9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Tenebrae (1982)
10/10
Tenebre:
16 February 2008
Tenebre is a film whitewashed with some of Argento's best murders and his wonderful, inventive and groundbreaking visual style. Perhaps his best giallo, Tenebre also supports a brilliant plot, with utterly surprising twists and turns that are among his best. Argento is not known for his great plots, because many of his films contain what are considered poor, average ones. His masterpiece Suspiria has been criticized for a poor plot, but the critics miss the point of Argento. He is a visual director. He doesn't focus on plots too much but rather on the visual aspect of a film to enforce the impact of experiencing them. His films shine with creativity and macabre beauty and his murders have an elegant, operatic quality to them. But here in this lasting masterpiece, he delivers a superb storyline and wonderful visuals.

The acting in Tenebre is also of a high standard. Anthony Franciosa is excellent in the lead and provides us with a performance that is interesting and realistic enough to capture our attention. Daria Nicolodi is also brilliant, and succeeds with giving us a balanced, well proportioned performance that is certainly among her best. She also has one piercing scream, one of the best I have ever heard. John Saxon is without failure excellent and brings some comedy to an otherwise heavily horror toned film. The rest of the cast give us above average performances that aid the film in many aspects.

Visually, the film is overpowering. Walls covered in white contrast with the drops or splashes of blood poured on them, which impact the audience with a vividness. Unlike Suspiria and the mysterious Inferno, the film is almost devoid of colour, with red, brown and the occasional blue creeping in. This gives the film a timelessness, a property Argento accomplishes excellently in films like the before mentioned Suspiria. The actors are dressed in mostly white also, which gives this masterpiece an luminous quality. There is a score that is just perfection by three of the four members of Goblin, which reinforces the atmosphere and beauty imposed. It can trill, rivet and simply sizzle it's way into your mind. It is a score that you could listen too without the film and still get the feel of what Tenebre is like: Thrilling, beautiful and inventive.

SlIGHT SPOILERS AHEAD: Some brilliant moments are too be found everywhere in Tenebre. The double murder of two women early on into the film is pure brilliance, and Argento treats these murders with an elegant artistry and brings to them a dance like quality, which snarls with beauty. The murder of these two women is among his best, certainly his top five greatest murders. The girl been chased by a vicious dog is heart stopping and thrilled because at some time in our lives we have probably been chased by a animal. Later on in the film there is a murder by an Axe on a black haired beauty which is something brilliant and which transcends gory into art.

The story centers around a mystery novel writer visiting Rome to promote his new book, but is soon engulfed in a series of murders that are similar to the ones depicted in his new novel.

Rating: 10 out of 10.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Marnie (1964)
10/10
Marnie is underrated Hitchcock brilliance.
18 August 2007
Alfred Hitchcock's Marnie is the director's hidden masterpiece, a film that is forgotten among mainstream audiences and probably remain in the shadow of Hitch's other masterpieces Psycho, Vertigo and Rear window (to name only a few). And what a pity! Unsuccessful both commercially and was greeted with reviews that made the picture out be a failure, Marnie has come to be seen by critics as the masterful film it really is. Tippi Hedren made her debut with The Birds the year before and was cast as the lead in Marnie because Grace Kelly dropped out (this was mean't to be Princess Grace's return to the screen but sadly she never did return). And what a performance! Tippi is phenomenal as Marnie and provides the film with one of the greatest performances to grace an Hitchcock film. She is at once sensitive, icy, cold and then broken to pieces emotionally in the next scene. She steals the show here even though she is starring next to Sean Connery. Now that's an accomplishment. Tippi is simply flawless is her difficult role as Marnie, a woman who steals but as a result of deeper emotional problems. Mark (Sean Connery) is entranced by his new employee Marnie and soon he blackmails her into marriage, realizing that he try and help Marnie to be rid of her frigidity and criminal ways. Sean Connery is usual superb self: Charismatic, sexy and animal like. His character is strikingly different to the emotionally disturbed Marnie who seems to be, as she says in the film, like something Mark has caught. They both are fantastic in the leads but are aided by great performances by the supporting players. Again, as in all his films, Hitchcock's creativity is apparent. The use of back projection and fake looking thunderstorms was intentional and use of very apparent Matte painting was meant to represent Marnie's dream world if you will. In Marnie, he was homaging the great European masters and especially the Expressionist ones. The critics criticized these aspects of the film, not realizing that they were not accidental. And Hitchcock also pays homage to another of his classics, Notorious, by recreating the famous crane shot in the film. Marnie is a very creative film, perhaps one of Hitchcock's most creative ones. It has been unfairly dismissed as one of Hitchcock's lesser films but I think it is one of his best. Dig deeper and you'll see the the themes Hitchcock loved most to explore designate throughout. There is a suspenseful scene that is one of Hitchcock's best where Marnie is robbing her employer's safe. Then suddenly (Marnie doesn't notice), the cleaning lady enters but does not notice Marnie. Can Marnie escape with the money without the cleaning lady noticing? Find out when you view Hitchcock's last masterwork.
5 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Peeping Tom (1960)
10/10
Disturbing look at ourselves!
20 June 2007
This is the first film by Powell I've ever seen and I tell you it won't be the last. Peeping Tom is in my perception the best piece of 1960, a year that produced the ever so famous Psycho and the beautiful Black Sunday. The reason I find Peeping Tom so astounding is that it is the only horror film that disturbed me. There is something in the character of Mark Lewis that really interested me. Maybe it was the fact that he is fascinated at observing people and we are forced to watch him, making us voyeurs. You can't keep your eyes away from the screen because you become fixated and involved. We can't help it, we are just so bewildered and fascinated and therefore we find ourselves identifying with Mark. He can't help it either! And for some reason this revolted and sickened critics in 1960, who made this masterpiece out to be a piece of trash. They were frightened at the notion of sympathizing with Mark, who murders because it has become a fascination that takes him over. He desires to see the look of fear in his victim's eyes. He has no emotional connection to these women. For example, he cannot stand to capture Anna Massey's character on film because he is afraid that he will have to murder her to satisfy his lust. He is fascinated by fear and so is forced to pick up his camera and capture these women's faces at the moment of death. We observe what he observes and so we feel somewhat connected with Mark and that disturbs us. Powell's masterpiece, perhaps his best film of the 1960s, is really about observing. He is trying to tell us that we become voyeurs when we watch a film. We can't keep our eyes away because it fascinates us, just as capturing the fear at the moment of death fascinates Mark. And so it scares us because we can identify with the killer. Peeping Tom is also an extraordinary film because it uses the power of suggestion. We don't see the women been murdered. It is their expressions that really do the trick. Seeing how terrified they are makes us imagine their deaths as truly horrifying. We create the murders in our mind and that makes us feel more connected to Mark. We just see the metal spike at the end of the tripod and the image of it getting closer and closer to one of Mark's victims sends chills down our spine. If Powell has shown the women been murdered the film would be not as effective. If is was soaked in gore and blood it would make us cringe but that would be all. Powell was able to make a film that can disturb 40 years after it has been made. Now that is an accomplishment!

Visually the film is like an Argento film at times. In the studio we witness an array of colors, red and green predominantly. This gives this masterpiece a sublime look. The studio is bathed in red, which contrasts to the cold exterior of the world outside it. With Powell's use of color on the studio scenes, I believe he was trying to convey that this is Mark's place were he can create. The film is truly beautiful to behold. It was shot in Eastmancolour so perhaps that is why it is so visually pleasing. It also has an very effective score that is played all on piano. It is not a driving score, but more melancholy, mesmerizing and at times eerie. And that is what Peeping Tom really is: Eerie!
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Very Informative, simply brilliant!
17 June 2007
This show is definitely one of the best on our screens which deals with art. It is rich in detail, and not only incorporates information about the artworks but analyzes them and provides interviews with professional people who provide their own interpretation of the artworks. This information gives the artworks a whole new dimension and really makes us look at them not as just paint on canvas or simply stone, but as deep spiritual works of pure genius. For example, in the episode dealing with Seurat's A Sunday Afternoon on the Grande Jatte in 1886, it transforms the women who is fishing to the left of the masterpiece into a prostitute 'fishing' for business. It is truly very informative and does not bore. This show also provides great information on the artist involved, delving deep into the person's personal life. It also tells of the history the work experienced. Leonardo da Vinci's The Last Supper had stones thrown at it and the apostles eyes were scrapped off with knives by French troops. Visually the show is great. The image is very clear and precise. This show should not be missed. I'd have to give it 10 out of 10.
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Deep Red (1975)
Deep Red is a simply brilliant masterpiece.
12 June 2007
Profondo Rosso is really the gem among Argento'a work, a film that managed to revolutionize the giallo and at the same moment become the ultimate giallo at that. You may ask what is a giallo? Well, it is basically a genre that combines mystery and horror, so it is basically a violent triller. It is the most plausible and well written film of his career to date and is the film that introduced us to the music of Goblin, a group that has become world renowned for their work on such classics as Suspiria and Dawn of the Dead. But what is really brilliant about Profondo Rosso is that it is the first film we see Dario experiment and gain more confidence. His camera becomes more fluid and gains more movement and elegant, while the angles he chooses become more strange. He begins to pay more attention to color, submerging the film in deep reds and greens which makes this one a feast for the eyes. It is truly a beautiful film to behold, even when the killer's victims are been stabbed and whatever else. Dario in this film also pays attention to architecture. Helga Ulmann's apartment is lushly decorated in black and white marble, plants and also a star shaped table (we later learn she is Jewish so the star is in fact the Star of David). But the true masterpiece of the sets in Profondo Rosso is Dario's replica of the bar in Edward Hopper's Nighthawks. This is in a sense a homage to Edward, as is the school in the film which is called the Leonardo da Vinci. Dario incorporates the style of art nouveau into this film predominantly, which can be in seen the windows of the villa and Giordani's apartment. And I'm not forgetting the black gloves, one of Argento's trademarks. The Performances in Profondo Rosso are very good. David Hemmings and Dario Nicolodi provide great performances. Their chemistry is very evident and they are very believable. Hemmings is able to get across his character's insecurities, especially in the scene where he arm wrestles Daria's character. It is very clear that he is insecure about his masculinity, which is evident in the scene in Gianna's car where the seat breaks and drops and so it seems that Gianna has become the bigger person, much to Marcus' embarrassment. Daria puts in an excellent performance considering this was about only her third or fourth film. She definitely gets across Gianna's independence which provide the film with some comedy. Gabrile Lavia is also good as the alcoholic Carlo, clearly getting across Carlo's drunkenness with his constant movements, such as stumbling. Meril I found fantastic in the conference scene, especially when she says the line: "You have killed and you will kill again." When she revolts back it is so realistic and her hand movements really make us believe she can sense evil in the room, like as though she is feeling the presence. This is Goblin's first score and it is truly a masterpiece. The theme is brilliant and is really driving and fits the film perfectly. It is a really mesmerizing as is the infamous lullaby, a disturbing piece. Profondo Rosso is truly a brilliant piece of art. A great plot, fantastic music, breath-taking visuals, great performances and perfect direction. Not to be missed! 10/10
39 out of 59 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Inferno (1980)
10/10
Contains Spoilers: Argento's understated masterpiece of supernatural horror
11 June 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Inferno is Argento's most understated and most visually stunning film to date. It has often been unfairly compared to Suspiria, which I admit is the better film of both. People often state that it pales in comparison to Suspiria, but yet what were people expecting with Inferno? A remake of Suspiria? Well, if that is so they would have been shocked when they saw Inferno. Inferno and Suspiria share many qualities but Inferno is in no way a remake.

This film is more atmospheric than Suspiria. The lighting can at times be overwhelming, reds and blues feature particularly. This creates an almost nightmarish vision of New York and Rome where the film is set. Or as it appears to be. This film in a sense is one big nightmare. It becomes illogical and incoherent. Some of the characters actions become irrational, for example when Kazanian is in the lake shouting and been devoured by rats, a hot dog vendor runs over and and stabs Kazanian in the neck a few times. Maybe the man did this because Mater Tenebraum made him do it? We don't no because Inferno has many plot holes which leave some events seem irrational. But this adds the strange other-worldly quality of the film. We seem to just sit back and believe these things are happening because we no we are dealing with the supernatural.

The special effects in Inferno are also excellent. The scene at the end where the nurse disappears but her reflection can be still seen in the mirror is fantastic. But even more impressive is when she turns into death. I won't tell you how she does it because I will spoil it for you. These effects where created by Mario Bava, an icon of Italian horror cinema. He makes the illusion look astonishingly real. He will be sadly missed, especially by Argento.

The performances are good. McCloskey's Mark is a character that is very irritating because he spends the film behind everyone else. He is played by Leigh as very 'wooden' and uninteresting. However, the actresses who play Rose and Sara contribute great performances. They are very believable, interesting and are the characters you wish Argento did not kill off. They are extremely beautiful and have the personalities that can really get the audience involved. They have the qualities that the main protagonist needs. Sacha Pitoëff is also excellent, especially in the scene involving his death. He is able to perfectly capture Kazanian's dark and mysterious character. Daria Nicolodi deserves a mention as she was also great, but not as good as in other Argento classics. Feodor Chaliapin Jr. as Varelli is brilliant and Veronica Lazar as his nurse is at times annoying and seemingly stupid but she is great in the ending, although her laugh seems fake and is laughable. The rest of the cast put in good performances but nothing really outstanding.

The highlight of the film is the scene in the flooded ballroom in the basement. Truly one of Argento's best scenes. Beautiful, atmospheric and scary. But yet it seems hard to believe that Rose would venture down into a flooded room for her keys. Let me just say that it nearly gave me a heart attack...

Keith Emerson's music is masterful. I loved it so much I even bought the soundtrack. It has received a lot of criticism, people say that it does not fit the film at all and some say it is not as good as Suspiria. Again the film is been compared to Suspiria. It is a tense piece of divine art, a truly haunting soundtrack. The theme is wonderfully hypnotic and then becomes a more powerful riveting piece. Mater Tenebraum is the best thing on the soundtrack. Unquestionably masterful.

Also look out for Ania Pieroni in the scene in the music room as Mater Lacrimarum, with the white cat. You can also spot her passing in a taxi as Mark leaves the apartment after Carlo and Sara's deaths.

Overall Inferno is an Argento masterpiece, a must-see piece of cinema. 10/10

It has become my favorite Argento!
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Suspiria (1977)
10/10
A Masterpiece.
10 September 2006
Suspiria stands out among the work of Argento because it is simply the best film of his career to date, and a truly brilliant film in itself. This film clearly displays Argento fantastic visual style, his attention to detail and his way of telling a story visually, rather then through dialog. The film is the most beautiful film I have ever seen, as it was shot on Eastman Color Kodak stock and was printed using the 3-strip Technicolor process, giving it an 3-D effect. This film stands as not only a monument to the genius of Argento but the film's photographer Luciano Tovoli.

Dario Argento influences culminate in this, his sixth film. It can clearly be noted that his main influence was his mentor, Mario Bava (Black Sunday). Argento made Bava's famous tracking shot his own, and this has become one of Argento's many signatures.

People say that Suspiria does not have a plot, but it does, although it is a simple one. I think it is genius of Argento not to focus to much on plot, as the audience will probably be trying to figure the story out if the plot for Suspiria was complex, therefore, they would pay little attention to how visual stunning Suspiria is, and this would sour the experience of watching Suspiria.

The acting in Suspiria I adored. Jessica Harper is perfection as Suzy, her innocence radiating out brilliantly. The supporting cast are just simply brilliant, especially Alida Valli and Joan Bennett.

This film is simply a masterpiece.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Who's Afraid Of Virgina Woolf, Virginia Woolf, Virgina Woolf...
26 June 2006
Mike Nichols' masterpiece is one of the most emotional depictions of a marriage on the verge of falling to pieces, an astounding, insightful and unremitting film that deserved it 5 Oscars. It was groundbreaking in terms of language and theme (It been released in 1966). It is one of the greatest masterpieces of the 60's and of cinema itself.

It's director, Mike Nichols, was at that time directing stage plays and his debut film was this film, which I consider the greatest film ever made by Nichols.

Ernest Lehman produced a fantastic screenplay, in my opinion, the best of his career. It keeps much of the dialogue of Edward Albee's play of the same title, which the film is based on. He also produced the film.

But the best thing about this film is the acting. Elizabeth Taylor gives the best performance of her career as Martha, a spiteful, cruel charactered women who is married to George (Richard Burtan, again very effective), a history professor. Martha invites Honey (Sandy Dennis) and Nick (George Segal) over for a night of mental games.

Nichols' paring of the most famous and tempestuous celebrities ever, Taylor and Burton, is what makes Who's afraid of Virginia Wolff so good. The energy and presence you feel from both of them is fantastic.

The supporting cast are excellent also.

Over all, this film is a masterpiece thats reflects the time it was been made.

10/10
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Warning Contains spoilers
24 June 2006
George A Romero has received cult status for the 1968 film Night of the living dead. But, in many ways, Dawn of the dead is the better film of the two. Firstly, it has a great setting: A shopping mall. What a FANTASTIC IDEA. Everyone loves shopping malls but the notion of having the whole mall to yourself is a dream come true. Secondly, it has some heart stopping scenes. My favorite scene is the one where the 3 male characters of the film get into a car meant to be displayed in the mall and race to both ends of the mall in order to close the main doors, therefore, not allowing zombies to enter. Thirdly, the music is fantastic, and i mean the Goblin score.

Over all, if you ever sue see a horror movie this is the one.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed