Reviews

48 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Better Off Ted (2009–2010)
9/10
Seriously Underrated
22 February 2024
The is the quintessential show to prove how important casting is to make a show successful. An outstandingly selected cast full of diversity in personality and skill.

Having Jay Harrington as Ted, the straight arrow lead was excellent. He looks like he's from central casting because his good-guy character was subtly supposed to be like a real-life central casting person.

Portia as Veronica was excellent, playing a seemingly heartless boss with terrific comedic timing and brilliant sarcasm to boot.

Malcolm and Jonathan as Phil and Lem are the two the complete the show. The two characters were cast to look opposite, but were bound together by a complete adorable nerdiness and love of inventions.

The premise of the company was that 'It's so ridiculous, it's funny' so you're not sitting there thinking "Oh this wouldn't happen" because they establish it very early on that it's supposed to be absurd.

There are a lot wishing that it wasn't cancelled so early, however I not exactly echoing that sentiment. It maybe had enough juice for a third season, but you could sense that some of the plots and subplots were going away from the unique absurdity to the cliché stuff you see in every television comedy series. E.g. Linda and Ted getting together.

What we got was essentially a show that was able to inadvertently finish while on top.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Did anyone order a stereotype?
17 February 2024
Hughesy is quintessential to the problem with Australian comedy. If you can get with one of the 2 major comedy talent agencies, you'll get yourself continuous failed television shows on whichever network you wish. And if you don't get yourself a television show, you'll get yourself as a guest on one of these failed television shows.

They fail because they're not funny. Herein lies the problem. These talent companies sign these unfunny people after a funny 5 minute set and then flood the tv scene with them before they've matured their act. Then this flood of spots builds their ego to the point of no return, and we're left with the same unfunny comedians pulling the same predictable stereotype comedy that's been going on in Australia since the mid 90's.

Dave Hughes has been using the same bogan routine since then and has cashed in on this routine and this show is one in many short-lived shows he's had with the same 5-minute routine.

It's why you won't see him in a Working Dog Productions show outside of a brief appearance here and there. They know his style and it doesn't fit there's, so they won't force him on Australia like the out-of-touch producers do everywhere else with every other stereotype comedian in Australia who won't change or mature their act. It's why there aren't any long-stand comedy shows that aren't part of the above mentioned.

Can't image anyone will be running to to the time capsule to be looking for this unfunny, predictable, stereotype trash.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Totally Full Frontal (1998–1999)
2/10
Was okay
17 February 2024
It was seemingly funny when I was a kid and stayed up to watch it, but having seen it as a grown up I couldn't rekindle the fond memories I had growing up.

The fond memories I had of the Ross Williams and John Walkers of the Full Frontal era didn't translate over to the Totally Full Frontal era. The overacting of the cast together with thin talent in Australian comedic writing that just hasn't evolved since the late 80's and early 90's.

Unfortunately, finding reruns of this program online has only made me scratch my head as to why I watched this program. I guess as my juvenile mind has evolved, my love comedy has gone past this type of show.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Migration (I) (2023)
2/10
Same shh; different day.
10 January 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Nothing new in this movie. It's like a random grabbing of bits and pieces from previous kids movies are put into this one, and then the theme of ducks is draped over the top of it.

Why they picked Mallards is odd. Mallards generally only migrate when based in frost areas, a concept the movie ignores and then right at the end they migrate to where migrate from; the complete opposite.

Then Hollywood being its usual PC self, they chose someone to voice a duck who has an India accent, when wild Mallards from India don't migrate anywhere near the USA. So where does it develop this accent from when none of the other characters have an accent from anywhere other than Jamaica?

I know; i know, it's a kids movie, but basic outliers still shouldn't be ignored to gratify the perpetually offended.
11 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Castle (1997)
10/10
One of the best
31 January 2023
Probably the most quotable Aussie movie of all time.

Encapsulates the Aussie lifestyle of the 90s and uses the lingo perfectly. I can understand why people wouldn't like it, especially those from overseas, but you could consider it a 'Vegemite' movie in that you need to be an Aussie to truly like it and understand it.

What makes the movie more charming is that a lot of the actors, aside from Caton, were unknown at the time of the movie. Steven Curry was an unknown and Eric Bana was an up-and-comer, so it makes the movie feel more wholesome.

There isn't an over-acting with the storyline too. They act in a realistic fashion and the comedic timing is criminally underappreciated. Subtle, but perfect.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Now You See Me (I) (2013)
1/10
Plot holes galore, and lazy production
7 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers
There are plot holes everywhere in this movie and some downright lazy flaws in the production that a n00b like me could see and shake my head.

There was the chase scene where Franco supposedly dies. Ruffalo, chasing Franco, reaches the street a few seconds after Franco speeds off in his car. The French chick arrives in the car and Ruffalo gets in and, while not moving, they decide to have a chat about him never leaving her behind. This chat lasted 30+ seconds yet in the next scene, she's caught up to Franco's car. Anyone who's driven a car at top speed knows that in 30+ secs, a speeding car is gone and lost.

That same car chase, the head on view has them speeding, but then they change to the helicopter view from side on and you can actually see them driving ridiculously slow. It is so obvious how slow they're going from that angle, I'm amazed they went with it because even a 8yo could see this production flaw.

Later in that same scene, the French chick hits the breaks hard to avoid a bus, causing them to nearly come to a stop, and yet the car still manages to not lose ground to Franco's car who doesn't break and is still supposed to be going top speed. Again, sloppy, poor production and editing.

As for the French chick, her role in this movie was pointless. Just there to add the typical Hollywood love story to it. She brings no revelations or surprises, nor would Interpol send a single agent to the USA.

The final magic performance, the crowd are all on a building top. They show it from the helicopter view from afar. Nice cinematography, until a little later in, when they reuse that exact same moving shot in reverse trying to disguise it as a new shot. Just lazy.

The plot is supposed to be full of surprises, but you could see everything coming a mile away.

The childish cliches only makes things worse too. The ultra dumb and dopey FBI made it feel like it was supposed to be a kids movie.

I must admit, I was fooled by the ratings and cast. How in the world did this get 7 stars? There must be a lot of cheese connoisseur who watched this because anyone who enjoys a movie with a good plot, without copious plot holes, along with character development and a meticulous production team who rid the movie of sloppy directing flaws wouldn't be rating this movie high.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Scripted Trash
13 December 2022
Fake challenges.

Fake contestants.

Fake drama.

Fake host.

It's so artificial that it's not worth watching. Everything is scripted from what the contestants say and do, to who the winner is. Some of these challengers can barely walk and chew gum at the same time yet they're made out to be these superior athletes who have balls of steel.

The host has no personality. You can see them reading the auto-cue by their delivery of the script, but also from their eyes continually looking at the cue cards.

These networks are getting so desperate for 'original' reality content that they're taking embarrassing short cuts.

No surprise this show got relegated to the 'second division' of network channels.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Thought this was supposed to be good?
27 November 2022
Story went nowhere.

Acting was out of context. Calm when under fire; angry for no reason... that sort of stuff.

A lot of pointless scenes in an already looooong movie.

Martin Sheen acted like it was a cardboard cutout of him.

Storyline was garbage.

Camera work was entry-level, high school quality.

Am still very curious to what people think makes this movie good? There are other war movie released from around the same time that are good and stand the test of time. This... well, it's a movie with a one-sentence storyline that got dragged out to a 3hr bore fest.

That is, unless I completely missed that it was supposed to be a parody of a war movie, because that would be more fitting considering how bad it was.

Won't be watching this one again, if I can help it.
9 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Would I Lie to You? (I) (2022– )
1/10
Poor, poor, poor!
6 August 2022
The host makes the show. You need a.funny straight man who doesn't react to the humour and has the ability to make humour while remaining straight. Rob has this; Chrissie Swan doesn't and this ruins the show. Other than having no hosting skills, she laughs at everything in a fake, morning-radio style and has no timing with anything.

Chris Taylor is not a comedian, despite what his talent profile lists.

Frank Woodley's humour does not fit the style of the show.

Australian comedians don't practice their improv like a lot of the UK comedians do. It shows when in the UK they can think and act quickly and make it believable, but in Australia their ability to lie and still appear believable is non-existent.

The only thing that this show is missing (and it'll happen soon if the show continues) is Joel 'I attend envelope openings' Creasy being a guest. Then you know the show has hit rock bottom.

Doubt this sees a second season. At least not as an hour-long program.

Just buy the UK version if you want to show the show.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great for schools
20 June 2022
This is an engaging and informative piece that gives a simple basis of the effects of too much sugar.

Its simplicity alllows for it to be used in primary school settings to help kids at an early and impressional age gain important knowledge about the tricks food companies use to con you into eating their foods.

Sure, there not much scientific application to his work, but that wasn't his modus operandi.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Irishman (2019)
6/10
Not one of Martin's best.
10 June 2022
Not bad, but lots of things wrong with it.

  • too long
  • too slow and goes nowhere at times
  • minimal actual action or suspence.


  • lack of character development
  • lots of pointless parts to the movie.


Average at best and patience is required. Watching while on a 3 hr flight was required because there was nothing else to do.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Goes Nowhere
17 May 2022
A looooong drag of cliches that goes nowhere.

So much tackiness like not putting his phone on silent and being a glaringly obvious CIA agent, which is against their whole 'hide in plain sight' mantra.

Give this one a miss.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Better Call Saul: Black and Blue (2022)
Season 6, Episode 5
7/10
A build up episode. Not worth writing home about.
10 May 2022
Episode lacks suspense and action. It's almost a filler episode, but there's too much going on for that. It simply sets up everything for the mid-season finale where the action will be waiting.
25 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Mask (1994)
1/10
???
29 January 2022
What the hell is this supposed to be?

No story No plot No sense of anything

It's like the people behind this movie were willing to pay for its success while ignoring the fact that nothing in the movie, from Jim's job, the club, the gang and everything else were anything club to resembling reality.
3 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
All bark; no bite
22 January 2022
You know they went cheap in production when the editor was dumb enough to keep in a scene where the green screen video had a regulation street 4WD overtaking Brian and Roman with ease while they were supposed to be driving at top speed. If you want to give the impression that they're driving ridiculously fast, you remove all green screen scenes where the background cars overtake you while driving regularly.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The best of the worst
21 January 2022
The Fast and Furious series is brain-dead and shallow in plot, yet this is the best of them. However in typical early 2000's movie making, they focus too much on the action, corny cliche lines used for the promos and a pointless love plot and disregard anything that resembles character development or a narrative.

The female characters have no use in this movie. It's all part of being PC. The. Brian-Mia subplot was unnecessary and, if removed, would have made the movie better and no one would have questioned why there wasn't a love interest. The doting looks at the camera/Brian are cringeworthy at best, too.

Same goes with Letty. She barely says a word throughout the movie and is simply there to get out of a car, look cool and make a partially-sexy pose for the slo-mo camera shot. Pointless.

I know this was written by a car magazine 'journalist', but surely he knew what was cliche and could have avoided it or at least added something that we hadn't seen in every other 'fast' action movie aimed at 20somethings?
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Merger (2018)
2/10
Predictable and done to death
24 September 2021
It's predictable dross. Nothing great about this. None of the characters have a skerrick of realism or believably and that's made even worse by cardboard acting from the likes of John Howard.

It's yet another nail in Australian film and tv's slow death.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Storm Boy (2019)
3/10
Too sentimental.
11 September 2021
Plot is simple and predictable.

Acting is over the top and feels very fake.

Overly Hollywoodised and relies on that 'feel good' sentiment to make it appear like a worthwhile movie, but because of the lack of story, lack of originality in the plot, lack of character development, lack of anything we haven't seen done to death, we're left with excessive sentiment to hide all of the above.

Had to watch this because of work, but won't be watching it again.

The Australian TV and movies industry are deteriorating at a rapid rate it'd be a crisis if the audiences weren't sucked in by unrealistic sentiment and unrealistic fight scenes. Oh well, it is what is it, I guess.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
It's baaaaaad.
17 July 2021
Is there like a prerequisite to overuse CGI nowadays?

The original was good because the story was simple, akin to the Looney Toons cartoon series, and the cameos from the other NBA players were simple and light-hearted. The only CGI was the obvious putting the real-world characters into the Looney Toones cartoon setting.

In this abomination, for starters the name of the movie doesn't even relate to the theme. It's a cash grab off past glories.

There is no mention of outer space in this, WHICH IS HOW THE ORIGINAL GOT ITS NAME. Instead this trash was set inside a computer (game) system. Not even remotely close to outer space.

Turning the Looney Toons into 3D stop motion animation was just trying too hard to modernise something that didn't need modernising.

LeBron was stiff and too sentimental. The sentiment wasn't needed. Even though MJ was the star attraction of the original, the plot wasn't about him per se. However in this product-placed trash, the movie is all about Lebron and how he's a superior individual who can still be better. Yawn, seen it a thousand times already.

The family were just far too perfect too. Except for the son who created the game. He was too self-entitled. Just totally unrelatable, the whole lot of them.

The video game was a complete rip-off of NBA Jam too. Didn't try to hide it either.

Having the teams scoring in the thousands was just dumb.

Fortunately, the kids will be naive to the original and not see how flawed the plot of this abomination combined with LeBron's cardboard acting and they'll probably enjoy the OTT antics of the Looney Toons in this. Me, a childhood fan of Looney Toons and Space Jam, not so much.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Contradictory Propaganda.
13 June 2021
It's movie where they decorate speculation as facts by poorly using the six degrees of separation theory to match their baseless claims and claim it's evidence while completely refusing to provide any DIRECT factual evidence.

They contradict themselves too with their conspiracy message by telling us not to trust Hollywood in a Hollywood documentary. So are we supposed to believe this nonsense or not? It's like Pinoccio saying his nose is about to grow. Will it happen?

The cherry on top is the continual statement to "do your own research". That's what conspirators say because they know that there are plenty of propaganda sources out there that are far more interesting and easier to get people to swallow the red pill because a majority of people haven't been taught how to decipher reliable and unreliable sources.

Unfortunately when Occam's Razor is the boring option, people are more likely to buy into Hickam's Dictum because it's interesting and they want to feel like they're 'on the inside'.
34 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Hasn't aged well.
13 May 2021
In the mid 90s when this was released, it was funny and vintage Carey. Now, 25 years later, it's very cringy and.tacky.

It's full of forced jokes and OTT replays of the original. Some funny moments still, but unlike the original, it hasn't aged well.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
It's just a bit meh.
14 April 2021
It's too cliche.

Typical structure and typical good guy is actually the bad guy and the bad guy is actually the good guy role revealing reversal.

If you want to see some state of the art CGI, wait until you see the bit where Mr. McGregor (D. Gleeson) goes rolling down the hill and suddenly starts bouncing like he's made of rubber and filled with air. Was so seamless that the producers, editors and everyone who reviewed and okay'd the movie didn't notice the ridiculousness of it.

Not a movie I'll be seeing again.
15 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
House M.D.: Last Temptation (2011)
Season 7, Episode 19
1/10
Worst episode of the House juggernaut
28 February 2021
This sappy, cringeworthy story about a med student is completely unnecessary. It's bad enough we've had to sit through something like 20 episode of a university/college student being a paid employee of supposedly one of the best doctors in the country simply because she's smart despite having no medial experience yet somehow can name any rare disease in the world quicker than her colleagues without having studied said diseases let alone read about them, but now we have to deal with a abominably poor representation of being a doctor in an episode dedicated to her?

This has to be an episode filler that replaced another episode because you can remove this episode from the series and the series doesn't miss a beat, kind of like how Taub was suddenly no longer there in an earlier series before being brought back because he 'tested' well with the audience.

I hate these sappy, sentimental types of episodes. They add nothing.
10 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
House M.D.: Lockdown (2010)
Season 6, Episode 16
1/10
tacky
24 February 2021
Warning: Spoilers
One of those unnecessary episodes where they overdo the sentiment and feel good moments for no rhyme or reason whatsoever. The Chase and Cameron plot was the worst. Completely Hollywood-ised insufferable nonsense. The fact the Cuddy never speaks to any law enforcements and was the only one seen searching for the baby, again nonsense. A head of medicine would be receiving continual reports from all over the hospital, not looking for the baby, and having her being the only one capable of thinking to look in a laundry hamper... c'mon. House showing his hidden deep, caring side; save it for the woman's march. Taub and Foreman beating each other up while high and yet they walk away with not one mark on them that raises questions?

All this in a hospital that's in lockdown and yet all the main character bar 13 and Wilson are alone and out of security camera's sights....

These are the episodes that give Hollywood a bad name. Tacky sentimental rubbish.
4 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Poor script; bad dialogue; atrocious 'comedy'
14 February 2021
One of the most poorly written scripts I've ever witnessed with just as bad dialogue. The characters are all so phony and hard to connect to and the storyline is filled with plot holes galore. For example, how did Kim develop these superhuman fighting and gun skills with no one to practice with? How did Kim develop such adept social skills to know the brothers were good people having just kicked some other people's butts?

It's got that vibe of a sylvester stallone movie where they're hoping the action scenes and out-of-place, unnecessary and cringeworthy comedic interludes hide the poor script, poor character development, plot holes and cliche story.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed