I respect Nolan's craft but I am not a fan.
I was left a bit bemused with the decisions that Nolan has taken as a director for this film. The entire first half the audience is made to invest emotionally in the making of the A-bomb. Because of the nature of the storytelling showing the film from the point of view of Oppenheimer, it is a natural way of making the audience root for the main character. Understood. Accepted.
The second half goes in establishing that Oppenheimer was a true patriot. He is even decorated for his contribution.
But what about the aftermath?
Yes there are mentions here and there. But there is no visible remorse. Nor in his actions it is clear. It is as if there is no accountability in the man. That is what baffled me the most. Was it the plan to hang it in the middle and allow the audience to choose how they see it fit? If yes then why tell the story from Oppenheimer's pov? Why make the audience connect with the man? The emotional investment in the main character only to be left wondering in the end as to why Nolan chose to leave it this way?
This may have worked for every other person but sadly it has not worked for me.
There is nothing great that we have not already seen in a Nolan film. The acting overall is good. Clearly the studio backed Nolan very well, so well that the film has prominent actors even in short cameos.
It's 5/10 for me as the movie, for me, fails at a human level. The film has no soul.
I was left a bit bemused with the decisions that Nolan has taken as a director for this film. The entire first half the audience is made to invest emotionally in the making of the A-bomb. Because of the nature of the storytelling showing the film from the point of view of Oppenheimer, it is a natural way of making the audience root for the main character. Understood. Accepted.
The second half goes in establishing that Oppenheimer was a true patriot. He is even decorated for his contribution.
But what about the aftermath?
Yes there are mentions here and there. But there is no visible remorse. Nor in his actions it is clear. It is as if there is no accountability in the man. That is what baffled me the most. Was it the plan to hang it in the middle and allow the audience to choose how they see it fit? If yes then why tell the story from Oppenheimer's pov? Why make the audience connect with the man? The emotional investment in the main character only to be left wondering in the end as to why Nolan chose to leave it this way?
This may have worked for every other person but sadly it has not worked for me.
There is nothing great that we have not already seen in a Nolan film. The acting overall is good. Clearly the studio backed Nolan very well, so well that the film has prominent actors even in short cameos.
It's 5/10 for me as the movie, for me, fails at a human level. The film has no soul.
Tell Your Friends