218 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
House (1985)
5/10
Undemanding haunted house B-movie fodder
9 May 2024
Roger Cobb is a Vietnam veteran and horror novelist whose life is turned upside down by the mysterious disappearance of his son Jimmy. Leading to both his marriage and his literary career being left in ruins. When his aunt dies having hanged herself, Roger inherits her old house. Moving in, he sets about writing about his experiences in Vietnam. Before long though, Roger begins experiencing spooky goings on within his new home and finds himself being forced to confront the ghosts of his own past.

It's safe to say that no one would have expected this horror comedy to be in any way a box-office success upon its release. The odds certainly weren't in its favour given that it received a limited theatrical release in the United States. However, despite this, it managed to gross $19.4 million from the North American box office, on a $3 million budget. Produced by Sean S. Cunningham, the man behind the Friday the 13th franchise and directed by Steve Miner who had previously helmed the first two sequels in the horror series. It's best described as a tongue-in-cheek haunted house movie, which in itself is something that even by 1986 had been done to death. After all, Poltergeist had only just been and gone four years previously. That having been said, there hadn't really been a movie of its ilk that had taken the subgenre in a more comical direction.

Written by Ethan Wiley (who would go on to write and direct its 1987 sequel The Second Story) and Fred Dekker, who had both written and directed the cult b-movie Night of the Creeps, and would go on to also write and direct The Monster Squad and would go on to destroy the Robocop franchise with its abysmal third entry. It wouldn't be uncharitable to say that either man had high credentials. Nevertheless, House, for all its shortcomings, was and still is something of a cut above the usual B-movie dross. Due of course in part to the fact that it wisely doesn't take itself too seriously.

Starring William Katt (likely best known for his roles in Carrie and the cult comedy-drama series, The Greatest American Hero), as Roger Cobb. A man deeply scarred and troubled by the circumstances concerning his past. It would therefore seem serendipitous when his Aunt kills herself, leaving him her old house, and he uses as a means to shut himself away to concentrate on writing about his time as a soldier in Vietnam. Of course, it's not long before our hero begins experiencing strange supernatural goings on, encountering all sorts of outlandish ghoulish phenomena. It's undemanding hokum with a plot that doesn't tax the brain too much. It's best to just to be left behind at the front door. At close to forty years old now it has to be said it has dated with age and looks rough around the edges, not helped by its 80s low budget. A stop-effect in bringing a winged skeletal demon to life looks pretty ropey.

George Wendt, best known for his role as barfly Norman Peterson in the hit sitcom Cheers which he was starring in at the time, offers some further welcome comic relief as Roger's nosey next-door neighbour, who becomes more and more bemused by Cobbs antics, as he becomes more and more unnerved by the ghoulish craziness he finds himself caught up in. Complicated all the more when he finds himself babysitting a beautiful blonde neighbours little son, and he has to defend against the house's mischeievous inhabitants. Lending some further fun into the mix. Katt himself does well in playing it all admirably straight-faced despite all the absurdity, lending some gravitas to proceedings. In the last analysis House doesn't offer anything new to the table. It doesn't offer much in the way of genuine scares, which most certainly Isn't its strength. Miner however manages to maintain a steady balance between the irreverent and the macabre. The sight of Katt running down the flight of stairs in his house, and right out into the street outside in military fatigues and goggles, will be more than enough to raise a smile. As will the reaction wonderfully puzzled reaction from Wendt as he's out walking his dog. Poltergeist can't even boast having done that one.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Craft (1996)
3/10
A failed attempt to do for witchcraft what The Lost Boys did for vampires
29 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
After transferring to a Los Angeles high school, Sarah finds the telekinetic powers that she possesses attracting the attention of a trio of misfit outcasts Bonnie, Rochelle, and Nancy who practice witchcraft. As with Sarah each of them comes from troubled backgrounds. When she joins their coven, they set out to get revenge on the more popular kids at school who have tormented them. However, things rapidly spiral out of control with the power they have now harnessed going to their heads. Leading to some very dark consequences.

Essentially a contemporary take on Witchcraft, The Craft was an attempt to do for it what The Lost Boys had done for Vampires back in 1987. With a bit of the black comedy, Heather's as well as a touch of The Witches of Eastwick thrown in for good measure. The movie sees Robin Tunney's impressionable lead protagonist moving to Los Angeles from San Fransico. Starting at her new high school, she finds herself raising the attention of a group of girls, who are wayward outcasts and practice witchcraft. When they learn that Sarah possesses supernatural powers, they persuade her to become the fourth member of their coven, completing an air-water-earth-fire circle and making them all-powerful.

It's of course not long before they start to abuse their powers, mainly at the behest of Fairuza Balk's unbalanced goth, Nancy. Seeking their pound of flesh from the more popular kids at school who have ridiculed and demeaned them. Early on Fleming paints a sympathetic of the troubled trio, with Neve Campbells carrying scars she received from an automobile accident, Rochelle is a black student who is constantly on the receiving end of racist bullying from a gang of white girls, while Nancy lives in a trailer park with her mother and her abusive stepfather. There is indeed a tragic element to the movie, but as would be predicted, when Sarah enters the fold, those who have wronged them begin to suffer the consequences events eventually begin to take a deadly turn.

Initially, It's relatively harmless acts of retribution that the quartet inflicts upon their unsuspecting victims. From Christine Taylor's high school princess suffering from alopecia to Sarah, casting a love spell on Skeet Ulrich's obnoxious popular Jock, Chris who callously spread a rumour that he had slept with her. Things then soon begin to get out of hand.

It's safe to say that The Craft had a premise that had plenty of promise. However, any potential it has is pretty much squandered due to its fairly abysmal execution. First and foremost what it suffers from the majority of the performances, with Robin Tunney delivering her lines with all the conviction of a block of wood. And lacking any real presence. Balk who is in fine cynical, nasty form, exuding some cool menace and looks darkly viscous under some black make-up eventually descends into schlocky over-the-top histrionics in its final reel It's only Neve Campbell who gives a convincingly solid turn and comes out of the whole debacle with any dignity intact. It doesn't help either that it lacks the inspired, black humour of The Lost Boys and Heathers, taking itself perhaps a little more seriously than was necessary.

The subplot involving Sarah having cast a love spell on Chris also proves rather problematic. As it becomes rather ambiguous as to how fully in control he is of his own actions when he attempts to rape her. While it seems, we're eventually expected to feel sympathy for him, when he has proven himself already to be an arrogant unpleasant jerk.

As the movie lurches into its final act, and with the inevitable showdown which sees Fleming dial things right up to eleven, and relying too heavily on some ropey looking CGI. It descends into far-fetched, over-the-top nonsense, topped off by an incomprehensible climax. What The Craft boils down to in the end is something of a missed opportunity, that could have benefited from a tighter script, stronger acting, and more of a fun sense of the absurd.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sleeping Dogs (2024)
6/10
A contemporary neo-noir thriller that Isn't as clever as it thinks it is
28 April 2024
Suffering from memory loss following a car accident, Roy Freeman is a former police detective who follows up on an old murder case he investigated. Believing there is a possibility that he and his ex-partner had the wrong man convicted, and is facing the death penalty. It's not made easy by the fact that he can't remember the case. As he tries to piece together evidence as to what truly happened he finds himself uncovering dark and disturbing secrets about his past. Is it sometimes better to let sleeping dogs lie?

It wouldn't be less than generous to say that this noirish thriller from Adam Cooper, who cuts his teeth here with his directorial debut, covers old familiar ground. There's most definitely a whiff of the mind-bending thrillers Memento and The Number 23. Relying on many of the common tropes, we have Russell Crowe's damaged protagonist attempting to dig into his past, and the murder of Marton Csoka's sleazy college professor. It's all here, sex, greed replete with a relatively brief voice-over from one of the dead supporting characters, as he reads through a book he had written, where he chronicles events that led to the professor's death. It's as if Cooper is ticking off as many boxes as he can.

Technically Cooper is very proficient in terms of the direction, and pacing it never feels lethargic. Although in terms of the stakes, It's difficult to truly become emotionally invested in Pacharo Mzembe's Issac Samuel who is facing execution as he is given very little screen time, making it hard to sympathize with him and his predicament. The plot also has an air of predictability about it, and given the movie's title, you pretty much know from the start that Crowe's retired detective is going to get more than he bargained for. It's nowhere near as clever as it attempts to be, with a final twist in its denouement that fails to deliver the sort of sucker punch that Cooper was undoubtedly aiming for. While it raises more questions than it awnsers due to an all too gaping plot hole.

Crowe as ever gives it his all and is a magnetic presence, managing to elevate proceedings, and it does help that he's abetted by a strong supporting cast which besides Marton Csokas includes Tommy Flannagan and Harry Greenwood. This is more than can be said for Karen Gillen, who fails to completely convince, as the femme fatale of the piece.

The movie eventually proceeds to unravel in its final act, with Cooper's attempt to gradually wrap up the movie's plot feeling awkward and clumsy. Leading to its underwhelming climax. Sleeping Dogs is by no means the worst movie of Crowe's career, but still, needless to say, It's not one of his best either, and wouldn't be deserving of being mentioned in the same sentence as his better work which includes LA Confidential or A Beautiful Mind. It's an attempt at a contemporary neo-noir, from a writer and director whose lofty ambitions exceed his mediocre talent, and doesn't quite deliver on what it promises.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Soul Man (1986)
3/10
A social teen comedy that has good intentions but lacks soul
21 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
When Mark Watson learns that his father, who is a wealthy psychiatrist will not pay for his college tuition. In desperation, he pretends to be black, changing his skin colour, as well as his hair and how he speaks. However, by doing so he finds that by doing so, he sets himself up for more than he bargained for. Experiencing racism, he learns what It's like being a black man in 80's America. And when he falls in love Sarah, a black student he comes to feel guilty about his deception.

Racism and the melting pot that was and still is American society, has been for a very long time a contentious and heated hotbed topic. With Soul Man director Steve Miner, who had previously until then had cut his teeth directing the first two Friday the 13th sequels, as well as the B-movie Horror comedy House, decided to steer in a different direction with this comedy, which attempts to be one part goofy teen comedy, and one other part social satire. Needless to say, the movie did ruffle some feathers upon its 1986 release. Not least of all because of lead star C. Thomas Howell donning black-face, with allegations of racial insensitivity coming mostly vocally from the NAACP. So severe was the backlash against it, that even though a commercial success at the box office, it scuppered Howell's career, and any chance of him being a mainstream Hollywood leading man.

This begs the question then as to whether the movie on reflection was deserving of the critical mauling it received. Is it guilty of being racially insensitive? Well, here's the thing, and let me just state that, to begin with, Soul Man is not a good movie. However, this is not due to the controversy it stirred up and erroneous allegations made against it. The problems with it are many-fold, not least of which is that Howell's Mark Watson exceeds a dosage of tanning pills to make himself look black, and then alters his hair. With some movies, a healthy amount of suspension of disbelief is required, and that is fine. But here, the notion that anyone would believe that he is a genuine black man, and not some college kid who has taken it upon himself to disguise his white ethnic identity is a bit of a hard pill to swallow. What Black it seems was going for was a movie in the spirit of Tootsie, which saw Dustin Hoffman's struggling actor who, out of deperation dons a wig, makeup, and a dress to pretend to be a woman to win a role in a daytime soap opera. Only to experience the sexism and prejudice that professional women have experienced in the working world. Therefore, I might have been more forgving towards Soul Man if were it not so that screenwriter Carol Black (the irony of her surname is not lost on me) didn't aim for the low-hanging fruit of racial comedy in depicting the casual prejudice and racism that Watson experiences. Going so far as in one brief egregious moment of forced comedy, where Howell dons sunglasses and sways from side to side as if he's Stevie Wonder black. There's also the additional story arc involving Howell having a sexual relationship with a fellow white student. Whose rich white parents (one of whom is played by veteran actor Leslie Nielsen), are there to act as the catalyst for some visual punchlines, that are equitably tired and lazy.

All the obvious cliches, and Black doesn't just stop there with the ethnic stereotyping, but its script that conform to all the tropes that abound in teen comedies of its variety. To the extent that anyone who has watched enough movies of this ilk could have written it themselves. Suffice it to say, you know the hero is going to get the girl, and somehow manage to not face any serious consequences for his duplicity. Not before learning some valuable lessons, and coming through the back of his experience a better man. And this is Harvard Law of all places that he has been defrauding, which makes it all the harder to buy. Needless to say, the movie writes itself. Far from being racially insensitive, it's more a case of it stooping to implausible genre conventions.

Just as careless is that Black hasn't put as much discipline into her storytelling, with one story arc involving one of Howell's fellow white students, and his girlfriend potentially revealing his deception proves to be unnecessary as it doesn't go ever anywhere. The best that can be said for Soul Man, is that the actors for the most part deliver solid performances, although Howell proves to be a bit even in his early scenes. There have been quibbles made about his chemistry with his love interest Rae Dawn Chong. I never found this to be an issue. Although it is ironic, that there would have been seeing as both actors became romantically involved, and would eventually marry, although they eventually divorced after just one year together.

Doubtless, all those involved with Soul Man went into it with good intentions, although it may be argued that the teen comedy genre may not have been the wisest genre to aim for. Or perhaps It could have, and it was merely a matter of creative lethargy from Black. Either way, it despite it' commercial success it's gone on to be a footnote in comedy movie history, as that movie that ruined C. Thomas Howell's. If Black wanted to write a smart, funny comedy that satirised racism, she should have watched Mel Brooks Blazing Saddles to gets some pointers. That being said, it benefited from it's cartoonish, western parody template as opposed to this movie which attempted to take a more down-to-earth, reality-driven backdrop. That complemented Brooks's brand of comedy. In the end, if you're looking for a sharp, witty, and insightful social comedy that tackles the issue of racism. Soul Man is not that movie. It's heart was in the right place, but not it's soul.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Gilliam once again displays his bizarre, creative imagination
13 March 2024
Dr. Parnassus, the leader of a traveling show has a dark secret that he has been carrying with him for years. In fact, it's been centuries as thousands of years ago he made a trade with the devil. Exchanging the soul of his daughter, Valentina for eternal life. Now the Prince of Darkness has finally come to collect his prize. In a bid to save her, Parnassus makes a final wager. Whoever is the first to collect five souls will win Valentina. When Tony, a young man who Parnassus's troupe saves from being hanged, agrees to help them, unbeknownst to them, he has his eyes set on marrying Valentina.

It's safe to say that the Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus couldn't be any more apt a title for what was then Terry Gilliam's foray into the imaginatively bizarre. A testament to the creative ambition and scope that he had given movie audiences with phenomenal Brazil, and The Adventures of Baron Munchausen. It received a lukewarm reception, upon its release and just managed to break even at the box office although it seemingly became more known for being the last movie of Heath Leger who tragically passed away during filming at the tender age of 28. This is something of a shame, although as sad that the cinematic world was robbed of such a hot talent all too so, it's a movie that deserves more acknowledgment of exhibiting Gilliam's bonkers imagination. Quirky as it is offbeat, the former Python does for Faust for Brazil did for Orrell's 1984. We see Christopher Plummer's world-weary Parnassus, dogged by the ravages of time, who found himself fronting a bankrupt theatre troupe which includes his teenage daughter Valentina (Lily Cole), a sleight-of-hand expert and barker Anton (Andrew Garfield), and a dwarf assistant Percy (Verne Troyer). Their main attraction is the Imaginarium which is a portal to a magical "Imaginarium", a surreal dream world that offers its participants their own desires, offering them a choice between difficult self-fulfillment or blissful ignorance. It's a wonderous conceit that affords Gilliam the free reign to be as creative and visually exuberant.

With the Imaginarium, he creates a world that is akin to the surrealist painter Salvador's eye-catching painting brought to life. Gilliam dazzles the senses but never at the expense of the plot of the movie, although he does veer a little toward overindulgence in its final act. Its story is propped up by some strong, idiosyncratic characters. The first, and foremost is Tom Waits' devilish Mr. Snatch, who delivers the goods, portraying him as if he were a disreputable snake oil salesman. The second is Ledger's Tony, a veritable wolf in sheep's clothing who is akin to being the other side of the satanic coin. Promising much to Parnassus and his troupe, but having his own personal agenda. If Imagarium does anything beyond dazzle the senses, it serves to be a reminder of what a gifted actor Ledger was. He is charming, charismatic, and just the right side of smarmy and duplicitous.

Ledger's death might have signaled a major misfortune for Gilliam's project but in an inspired piece of imaginative resourcefulness turned to Jude Law, Colin Farrell, and Johnny Depp to fill the void left by his tragic absence. And it works in its favor, adding to the mystical otherworldly nature of the Imaginarium in spades.

As with much of Gilliam's previous movies, there is his trademark combination of dark comedy and tragedy, which is when as a filmmaker he is at his most effective. As well as a touch of pythonesque lunacy that he readily throws into the mix.

As the movie's title protagonist, Plummer gives a measured performance as the weary, time-worn Parnassus. He really sells you on the fantastical notion that he has lived for centuries, and is a man dogged by regret, guilt, and sadness. His more youthful supporting cast which comprises of Andrew Garfield, Lily Cole, and the late Verne Troyer, another actor who was taken from us too soon, lend sturdy support. With Cole of particular note given her profession as a model, she proves that she is more than a pretty face. She is both demure, sweet, and captivating as Valentin. Garfield also delivers, showing the early promise he would later deliver in Hacksaw Ridge, while Troyer in wonderfully cynical form as Parnassus's diminutive assistant Percy.

If Gilliam does anything, beyond his prowess as a director, and his his aptitude for creating fantastical worlds of imagination. He creates something which as a tribute to Ledger acts as a fine final curtain call to him. And with the tragedy surrounding the story as well as the late actor, it is more than a fitting love letter to him.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Hunt (2012)
9/10
A brilliant yet terrifying depiction of an all too real issue
12 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Lucas is a kind-hearted nursery school teacher who is loved by his pupils, and those in his community alike. He unfortunately finds his whole world crumbling around him when one of his pupils, Klara who had a crush on him, implies he has sexually abused her. Finding himself becoming a social outcast, he struggles to prove his innocence to the same community that has already tried and convicted him.

Thomas Vinterberg who had previously explored the subject of sexual abuse with the provocative Festen, did so again with The Hunt. However this time he flips it on its head by depicting the plight of someone who is falsely accused, with Mads Mikkelsen, who has become more renowned for playing more villainous roles, proving his range in this hard-hitting drama. Once a beloved member of the community that he inhabits, its a charge leveled at Lucas that not only affects him but also his teenage son Marcus. Finding himself the burden of having a father who has been accused of the most heinous of crimes.

Vinterberg superbly depicts the shoot first and ask questions later mentality that has become prevalent in contemporary society. Whereas often is the case that someone who has such an allegation leveled at them is already found to be guilty before being even proven innocent. One such example is Grethe, the director of the nursery who is present at the questioning of Klara by an acquaintance, who due to her over zealous approach is prepared to think the worst before being made aware of the full facts. Its the incompetence of her and others that makes Lucas's plight all the more infuriating.

Mikkelsen gives a powerful, sympathetic performance as a man finding the life he has built for himself disintegrating, becoming a figurative leper to practically everyone around him who has become enveloped in mass hysteria. His despair and frustration as well is very much palpable as he sees those who he thought were his friends turn against him.

To say Vinternberg as he did before with Festen, is covering a taboo, and needless to say delicate subject would be an understatement. He handles it though with sensitivity, with it never once feeling sensationalist or exploitative. What makes it so undeniably sobering is it's something that could happen to anyone, making it all the more relevant a subject. Pedophile paranoia although to some degree understandable is at its heart a very genuine and pertinent issue, which is what singles out Vinterberg for praise for daring to broach one that is so contentious. It all builds to a climax, which after the dust has seemed to have settled, asks of us a thought-provoking question. Are those who find themselves on the receiving end of such abhorrent allegations. Vinterberg doesn't offer any easy answers, which makes it all the more real and chilling. The Hunt is a masterpiece of film-making and a superb piece of social commentary that examines a complex issue that Isn't talked about enough and should not be ignored.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
As Good as it gets couldn't get any better
11 March 2024
Melvin Udall is an obsessive-compulsion author who writes romance novels, and who is rude and obnoxious to everyone he comes into contact with. This includes his gay neighbor Simon. When Simon is hospitalized after being robbed and attacked in his apartment, Melvin finds himself reluctantly looking after his dog, he begins to soften and develops a more caring side. Especially towards Carol, the long-suffering waitress who frequently serves him at the local diner he goes to. But when she is forced to leave work to care for her sick son, Melvin finds himself unable to eat his breakfast and makes a surprising move that Carol would have never expected.

On the face of it, Melvin Udall is an inveterate misanthrope who is as dysfunctional as he is both hostile and cranky towards everyone. Not someone you'd expect movie audiences to find themselves warming to or rooting for. After all, Melvin is an obsessive-compulsive writer of romantic fiction who is racist, xenophobic, anti-Semitic, homophobic, and misogynistic. But somehow James L. Brooks's magnum opus, As Good as It Gets manages to do precisely that. Thanks in part to an Oscar-winning turn from Jack Nicholson as the movie's obsessive sourpuss. Proving once again that Nicholson's talent is not only as a dramatic actor but a comedic one. In the hands of a lesser actor, or a lesser writer for that matter the character of Melvin would not elicit any sympathy or any measure of pathos.

Much of the movie's charm and warmth comes from Melvin's sharp barbs, which come chiefly at the expense of Greg Kinnear's Simon, the gay neighbor whose dog finds himself on the receiving end of Melvin's more mischievous nature. It's this dynamic between him and Carol the Waitress, played by Helen Hunt who we see early on carrying the weight of the world on her back. Having to contend with her son's acute asthma, providing the crux behind the movie. When Simon is hospitalized it's Melvin who becomes the unlikely miracle in disguise and steers him towards the movie's story arc of redemption. And to say it's a rocky road would be an understatement. In the grand tradition of some of the best comedy characters being those who are not necessarily the nicest of human beings (think Basil Fawlty for example), there is an element of tragedy to him. Like Jerry Lewis once said, there is no line between tragedy and comedy. And Melvin exemplifies this beautifully. But as before stated, there is hope for Melvin, who has lived a reclusive existence in his apartment and has resigned himself to believing his life as it stands is truly as good as it's ever going to get. It's the relationships that he begins to find himself developing between both Simon and Carol that offer him a shining beacon of light.

Nicholson brings humanity and sympathy to Melvin, in a role that could have easily been very one note. And he's matched with winning performances from both Hunt and Kinnear, the former once again displaying her knack for comic bantering in the U. S. sitcom Mad About You. On paper, As Good as It Gets could sound like another generic comedy, with the relationship between its romantic leads getting off to a rocky start before each of them invariably falls for one another. And while it does bow to convention it does so without ever feeling hackneyed.

The lead trio of Nicholson, Hunt, and Kinnear are complimented by some excellent support which includes Cuba Gooder Jr., Yeardley Smith, (the voice of Lisa Simpson), and veteran actress Shirley Knight as Carol's mother. Making As Good as It Gets is a winning feel-good comedy that will leave you with a smile on your face long after the inevitable fade to black.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Willow (1988)
7/10
A rollicking fun fantasy adventure romp
11 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
A baby girl is found by a river by the children of Willow Ufgood. A Dwarf farmer who aspires to be a great sorcerer. Taking her into his care, it becomes apparent that she is more than she seems when his village is attacked by dog-like creatures that have been tracking her. Willow finds himself setting out on a quest to the first person he can find, but in doing so he finally learns that she is Elora Danan, the baby girl destined to bring about the downfall of the evil sorceress Queen Bavmorda. Finding himself teaming up with the roguish swordsman Madmartigan, and the brownies Franjean and Rool. They set out to seek out the powerful sorceress Fin Raziel to aid them in protecting Elora while pursued by Bavmorda's daughter Sorsha and the commander of her army, General Kael. Who seeks to bring her to Bavmorda so that she may exile Elora's soul into oblivion.

Having had major box office successes in both the action/adventure and sci-fi field with his Star Wars trilogy and the first two Indiana Jones movies. It was probably inevitable that he would set his sights on delving into the sword and sorcery genre with this fanciful fantasy effort. Casting Warwick Davies in the movie's title role, who was up until then best known for his role as the cute cuddly bear-like Ewok Wicket in Return of the Jedi. Willow undoubtedly marks his most prominent role on the big screen as the movie's unconventional vertically challenged title hero of the story. And a welcome one at that, for what Willow lacks in the essence of being a more traditional statuesque, swashbuckling action hero he more than makes up with charm, making for an affable likable screen presence. In terms of the traditional action stakes, Val Kilmer, an actor who normally I'm less than enthused with more than well fits the requirements as Madmartigan. A Han Solo prototype who becomes a reluctant protector of both his diminutive new acquaintance and the even more diminutive child under Willows's guardianship.

Willow is a rollicking, old-fashioned adventure which like in the tradition of matinee movies that Lucas aped with his previous box office bonanzas, is not short on some breathtaking action sequences and with no shortage of endearing characters. Yes, its plot is overly simplistic and it relies too heavily on hackneyed tropes associated with its ilk. However, what it does have is an abundance of wit fun, and exuberance thanks largely to Ron Howard who directs proceedings with verve and a degree of panache. Proving his ability to construct some breathtaking action set pieces which include Madmartigan fighting with soldiers on a horse-drawn cart, and battling soldiers, Trolls, and the monstrous two-headed Eborsisk monsters.

True, the romantic subplot involving Kilmer and Whalley Kilmer's Sorsha does feel rather tacked on, and the latter's expedient conversion doesn't quite convince. Although the sexual tension between her and Kilmer is quite palpably felt, probably helped by the fact that they were a genuine married couple when the movie was in production. It does feel as well that screenwriter Bob Dolan has to spoon-feed early on what we can predict is going to eventually happen between the two.

Unfortunately some of the special effects, particularly those of the two-headed Eborsisk monsters which are stop-motion now look shoddy by today's standards. This however doesn't take away from the fun and sense of adventure on display.

With excellent support from the ever-reliable Kevin Pollack, Rick Overton, the glorious Patricia Hayes (anyone not familiar with her should check out the 1971 one-off TV drama; Edna the Inebriate Woman if they ever get the chance), Gavin O' Herlihy, the physically imposing Pat Roach and the late Billy Barty in a relatively brief appearance early in the picture they each help make; Willow a flawed but never the less entertaining fantasy adventure romp for all the family.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Striptease (1996)
4/10
All that money certainly didn't go into the script
9 March 2024
Former F. B. I. Secretary Erin Grant loses her job as well as custody of her daughter to her deadbeat, small-time crook of an ex-husband, due to his arrest record. Erin Grant turns to stripping at a nightclub as a means to support herself. When performing one night, one of the members of the audience gets a little too up close and personal with her, leading to Congressman Dilbeck attacking him. One of the spectators who is besotted with Erin plans to help her get her daughter back but things however go very awry.

Based on Carl Hiassen's 1993 best-selling novel, Striptease was noted at the time for its lead star Demi Moore receiving a then-unprecedented $12.5 million for the role. Making her the highest-paid actress at the time. Not to mention that the movie's overall budget was $50 million, one has to ask was it all money well spent? The short answer from critics at the time was a resounding no, and it's not really at all difficult to see why. Although touted as being as being one of the worst movies of all time, It strikes me as just a bit on the harsh side. It's far from being a good movie but is hardly worthy of such dubious notoriety. Adapted for the screen by Andrew Bergman who up until then and still has had a rather unremarkable career although he did have a writing credit on the classic spoof western Blazing Saddles. The movie suffers from Bergman being unable to successfully blend the genres of political thriller with satirical comedy so that it feels decidedly uneven.

Purportedly in preparation for the role, Moore visited strip clubs in New York City, California, and Florida, and she met with strippers. And exercised while practicing yoga and it certainly paid off in terms of her being able to perform on stage. However, the same can't be said for her aptitude for comedy which she displays little of. Strangely enough, given that she is the lead in what is essentially meant to be a comedy. Her character is essentially relegated to playing it straight, with any comedic slack that there is taken up by Burt Reynolds, as the sleazy congressman, Ving Rhames as her Bouncer friend, who plays protector to her while pursuing insurance scams involving cockroaches in yogurt as a means to sue the manufacturers and Robert Patrick as her no-good ex-husband. The sight of Reynolds in a stetson hat and boots, while covered in Vaseline, does raise a titter. But beyond that, the laughs are in short supply, and a talented supporting cast feels wasted.

The plot is rather superfluous and shallow, if not more than a little contrived, and proceeds to degenerate into utter stupidity in its final reel. As a sleazy political drama/thriller rather than a comedy it may have worked, if Bergman pointed it in that direction as he clearly doesn't know how to juggle its contrasting thematic elements. But as it stands the end result is a missed opportunity of fairly major proportions. As well as a failed attempt to prove that Moore could pull off comedy.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Thanksgiving (I) (2023)
4/10
Not much to give thanks for
8 March 2024
After the tragic consequences of a Black Friday riot, a masked killer dressed as a pilgrim begins targetting those who were present that night in Plymouth, Massachusetts, the origin of the holiday. As the body count increases, it becomes apparent that the killer has an even more sinister plan in mind. Can the local Sheriff Eric Newlon put a stop to the killer's bloody rampage?

The latest offering from Eli Roth, which like Machete and Hobo with a Shotgun had its origins as one of several fake trailers created by different directors for Quentin Tarantino and Robert Rodriguez's Grindhouse movie double bill. Thanksgiving treads familiar ground, with what was seen before with the Scream franchise. However, the problem with those movies is that besides the fact that they should have ended long ago. It spawned a series of pale of imitations, with this being the latest of its ilk. The problem first and foremost is that there aren't any really engaging or memorable who you really care about, with the only familiar faces among the cast being Patrick Dempsy and Gina Gershon, the latter of whose presence is all but too short-lived.

Roth seems to attempt to compensate for this, as is his want with his penchant for excessive gore and grisliness. And when it's nasty it's downright nasty. Chief of which is when one of the killer's hapless victims is literally cooked alive in an oven only to be served up as Thanksgiving dinner. The director has certainly never been known for his restraint when it comes to bloodletting as he previously proved with his first two Hostel movies and The Green Inferno. However, when it comes to building tension and a sense of foreboding he's most definitely no Wes Craven. It's all very much by the numbers and shallow as it is empty-headed, lacking any of the self-referential wit and self-knowingness that the likes of I Know What You Did Last Summer, Cherry Falls, and Valentine failed to capture.

There is some innovation behind it though, with the first kill offering a spark of originality, while the performances are solid enough there's no character to care enough to truly root for. And with so much effort in concentrating on satiating bloodhounds' taste for all that's grisly Roth and Screenwriter Jeff Rendell have failed to concentrate on constructing a credible plot. It has more holes than a block of cheese.

Apparently, this managed to scrape in enough money at the box office that Roth already has plans for a sequel. This will therefore probably lead to the start of another Horror franchise that like Friday the 13th and A Nightmare on Elm Street will outstay its welcome. And that's the last thing that we need.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A funny and moving character study about faith and conviction
21 January 2024
Father Morris is a priest who has become jaded with conflicted with the nature of his faith. Daily listening to his parishioners confess their sins in the confessional, he wonders if he is really making any difference in their lives, and struggles with the guilt and knowledge of knowing that the husband of one of his regular confessors is having an affair. When the 21-year-old Amber walks into his confessional, claiming to have murdered a homeless man, the cynical Morris sees through her lie and dismisses her. Refusing to leave much to his annoyance, he finds his life turned upside down by her, as she forces him to confront his dedication to priesthood.

Directed by Matthew Tibbernham whose only real major credit was as an Assistant Director on the 2012 horror flick Sinister, Surviving Confessional marked his debut full-length feature as director and remains one of only two movies that he has helmed. The other is the upcoming horror/sci-fi movie Parallel which is to be released next year. With a screenplay written by Nathan Shane Miller whose work up until then had been limited to several short films, Surviving Confessional marks a monumentally impressive debut in what is a low-budget, minimalist indy film. Painfully obscure, especially so that it doesn't even have a Wikipedia page dedicated to it. It's a movie screaming out for better acknowledgment. Anchored by a superb central performance by Clayton Nemrow, an actor I am unfamiliar with but has had a prolific career spanning over twenty years. He breaks the wall as Father Morris, addresses the audience, speaking of how he has grown jaded and is suffering a crisis of faith as he listens to his parishioners' confessions on a daily. Basis. We see a man forced to confront if there is any real purpose to his position, and if he is giving any real meaning or solace to those who come to him.

However, when a young woman named Amber enters his confessional he finds himself questioning his devotion to his faith more so, not least because he is conflicted by the feelings he has for one of his regular attendees, Mary who is troubled by the state of her marriage, and whom he knows her wife has been having an affair. Needless to say, the movie deals with Father Morris's struggle to remain true to his duties as a Priest, while attempting to reconcile them with his love for Mary.

Morris's doubts are exacerbated further by Amber, whose presence remains a mystery, and yet becomes something of an annoyance to him, and provides some welcome moments of sharp, pointed humor to the fore. Jessica Lynn Parsons provides a superb foil to Nemrow as the beleaguered and morally tortured priest. The movie is an absorbing character study of the nature of faith offers and challenges the very principles. It's thoroughly involving thanks to the dynamic between both Morris and Amber, and when you think you know where the movie is going writer Nathan Shane Miller pulls the rug right from under the audience. Wrapping up with a denouement that is as emotional as it is poignant. Surviving Confession is an obscure gem and deserving of more attention. Not least because of Nemrow's winning performance, which he injects with so much pathos and conviction.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Paperhouse (1988)
7/10
Haunting and evocative but let let down partly by an uneven central performance
14 January 2024
Suffering from glandular fever 12-year-old Anna finds herself living a largely lonely existence in the confines of her bedroom. Turning to her drawings as her only means of any kind of distraction, she finds that what she draws she envisions in her dreams at night. Befriending a young disabled boy named Marc. The temporary solace she finds with him is ruptured by the link between the dreamworld she is inhabiting and the boring reality of her everyday life. One that her dreams into a dark and chilling nightmare.

Directed by Bernard Rose whose limited directorial CV would include intriguingly enough, his screen adaptation of Clive Barker's Candyman. Paperhouse which preceded was itself based off of the 1958 novel Marianne Dreams and marked something of a more understated, emotional, and poignant dark fantasy drama. Flawed though it undoubtedly is it is still a movie that is better than the sum of its parts. Putting a different spin on the dreamworld concept that has been utilized in A Nightmare on Elm Street to name the obvious, as well as the lesser-known Dreamscape. The movie although it does feature horror aspects is more a haunting drama about the friendship between a young girl and a terminally ill boy. Hindered sadly by the score which while for the most part effective, does become a bit overbearing in earlier scenes and the slightly mixed quality of acting. Charlotte Burke's performance although for the most adequate does become rather wooden in areas, and it's likely, not surprising that this would prove to be her only professional acting credit. American actress Glenn Headly fares slightly better, effecting a very convincing English accent is far from the best I know her to be capable above. The rest of the performances however are excellent with Gemma Jones, Ben Cross, and Elliot Spiers as Mark, the crippled boy that Anna befriends.

Rose manages to evoke an ethereal, dreamlike quality to the dream sequences and an emotive mood that hangs over the entirety of the movie. However, he does fall short when it comes to horror aspects which rather than having an air of foreboding just don't cut the mustard. Given some of the dialogue in the scenes though, I would defy any director to have been able to have pulled them off. The movie's denouement as well just doesn't come off quite as well as it should of either, which I felt wrapped things up a little too conveniently. Nevertheless, Paperhouse makes for a mainly rewarding experience and it manages to pull off a stark, ramshackle aesthetic in the dream sequences and admirably utilizes its low budget to remarkable effect all things considered. It's sad to know as well Marc Spiers sadly passed away six years after this film was released at the all too young age of 20 with only a handful of acting credits to his name. Something that lends a more poignant edge to the film. Anyway, despite its obvious shortcomings it's still worth a fairly touching and atmospheric piece of work from Rose, who as he did with Candyman proved that he had an aptitude for creating a brooding or haunting ambiance in his work, and who may have very well been a wasted talent.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Howard the Turkey
10 January 2024
Howard is a Duck from the planet Duckworld, who is accidentally brought to Earth by a laser beam. Finding himself in Cleaveland, he befriends singer, Beverly after saving her from a couple of thugs. Beverly puts him in touch with her scientist friend Phil, who in turn puts him in touch with Dr. Walter Jennings. Jennings reveals that it was an experiment that he was working on that was the cause of Howard being brought to Earth. However, just as Jennings is planning to return Howard to Duck World, an evil alien being arrives via the laser beam and possesses Jennings's body. Now Howard, Beverly, and Phil must work together to defeat it before it brings down more of its kind using the laser beam and takes over the Earth.

Based off of the adult comic of the same name, George Lucas's 37 million-dollar science-fiction adventure comedy would crash and burn at the box office, being both a commercial and critical flop. Initially intended as an animated feature it was swiftly changed to a live-action one due to contractual obligations. One could theorize as to why it bombed so badly. Its absurd and off-kilter premise may have alienated mainstream audiences, or perhaps it was simply just a case of it not being very good. The problem chiefly with Howard the Duck, or as it was originally entitled in the UK, Howard: A New Breed of Hero, is that it was marketed as a family-friendly summer blockbuster, which given the nature of some of its near-knuckle humor proved to be a major misstep. Not least of which makes references, and I kid you not, to beastality in a scene where the movie's main female protagonist Beverly played by Lea Thompson begins to get a little too up close and personal with our feathered hero.

The movie is essentially one of two halves, with Howard arriving on Earth, and deals with him trying to acclimatize himself to life on a planet with a population he refers to rather frankly as "hairless apes". We see Howard getting a job as a towel boy in a massage parlor. Like I said, how this managed to get away with a PG certificate is anyone's guess. Meanwhile, he becomes acquainted with Beverly who proves to be his only friend on Earth while also meeting the zany and eccentric Phil, which sees a young pre-fame Tim Robbins chewing half the scenery. The second half revolves around the attempt to return Howard to his home planet, Duck World which in doing so sees a monstrous alien being called The Dark Overlord arriving with designs on taking over the Earth. Pretty standard megalomaniacal alien villain stuff really.

The problem with Howard the Duck besides its misjudged humor, is its inane screenplay and some highly uneven acting. Thompson who was so much of a more appealing screen presence in Back to the Future looks positively embarrassed, as if she wants to be somewhere else while Robbins gurns his way throughout the movie. The one actor who comes out of the movie with any genuine dignity intact is Jeffrey Jones who steals every scene he is in, as he takes on two roles. That of Dr. Jennings and the malevolent Dark Overlord. It's to Jones' credit that he manages to bring some measure of credibility to his role, which in a movie like this is really quite saying something. I mean, this is after all a movie that boasts duck breasts. Yes, a topless female duck. It doesn't get any more ridiculous as that, oh wait did I forget about the beatality? Scratch that. It's the second most ridiculous thing in this.

What saves it from being completely awful, besides Jones' superb double performance is that on the odd rare occasion, I did laugh despite myself. And then there's John Barry's rip-roaring score, which in the right movie would have set the tone for a rip-roaring science-fiction adventure comedy. Unfortunately, this wasn't that movie. I will say this much for Thompson though she displays her vocal talents in this, and she proves to be a talented singer, acquitting herself very well in her musical scenes. This is about the last really good thing that could said for Turkey, although it would not be the worst thing that Lucas would inflict upon movie audiences with his god-awful Star Wars prequels. Nevertheless, there's a reason this got lumbered with the nickname Howard the Turkey, and it had nothing to do with Thanksgiving.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Braindead (1992)
7/10
Good gory fun if you leave your brain behind and just go with it
10 January 2024
Lionel Cosgrove is a twenty-five-year-old bachelor who lives with his domineering mother Vera in Wellington, New Zealand in 1957. When Lionel meets the beautiful Paquita, the daughter of a grocery store clerk he thinks he may have found the girl of his dreams. However, Vera manages to predictably put a monkey in the wrench when while he is visiting the zoo with Paquita, Vera who is spying on them is bitten by a vicious Sumatran rat monkey. Infected by the bite, Lionel's turned upside down when his mother is transformed into a puss-squirting undead zombie. Before long the young man finds himself having to cope more than he can deal with, as bodies begin to pile up. And if that wasn't bad enough his obnoxious Uncle Les turns up which complicates things further. As events spiral further and further out of control, he and a host of his Uncle Les's unwanted party guests find themselves pitted against a horde of crazed flesh-eating zombies. Can he save the day, and finally get his girl?

Peter Jackson's second movie after his ultra-low budget first feature Bad Taste and his first collaboration with regular screenwriting partner Fran Walsh. It's no exaggeration to say that Braindead, or Dead Alive as it is known in the U. S., rates as one of the goriest and sickest movies imaginable. Made on a loftier budget of $3 million, much of it going on its practical effects and an immense bucket of blood and gore. Not least of which would be in the movie's showstopping climatic scene where Timothy Balme's hero Lionel massacres a horde of zombies using a Flymo. A scene that called for the use of 300 liters (79.2 gallons) of fake blood. To say that it will leave your jaw on the floor would be an understatement. It, however, is just one of several memorable moments like a kung-fu fighting priest who "...kicks arse for the lord", a hilarious scene involving an undead baby in the park.

It's safe to say that Braindead is not a movie for the easily offended or those with queasy stomachs. Particularly in the vomit-inducing dinner scene where Lionel reluctantly is forced to play host to associates of his mothers. Zany, and off the wall, Jackson creates what is essentially a live-action cartoon with larger-than-life, over-the-top characters from Lionel's domineering cantankerous mother to his lecherous Uncle Les. There are also some inspired splatstick moments, with Jackson displaying a directorial panache for visual humor.

On the negative side, given its low budget, it does look rather gaudy, and the incidental musical is tacky with the overall standard of acting being something of a mixed bag, ranging from average to just plain bad. It also eventually begins to run out of steam towards the end and Jackson lets his over-indulgence get the better of him. However, if you can overlook this Braindead is blood-soaked, sick fun you can stomach its gross-out humor. Needless to say, it won't be for all tastes, but it's safe to say it could be ranked as New Zealand's answer to The Evil Dead. It, after all, served to help kickstart Jacksons' career and is worth seeing if just for its sublimely insane final act. Despite its shortcomings, it's something of a guilty pleasure, if you leave your brain behind you'll be sure to have some fun with it.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Teen Wolf (1985)
5/10
Fanciful shallow teen fluff that coasts off of Michael J. Fox's charisma and charm
4 January 2024
Warning: Spoilers
17-year-old Scott Howard is a typical teenager, or so he thinks. If being continually overshadowed on his basketball team by better players wasn't bad enough, amongst other problems. He soon learns that his family has a bizarre secret. Discovering that he is descended from a long line of werewolves, and before he knows it, once his secret is out he finds himself becoming a local celebrity, and the star player in his team. However, Scott eventually learns that being the Big Man or in this case "Wolf" Isn't all that it's cracked up to be.

One of a slough of 80's teen comedies to have bombared cinema theatres back in the day, Teen Wolf was essentially nothing more than a vehicle for Michael J. Fox, who had made something of a name for his self in the sitcom Family Ties. It's rather curious that it would be released just a few short months, before he'd hit it big, albeit it releatively briefly with Back to the Future. A movie which this forgettable so-so effort would be overshadowed by, although it was successful enough at the box office that it managed to earn itself a god awful sequel as well as a tawdry, short lived animated series. And would inspired a underwhelming MTV TV series.

It goes without saying that Teen Wolf is fanciful fluff and coasts off the charisma and charm of Fox, who manages to more or less carry what is really just another hackneyed, formulaic teen comedy with it's lycanthropic plot being nothing more than a shallow gimmick. All the old chestnuts associated with movies of this ilk are all present and correct with Fox being the lad from the wrong side of the tracks, who is put upon by the local bully, and who is shunned by the beautiful popular girl who he lusts after. He is seemingly oblivious to the fact that his close childhood friend Boof has feelings for him, and from there you pretty much know where the plot, which involves his his Basketball team taking part in the High School Championships is going. The movie's screenpaly pretty much writes itself.

Needless to say that Fox's angst ridden protagonist goes through something of a personal passage of self discovery before the movie reaches it's cliched conclusion. One that is replete with a cheesy a-typical 80's musical montage. There is also a sense that the whole conceit of Scott being a Werewolf is never completely used to its fullest.

The supporting cast which includes Jerry Levine as Scott's Fonzi-esque best friend Stiles acquit themselves just fine, but it probably says something that there individual carreers haven't amounted to much or that they quit acting completely. It probably comes as no surprise either that it would spawn several low-rent imitations with the likes of Teen Vamp and My Best friend is a Vampire. Teen Wolf is nothing more than a footnote in Fox's early career, and one that would ultimately peak with the Back to the Future Trilogy. It's nothing more than passable, generic fodder that after having done watching it, you'll be hard pressed to really remember shortly after having done so.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Thing (1982)
8/10
An exercise in how to create a growing sense of paranoia and tension
4 January 2024
In a remote research station in Antarctica in 1982, the members of its team unexpectedly encounter the inhabitants of a neighboring Norwegian research station, who are trying to kill a dog that has escaped from their base. After killing the crazed Norwegians, the shaken research crew flies out to their base only to find all of them are either dead or missing. All they find are the remains of an unknown creature that the Norwegians had attempted to burn. It soon becomes clear to them all that what they have found is an alien life form. However, before long it becomes terrifyingly apparent that the creature can take over and copy other life forms, and that it spreads from one person to another like a virus. Before long paranoia takes hold of the team, whose trust in one another swiftly deteriorates, and terror descends upon them.

An adaptation of John W. Campbell Jr., novella Who Goes There? The Thing had been originally loosely adapted into the 1951 science fiction-horror film The Thing from Another World. Several directors would be considered before cult movie director John Carpenter who had gained critical acclaim for his low-budget 1978 horror movie Halloween. Starring Kurt Russell who had only just previously worked with Carpenter on the science fiction action film Escape From New York, the movie features what was at the time a relatively unknown cast of actors. It, like Halloween, has a basic premise, which relies heavily on an ever-pervasive sense of dread, and a sense of cloying paranoia. It probably comes as no coincidence that the movie was released just a few short years after Ridley Scott's 1979 Science-Fiction Horror classic Alien. Indeed, it may be said that Carpenter may have taken some inspirational cues from Scott's masterpiece. Both have remote secluded settings which add a degree of claustrophobic tension into the mix. Quentin Tarantino himself has cited The Thing as having inspired his debut masterpiece Reservoir Dogs, with its themes of paranoia and the use of a small backdrop.

Similar to 1956's Invasion of the Body Snatchers directed by Don Siegel, the movie relies on a growing sense of inevitability and dread, as each of the movie's 12 protagonists succumb to the paranoia that begins to swallow them. Its intense, somber atmosphere is echoed by Ennio Morricones' intense and eerie synth score. As with Halloween, Carpenter knows how to pull his audience's strings so before long they're looking over their shoulder, or looking around every corner long after the movie has ended. He makes excellent use of the minimalistic aspect of the movie's setting, with its closed-in environment adding to the ever-increasing anxiety of his characters. It's to the movie's testament that its amazing, eye-popping practical effects from Rob Bottin still hold up to this very day. When the Thing reveals itself under its human guise, the scenes of it contorting and twisting or detaching itself from the rest of its physiognomy are a true work of art. Carpenter also allows for subtle touches of subtle, dark humor while never undermining the movie's grueling intensity.

In the role of R. J. MacReady, Russell is in typically dry and sardonic territory and brings just the right touch of wry bravado to proceedings. Essentially becoming the alpha male of a group of men, who have begun to turn in on themselves. He's given fine support from a cast that includes Wilford Brimley, Richard Masur, Keith David, and Donald Moffat.

Both a commercial and critical flop on its release, and it perhaps wasn't helped that it had to contend with a certain Extra-Terrestrial, it has eventually been evaluated and given more of the kudos it deserves. The Thing is something of a seminal piece of film-making and a solid lesson in evoking atmosphere and a palpable sense of paranoia and dread. It along with Aliens stands as one of the cult iconic Science-Fiction Horror movies of the 80's.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Keep (1983)
2/10
Atmospheric and stylish but suffers from too much plot details ending up on the cutting room floor
3 January 2024
During World War II, a small platoon of Nazis is sent to guard an ancient and mysterious fortress in the Carpathian Mountains in Romania. When one of their number unwittingly unleashes a powerful, supernatural force that has been kept imprisoned within its walls. An enigmatic stranger known only as Glaeken senses this from where he lives in Greece, and travels to the keep. The purpose of which is to destroy the force of evil that has been released. As soldiers fall prey to the demonic being, an elderly Jewish man Dr. Theodore Cuza, and his daughter Eva are brought to the keep, as they know of it, and it is hoped they may be able to uncover what is going on.

Directed by Michael Mann The Keep was his second theatrical feature after the neo-noir, heist action thriller Thief. Going in a different direction genre-wise, although certainly not tonally. Mann's adaptation of the novel of the same name by F. Paul Wilson consists of much of the stylistic and visual flourishes that he has become synonymous with. With a haunting and atmospheric score composed by Tangerine Dream who he had previously employed on Thief, and who would later work on other 80's fare like 1983's teen comedy Risky Business and 1985's dark fantasy adventure movie Legend. The Keep for all of its brooding, intense ambiance that would become very much a staple of Mann's work, is a laborious, incoherent turgid mess of a movie.

Filmed in Wales and at Shepperton Studios during the autumn of 1982, it arguably didn't help that the movie befell numerous post-production issues. Not least of which was the death of special effects supervisor Wally Veevers who passed away before he had completed work on the movie. Then there were numerous editing problems, a result of overbearing studio interference where Mann's original 210-minute cut of the movie was whittled down to 120 minutes. If that wasn't bad enough, after less than positive reviews at test screenings it was further cut down to 96 minutes. It's therefore that it comes as little or no surprise that the end theatrical result was and still is an unintelligible shambles. With many pertinent plot points that would have much-needed context to who Glaeken is, and what his link to the demonic force known as the Molasar among other key details.

One might postulate that Mann may have been a victim of his creative ambitions, as well as underestimating the concerns that may have arisen from studio execs. Who may have not been willing to sign off on a three-and-a-half-hour horror movie? Up until then, it was something very much unheard of for a movie its ilk. But where fault may have lied with both Mann and the studio, there can be none leveled at its cast who deliver the goods in regards to their quality performances. First and foremost Scott Glenn cuts a striking and enigmatic presence as Glaeken, while veteran actor Ian McKellen is on top form as the wizened but no less formidable Dr. Theodore Cuza. Alberta Watson makes for a beautiful and headstrong, determined presence as Cuzas' daughter Eva. With a cohesive supporting cast that includes Jürgen Prochnow, Gabriel Byrne, and another veteran Robert Prosky rounding them off.

There is very Mann's propensity for utilizing shades of blue, green, and purple in his color scheme, it's the use of such that compliments the Gothic appearance of the eponymous Keep. He also uses old tropes like swirling fog which he throws into the mix, which admittedly adds to the right touch of supernatural, haunting ambiance. Although he is all too heavy-handed with his use of Tangerine Dream's score which while intoxicating becomes too loud and overbearing, to the point it drowns out some of the dialogue. The movie's prime antagonistic monstrosity the Molosar although effective enough in design, hasn't altogether aged well in terms of the overall practical effect. Which today would probably be rendered with CGI, and likely more to its detriment. It is never the less voice with a commanding otherworldly authority and resonance by Michael Carter.

Receiving mixed reviews, and perplexingly something of a cult following there have been calls for Mann and Paramount Studios to release a director's cut of the movie. Much of this adds further backstory behind Glaeken and the Molasar, the former, and Eva falling in love, as well as a happy ending that was added to television screenings of the movie. As well as Glaeken kills the captain of the boat who brings him into Romania, and who tries to steal his "weapon" which he uses in the end to kill Molasar. Further scenes between villagers and with Father Mihail and Alexandru, and Alexandru being killed by his sons when he proceeds to corrupt the village. The original cut, even if it were merely an 180-minute cut may do something to repair the damage done by the studio. However, they as well as Mann have remained uncooperative regarding this.

The Keep until then remains a monumental narrative disarray that feels as if it's been pillaged by ample screen time that may have made it more work coherently as a cinematic story. It remains something of a curiosity due to the big-name director behind it, although it's one of a dubious nature. Just don't expect anything anywhere near resembling a decently told, solid plot. Because you won't get one.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Hunger (1983)
7/10
A visually sumptuous allegorical tale of addiction undermined by its nonsensical ending
3 January 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Miriam is a centuries-old vampire who has existed as far back as her origins in ancient Egypt. Surviving on the blood of the numerous lovers she has had over the years, they in return do not age until she grows tired of them. Unfortunately for her latest one, John, that is the case for him with his life expectancy being very short. In desperation, he seeks the assistance of Dr. Sarah Robert. A research gerontologist, who is studying the effects of rapid aging in primates. She is at first dubious regarding John's story, but her curiosity leads her to contact Miriam and finds herself being bewitched by the immortal seductress, herself.

Based on the novel by Whitley Strieber which was first published in 1981, The Hunger was the debut full-length theatrical feature film for Tony Scott, brother of the now legendary Ridley Scott, who no doubt had a lot to live up to when compared to his older sibling who had gained critical plaudits for his work on Alien and Blade Runner. A contemporary arthouse reworking of the Vampire mythology, that acts as an allegorical meditation on the nature of addiction. Scott follows in the footsteps of his brother, revealing his own aptitude for an aesthetic flair that he shares with Ridley. Opening in a dimly lit nightclub to the strains of a moody 80s retro-punk track. Scott sets the right ultra-modern, bleak tone that will echo throughout.

Both Catherine Deneuve and David Bowie on a purely visual basis, make for a striking couple. Appearing sleek and stylish in what could be mistaken for sharp Armani apparel, and dark sunglasses. They pick up random strangers who are just as beautiful as they are, who they feast upon with a fusion of unsettling bloodletting and savage eroticism. You can definitely see Ridley's influence, with shades of Blade Runner seeping into the mix. Scott peppers scenes with fluttering pigeons, swirling smoke, billowing curtains, and elegant artifacts which lend an air of film-noir sensibility.

Posing as a wealthy couple that teaches classical music lessons in their elegant New York townhouse, which is a relatively mundane contrast to their more alien and disturbing nocturnal activities. John is seen to have a more relatively humane side to his personality when compared to Miriam. Particularly in his relationship with Alice, and it's this, that offsets how predatory and remorseless she is. Even, when John ultimately gives in to the hunger he has for youth, leading him to a moment of self-preservation, that is abhorrent and cold-blooded. There is still a palpable air of remorse that is subtly felt in him.

Make-up artist, Dick Smith's brilliant make-up, effectively captures Bowie's deterioration from a handsome, youthful playboy to a decrepit, silver-haired octogenarian seamlessly. It helps as well, that Bowie to his credit, pulls off a convincing transition, from his youthful visage into his elderly personae, which never feels ham-fisted.

First and foremost though, Bowie inhabits what is a supporting role, and whose screen presence is relatively shortlived with Susan Sarandon being the movie's chief protagonist. Gerontologist, Sarah Robert whom John turns to as a seemingly grim fate of an eternal living death awaits him. And it's Sarah's inquisitive scientific curiosity to learn more about John's affliction that has her inevitably crossing paths with the sultry Miriam, who with the loss of John so to speak, seeks a new lover, and a figurative protege in Sarah. Fearful of the loneliness that eternal life can envelop her, and fuels her drive to seek companionship as well as a partner in blood. The isolation and the regression into becoming an outcast from the rest of the world due to the life she has chosen is a major theme and is something that weighs heavy on Miriam. Catherine Deneuve brings a seductive allure to Miriam and is captivating as she is deeply sensual. While Susan Sarandon is suitably tenacious as the inquisitive Dr. Sarah Roberts and has a strong and understated sexual chemistry with her female co-star.

As an allegory on the nature of addiction, the sense of isolation, and to an extent how it leads to one becoming a societal pariah, and how addicts inevitably feed off others to maintain their fix, The Hunger for the First Three Quarters works rather well. Where it flounders is in the ending that the studio forces on Scott, which pretty much undermines the more moralistic original ending that was far more fitting within the context of its allegorical plot. What we're lumbered with is one that feels like one that came out of a Cadbury's Flake advertisement (and features a very brief appearance from British actress Sophie Ward at a very youthful age). Ending the movie on something of a bum note.

The Hunger overall though is a visually arresting and highly atmospheric, somber, and brooding work from Scott, who rightly or wrongly would go on to be somewhat overshadowed by his older brother. Although not without some degree of talent and a flair for a strong aesthetic eye, this was the movie that would first highlight his aptitude for it. Also look out for a brief appearance from a young pre-fame Willem Daefoe as a sleazy street punk, before he rose to greater prominence.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Manhunter (1986)
8/10
An atmospheric and intense 80s time capsule that sports a charismatic awards worthy performance from William Peterson
1 January 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Will Graham is a retired F. B. I. Agent who lives a quiet life with his wife Molly and his son Kevin. When a prolific serial killer nicknamed by the press as The Tooth Fairy who preys on families continues to elude the bureau, Will's old friend and former superior Jack Crawford approaches him, as Will has an aptitude to get into the mind of a serial killer, and display total empathy. The troubled ex-agent is initially reluctant to go into service but cannot bring himself to see another family fall prey to the brutal Tooth Fairy when he knows he can potentially put a stop to him. Accepting Jack's request despite protests from Molly, Will sporadically meets with the charismatic and highly intelligent but dangerous serial killer and psychiatrist Dr. Hannibal Lektor whom he helped capture. However, it came at the cost of Will nearly losing his sanity after falling victim to a brutal assault from the deranged Lektor. Soon the hunt for the elusive Tooth Fairy becomes a race against time before the killer strikes again as his modus operandi dictates he does so when there is a full moon. Meanwhile, photographer Francis Dolarhyde who is the eponymous Tooth Fairy is romancing a young blind woman who is unaware of his clandestine activities. And of the deep pent-up rage and turmoil that lies deep within him.

What was then the latest movie to come from Michael Mann who had previously been behind the 1981 crime thriller Thief and the 1983 World War II Horror movie The Keep. Having also been the creative mind behind the iconic 80s Detective series Miami Vice. Manhunter is based on Thomas Harris's novel Red Dragon which was the face of his series of books to feature the even more now iconic Dr. Hannibal Lectre,(although his surname was misspelled as Lektor here) had its name changed because producer Dino Delaurentis had previously had a flop with 1985's The Year of the Dragon. Therefore he had no intention of wanting to tempt fate a second time, although it proved fruitless proving to be a commercial flop and achieving only mixed reviews. A fate that most certainly wouldn't befall the big screen adaptation of Harris' second novel in his series The Silence of the Lambs which received critical acclaim, was a box office success, and pulled in five Oscars to boot.

Needless to say, the reason perhaps for its failure to pull in audiences is that Mann who himself adapted its screenplay, didn't stay quite as faithful to the source material as fans of the novel would have liked. First and foremost Lektor here is not portrayed as being a cannibal, having been a killer who targeted college girls while in Harris' novels "Lectre" was more indiscriminate. Also the physical appearance of Francis Dolaryde who in the books is described as being far more handsome and slender built, with a slight deformity in that he had a cleft lip. Rather than the lanky, bald, ghostly-looking figure as portrayed by Tom Noonan. While the movie's denouement differs greatly.

All present present and correct however are many of the same characters that have become synonymous with the series, which include Agent-in-Charge of the Behavioral Science Unit of the F. B. I. Jack Crawford as played by Denis Farina, Forensic psychologist Dr. Sidney Bloom (and another friend of Will Graham's whose name was changed from the novel as it was originally Alan) with Paul Perri inhabiting the role, and Dr. Frederick Chilton, director of the sanitorium where Lektor is imprisoned and played by Benjamin Hendrickson. The dynamic and relationship between Will and Jack is the one that is most pivotal and apparent to the plot.

Mann's Manhunter as with his previous movies is textbook 80s fare, from its supercharged and synth score as composed by Michael Rubini, Barry Andrews, and Klaus Schulze. As well as it's pop track that simply screams out the era. It is safe to say that he doesn't skimp on any measure of style, with his employment of shades of blue, green, and purple in his color palette. It all adds to the intense and brooding atmospheric ambiance that he composes. And complemented not least by the movie lead actor the undervalued William Peterson who imbues Will Graham with a burning intensity. It's hard not to believe that Graham is a damaged human being haunted by the demons of his past. And that one that looms over him that haunts his thoughts is Brian Cox's Hannibal Lektor. Who has an overall brief screen time, only appearing in three scenes but Cox makes each one most definitely count. Making a palpable impact. His version of Lektor as opposed to Anthony Hopkins who would become more renowned for the role, with his jet black vampiric hairstyle and pale white complexion is a more understated, and realistic approach to the character than what was to later come. Portraying him in a calm, matter-of-fact manner and who knows how to mentally unpick and analyze Graham, making him a formidable and highly deadly adversary.

Overall, Manhunter feels like something of a figurative chess game but with only Lektor moving the pieces on the board. Intelligent as well as provocative, and sporting a superb charismatic and challenging performance from William Peterson. Playing a man torn between his loyalty to his family, and his sense of duty as a human being. He is a man caught in a maelstrom, that is aptly paralleled by that of his prey who himself is a tortured figure, albeit for more self-serving reasons. We get something of a portrait of a contradictory figure who you will both revile and have pity for in equal measure. Dolarhyde is indeed a pitiful semblance of a man. But who is the hunter and who is the prey swiftly becoming blurred and in no small thanks to a certain Dr. Lektor. A scene where Will is forced to face the consequences of his decision, and talking to his young son about his own personal demons both real and figurative will be sure to stay with you. It feels like a father telling his child that those monsters your mother and I always told you that are not real. Well, they are.

If it does falter, Mann does occasionally lapse into stylistic pretensions. While Peterson's Jacobean-style monologues arguably veer a little too close to the overly histrionic. It's still a powerful, and visually striking thriller that anyone with a nostalgic fondness for the 80s, especially 80s synth will for the most part embrace. It unfortunately became something of a footnote compared to Jonathan Demme's Oscar-winning and superior The Silence of the Lambs, having been overshadowed by it. It doesn't quite deserve to be mentioned in the same name as it but has still been deserving something of the critical reappraisal it would later receive.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Superbly acted and handsome looking but it feels like watching a hack Mills & Boons novel having been brought to life
27 December 2023
In the early half of the Twentieth Century, in Montana, Colonel William Ludlow raises his three sons, Tristan, Alfred, and Samuel. Samuel. Who is the youngest and is engaged to marry Sussanah who he brings to meet his family on their farm. When World War I takes hold of the globe, Samuel sets out to fight in the conflict, with his ever-protective brothers following him into combat. When Samuel is killed, Samuel and Tristan return home after completing their tours of duty. However, on returning both men themselves fall in love with Susannah, and the conflict that arises threatens to tear their family apart.

An American period drama very much in the vein of some of the classic melodramas of the golden age of cinema. Legends of the Fall has that old-fashioned tonal feel that invites comparisons with movies like East of Eden, as well as Gone with the Wind. Directed by Edward Zwick, who let's be fair has had an overall patchy career with The Last Samurai arguably being his closest work to reaching classic status. Comprising of an overall decent cast that includes veteran Anthony Hopkins, Aidan Quinn, Henery Thomas, and Julia Ormond who at the time was practically unknown, and who has unfortunately dwindled into practical obscurity. It's headed by Brad Pitt, who although not a terrible actor has been nothing more than an acceptable leading man and screen presence. Albeit at least a charismatic one.

The plot which is to be charitable is irrevocably contrived and relies on us swallowing the conceit that all three of the brothers of the story, played by Pitt, Quinn, and Thomas fall for the same woman. An unlikely setup for sure, but it's one that writers Susan Shilliday, William D. Wittliff, and Jim Harrison ask us are determined to sell to the audience. The character of One Stab, a Native American who is Colonel Ludlow's most loyal and trusted friend whom he employs on his farm, acts as the narrator for the movie. Imparting the events in Ludlow's life that have forced him to raise his three boys without the presence of their mother who has parted company with him. He describes the contrasting personalities of each with Alfred being the level-headed one, with a maturity beyond his years. Tristan is the more, free-spirited impetuous one while Samuel's is more unassuming, idealistic, and naive.

Within this dynamic, we see despite their differing natures, the closeness and solidarity the brothers have which as the story unfolds, makes the tragedy of its plot all the more poignant and tragic. Hopkins crusty, seasoned old Colonel who makes no bones about his disapproval of Samuel's idealism, and his resolve to go to war is ultimately left helpless as his sons leave for the trenches of France. Forced to play host to his figurative baby son's fiance who is ultimately left behind to pick up some of the pieces of her would-be husband's demise.

It's no exaggeration to say that Legends of the Fall is a handsomely laid-out movie, with gorgeous production values and stunning cinematography. From the picturesque rural backdrop of the Ludlow homestead to the war-torn, mud-drenched trenches and No Man's Land the period detail is startingly brought to life. It can't completely compensate for an overly sensationalized tonality, despite the best efforts of its cast to reign things in.

Hopkins as the patriarch and figurehead of the Ludlow family is a casting choice that is perfectly on the nose, with his commanding authority belying a softer center under his tough exterior. Pitt as I've said before although not the worst of actors, although far from the best is on strong form here in a role that plays to his strengths as a charismatic leading man while Aidan Quinn is a bold contrast as Tristan's more level headed, prudent and more reserved brother Alfred. Ormond who up until this point was more unknown, at least outside of the UK delivers the goods in what might have at the time been her career making role.

However, for all the handsome cinematography, solid turns for it's decent cast and superb production fans, I couldn't help but feel I was watching a hack Mills & Boons novel being brought to life. The plot after all does stretch credulity to some degree, while it lapses into histrionics. The plot twist of Pitt marrying the considerably younger daughter of One Stab, who Alfred quite rightly describes as inappropriate considering she had been like a younger sister to the three male siblings growing up just doesn't quite ring true. Although this may be coming from a position of resentment and jealousy from Alfred, who bitter at the favoritism his father and youngest brother Samuel have shown toward Tristan. He nevertheless has a point.

The Legends of the Fall is overall forgettable fodder from director Zwick, who for all the sheen and polish he gives the movie, can't compensate for its narrative shorting comings and its penchant for melodrama. On a technical level its consummately crafted but the heavy handedness of its storytelling leaves something to be desired and it's thanks in no small part ot its cast, that they managed to be the glue that holds the movie together as well as Zwicks assured direction. At over two hours in length it passes the time and just manages to not out say it's welcome. But not long after it has ended you'll be hard pressed to remember it.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Doctor Who: The Church on Ruby Road (2023)
Season 1, Episode 0
6/10
Gatwa makes for a charismatic presence even though the story is a frivilous, camp mish-mash of Gremlins and Labyrinth
27 December 2023
Warning: Spoilers
It is the lead-up to Christmas in 2023 and young Ruby Sunday is an orphan who was raised in care by her foster mother Carla and her now bed-ridden grandmother Cherry. Attempting to find the truth about where she came from proves fruitless. However, she and certain people around her begin to experience common bouts of bad luck. When a recently bi-regenerated Doctor arrives on the scene and begins investigating the phenomenon. He unravels a plot by a crew of alien Goblins to kidnap Lulabelle, the newly fostered baby girl taken in by Carla. Whom they plan on feeding to their mighty Goblin King, and whom the Doctor makes it his mission to rescue.

Essentially marking the first full-length debut story of Ncuti Gatwa, after his relatively brief introduction at the end of The Giggle just a couple of weeks previously. The Church on Ruby Road marks a welcome return to the Christmas Specials that Russell T. Davies, funnily enough, introduced along with David Tennant when he made his own debut back in 2005. Suffice to say Gatwa made something of a splash with what was a lenghier than normal initial introduction to his iteration of the Doctor. And with his first proper outing he continues to do so as he proves as he did in his role as Eric Effing in Netflix's Sex Education, that he is a charismatic force of nature. He has an instantaneous presence, and the rapport he has with Millie Gibson's Ruby Sunday couldn't be any more palpable. Although, as good as she is in the role, Gibson's personality traits and mannerisms seem oddly all to familiar to Jenna Louise Coleman who has previously played former companion Clara Oswald.

Putting those qalms to one side however, Ruby does have a very charming and endearing relationship with her foster mother Carla, as well as her foster grandmother Cherry. No doubt there may be those naysayers who complain that the interacial nature of Ruby having being raised by a black foster parent is Davies ladeling on "The Message". Although personally I found it to be overall very positive to see a youny girl having been brought up in a black family background, and having grown in to a healhty stable young woman.

Some may balk at the inclusion of a trans-woman being a member of a band that Ruby performs with, as with the inclusion of a middle aged man named Abdulah in a pre-credits sequence at the end. And they may or may not very well be right, but these are the least of some of the issues that Imay have had with this latest Christmas offering from Davies. For some of the positive aspects there were withThe Church on Ruby Road I did have several reservations. Not the least of all being the plot which is something of a mish-mash of Gremlins which incidentally was a Christmas horror movie, and the Jim Henson movie Labyrinth. Hell, the figurehead and leader of the motley crew of Goblins is himself called The Goblin King. Although he is far away from being the dashing, handome figure that David Bowie was in the 1986 fantasy movie. We even get a musical interlude just as the Goblins are preparing for their monstrous superior is about to feast on the helpless baby Lulabelle.

The story also feels all too camp, and frivioulous even by the series' own standards, while the way the Goblin threat is wrapped up is done so all too expediently and feels lazy and contrived. While I have further reservations in regards to Ruby's future story arc. One gets the feeling we're going to have another Rose, Girl who Waited, Impossible Child plot where the companion has some special connection to the Doctor that goes beyond them just essentially being a normal, average unassuming human being. Practically gone are the days where it seemed that the Doctor just had a connection with his companions which was puerely down to chemistry, and a mutual admiration, respect and affection for one another.

This however, is not to say that the story is awful. It's certainly far from the worst of the Christmas Specials that davies has himself written. The worst being Voyage of the Damned which featured the toe-curling sight of Queen Elizabeth II waving to the heavens and thanking David Tennant's Doctor. It's passable if you can get past Gatwa's Doctor proceeding to sing, and not that I am knocking his vocal talents because he certainly has them. However, this just felt a step too far in what is transparently be in the camp fun stakes. And if that doesn't make matters worse, Gibson who is passable enough in her vocals ends up joining in.

To round things off we have ex-Eastenders star Anita Dobson who is relable as ever playing Ruby's neighbour Mrs Flood who proves to be the first character to break the fourth wall in the series, since Willaim Hartnell did so in the Christmas episode of The Dalek Master Plan back in 1965. One wonders if she is going to prove to play some significant part in the series, and that she is nore than she appears to be. She most definitely knows what a TARDIS is which leads me to wonder if she is a Time Lady. Perhaps she's Romana or anothe rincarnation of the old woman we saw in The End of Time who had some connection to the Doctor. Or perhaps she's both.

Either way The Church on Ruby Road makes for a passable introductory story to the Doctors 15th personae. Although I must confess to having mixed feeling towards Gatwa. I don't doubt he is going to make an excellent and formidable Doctor. However, due to the fact that he seems to support the direction that Davies wants to take the series in, which includes the tiresome necessity to deliver "The Message", I am ill at ease as to its future. Considering it's drastic drop in ratings with the three 60th Anniversay specials having been the lowest for any series special in some time. If Davies doesn't get his act together, and concern himself with writing science-fiction/fantasy stories, rathet than hitting fans over the head with heavy handed woke politiking. There may soon not be a series ofr him to even be able to do so. Not that I would want him to do so in the first place. Anyway, I await 2024 and the latesr serious with some trepidation, as I don't doubt the majority of other fans.
6 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Locke (2013)
9/10
An inspired piece of minamalist filmmaking anchored by a magnetic performance from Tom Hardy
19 December 2023
Ivan Locke is a loving and devoted husband and father as well as a successful construction manager. After receiving a phone call just as the most important job of his career is nearing completion, he finds himself traveling to an unknown destination. As the night unfolds he finds his life and career being likely changed forever, and not for the better.

A vehicle and the pun is very much intended for the incredibly versatile, charismatic, and mesmerising Tom Hardy. Locke, the brainchild of writer and director Steve Knight was a movie that upon its release received some criticism as just being Tom Hardy stuck behind the wheel of a car for an hour and a half. Those who leveled said criticism can't have been paying any attention, for the movie is a sublime piece of minimalistic cinema thanks in no short part to Knight's superbly written screenplay and Hardy's beautifully nuanced and subtle performance as the titular Ivan Locke.

Essentially Knight has us going into the movie blind, not knowing anything about the man and why as the movie opens we see him embarking on his journey. It's only as he proceeds on his trip through speakerphone calls with his boss Gareth; his junior Donal; Katrina, his wife of 15 years, and his two sons Eddie and Sean, that the story begins to unfold and his reason for making the hour and half journey from Birmingham to London becomes apparent. For the entirety of the movie, Hardy is the only person that we ever see on screen, with the other actors' voices only ever being heard off-screen. Needless to say, the shooting schedule for the movie was somewhat unorthodox, with Hardy having filmed his part in 6 days. His scenes were shot twice per night as they were done in a single take. The other actors were at the time in a hotel room, speaking on the phone with Hardy, who was on location. This however did not do anything to affect the quality of the performances, and not least the movie start is positively magnetic, so much to the point that he holds your attention for Locke's complete runtime.

It would be very easy for the movie's plot to swiftly run out of steam, but Knight miraculously manages to keep the story rolling along, piling on one dramatic obstacle after another. The pressure swiftly begins to mount, and as Locke manages to just hold things together the stress becomes ingrained ever so lightly in his countenance. In the hands of a less accomplished and gifted actor or writer, it could descend into melodrama and histrionics, but it's so tightly written and Hardy so nuanced that it couldn't feel any more real. More shrewd is Hardy's artistic decision to play Locke as Welsh, with a silky crisp twang that complements the protagonist's calm, relaxed nature. His voice is so imperturbable that it is almost hypnotizing, making it practically impossible for your attention to waiver for a second.

Some may find the movie's open ending with Locke's ultimate fate being left up in the air frustrating, although I find it more rewarding as it makes you empathize more with him, as you figuratively are put in his position of not knowing what the future may bring for him. While I fail to see how in any other way Knight could have brought the movie to a close. Locke is a masterclass in how an actor can carry a movie on his shoulders, although Hardy is supported by a plethora of superb vocal performances from a range of talented thesps. Like Buried it proves what can be achieved with a minimalist concept, and a very low budget, although in this case even more inspired and amazing results. Locke is a must-watch, although unlike some movies due to the nature of its plot it loses something on repeat viewings. Making it a one-time-only deal. Locke is nevertheless a superb piece of unconventional film-making.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Attempts to ape the gentle, poignant comedy of Bill Forsythe but gets it very much wrong
17 December 2023
Will and Ronnie are two Scottish twenty-somethings from the Wester Hailes district of Edinburgh who have grown weary of their lot in life. Rebelling against the monotony of their existence they become the equivalent of contemporary highwaymen. Each of them donning Clown and Wolfman masks, they rob tourist coaches in the highlands carrying vacationing Americans. As they continue their crime spree, and their notoriety grows they attract the attention of the media becoming modern-day folk heroes into the bargain. Due to the ineptitude of the local police force they manage to continuously evade capture and arrest. However, when an American Cop who just happens to be among the passengers during one of their robberies decides to pursue them himself, he proves to be more than a match for them.

Following off the heels of a series of light-hearted comedies that hit cinema screens in the early eighties, Restless Natives arguably owes some influential debt to the movies of Scottish writer and director Bill Forsythe whose works have included the critically acclaimed Gregory's Girl and Local Hero. It certainly attempts to be gentle and poignant in very much the same tone with its tale of two Edinburgh lads who are fed up with getting the short stick in their individual lives and proceed to, rob coaches carrying American tourists in the Scottish highlands. Indeed, the movie manages to squeeze an ample supply of sympathy for its youthful duo, one of whom Will is at the bottom of the pile career-wise as a city street sweeper. His best friend Ronnie who fares slightly better is employed in a joke shop, but unlike his bosom buddy who is his only companion leads an otherwise lonely existence.

It feels almost kind of like Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, although both of the movie's lead characters turn to crime, both make for pretty likable and affable protagonists. Will is quietly spoken and despite being a strapping six-footer is a gentle kind-hearted soul while Ronnie is contrastingly more loquacious and a bit more of a character. He is also undoubtedly the brains of the operation. The thing with Restless Natives is that the low social standing of its somewhat tragic anti-heroes is that it acts as a reflection of the social economic State of Scotland in the mid-eighties. Although not necessarily a "political" movie so to speak, there is an undercurrent of anti-Thatcherite social commentary regarding the post-industrial economic blight in American director Michael Hoffman's comedy caper.

However, for some of the potential that Restless Natives has, and despite the subtle political aspects writer Ninian Dunnett fails to deliver on the promise that it might have had. Chiefly, what bogs it down is the ridiculous and somewhat incredulous direction Nunnett takes the plot. The romantic sub-plot that revolves around Will and the pretty young coach tour guide Margot from the off stretches credulity. Seemingly amused and less than perturbed by the fact that she and her fellow passengers are being held up at gunpoint by two glorified criminals. The predictable romance that blossoms never really rings true between them both, when Will proceeds to track her down, and in one misjudged scene he actually convinces Ronnie to assist him in their respective guises to deliver a bouquet of flowers to her mid-bus tour. Presumably, this is meant to inject some further charm and an endearing quality to proceedings very much in the mold of Bill Forsyth. However, Nunnett unlike Forsyth lacks his aptitude for pulling the heartstrings of his audience.

If that's not silly enough it's when both young men go on to become regarded as modern-day Rob Roys, who for anyone not familiar with Scottish History was a Scottish outlaw who came to be perceived as being a folk hero in a similar vein to Robin Hood. To give director Hoffman kudos he does manage to keep the pace rearing along at an even pace. The scenes involving Will and Ronnie's Clown and Wolfman being pursued through the streets of Edinburgh to the strains of Scottish folk band Big Country's electrifying title theme tune are likely to give you goosebumps. That being it's relatively short-lived, and both lead actors, Vincent Friel and Joe Mullaney don't entirely cut the mustard as convincing leads. Friel is stilted throughout, although Joe Mullaney although far from commendable fares better and can breathe more life into Ronnie. He also manages to bring some measure of understated vulnerability and poignancy to his cheeky chancer, especially in the graveyard scenes. It comes as likely no surprise that both actors, although Friel has continuously managed to maintain something of a career have faded very much into obscurity. However, what hurts the movie besides the at best mediocre performance of both actors is their out-of-place Glasgeigian accents. Especially Bernard who despite giving a reliably charismatic turn as Will's slightly eccentric father, as an English actor plays him with a Glasgow accent that is contrary to the movie setting. Albeit a thoroughly convincing one. I suspect that the fact that Hoffman was and is American and therefore unfamiliar with Scottish colloquial accents would have accounted for this.

Out of the youthful cast on hand, it's Teri Lally who by far is the most worthy of notability, delivering a charming and winning performance as Margot. Who, despite having gone on to a long-running Scottish Soap Opera, Take the High Road has herself found herself dwindling into the same obscurity as her two male co-stars. It's only Ned Beaty as the chief antagonist as it were, who is notable among the cast as a veteran Hollywood supporting actor who is of a noteworthy presence.

Lumbered with a scarcely credible conclusion that puts the con in contrived, Restless Natives have nevertheless bemusingly gained some minor cult status and some positive recognition from some movie critics. It didn't prevent it from being a commercial failure which I think fairly earned despite it not exactly being awful. It fails to strike the right chord while lacking the social realism and adroitly judged gentle poignancy of Bill Forthye's Gregory's Girl and Local Hero.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bronson (2008)
8/10
A stylish and incendiary "Biopic" featuring a superb, immersive chameleon performance from Hardy
16 December 2023
The True Story of Michael Peterson, who as a young man decided to attempt to rob a a post office with a sawn-off shotgun. He is however apprehended by the police and sentenced to seven years in prison. He would go on to spend 34 years behind bars, 30 of which were in solitary confinement due to violent crimes he committed while being incarcerated. All the while becoming renowned in the media for his volatile reputation and earning himself a dubious celebrity status.

The latest movie from Danish-born writer/director Nicolas Redn Refn who had made his name with his Pusher trilogy. Bronson marked his second English language feature after his 2003 psychological thriller Fear X. Based on the life of one of Britain's most infamous and divisive figures, who would earn the title of being one of the country's most violent criminals. He was responsible for a dozen hostage takings and assaults on prison guards while incarcerated. The movie invites comparisons with the Australian bio-pic Chopper, which detailed the life and times of the notorious Mark Brandon Read. However, unlike Read, although Bronson has been guilty of a series of violent crimes while behind bars he has never murdered anyone. Which is why to this day there have been calls for his release from prison.

The movie depicts the early childhood of a young Michael Peterson who unlike Read came from a fairly stable and loving middle-class family background. Even though his predilection for violence reared its ugly head as a child. Bronson is not short on an ample amount of style and verve, with the eponymous anti-hero narrating his life in front of a live audience within a vaudeville-style theatre in prison clothes. His story is told in a series of vignettes with interludes of his narration. Despite its fairly gritty subject matter, Winding Refn doesn't shy away from peppering the movie with some black humor, particularly Bronson's self-deprecating narration.

Hardy is as always compelling delivering a performance that is nothing short of chameleon in nature. Bulking up with a weight gain of 40lb in muscle, growing a trimmed mustache, and shaving his head he becomes barely recognizable. He deeply immerses himself within the role, having met Bronson on several occasions in high-security psychiatric hospitals having paid great dividends. He clearly manages to have gotten inside the man's head, mimicking his voice and mannerisms to an extent that is quite simply eerie. A feat also phenomenally pulled off by Australian actor Eric Bana, who himself had met Mark Brandon Read in preparation for his role portraying him in Chopper.

The stylistic nature of the movie as well as the fact that it is a biopic that casts a spotlight on a notorious convicted felon, has predictably raised a few eyebrows, courting controversy. Not helped by the fact that an audio recording of Bronson was played at the movie's premiere with no prior permission granted by officers at HM Prison service. Winding Refn is indeed evidently inspired in his directorial flourishes by Stanley Kubrick's A Clockwork Orange which itself was highly contentious and controversial upon its theatrical release in 1972. Scenes of violence perpetrated by the titular anti-hero shot with classical music playing over it as well as camera shots and angles being decidedly Kubrickian. Although, whether it in any way glorifies Bronson is entirely subjective. The director's intentions are to explore the concept of "Bronson" rather than Michael Peterson himself so that the line between the man and the myth is blurred. Something that Chopper's Andrew Dominik similarly set out to delve into with his own movie.

In this respect, it's that it is therefore most likely a misnomer to label it as a Biopic rather than a loose mythological retelling of his life. Winding Refn is at least truthful in that Bronson was eventually institutionalized in several mental hospitals, and art imitates life in so much that Psychiatrists discussed psychopathy and schizophrenia, but never agreed on what mental illnesses, if any, their criminal patient had. Meaning, that in life as in the movie, there has been ambiguity as to his very nature and humanity.

Bronson however is indeed a provocative and incendiary piece of filmmaking that has divided public opinion, as has been the case with people's overall perception of him. At just over an hour and a half in length, it is fairly short in length but due to Winding Refn's unconventional method of storytelling and his ultra-modern excesses, it may likely alienate mainstream filmgoers. It is visually striking and likely marked the career-making role for Tom Hardy, who arguably could be mentioned in the same sentence as fellow British actor Gary Oldman as one of the most formidable talents of his generation. Its brooding, intense tone is punctuated by an electrifying closing synth theme tune by Glass Candy. Bronson doesn't quite make the grade as being a classic of British cinema. It nevertheless will still stay with you long after the closing credits have ended.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Doctor Who: The Day of the Doctor (2013)
Season Unknown, Episode Unknown
8/10
A bit contrived but still a wonderfully imaginative celebration of 50 years of the series
15 December 2023
Warning: Spoilers
In 2013 the Eleventh Doctor and Clara are brought to London's National Gallery by UNIT head Kate Stewart, who shows them a three-dimensional painting of Time Lord origin which depicts the final moments of the Time War on Gallifrey. In 1562 the Zygons are preparing to put a nefarious plan into motion, and the Tenth Doctor is courting Queen Elizabeth I. While on Gallifrey, the War Doctor is preparing to detonate the moment that will destroy his home planet and end the Time War. In the course of events, all three incarnations of the Time Lord's paths cross and both the Tenth and Eleventh Doctor work with the War Doctor, to detonate the moment.

Matt Smith's penultimate episode before he would make his final appearance in the 2013 Christmas Special The Time of the Doctor, this one-off special to commemorate the series' 50th anniversary saw the return of David Tennant as the tenth incarnation of the Time Lord. While also seeing Billie Piper return albeit not a Rose Tyler but the interface of The Moment, a sentient Gallifreyan weapon of mass destruction that takes on her visage. Guest starring as well is John Hurt who appeared at the end of The Name of the Doctor where in a shock revelation it was revealed that there was a secret version of himself who fought in the Time War and is known as the War Doctor.

The third televised multi-doctor story with the past two being The Three Doctors and The Five Doctors, by stories of this nature its plot is always going to feel somewhat contrived. Although to the writer and then showrunner Steven Moffat's credit he rises to the challenge and pretty much delivers the goods. Although one might wonder why the Moment takes on the appearance of past companion Rose Tyler, seeing as the War Doctor has yet to eventually meet her. Which makes Billie Piper's inclusion seem rather superfluous. Although it's to her merit she gives a sublimely alien performance as the Time Lord sentience. Matt Smith is in reliably top-notch form as the Eleventh Doctor, and he impresses in a showstopping opening credits sequence that sees him dangling from the TARDIS as it's airlifted via helicopter by UNIT. A stunt that he performed himself. Jenna Louise Coleman once again offers solid support as Clara, with the chemistry between her and Smith already having been more than cemented.

The early scenes between David Tennant's Tenth Doctor and Queen Elizabeth I in Elizabethan England offer some fanciful moments of humor, with Joanna Page clearly having a ball as the smitten monarch. It also makes a nice little callback to the series three episode The Shakespeare Code as well as The End of Time where his relationship with her was briefly mentioned. We also see the welcome return of the shape-shifting Zygons, who made their one and only appearance in the classic Tom Baker four-parter Terror of the Zygons back in 1976. And they make for a formidable presence as they match wits against the three Doctors.

This brings us nicely to both Tennant and Smith who as has been seen in interviews they've had together, have an excellent rapport with one another which translates greatly on screen. They bounce off of one another effortlessly, and Moffat peppers his script with some witty banter and back-and-forths between the two. While John Hurt's aged personae appear to be perpetually perplexed and bemused by his future self's behavior. Jenna Louise Coleman also ably gels with Tennant as well.

However, what proves problematic is that Tennant predominantly is given little to do and he feels as if he's really just along for the ride, which is a potential pitfall with multi-doctor stories. Moffat however somewhat makes up for this with an inspired plot device that necessitates the presence of all the Doctor's inclusions, which includes a very brief appearance of a a certain future iteration of the Time Lord. It works remarkably well within the context of the plot and avoids what could have been obligatory fan service.

As for the production values, the BBC has clearly pushed the boat out on this one with the relatively brief scenes of the Time War on Gallifrey having the kind of epic quality that you would hope for. The quieter scenes involving the War Doctor and the moment within a barn in the Dry Lands on Gallifrey are beautifully realized.

Although slightly flawed The Day of the Doctor ranks as the best anniversary special of the series and is bolstered by strong turns from its cast with Tennant stepping back into the role with ease, feeling as if he never left the role. And with a neat little cameo near the end, which somewhat foreshadows the impending exit of Smith's Eleventh Doctor, as Tennant's was foreshadowed in Planet of the Dead. This anniversary special makes for an enjoyable, nostalgic romp with solid imaginative storytelling from Moffat, and at just 75 minutes in length, it's admirable that he's able to cram so much plot in such a relatively short run-time. Setting the standard for Smith's departure which would see Peter Capaldi taking up the reins.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed