Reviews

13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Waco: The Aftermath (2023– )
6/10
A bit unnecessary but enjoyable
11 July 2023
Overall I feel like the show missed a big opportunity to build on a lot of the conspiracy aspects of the Waco incident (think Waco: Rules of Engagement documentary meets The People v. O. J. Simpson,) and turned this into a incredible court room focused drama with some flashbacks. Ultimately this is 3 stories crammed into 5 episodes. The the trial of the Branch Davidians; Gary Noesner and his uncovering of para military groups; and David Koresh's origin story.

Each story feels quite thin and vague, either not enough time to properly flesh out the characters and backstory or there just really isn't much material to explore. The Gary Noesner plotline especially feels like filler and a quick way to try and bring tension and action.

Many one dimensional characters and stories throughout and the series is rapidly switching back and forth between them. Compared to season 1 which keeps us at Mount Carmel with our characters and only slight deviations, this is why I believe only focusing on the trial would have been more entertaining and engaging. There are some shining stand out moments though.

Right off the bat I have to mention Giovanni Ribisi as the lawyer representing the Branch Davidians, in every scene he's such an interesting actor to watch but we don't spend enough time with him and to appreciate his relationship with the Branch Davidians and see it grow.

The actor playing Branch Davidian Clive Doyle is totally believable and creates a sympathetic and human character, but again, it's a shame the series jumps about so much, we just never get to stay with them.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tokyo Vice (2022– )
7/10
This could have been so great
5 August 2022
Tokyo city, the Japanese culture, the crime syndicates, the relationships between the police and the criminals and the journalists. It's all so gripping. But the show doesn't spend as much time as it should on these aspects, instead we're treated to a western woman's bizarre personal story that really has nothing to do with the show, coupled with the main protagonist a man also from the USA who aspires to be a journalist. Inbetween that we get what we actually came to see and when it happens it's great the Japanese actors are fully convincing and interesting.

I can understand them giving us a westerner to relate to, and act as our entry way in to Japanese life and crime, but instead of building on that character and growing with him and then shifting focus on to the Japanese storylines once the audience was comfortable enough, it's like the show is too scared to leave that comfort zone. The protagonist meets a western woman and because of that we're supposed to divert our attentions away from the main story and care about this woman's personal strife. No. Show me what Tokyo crime is really like.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
This could have been great
23 January 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This starts off slow and predictable. A group of friends at Oxford university enjoying a party in the pre-war years that swiftly sets up future characters one being a very pro-National Socialist, interesting, but abruptly ends. We're then launched into the days prior to Chamberlain going to Munich for his meeting with Hitler. There's a forced love story for our protagonist showing tension with his needy wife, there was no build up to his character to begin with and this was a lame attempt to make us feel something, anything. I thought to myself this is going to be bland.

Then Jeremy Irons comes in, every time he's on screen it piques my interest because I want to learn about the man Chamberlain, and Irons presents us with a very immersive performance portraying a man under huge stress and in a very difficult position. For me he saved the show but he is a secondary character and I thought he did well with what he had to work with.

Intermittently we're shown a German diplomat on a crusade to bring down the National Socialist Party, this diplomat turns out to be our protagonist's friend from Oxford. It's not explained why this person is now completely anti-National Socialist but there is a reason later on which I think is contrived and not fully believable.

The diplomat wants to smuggle a document to his old Oxford friend and the tension build up is good, until you realize the document is not really anything but a bunch of notes from an old meeting talking about invading the Czechs. The German diplomat becomes emotionally hysteric, desperately trying to get the viewer on side by warning us of "millions of deaths" and Hitler's plans for "world conquest" that he would have absolutely no clue about, almost like he's been brought back from the future to warn Chamberlain.

He leads our protagonist through the streets in such a obvious shifty way and then into a pub filled with German officers to have a secret meeting! It's comical. He demands a meeting with Chamberlain to discuss this document and gets one, and this is probably the best scene in the movie, Chamberlain shoots down his attempts and shrugs it off as hyperbolic and nonsensical and rightly so almost treating him like an upset child. I couldn't help but notice this is a play on current politics, with immature millennials demanding action on things they know little about and letting their emotions create conclusions.

The diplomat is then alone in a room with Hitler and has a pistol with the intention of killing him, but he cannot bring himself to shoot Hitler, for no reason given. Then at the end the diplomat is asked if he will keep fighting and he says "yes." WHAT? You had the ultimate chance to end it and chickened out, then what are you continuing to fight for? Ridiculous writing.

The actor playing Hitler is good and uses the deep voice that is often missing from previous portrayals, him and Irons are the crux of this movie and if only it could have more focused on the enthusiasm for a deal and the backroom drama and the hopes to avoid war with more of a character study on the two men at that period in history.

I have to note there is diversity forced into the movie, even with a line telling the protagonist (the viewer) that she's from Nottingham incase we were all too prejudice and presumed India.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
It's ok
9 December 2021
Just finished the first episode, I'm really taken back by how fast paced it is, there's no build up, it's like it tries to get the introductions out the way as soon as possible and I hope it's because it will slow down and expand on the story in the other episodes.

Set design is nice, lots of immersion.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Interesting film but the editing/camera work harms it
29 October 2021
I'm half way through the film and I'm annoyed by the fish eye lens and depth of field. Strange decision and takes me out of the film. Other than that there's weird silences and bland camera positioning. With a better director/editor I think the film could be a lot better.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Required viewing for every leftist in the West.
20 March 2021
It's common place today to hear calls for "equality" and "social justice" without terms or goals ever being defined. This is not like the 1960s with objectives such as being able to enter a shop through the same door as someone else. They are empty slogans used as wrapping paper to push political ideologies and to crush individual thought and put any opposition in to the "oppressor" or "enemy" category so they can be denounced. Watching this film you can see clear parallels between the trains of thought, the Khmer Rouge being where it inevitably ends up if there are no good people left to fight.

This film depicts the closest man has come to true communism. The fool's search for everything being equal, removal of all classes (private income and self determination), abolition of private property. Even before the atrocities start it's already a bleak picture when compared to the West, everything just stagnates. The violence and "re-education" varies from government to government but economically they generally follow the same pattern as a result of an obsessive control behavior from the state or as they call it "the people."

What's sad is that Angelina Jolie the director is still an anti-west liberal who would probably agree with a lot of what the Khmer Rouge wanted to achieve but because the violence was so horrific you have to overtly be against it. But I give props to her for showing what kind of puritan hellhole left wing ideology can lead to without political opposition.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Dig (2021)
6/10
There was no need for the distracting love triangle.
7 February 2021
I was excited to see a film that portrays 1930's England, and Ralph Fiennes and Carey Mulligan are proven actors that bring a unique presence to their films. Archeology might be a tough sell for the premise of a film and it was these actors that drew me in. The first half gets it so right, it's just about the time period and characters digging while becoming excited as they unearth the past, it's rather simple yet these actors have no trouble keeping you interested. In fact it was refreshing to see English people presented on screen becoming excited over finding evidence of their ancestors and past to this ancient land given the current hostile attitude towards the English and Celtic peoples by particular political groups and media companies who like to remind us we have little culture and heritage.

Then suddenly it's as if the writers thought viewers would become bored and in comes a new character, a rather modern-behaving "liberated" female with her controlling husband, inserted into the plot to remind us how women should really behave in the current age as if we needed reminding. The key characters become background noise, and you have this love triangle develop, the film takes on a different purpose, I'd rather see more character development between the man who discovered the relics and the museum trying to take credit from the little man.
125 out of 163 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Outpost (2019)
8/10
Really good war movie with an interesting premise
16 January 2021
Looks like a small budget film but they made the production values appear on par with higher budget films. It's not an over the top "America hell yeah" patriotic movie it tries to keep the emotions just about humans in a terrible situation. They nailed the Afghanistan vibe and the colour grading keeps the film looking gritty.

I've seen reviews talking about a slow start to the film, but that ended up being my favourite bit as it goes through the different camp commanders and shows how the men behave differently to each one, trusting some while finding others incompetent and I liked seeing their reactions.

Eastwood is great in this and feels like a natural leader.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mindhunter (2017–2019)
8/10
Good but I can't stand Tench's kid
30 September 2020
I'm on the second to last episode of season 2 and I'm so tired of having Bill Tench kid's story forced on me as filler. Any kid that behaves so 1 dimensional as he does would be considered not right by any sane person, and yet episode after episode we have this whiny mother pretend the kid's fine. It's gone on for too long, I want to see murder mysteries solved not this annoying kid who doesn't act.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Da 5 Bloods (2020)
5/10
Slow start and very preachy but it grew on me
13 June 2020
I'm expecting to be preached to since it's Spike Lee but wasn't prepared in the bluntness of the messaging, I almost felt like I was being told I'm too stupid to know that African people have achieved things. Despite that it does work but it sets the tone of the film early on and gives it a comedic/less serious vibe and since I was expecting something deeper and more centered around the conflict perhaps it disappointed me in that respect. Once I got in to the rhythm of the movie I could accept it for what it is.

Overall I think it's a missed opportunity to show a deeper Vietnam war story and get the audience to understand further about what it was like to be an African-American in Vietnam during the 1960s. The action scenes are very comedic and Hollywood-esqe so there's no tension there. Chadwick Boseman is excellent and I wanted to see more of him, but his role is very much a cameo, I reckon if the movie had been more serious the audience could have really related and felt for that character. Delroy Lindo is incredible in this too, but again I wanted to see more of the two character's relationships that formed during the war to really feel and understand them. I had hoped the search for gold would be a sub plot to bring the veterans back to Vietnam but actually it's the focus of the movie with Vietnam as a sideshow/after thought.

The artwork, soundtrack, and message of the film makes me yearn for what could have been, a deep look in to the Vietnam war by a director that can tell these types of stories in a hard hitting way but it came across almost as a comedy with serious bits thrown in that I can't make sense of.

I don't agree with the "black lives matter" sloganeering at the end of the film either, I think if other races did that it would be unacceptable and it also places Africans in the predisposition of victim hood, of being in chains from the very start no matter what they do or who they are, of never shaking off their past and it enables other races to start their own similar groups. The movie also paints the picture, and many will believe this to be true as a result, of African-Americans being used as cannon fodder in Vietnam when in reality it was a class-based prejudice, a lot of poor white people died in that war at no choice of their own and just because they have the same skin complexion as the people running the war that doesn't make them the same people, they probably had more in common with the African-American they were dying beside.
4 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Entertaining but now even the film maker distances himself from the solutions
4 April 2020
I really enjoyed the film upon first several viewings, and the previous films, even for purely entertainment value it kept my interest. Since then after further reading and understanding more on politics, human history, money, genetics etc. I found myself agreeing with basis of the film less and less.

The film maker himself seems to have distanced himself from the Venus Project solutions of resource-rationing through a centralized system of some sorts that isn't a government and isn't managed by human beings. With no clear blueprint to critique, this 'solution' becomes more and more farcical and detached from our reality. It doesn't help anyone to keep repeating "RBE" (resource based economy) with no clear picture on how to get there as human beings will default to what currently works for them. A good example are the communist takeovers of nations; after promises that the centralized system will provide all their needs, human beings found it more efficient and beneficial to bypass the government and trade with each other on black markets, either because the state decided for them what they would need and got it wrong or because of inefficiency and stagnation which plagues state-run organizations universally. Mass exoduses of people to Western nations were and are common as people preferred the technological advances and increased living standards that occur or a lack of centralized government interference.

The film maker now promotes more left-wing liberal politics rather than repeating "RBE" which I guess is an improvement as it's something to critique but I find the two positions conflicting as the initial RBE system was meant to decentralize governments and be more flexible, but the contemporary liberal position is to centralize state power as much as possible and suppress trade between peoples with heavy restrictions. Realistically of course this was always needed to implement resource rationing to prevent an absolute free-for-all, but the Zeitgeist followers were in denial in an attempt to distance themselves from command economies gone before that have proven not to have solved the problems.

I thank the film for introducing me to all sorts of authors and speakers that I would never had stumbled upon otherwise, but what the film really lacks is a blueprint, a political strategy to achieve goals that will convince people of their credibility. Right now the "movement" behaves like a cult, the majority of people do not understand what RBE means and rightfully so there is no blueprint, but they promote it as if it's automatically better even without knowing if that's true, it could be a lot worse we do not know and being that partisan and ideological about something of which there is no plan will put most reasonable people off the idea entirely.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Game of Thrones: The Long Night (2019)
Season 8, Episode 3
4/10
The Episode That Exposes The Writers
2 May 2019
Warning: Spoilers
For a long time now the audience has been content with the adaption from book to screen. However, season 5 and onwards there is a clear change in tone, lots of last minute Hollywood saves, less characters die, and lots more one-liners and other dumb dialogue. It starts to feel like a generic fantasy or action heroe series.

Episode 3 season 8 should prevent these two writers from getting future work in the industry, it is some of the sloppiest story I have seen and I feel cheated out of the 8 years of watching the show to have it end like this. There was a clear and deliberate attempt to make the White Walkers the main enemy, so much time and build up to get us to this point. In the end the White Walkers couldn't even get past Winterfell and now it's all over. It's a strange feeling because of the huge build up your anticipation was that these were a greater threat than anyone else and yet it's over in an instant. Now we have 3 episodes of.... what? I anticipate lots of filler and drawn out scenes until they eventually fight Cersei and that's it.

What a shame it had to end like this.
26 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
My Lai Four (2010)
1/10
Terrible acting, terrible everything.
22 March 2019
If it's one thing I dislike it's an interesting and important story being used up in bad films. Movie Executives are going to look at this failure and tell anyone else trying to do their take on this story that it will not be popular enough and that it has failed in the past.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed