theater 3000 fans out there? If there are, then you should know Cinemax is remaking four movies (one of them that was shown on the MST3K Home Game) that were produced by Samuel Z. Arkoff, and with new special effects by Stan Winston. The first of these remakes if "She-Creature".

The original "Sea-Creature" was a tale of the hypnotist Dr. Carlo Lombardi, who, as, at first, a meager sideshow act, would hypnotize the woman he loved, Andrea, and send her into life regression, until she brought forth an ancient "She-Creature" monster to do his bidding (kill anyone he hated, or kill randomly). They later became a country-wide sensation, and all goes well for Lombardi until hero Ted Erikson (Lance Fuller) falls for Andrea, and helps her resist Lombardi.

Thats as far as i can remember the incoherent plotline. Somehow Lombardi gets killed, and everything turns out all right. Notice I did not include any sarcastic comments about the original film, as this is not a review of the original, and plenty of comments can be found on MST3K.

As for this remake, it is easily above the original. But seeing as how that isn't saying much, I'll go a bit farther.

Its the early 1900's, and Angus Shaw (the underrated Rufus Sewell) runs a sideshow with his wife, Lilian (Carla Gugino), who plays a mermaid in their show. They live contently until one day, they and their carnival partner have meet a mysterious old man with a real, live, beautiful mermaid (Rya Kihlstedt, whom he says killed his wife. After trying to acquire the creature from the old man, the carnies are kicked out of his house. Sewell, his partner, and a third man later steal the mermaid, but the shock of their entrance gives the old man a heart attack, of which he dies.

Thus, they take the mermaid, and all board a ship headed for America and the Big Time!

Unfortunately, the mermaid turns out to be a beautiful being that kills any stereotyped characters who come within one hundred feet or fifteen minutes of her. And, she has developed a psychic link with Lilian!

The film, with an obviously bigger budget, better script, and greater cast than the original, make this movie creepy and well made. You actually care for the characters, due to their somewhat sympathetic writing (for a B movie anyway), and good acting, particularly from Sewell and Gugino. However, there are the stereotypes, such as the drunken sailor, the foreign black guy, and the nice guy sidekick. The sailor, who makes passes at Lilian, is a type of character so sure to die in this kind of movie, the film makers just put his death in as an afterthought to another scene altogether,a sign of that they know what kind of movie they're making, and a good sign of subtle movie making.

The true She Creature is a very cool, lifelike, and scary monster from Stan Winston, although it does look a bit like the Queen Alien from "Aliens"(which is actually very fitting for her).

However different it may seem, this movie is very much like the original. The Sewell and Gugino sideshow couple are much like the Lombardi and Andrea sideshow couple from the original. The movie also takes some of the originals better ideas, like developing a psychological link between the main actress and the monster, although it definately works better here than in the original. Add to that a better change of setting, and it just adds another layer of improvement.

However, as an MSTie, I have one major pro and one major con to add. Pro: this movie does NOT feature the evil, loathsome Dr. Carlo Lombardi. Con: this movie DOES NOT FEATURE THE EVIL, LOATHSOME DR. CARLO LOMBARDI! Man, the guy made the original the film it was! However, I respect and enjoy the remake on its own merits.

All in all, this is a well made, well acted, thrilling, and cool film that easily outdoes the original, and succeeds on its own terms as a good A, and great B, Movie.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good and fun, though less acurate, entry in the great Dino Series.
8 August 2001
Warning: Spoilers
*Warning: Contains Spoilers*

Here we are at entry number three in the fun, and often critically maligned, Jurassic Park series. And though this may be the least scientifically accurate one, it is still a great, short blast of fun.

Following the legendary Jurassic Park and the critically panned The Lost World: Jurasssic Park (my personal favorite in the series), Joe Johnston directs this short, quickly paced, and very fun dinosaur movie. With an okay premise, simple and understandable characters, and the always excellent presence of Sam Neil and William H. Macy, Johnston directs the movie like a good old fashioned Ray Harryhausen film.

The story takes place after Isla Sorna (Site B) has been made public, and the world knows dinosaurs are now alive and well. And of course, like anything interesting and extremely dangerous, stupid tourists want to see them! Such is the case when the son (Trevor Morgan) of a divorced couple (Macy and Tea Leoni) goes sailing around Isla Nublar with his mom's new boyfriend. Naturally, as is the case of anyone going near dinosaurs or trying to videotape Godzilla, they end up getting stranded on the island. Talk about bang for your buck.

Enter Alan Grant. Still digging in the hot Bad Lands for fossils, he's strapped for grant money. So Macy and Leoni ask him to be a "tour guide" while they fly over Site B, never mentioning their true intentions of landing and looking for their son.

So, despite the best of common sense from Grant, the plane lands, is attacked, and you've got a few really unlucky people on "the worst place in the world".

The film moves quickly, and is about 20-30 minutes shorter than the previous two. I preffered the more dramatic aspects of the series, but I loved the atmosphere of quick adventure and fun this movie brings. It works in a Ray Harryhausen kind of way.

As a dinosaur enthusiast, I'm also glad to see more dinosaurs (though I still love T-Rex more than anything but Allosaurus). We get Pteranodons (NOT pterodactyls!), a quick cameo of what I'm pretty sure is a Ceratasaurus, and the well hyped Spinosaurus.

The scenes with these dinosaurs are excellent (even though the Ceratosaurus bit is really just a joke). The Pteranodons attack, the Spinosaurus's introduction and finale, all are very tense and executed well on screen.

However, there are, naturally, some setbacks. And if any of you say plot holes and characterization, go watch American Beauty. This is a dinosaur action movie damnit, not a serious drama!

The main problem for me is that the suspense is somewhat killed when a 40 foot long dinosaur can't catch up to a group of mindlessly scrabbling humans. That's what, among other things, I loved about the Lost World: lots more dinosaur food. They manage to stay far ahead of the Spinosaurus (except on water), and it loses its thrill. Luckily, this doesn't happen in any scene with the pteranodons and the velociraptors.

Which, however, is another problem. Although the T-Rex is traded in for the Spinosaurus, the velociraptors are abundent, which is the problem. We've seen plenty of the velociraptors in the previous two, and trying to make them more intelligent and altering their looks for this outing just doesn't cut it. I would suggest more of the aforemention ceratosaurus.

But my big complaints is really just nit-picking scientific details, so its nothing big. The fact is that this movie is really quite less acurate to common theories on dinosaurs than the previous two. For one thing, i doubt a Pteranodon would go after something so large as a human when its mouth is designed to catch fish, or feed an healthy teenager to its young.

And for the hyped up Spino vs. T-Rex fight, the Rex would've one easily. While the Spino is bigger than the Rex, its only by about 4 feet in length. And while the Spino did have a longer head and bigger hands, it was much more lightly built than a Rex or even an allosaurus. Its teeth weren't designed for taking down large, struggling prey, its jaws were weakers, and the Spinosaurus's trademark spine is a giant weakness. It would have been easily damaged during a fight with any large prey. The Rex was more muscular, had teeth and a jaw designed to crush bone, binocular vision, excellent sense of smell, and a brain twice the size of the Spinosaurs, Acrocanthosaurus, or Giganotasaurus. Spino was just there because it looked cool.

Still, the fight was cool, but not up to anything Ray Harryhausen has done.

Overall, this is a well, but not excellently, made diosaur action movie. And just the words "Dinosaur Movie" make me want to see it again. I'd give it 3 1/2 out of 5 stars.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Godzilla: The Series (1998–2001)
Second review: better than the movie and other cartoon, but lacks enough 'Zilla action
31 July 2001
This is my second, more carefully constructed review for this series. As said, i won't cover the ground details as i did before, but offer a second opinion.

I still like this series, and I do think it's better than the movie, in that it has better, more believable characters, and Godzilla acts more like Godzilla than he did in the remake.

The main problem is that, in his own cartoon show, Godzilla is rarely seen, and often treated as a mere Deus Ex Machina!

Sure, there are some interesting monsters, and they get plenty of screen time, but most of them are just large insects, and any potential mystery about their appearance is ruined, since they usually are completely seen in the prologue before the opening credits.

And yes, the human characters are more than just cardboard cut outs, they earn our interest, and interact instead of just act towards each other. In other words, the almost exact opposite of the characters from the 70's Hanna-Barbara show (but even they had good intentions).

But, unfortunately, while the the humans and monsters are often interesting, the producers of the show forgot one thing: this is called "Godzilla: the Series", so why is it he only shows up twice an average episode?!? And when he does show up, its usually when he either makes his first appearance, gets injured, then comes back in at the end to kill the monster after the humans fail.

While the humans don't fail always, whatever plan they do have requires Godzilla uses him as a plot device, and without it, he probably wouldn't have shown up in the episode at all!

Its like in most of the Gamera (re: flying-turtle Godzilla knock-off) movies: Cool evil monster comes in, humans stare at it, Gamera comes in, get wounded, retreats, humans attempt to kill cool evil monster, fail, then either Gamera comes back and kills it himself or becomes integral to the human's attempts to kill it. (also, for fun, add in tiny short wearing children who are "friends of Gamera")

Basically, take this formula, replace the boring Japanese people with the interesting cartoon characters, take out the tiny-short wearing kids and put in NIck Tatopolous, and (this is the worst part) replace Gamera with Godzilla, and you have generally every episode of the series, though not as lame as the older gamera movies, but not as good as the recent ones.

also note: While Godzilla and Nick in the show have a relationship somewhat like Gamera had with whatever small kid he was saving, Godzilla is not under Nick's control. And while Godzilla does often protect Nick, it is often not his main reason for being in the story. Also, while Gamera mostly followed the kids, Godzilla and Nick often follow each other to wherever the story takes them.

However, the episodes where Godzilla is the center of attention are absolutely excellent! The episode where Godzilla is cloned, where he is being mind controlled, where Nick and Monique go inside him to stop a virus, are all great shows.

Especially great is the one where Godzilla meets up with another monster like him, and becomes a surrogate mate. That episode takes everything good about the series (character development and interaction, monster fights, and drama), and rolls it into a perfect episode. Heck, they even have a giant mutant turtle in that one! An obvious nod to Gamera, and a monster fight Kaiju fans would kill to see.

Overall, "Godzilla: the series" is good, a great improvement on the movie, and its worth seeing every episode, but it could have been great if only Godzilla himself were in it more.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"Give me the rod!" "I beg your pardon?"
27 January 2001
Well, as a fan of sci fi movies, I must say that a good special effect or two or some fun characters can always save a bad movie.

I'm not saying that here.

Now, there are a lot of things wrong with this movie, but there are some good things too (always look on the bright side of life). As an MST3K fan, i've seen some bad movies, and sure this movie deserves to be on the show (were it still running), but it would definately be one of the least painful movies. For one thing, it's not evil, and aside from the acting, isn't too painful. It doesn't want to hurt the audience like Battlefield Earth or Armaggedon did, its just stupid and mostly harmless. It has some neat special effects, some okay directing, and beautiful backgrounds.

However, that can't save the movie from its big failings. For one thing, the acting is absolutely horrid! The main characters are bad and stereotyped, Marlon Wayans is lamer than Jar Jar binks (though he tries), and we have a Dwarf character who is useless and never even given a name! This doesn't go on to the bad mages, romantic interests, and Thora Birch was just unbelievably bad! However, seeing Richard O'Brien (of Rocky Horror and Dark City fame) was nice, even though he was pretty bad as well.

But special attention must be given to the worst of the bunch, Jeremy Irons. You can tell he took the role for the money, but man, couldn't he have put a little more, how should i put it...dignity into the movie? If he had put in a better performance, it might have saved the movie (okay, that's reaching). His overacting could scare Godzilla! And I swear, there is one part, where the movie jump-cuts from an outside shot of the castle to Jeremy Irons, spinning around and talking to the camera, staring at him from behind two guards- I swore he was about to break into song! It is no understatement to say he was worse than John Travolta was in Battlefield Earth!

As for most of the props, they look like props Gamers would use when playing Dungeons and Dragons for real! The dragons are cool, but are rarely seen, the sets are often pretty fake, and sweet merciful Crow and Servo is the dialogue bad!

All in all, with this, Battlefield Earth, Mission Impossible 2, and the scores of other bad movies that have come out will truly keep the need for MST3K fans alive and well!

But as i've said, Dungeons and Dragons is the best of the bad movies that have come out this year. It may be stupid and badly written and acted, but at least it's not evil, and is easy to make fun of!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Gorgo (1961)
Good Godzilla Knock-Off That I'll Take Over the Early Gamera's Any Day
11 August 2000
First off, let me say that I am indeed an MST3K fan, but I saw, and have owned this movie, long before i ever even became a MSTie myself. And as for the original himself, Godzilla, i have been a Godzilla fan longer than I have ever even walked (literally). So in that respect, my priorities come Godzilla first, MST3K second.

With that out of the way, this isn't an all that bad Godzilla knock off. For one thing, it isn't dubbed, though the actors are still hard to hear clearly. Second, the monster effects are fairly good. Simple man-in-suit technique that still works today. Third, there is a plot, involving the young Gorgo being taken by British entrepeneurs for exploitation back on their ol' isle. Then daddy/mommy/whatever Gorgo comes to his/her/its baby's rescue. She smashes through some British landmarks in typical Godzilla fashion, with typically poor military resistance. There are human characters thrown in, but they do little more than observe.

Why do i actually like this movie? Because I like Godzilla, and Godzilla knock-offs that don't go the way Gamera did after his second movie: Helping people all the time and being "Friend to all children!" Yes, there is a child that somewhat befriends baby Gorgo, but even the kid knows that baby Gorgo don't give a crap about him when his mommy shows up.

Its not campy, its not deathly serious, its just good old fashioned Godzilla-type city stomping. If you're a Godzilla fan , you'll enjoy it easily. If not, you'll at least sit through it and have some fun nonetheless.

And if you're a biased MST3K fan, unlike myself, you'd hate the Godfather if it was shown in front of MIke and the Bots. Even they admitted it wasn't all that bad of a movie!
15 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Clerks (1994)
9/10
Makes Me Want to Actually Get a Job
8 August 2000
The first film in wonderful "Askewniverse" of Kevin Smith, this is 90 minutes of witty dialogue, interesting and strange characters, and clerking at a Quick Stop and Video Store.

Dante is your average "don't care about life goals, just want hockey" kinda guy, who works at the local Slim Jim jockying store. He's called in to work early one day, and waits on the usual buffet of customers, weird and normal alike, in New Jersey. His best friend Randal "works" at the RST Video Store nextdoor, who often closes up and goes over to bug Dante. And of course, waiting outside, jonesin' fixes, are the greatest duo in movie history, Jay and Silent Bob!

There actually is a story involving Dante's confused love life, a young child buying cigarettes, and Julie Dwyer Dwyer dying at the local YMCA pool, but those are just there to serve up Writer/Producer/Director/Star Kevin Smith's delicious dialogue. From Dante and Randal's talk about Randal's "head over heals" cousin in a car, to a man looking for the perfect dozen of eggs, to the seemingly endless parade of insulted customers, this is a classic that was made for only $27,000, most of which Smith himself funded. Its so seemingly easily well made, that watching it gives you the inspiration to make your own movies.

And watch out when the bathroom lights go out. You never know whose in there, except a soon-to-be terrified Caitlin Bree.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
It's the Beach Movie of the Aryan Nation!
26 July 2000
Yes, ladies and gentlemen, the Hitler idea of the perfect Aryan Nation lives on in this disguised piece of trash from Mystery Science Theater 3000! Yes, there are a few kids with black or brown hair, and even one black man in the form of the great Little Richard, but odds are they will be destroyed after the waves of rich white blonde kids take over.

Don't bother with any sort of plot, or even trying to find anything cohesive in this tripe. Manos had more of a plot than this. Simply put, something happens that requires lots of rich white kids dancing around like the inbreds they are.

Things happen without the aid of a plot. Unfunny pratfalls from "comic relief", annoying people who you want to die.

However, it is good to see Evil Fey Dad and his sidekick, Crayola Hat LAWRENCE!!!
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Hyped and Substanceless, but not Detestable or Worthless
31 May 2000
As the first overhyped movie of the summer, we are presented with Mission: Impossible 2, the sequel to 1994's Mission: Impossible, which wasn't even really that great to begin with, what with a barely held together plot and all. The tradition of not being as great as it's told to be follows in the sequel. THere are huge characters changes in Cruise's Hunt, and his supporting team is rarely seen, the character's actions seem to belong to other people at time, and John Woo's action scene certainly aren't up to his par.

However, there are several improvements from the original. While the plot may seem rehashed, its much more tangible than the first one's, and does allow for a better villian, and a better sense of danger. Also, the action scenes, though not great, have more action in them, but at the expense of the suspense of the first one's.

But the few improvements cannot help what is really just 1/12 of a good James Bond movie.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Batman (1989)
8/10
Almost Perfect
6 April 2000
First off, even as a loyal comic fanboy, Batman is a great movie. As a movie mogul, Batman as a great movie.

The comic series of the struggle of Batman's one man war on crime is played out in a bit of a shortened, but still sweet, film version. Michael Keaton plays the tormented Bruce Wayne to a tee, and Jack Nicholson does an excellent job as the homicidal and hilarious Joker. And Kim Basinger does a pretty good job as the romantic interest as well.

Tim Burton's style works perfectly for the world of Batman. Gothic towers spiral up and obscure the sky. People are as depressed and realistic as they would be in a real city. And Gotham City shines in all its sin as it should. Burton's dark style fits in well for a dark story, and sets the mood well, but he makes one tragic mistake that will anger any comic fan: Batman doesn't kill! That's where I back off a bit.

Other than that, a great, exciting film. 9 out of 10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
If Alfred Hitchcock Were Alive Today...
25 March 2000
...odds are, he would have either made something like "American Beauty", or been one of the numerous people who have seen it over and over again.

American Beauty is the wonderfully uplifting tail of the destruction of a man's life, and the deterioration of his family - and no, I'm actually not being sarcastic. One day, when mild mannered and hapless Lester Burnham realizes the travesty his life is, you can hear something snap in his head at dinner with his family. He breaks down his daily routine, and asks himself why he hasn't killed himself yet.

And the answer is, he decides he has nothing too lose, and therefore, has too much to live for. He can do whatever he wants, without a care in the world, risk free, because no one he hurts really cares about him. His actions effect others, and he honestly has no real reason to care. His flaky wife finally admits to herself she left him emotionally, and his daughter is shaken up when Lester develops a huge crush on her flirty cheerleader best friend. The Hitchcockian elements of the film are Lester's reasons, his actions, and their effects. In such a simple setting with simple characters, the wierdest things happen to show the beautiful simplicity that is life, and only Lester and his neighbors abuse Son realize this, nobody else ever catching on.

While it may seem that the film is fraught with depression and unbearable tension, the truth is that it is, but that is one of its many beauties. Going insane proves to be the only way to stay sane in the world, and Lester enjoys every minute of it, as does the viewer. We watch as he happily destroys the false holds everyone around him holds dear too, and can only hold onto Lester's wild ride. A dark, comic, beautiful ride that doesn't make us, but helps us realize the beauty beneath God's world.

P.S. Pay attention to the date this was written - one day before the Oscars. I'll be very surprised if this film does not receive best picture, but no matter. Gaining or losing a piece of gold will not tarnish this film's beauty.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
It's Jiggly Rip-off fest '79!
19 January 2000
From the Halls of Great Pain at MST3K headquarters comes an uncalled for rip off of Charlie's Angels, Angels Revenge (Brigade)!

Here, a few good actors and a lot of bad ones unite in a barage of shameful "starring" parts to make the real main characters look like good actors- the seven foxy ladies. Their mission- to act like they are trying to bust up a drug ring. They fail at the acting part though. The ladies who aren't white are all bad stereotypes, and their acting makes baywatch look like the a Meryl Streep movie. The only thing resembling a saving grace are that they are hot. Thats it. Other than that, every other actor makes me want to watch the Shakespearean techniques of Manos. Jack Palance is terrible, in perhaps one of the few movies he has been in (must hve been early in his career), the rejects from sitcoms make up the cameos, and what the hell was Peter Lawford doing in this?

Wait nevermind. I just realized he was drunk and stoned most of the movie. That explains it.

Well, the story has the ladies doing various things while "acting" to destroy the drug ring, including robbing a very shameful Jim Backus, slicing up a drug dealers genitals in a "humorous" scene, seducing two fishermen finding drugs (in a scene akin to watching whales mate), and making the viewer vomit through every other scene.

Skip this movie at all costs, unless, of course, you see it on MST3K. It will drain all hope and beauty from your world, as well as all the vomit from your stomach.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hobgoblins (1988)
Hi Satan! What, You Hated This Movie Too?
15 January 2000
YES! From hell and back, not even the prince of darkness can stand the evil film MADE BY ACTUAL (hideous) PEOPLE! That's right, this movie did not come from hell (though it feels like it), but from stupid people "film makers". In our anti-God movie, the ciggarette smoking man from the X-Files, now a security guard, finds a bunch of evil alien "Hobgoblins", who kill people by projecting their fantasies. Why the hobgoblins kill, or why the old security guy never just blew them up, God alone knows.

And it is by God's grace that some of us survive the rest of the movie. A wussy assistant security guard, his slut friend, her "army" boyfriend, a Pee-Wee Herman in high school geek, and the "Main Character"'s whiny girlfriend, who will only like him if he can beat people up with yard tools and harass women as well as the president.

When "main character" lets said Hobgoblins loose, and Smoking Man sends him after them, they find Main Character's friends and almost kill them (unfortunately). After some sexual "jokes" that feel like hydrochloric acid on your groin, stupid actors chase Hobbies into "Club Scum", where Main Character's girlfriend has become a slut, and discovers that the only way to get men to like you is to be a slut.

From there, the stuff (not plot, stuff) goes downhill, runs over several pedestrians (the viewers), and crashes through three playgrounds and hits five puppies and finally hits a tree, which is the begginging of the movie.

Them some more stuff happens. The (thankful) End.

By the way, let us all give pity on MST3K writers for having to view this movie 8 or 9 times to make an episode out of it for our pleasure. We salute them!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hate Austin Powers? Love MST3K? Come On In Then!
5 January 2000
First off, let me say that, to keep fans of this movie and austin powers fans off me, that I DID NOT hate this movie, or (the overrated but good) Austin Powers movies. "Diabolik" is an almost enjoyable, in a "make fun of it yourself" kind of way. In the movie, based on a popular European comic, a criminal mastermind, the anti-hero of the film, Diabolik, and his girlfriend Eva make asses out of the police and mob by stealing money and killing lots of people, and having a blast doing it! Meanwhile, the at-times-almost-likeable Inspecter Genko, Diablick's (sorry, couldn't resist) arch enemy, chases them around, and, thanks to the stupid police force, fails miserably to catch Diabolik, even with the help of the equally stupid, and vile talking (is that stud coming?) mob bosses. With lots of unneeded special effects (a blue screened in phone booth?!?), stupid people, and WAY too 60's style to it, it is annoying. However, it does have the makings of a perfect MST3K movie: its foreign, has lame dubbing, better than "Batman and Robin" acting, and some actually good humor. Oh, and it's from the 60's! Perfect MST3K fodder! It is nice to see that for their final episode, the MST3K boys, and the viewers, didn't have to sit through something as bad as Prince of Space or Space Mutiny or Hobgoblins! I wouldn't suggest renting it, though.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Not enough films like these.
29 August 1999
There simply aren't enough films (not movie, FILM) like this around today. Much like this year's other great underdog, the Sixth Sense, the Iron Giant truly comes out of nowhere in a once commercialized or stupidized genre. And both have similar storylines, namely about a boy who has something very special about him. In the film, young Hogarth Hughes of Rockwell, Maine, finds a giant robot in the woods behind his house. With the robot apparently having lost his memory from a bump on his head, he befriends young Hogarth....actually, Hogarth befriends him. As most reviews have stated, there are no stupid Disney-used traits at all in this film. NO dumb sidekicks, no stupid songs, and excellent characters, including the Giant himself. Hogarth, his mother, and the rest, all feel and act like they should from their respective backgrounds. So no one here is exceptionally heroic, or sarcastic. I have endless praise for this film. It is bold and grand in every aspect. It is my favorite film of all time, tied with the Matrix and South Park: Bigger, Longer, And Uncut. And on one last note, it would be a tragedy if this fine film is overlooked by other underdogs from this year such as the Sixth Sense and....well, so far, these are the only 2 movies this year that I have seen (with the possible exceptions of south park and the matrix) that deserve to be nominated this year.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Godzilla: The Series (1998–2001)
Better Than the Movie and Most TV Shows, Animated or Live
21 August 1999
Godzilla the Series takes place where the near-blockbuster movie left off. Nick Tatapolous finds the original Godzilla's one surviving egg. During its hatching, the baby Godzilla implements Nick as its adopted father.

This could've gone into corny areas, as did several other tv show's and the other godzilla cartoon from the 70's, with Godzilla always being there for them no matter what, and always a good guy. NOT SO HERE. Godzilla, though seeing Nick as his "father", also sees the entire planet as his own nest. So, whenever a monster attacks Nick, or starts taking its own land, Godzilla will fight it off. but it also means that mankind definitely gets in Godzilla's way, and there is often little NIck can do, since its not like he can just call an independent thinking creature like Godzilla off. And thankfully, in the series, Godzilla does breath his radioactive fire. And he is much meaner and more assertive against enemies than the movie Godzilla. But several characters from the movie are back in the seires, and are much more interesting at that. The rarely seen Elsie Chapman and Mendel Craven are more 3 dimensional here, as are Audrey Timmons, Animal, and Major HIcks. Several episodes even devote more than ample time on character's histories and relationships to each other, such as an episode where a major character is Elsie's one time fiancee, or plenty of episodes where newcoming characters Monique Dupree, a frech secret agant, and Randy Hernandez, an early 20's hacker, hit it off, but not so well as in most relationships. And the majority of the monsters are great and original. One problem though is that they are often shown in all their designs glory in the first few minutes of an episode. All in all, the series has more plot twists and refreshing script work than the movie. I strongly suggest that everyone watches it and gives it the attention it deserves.
20 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mitchell (1975)
Beware the bulging veins and pulse-less heart of MITCHELL!!!!
19 August 1999
From the demons of hell who made Bill Clinton and any sci fi movie set in the south, comes the fullest, richest, creamiest, butteriest.....yuuummmmmm..... Oops, sorry, those are the words of Joe Don Baker as......MITCHELL!!!! The fattest, flubber-assed, most incompetant, brainless, and probably genital-less, "protaganist/detective" ever since Torgo of "manos, the hands of fate" True to its roots, MST3K came up beyond the call of duty with this film. Mitchell himself is a hard-as-whipped-cream cop, who takes it upon himself to take down a drug dealer by sitting in his car outside the dealer's house for hours on end, threatening any and everyone he can, sleeping with linda evans in the most eye twitching love scene since the great Stanely Kubrick showed us Tom Cruise naked. With little or no action, which mainly consists of JOe DOn shooting unarmed innocents, and a 5 mph car chase, which is out-speeded by a footrac from Andy Kaufman and one of John Saxon's henchmen. Although the ending is probably the real life thing that would have happened if the crew of Gilligan's Isle got wind of how annoying each other are. So, if u like to see a sexist, fat ass, Jeff Foxworthy-style-joke-of-a-hero sleeping with LInda Evans, sexually harassing Martin Balsim, and occasionally getting a few hookers from the 2 or 3 scenes John Saxon is in, or if you like any band or person like Backstreet Boys and N* Sync, then Mitchell is for you! But if,however, you have half a brain, and to you any movie above any remake ever made this year, than go punch yourself in the eyes twice for more than you will have with this movie.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What Else Can be Said that Hasn't been said about the modern Shakespeare?
13 August 1999
MST3K is EASILY the greatest television show ever produced and witnessed by the human eye. LIke a modern Bible that mirrors its own timeframe, while producing timeless lessons, MST3K is without a doubt the greatest thing to come along since movies came aloong! NOtihng ,and i mean NOTHING is safe from the wrath of Mike, Joel, Servo, and CRooooooooooooooooow! Everyone and everything from Mark McGwire to Shakespeare to fake religeons that phony hollywood people accept all too willingly, to so called "music" television, to my own personal hero, Godzilla, take hits and heart felt and mindful cracks on the ass here. With the best writing in movie, television, or book this side of the simpsons and the godfater, Mystery Science Theatre 3000 will forever live in the faithful MSTies minds....

and especially in the minds of Joe Don baker and everyone else who's name was even mentioned here, celebrity or not. HAHA! take that you pompous airheads! FOR, WHILE YOUR MEMORIES WILL FADE AWAY, THE TIMES OF MST3K WILL LIVE FAR OFF INTO THE NOT TOO DISTANT FUTURE....
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed