Reviews

18 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Killer's Kiss (1955)
6/10
67 min film visually appealing, but feels like 2 hours
18 May 2023
It is not a good sign when you check how much more time is left on a film and discover you have only been watching for half an hour. Despite being only 67 minutes in total, this film feels much longer. Part of the problem is that aside from the climax, almost nothing happens on-screen. The slight story mostly moves forward in voice-overs and off-screen dialogue in between artistic visuals.

Stanley Kubrick wore almost all the hats for this film: co-producer, director, writer, editor, and most importantly, cinematographer. Unfortunately Kubrick the cinematographer unequally overshadows all the other roles. Visually the film is an endless string of incredible images, worthy of an art exhibit of still photographs. Unfortunately so many great visuals distract from, rather than enhance, the story. If the story or characters had been fleshed out enough to hold a viewer's attention, this could have been a great film.

This film is Kubrick still experimenting with style, and so you need to come to it with the right expectations. It has been packaged like a quick B-movie noir, but if that is what you are looking for, it will disappoint. If on the other hand you want to watch it because the director was a young Stanley Kubrick learning his craft, then you might find some interesting moments in this film. In particular there is the boxing match, filmed from a boxer's tight, almost claustrophobic point of view, ignoring the more standard point of view of the spectators.

Most importantly, Kubrick obviously did learn things making this film. After Killer's Kiss, Kubrick would go on to direct a string of classics, starting with another, much better, noir film, The Killers.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Period footage lets you see the history
10 May 2023
Warning: Spoilers
It is the actual period footage that makes this short history of aviation in Canada special. Most of the film shows us the actual planes, and sometimes footage from those planes, interspersed with a few modern anecdotes from pilots who had flown in the early days. Double Heritage is part 2 of a three part National Film Board (of Canada) series called collectively Salute to Flight.

The film begins and ends with dramatic cockpit footage from World War II, then goes back to early aerial survey flights of the Canadian wilderness in the 1920's. The focus is on flying in the northern part of the country in often harsh conditions. We also see the departure of the Byrd expedition to the North Pole in 1926 and footage implying cooperation with the USSR to survey that pole in the 1930's.

Although the film was made in 1959, it ends with the development of the industry during the Second World War. It is a good choice as the going further would have seemed anti-climatic after viewing bombing raids from the cockpit. The history lesson does continue in the third film The Golden Age (1959).

This doc will appeal if you are a fan of history or a fan of aircraft. It succeeds because it sits back and gives you the footage to see for yourself.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Perspective: Log Drive (1957)
Season Unknown, Episode Unknown
8/10
Interesting Short Doc about a Now Vanished Profession
7 May 2023
I haven't seen the 17 min version referenced in IMDb. I instead saw the full 29 minute version - Log Drive. I found it an interesting historical documentary about the labour required to move tons of wood down through lakes and rivers towards a pulp and paper mill in Quebec. The commentary is interspersed with verses of a song about the process.

If the shorter version includes the music only, it would be missing some of the context provided by the full film, and would be more of a visual collection set to music. There is nothing wrong with that, and it would still be entertaining, but I found some of the most amazing bits to be parts that were not set to music. The commentary changes it from an art piece to a more educational film, one that still feels quick.

Within a generation after this film was made, the massive enterprise being documented had become a vanished way of life. That makes this well-made and entertaining documentary a historical document worth seeing.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great Until the End
2 April 2023
I loved the first 95% of this short. The title band, the dancers, and the singer, Sally Gooding, are all excellent. I have happily re-watched this short for all those reasons. Note: Fredi Washington is listed in IMDb as a dancer, but her character (Sally Gooding's cousin) does not dance in the film.

The film's all black cast are shown well-dressed and mostly successful performers and patrons. I was originally impressed by that, given the film was copyrighted in 1933. Unfortunately the final moments of the short are spoiled by a visual reminder to the audience that this type of music and these characters are all recently "from the jungle", denigrating both the music and any appearance that an all-black cast enjoying an evening at a nightclub is comparable to white audience members doing the same thing.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Metropolitan (1989)
7/10
Jane Austen Reimagined for 1990
22 December 2022
This film is not for everyone, but if you enjoy drawing room conversation, this is an interesting update on the Regency romance.

Whit Stillman has written a Jane Austen-style social commentary. The genius is that it is set among a very small segment of 1990 society that still lived the same lifestyle as Austen's 1810's heroes and heroines. The debutants and their escorts do nothing but spend a season going to debutante balls, and wittily conversing in drawing rooms afterwards. Austen's loving satirical look at her own narrow social world has been updated to the equally narrow circumstances of the film's society youth. The cast represents a small microcosm of 'types', all presented with equal parts affection and satire. They know their little universe is dissolving, but it is more to be objectively discussed than acted upon and is given no more weight than discussions of 18th c literature and philosophy.

The cast were all unknowns, many of whom did little other film work afterwards. Much of the focus is on Edward Clements' rather naïve Tom. In "reduced circumstances", he outwardly professes to reject the lifestyle of balls, but easily fits in with the group given the opportunity. Even his brand of socialism is based on an 18th c writer, rather than modern circumstances. His chief characteristic is that he consistently misreads everyone else, even his own father. Unfortunately, the clueless Tom is hard to really care about. Other characters are far more relatable. Unknown to Tom, his continued access to the small and exclusive group is because of the crush on him held by Carolyn Farina's Audrey. Audrey is openly a fan of Jane Austen and lives her life in the style of an Austen heroine. Although shy and quiet, you can still feel for her. The most memorable character is Chris Eigeman's Nick. Outwardly humorously cynical, he actually cares about others more deeply than his friends. Eigeman draws the eye whenever he is on screen.

If you enjoy intelligent dialogue, and can enjoy a film without any action or suspense, you will find this a worthwhile film to watch.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Gate of Hell (1953)
8/10
Timeless Issues From Medieval Japan
10 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I knew nothing about this film when I started watching it, but the film has stuck with me because although the film was made in the 1950's, and represents Japan in the year 1160, the emotions of the characters seemed contemporary. What begins like a historical costume epic finishes as a personal tale about a stalker and his impact on a happily married couple.

The first third of the movie takes place against the backdrop of a short-lived rebellion that took place in 12th c Japan. Kesa (Machiko Kyô), a lady-in-waiting to the empress, volunteers to act as a decoy by pretending to flee in the empress's carriage. She is defended by a rural samurai, Morito ( Kazuo Hasegawa), who goes on to earn distinction in the rebellion. After the rebellion is put down, Morito travels to the city along with other loyalists to receive rewards from their lord. There he runs into Kesa again, who thanks him for what he did for her that day. Morito is smitten. It is not until he requests the woman as his reward that he learns she is already married to one of the high-born lords of the city, to the amusement of the city nobility.

Up to this point the story has been an exciting historical adventure. From here on the film becomes a personal drama centering on three protagonists, the increasingly obsessed Morito, the mortified Kesa, and her reserved husband, Wataru (Isao Yamagata). The original Japanese audience may have already known the outcome of the rebellion, but the rest of the film builds suspense trying to predict how each of these individuals will react to their personal drama. I found this part of the film riveting and contemporary.

The centre of the story is the samurai Morito. This character has clear, almost idealized views of right and wrong in matters of war and feudal loyalty, even when it means an irreparable rift with his only family member. However on a social level, the character's principles break down when he is publicly denied the reward he has chosen for himself, compounded by class snobbery and ridicule. What begins as a stubborn refusal to accept the obvious, becomes an obsession to get his own way. The hero of the first third of the movie, he transforms into a villain by the last third. Hasegawa carried the character to both extremes with conviction.

Machiko Kyô's performance as Kesa is more nuanced. As a westerner, I must infer from the film what Japanese society expected from women in the period. Although she begins with a heroic act, she spends most of her flight as the empress in a dead faint, which I can only assume would be considered as commendable delicacy for a woman of her class. Therefore her performance really begins when we meet her again after the rebellion is over. Despite the demure face her character must always maintain, she manages to convey a range of emotions. She is a loving wife, but as the centre of public gossip, her character is also in a constant state of humiliation. It is her self-reproach for some potential misstep on her part that motivates her, moving to fear as Morito's character becomes more unpredictable. In the end when she is faced with an impossible choice, she manages to keep the audience guessing as to her intentions.

Of the three, I found Wataru's character the most interesting. He holds onto his dignity and principles in the face of gossip, ribbing from his friends and provocations from Morito. This is not the most important role, but he acts as a necessary foil to both Kesa and Morito. In Yamagata's scenes with Kyô, his love and affection for his wife are clear, emphasizing that Kesa's feelings of having failed him are internal to her alone, and not due to any reproach from her husband. Opposite Hasegawa, Yamagata is almost stoically calm, emphasizing the increasingly agitation of Morito.

The film is also a visual treat, using the relatively new colour technologies to great advantage. Jigokumon/Gate of Hell was given an Honorary Oscar for Best Foreign Language Film (before the category became official), but it also won an Oscar for Best Costumes (Color). The outfits are eye-catching, often beautiful, or at the very least intriguing. I know nothing about medieval Japanese clothing, but another detail makes me believe these are historical rather than fanciful. I was inspired watching the film to look up the details of the Heiji rebellion, and saw an illustration from the historical scrolls of imperial carriages which were obviously copied closely when designing Kesa's decoy carriage. I know that is not proof that the costumes were as faithfully researched, but it is evidence that the filmmakers were more concerned with historical accuracy than Hollywood filmmakers of the same period were when representing medieval Europe.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Realistic look at Sex Ed (for 1953)
16 October 2022
The attitudes expressed in this film are very dated, but represent the goals of desired behaviour for teenagers in the early 1950's.

What makes it different is that this film is much more frank than similar films made in the USA at the same time. Unlike those films that couch sex-education in euphemisms and are limited to teaching abstinence, this film outlines the level of education that should be doled out at various stages of a child/teen's development. The focus is actually on teaching parents how to raise their children to behave correctly, rather than on telling teenagers what to do or not do. The production is paid for by the McGraw-Hill Book Company, so books also figure prominently in providing good guidance.

There are gender attitudes in this film that will grate on modern viewers, and the two white middle-class teenagers shown may be too idealized to resonate with modern teenagers, but the film is a frank, realistic look at teenage development in the 1950's. It is too realistic to be campy, but it does serve as a valuable record of a moment in history.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Above Average Serial Fun
30 August 2022
This serial turned out to be a bit better than many, despite the constraints of a low budget. (Something almost all serials needed to deal with.) Yes, it uses lots of stock footage, but pieced together to good effect. There are all the standard serial tropes - lots of climatic cliff-hangers from the which the heroes are revealed to have walked/rolled/jumped away from at the start of the next chapter. Some of these are above average, in that it is not always obvious how they will have avoided that one. This serial is one of the type where the true identity of the villain is unknown until the end. In this case, the villain is not only masked but in a full-length supervillain outfit which is speculated to have inspired Darth Vader's wardrobe. His look seems out of place among all the standard 1930's suits and uniforms, but it is all in campy fun.

For the most part I thought the story was quite good. My only real disappointment with the serial was the final chapter. The final reveal opened up plot holes and relied on rather unrealistic behaviour by some of the characters. In my opinion, the red herrings were all better thought out. Either the writers didn't agree on the end until the last minute, or someone stepped in and imposed an ending, unsupported by the rest of the story. Still, most of the prior three hours plus had been good enough that I could shrug off the weak ending as part of the camp of serials The serial is 12 chapters, mostly around 15 minutes each. The first chapter is twice as long and seems to combine several situations in what may have originally been intended as a couple of additional chapters. It serves to help get you into the story if you are not watching the episodes all at once. There is also a recap episode part way through.

If you are into serials, this one is worth a watch.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Maybe the Best Macbeth / Lady Macbeth
26 August 2022
Kurosawa has achieved a masterful retelling of Macbeth. The stark black and white settings, full of mist and shadow, give exactly the right feel of foreboding and otherworldliness. Toshirô Mifune strikes all the right notes as a Japanese general initially happy with his position and loyal to the lord he serves, but slowly consumed by a combination of ambition and paranoia. The iconic climax is as exciting as it is tragically inevitable.

Even more memorable than Mifune, Isuzu Yamada as Lady Asaji Washizu is the most chilling Lady Macbeth I have ever seen. In Japanese, the castle is called 'Spider Web Castle', and she is the perfect spider at the centre of her web. She does not plead, cajole, or seduce her husband to move against his lord. She sits in complete stillness and calmly describes dire scenarios of betrayal and destruction as if they were established facts. Her stillness emphasizes Mifune's increasingly restless agitation. When the couple does move against the lord, she moves purposefully and relentlessly; the sound of her rustling silks in the otherwise total silence is strikingly ominous. Yamada's motionless posture before the murder is also neatly contrasted by her inability to stop moving as she descends into madness.

This Macbeth may not be in the original words of Shakespeare, but Kurosawa has instead infused the film with elements of traditional Japanese Noh theatre. This stylistic constraint has given us a film that in mood, tension, and eventual tragedy, captures Shakespeare's play more effectively than many more "realistic" English language efforts.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
French comedy full of joy and feeling
4 March 2022
I was not aware of this warm-hearted comedy, but I am so glad I watched it. Made in France in 1938, it is full of genuine characters who would never have passed by the Hayes Code censors in the United States at the time. A small French village has suffered through first a poor baker, and then no baker at all. Now the villagers rejoice at the arrival of a new and talented baker, along with his young and very pretty wife. Disaster strikes in less than a week, when the baker's young wife suddenly runs away with a handsome young shepherd. The baker is devastated, and worse from the point view of the villagers, he loses the will to bake.

While pivotal to the plot, the wife of the title is only one minor character in a film full of delightfully exaggerated characters. There are those who carry on cordial feuds that have lasted generations, on the assumption that "there had to be a good reason", while others are quick to start new ones. There is the agnostic schoolteacher, the earnest young priest, the entitled local landowner, the judgmental spinster, the long-winded storyteller, and so forth. None of these characters are presented with anything less than good-natured affection and delight. In a different film, the mockery some of the characters aim at the distressed baker could easily have tipped into cruelty, but meanness is never felt.

Even in a cast full of delightful over-the-top characters, the lead Raimu, as Aimable the baker, stands out in every scene. He is the good-natured everyman, playing a comedic character who also remains fully believable. His genuine pain and disbelief at the unexpected disappearance of his wife is always felt, even while the film shows us the humour in every situation. The scene in which Aimable and his wife finally come face-to-face again is masterfully played. I intend to search out other films made by this French star.

This joyful film is a not just fun to watch, but will leave you with both a smile on your face and a warm spot in your heart.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Silent Historical Epic Deserves to be Better Known
10 October 2021
This silent epic should be much better known than it is. It is based on the plot of an opera of the same name, describing a real revolt in Naples in the 17th century. The title character, Fenella, is the fictional mute sister of Masaniello, one of the key historical figures in that revolt. Fenella is played by ballerina Anna Pavlova, in her only full-length film. Unfortunately, Pavlova's broad acting style is better suited to ballet or opera, playing to the crowds in the back, rather than to the more intimate medium of film. On the other hand, she was one of the most famous dancers of her day, and this film is one of the very few records left to modern audiences to see her in motion.

Despite her top billing, the film does not hinge on Pavlova, and for the most part, this is really a beautifully made film. This was a Big-Budget picture when it was made -- the ornate costumes and sets are stunning. The scenes of the revolt are chaotic, real, and compelling.

Some of the actors, including Pavlova, as well as a few of the supporting roles, are guilty of the sort of overly theatrical acting associated with early movies. For the most part however, the acting is natural. I was particularly impressed by Douglas Gerrard, playing a nobleman who seduces and abandons Fenella in favour of his aristocrat fiancée.

Surprisingly, the film also works as a "silent musical". The early part of the movie includes a number of dance numbers showing a variety of styles, and not just those featuring the film's "star", Anna Pavlova. I would recommend this film for all of its parts.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Original Noir/Mystery
10 October 2021
Nice twist on the noir trope of the anti-hero being caught for the one thing he didn't do. The movie begins with the main character on trial for a murder he claims to be innocent of, explaining what "really happened." The story builds suspense as you wait to discover how he came to be in that position.

The cinematography is also attractive, more outdoor shots, instead of the usual dark alleys associated with noir movies.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Beautiful, Funny Romp
10 October 2021
An extremely witty comedy, and lovely to watch. Monte Blue (Dr. Paul Giraud) in particular is great at silently mugging without becoming too ridiculous. The dialogue in the cards is funny and well-written. I love older movies in part because I am a fan of period dresses, and this film has some beautiful sets and costumes.

The story is about two married couples, all who secretly begin flirtations with the spouse in the other couple. The opening credits list a "French play" as the source of the movie but title aside, the action could in fact be set anywhere.

My only disappointment is that I would have wished for better music for the renowned dance party sequence. The version I saw had the Charleston played by an organ on the soundtrack (uncredited score by Ben Model). This probably came close to what 1926 audiences would have heard, but somehow seemed too refined for the mammoth, raucous, dance party shown on screen.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Brilliant Film for any Decade
10 October 2021
Wow. This film was so impressive.

The story begins as a well-crafted ghost story and turns into so much more. The movie begins by showing us the tragic ends of our characters and then goes back to see the downward path that brought them there. Even so, while the foreknowledge of their eventual fates creates pathos, the storyline is never predictable and often surprising. The acting is believable and moving, with a subtlety not always found in the silent era. The special effects, which seem to be done entirely using double exposures, are extremely convincing. Audiences must have been wowed 100 years ago.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Early Summer (1951)
9/10
Universal film about family affection and misunderstanding
10 October 2021
This is a beautiful quiet film about people who care about each other deeply, but without any awareness of each other's point of view. It is this affection for each other that makes the film universal.

Other reviewers have focused on the clash between traditional pre-war Japanese values, and the influx of modern (for 1951) values. In a way, this can be seen in the way some family members go about organizing marriage for their presumed dependants, based on their own core values, without ever consulting the affected parties. For me, the real theme of the film is that this is not done out of pride, or any need to control others, but purely because none of the characters ever imagine that their own values are not universal.

This theme is played out repeatedly throughout the film. Married and unmarried women cannot stop championing to each other that their situation is better, to the point of driving a wedge between friends. A child assumes his desire for a particular toy will be taken up by all the adults around him. The family patriarch settles into his own contentment, oblivious to the fact his wife is unhappy because she is still mourning a lost child.

In the end, most of these divides between points of view are not resolved. Some get their way, others do not. But life continues, with every character still loving everyone else. It is this strong family bond that makes the film universal. My personal favourite in the Ozu universe.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nomadland (2020)
9/10
A movie about a real-life Choice
10 October 2021
Your reaction to this film will likely depend on your own values. The individuals shown in this film have come to where they are through personal and financial loss, and must perform sometimes degrading, low-income, seasonal jobs to survive, while contending with pity, incomprehension, and even anger from those still within mainstream society. Yet their lifestyle is a conscious choice. Most of the "performers" in the film are true nomads who have made this choice in real-life.

My husband considered the film depressing, because he could not bear to live in the conditions lived by the people in the film. What he, and others, saw is a film about a woman forced into a "homeless" nomadic lifestyle by economic hardship, scraping by. I found the film uplifting, because in my view, this film was about a lifestyle choice being discovered and eventually embraced, despite the pressures from mainstream society to return to their fold.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Limit (1931)
7/10
Beautiful Images, Minimalist Plot
10 October 2021
While most people seem to love or hate this film, I have mixed feelings. It is a beautiful, slow-paced film, about emotion rather than actions or events. Limite is full of beautiful black and white film images that are beautiful to look at, as long as one is willing to just sit back and enjoy the scenery. Eventually however, the scenery becomes too repetitious. I think a more experienced filmmaker would have edited the film down a bit, but instead every artistic shot was kept.

The scenario (plot is too strong a word) involves three people adrift in a rowboat. The three have each cut themselves off from the world, and we see in their memories their separate paths to isolation. The memories are not the structured flashbacks normally used to advance a narrative, but instead shown as flashes of imagery, closer to the randomness of true human memories. The process works well for the first half, building an atmosphere of isolation for Woman # 1 and Woman # 2. However, the film begins to drag with Man # 1, whose backstory is oddly more complex.

If you enjoy a film that is a little different, experimental, or just like watching beautiful imagery, you might enjoy letting this film wash over you.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The General (1926)
10/10
A Physical Comedian at His Very Best
10 October 2021
One of my new favourites as soon as I saw this. It is rare that I can sit at home with a laptop, and still laugh out loud watching a film. Keaton's acrobatic stunts are breathtaking and beautifully timed. I was wishing I had a working knowledge of steam engines, but it seemed that the actions are based on the way a train really worked, not on contrivances to further the plot or create a gag.

I know some people object to the film because Keaton's character is on the side of the Confederate army. This is a technicality; Keaton is not taking sides. The Union soldiers in the film are never shown as villains or buffoons. In fact, the movie works all the better because his adversaries are intelligent, competent men. The film would work equally well whichever side Keaton took, however the real-life incident which inspired the film involved Union soldiers stealing a Confederate train, so that is the plot. As there would have been survivors on both sides alive in the theatres when this film was made, a degree of neutrality would have been expected.

I recommend leaving the history aside, seeing the armies as representing "Side X" and "Side Y", and just enjoy watching Buster Keaton perform at the height of his art.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed