Reviews

5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Mute (II) (2018)
9/10
The most fun I've had watching a movie for a long time
13 March 2018
This movie is not for everyone, just like another of my favourite movies Drive, but unlike most movies it kept me hooked, and made me feel and care. It is the best movie I've seen in some time.

Although a very different movie from Drive, both have in common that they trust the viewer to pay attention and read between the lines, and are not afraid to take their time to get where they are going.

The acting is top notch and the characters are interesting, deep, flawed and often with unexpected agendas and histories. There is good and bad in everyone, and because we follow the stories of multiple characters it makes the story far richer.

The world building is minimal but effective, and shows us a near future which feels entirely plausible - neither dystopian, nor utopian. I was always eager to see more of the future Berlin and understand the world in which it existed.

The cinematography is masterful in that it puts you right into the story and shows you everything you need to see without excessive flourish.

The movie can be fairly violent at times, but it is fairly minimal by modern standards and it does not dwell on these scenes more than necessary to bring the point home.

I would be remiss if I fail to mention that Mute does fail to trust the audience in a couple of places where it suddenly switches from the slow progression of subtle reveals to crude and very direct explanations in the form of flashbacks. I'm not sure if the intention was to shock, or if the purpose was to ensure everyone was on the same page, but either way this jarred with the rest of the movie for me and should IMHO have ended up on the cutting floor. However, these are just minor flaws in a great gem of a movie.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Interstellar (2014)
4/10
Inconsistent story about human emotions - not interstellar travel
29 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Interstellar is visually spectacular and carries an important message that we must look up from the dirt and reach for the stars if we are to survive.

Unfortunately it takes the vast wonder of the universe and reduces it to some cheap action filled thrills which make little sense. Our "little" galaxy has an incredible span filled with an astonishing number of stars - anything from 100 to maybe 400 billion stars. We have the mysteries of the galactic core, the other spiral arms, nebulae and so much more - but this movie dismissed them all in favour of a fantastic journey to bizzaro worlds that defy all we know of physics in a galaxy far, far away. As soon as the crew land on the first world the over-the-top action starts where they make stupid mistakes, but then miraculously survive anyway in ways that make very little sense. Worse, the crew exploring these wonders care nothing for the amazing things they are privileged to see and experience.

Speaking of the crew, be prepared for the usual Hollywood mix of moron and genius. These are as usual people able to casually solve complex scientific problems, but struggle with simple logic and deduction in making most of their decisions.

The story of the blighted earth dying of starvation and regressing is poignant, but sadly full of inconsistencies. If only corn survived as portrayed, practically void of nutrients as it is, it would be game over. Good thing also that everyone seem to be behaving like model citizens as it looks like the military (and maybe also police?) has closed shop. So when the world collapses with mass starvation everyone just puts down their guns and gets along.

Let us also assume that although the blight is something we cannot figure out and stop, but we would not take it with us into space and to other worlds...? Why then build our space habitats on the ground in the remote hope that we'll figure out a way to turn-off gravity?!? If we have the resources to send dozens of sophisticated, long-range space missions off on a hopeless cause - why is nobody building bases on the moon? Sending people - and not least robots(!) - to Mars and busy bringing back asteroids for building vast cylinder habitats IN ORBIT!!! Worst case scenario, if you can't bring the people up, then just grow the food in space and drop it down.

I'm not even going to get into the whole future-past-paradox with multidimensional peep-rooms behind the bookshelf. In the end this movie is not about science fiction, space exploration, human survival or any of that. It is a story of love and loss designed to tug at your heartstrings and wow you with visuals sprinkled with some over the top disasters that they cannot possibly recover from...

If your switch off all your critical thinking and watch this in the cinema with low-expectations you might be able to enjoy the ride.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Knows what it wants and does it
11 May 2013
I enjoyed this movie. Not because it is a brilliant movie, but because it knows what it wants and really goes for it. It was fun, unlike a lot of much more polished and bland big title movies which were suppose to be great, but instead really bored me to tears. Perhaps I'm too cynical and jaded, but most of them are far too predictable and over-produced without getting into a big rant about those movies. The Man with Iron Fists, however, felt honest and the over-the-top weapons and fights were both entertaining and inspirational, while never attempting to be realistic and obviously being a homage to exaggerated wire-fu effects. I laughed, I cared and I enjoyed watching it and that is more than I can say for a lot of the big budget polished productions that try to cleverly tug your heart-strings and manipulate you according to their demographic research for the movie.
10 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tragic Lovestory with plenty of Action
13 December 2005
Tristan and Isolde is one of the most enjoyable films I've seen this year. I saw it in a preview screening without knowing anything about the film or the myth. I expected a mediocre romance, only hoping that it would be set in an interesting medieval setting and that my girlfriend would enjoy it. Well it is a story of love, but also so much more. The film has a dark undertone to it and every character is torn between hard choices of power, loyalty, friendship and in Tristan's case, love. There is plenty of both tragedy and love and although very dramatic I never felt it was being too sentimental. The battle scenes are very well done. Although realism is sometimes sacrificed for dramatic impact, this works very well for the film. Most importantly there are no invulnerable heroes. Everyone is in immediate danger of mutilation and death, making the fight scenes more intense. The casting of Tristan, Isolde and Lord Marke is perfect and most of the supporting cast do an equally great job. The absence of any Hollywood superstars makes the film all that much better. Enjoy.
379 out of 456 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Donnie Darko (2001)
10/10
Love at first sight
25 August 2002
Saw this as a preview showing at the frightfest festival in London and I can't wait to see it again.

It's an emotional ride, beautifully told with a wonderful soundtrack and great acting. But you cannot believe anything I say here. For I am in love. It happened once before, when I saw Requiem for a Dream, but luckily I'm not a monogamist and I can love them both.

I must admit I almost didn't see it. Six foot tall bunnies and timetravel are not good selling points with me, but it seems right somehow. Jake Gyllenhaal is perfect as Donnie Darko and I will be sure to keep my eye on what Richard Kelly (director) does next.

See it if you like something different. If you want an original experience. An experience I cannot recommend highly enough.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed