Reviews

If you see this as an independent movie and don't compare it to the previous movies then it's not bad and I found it quite fun and entertaining to watch.

I am however a bit confused to why people don't know about destroying the brain stem of zombies after all those years, people need to stop wasting ammo 😂 Neal McDonough is the star in Resident Evil Racoon City for sure and the movie would probably be a lot less without him.

I think this movie was worth watching even if it's nothing compared to the previous ones with Milla, don't miss out on this one if you are like me and love zombie movies 😁

I think it's important to see this as something else that is based on Toliens characters, but do not see this as his or compare it to Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings triology.

If you think of this series as independent and don't compare it, you will absolutely love it.

I think they have caught something special and I think the characters are what I had expected or more.

If I was to compare Galadriel to Cate Blanchet's character I would be disappointed so I chose not to.

The acting isn't that awful as I heard it would be. I think the actors are doing quite well it just can't be compared to the triology because I think Peter Jackson brought out the very best in each and every actor.

Think of this series as independent and something new and you might like what you see. I was happily surprised.

I watched this "junk" sadly to say I wasted about 5 hours on this wich is time I will never get back. I have always loved the work of Stephen King and people who makes movies out of his work, normally it adds up and there's a good story to it all, it didn't happen in this case sadly. I felt the acting was good from acters I love and some new managed to impress me aswell, this is why I voted it 3 :) It started awsome, but after a while I felt that the story was somehow lost in action and there was a lot of religious stuff all the sudden. Maybe if you are religious you will love this story, but I didn't and am not religious, how ever my not being religious has nothing to do with not liking it. Somewhat after having watched most of the story, I felt confused and wondered if there should be a good ending to it all, wich I felt the lack of. Sorry Stephen, but you put this story in the wrong hands, it could have been done a lot better. I won't be watching the second season.

I give this movie 10/10 because I think this movie has a real story to it, it feels all too real and it makes you sick while watching it. I can't say I would recommend this movie to anyone to see, but it is a movie people should see not because it's such a great movie, well it is, but because it's about real people and a story that could happen. I do how ever hope that people never do anything like this because I want to believe in peoples goodness. The acting is great if not even awesome, the story is "too real" and I can see the Joel Schumacher in this film as well as others, he is one of my favorite filmmakers through the time because of movies like this one. Even if I do not want to recommend this movie it is one of the best movies I ever saw.

I vote this film 2 only because you see a few parts that are nice about Scarlett Johansson ;) When I saw this movie, it was a huge pain to be honest, the only point where I actually wanted to look was when you got to see Scarlett's tits and ass :). Also it seems to me after have watched another film the other day that this is a rip off from an earlier movie called "Life Force" or at least it felt like it to me. I didn't see what was good about Under her skin at all :( I like a good actress like Scarlett and her body parts which were nice to look at, but sorry to say this movie was not at all good entertainment. I actually longed for this movie to end at most of the point I was looking and I was hoping that in the end there would be a good point or something, but it failed so terribly that I feel I want to warn people about watching this movie :( I normally don't review movies unless I have something good to say about them, but this was the end for me when it comes to having any hope about film creating and entertainment. If you do watch this movie, you'll loose the time you spent watching it and will want it back for the rest of your days so I'd say "Watch something else, anything else".

I think the first time I saw this movie, I didn't totally understand it and as I grew older, I grew wiser :) This is the third or forth time I have seen Vanilla Sky and if you follow the story about David and the small messages you should be able to make a point out of it or at least understand the message it sent me. What is happiness to you? This is different for different people and in the end I think real happiness is to understand that you need to be happy in real life and you can't keep living in a dream world. At least this is happiness to me. Everything in life is a choice and now and then this is what life is all about, making choices that leads to other things, greater things in life, or less happy things in life. All though I'd like to think that the end was happy to David and he got the happiness that he deserved. Is happiness really to be good looking or rich or is there a higher purpose to happiness. I think there is and I think he did realize this eventually :) Vanilla Sky is a great movie and should be watched not only once, but twice or three times or more to be honest. This movie is brilliant and becomes more brilliant for each time I watch it.

Now let's see. I was getting a bit drunk this evening when I watched those 2 hillbillies in this awesome movie, but I think that made the movie even more fun to be honest. I had forgotten how sexy Mickey Rourke and Don Johnson were those days, but in this movie it's like a sex explosion with the needed violence and gunfights to make the movie what it is. It didn't really help me that both of them had a motorcycle either because motorcycles might just be sexier than those 2 men together in the same movie. This is a combination of fun and violence and like someone else said "Those movies aren't made anymore". Some people might not like this movie because today when watching a movie a lot of people seem to forget the real reason to watching a movie in the first place, did you enjoy it? Was it fun? In my opinion Harley Davidson and the Marlboro Man is one of its best in this category. It is so totally worth watching more than once. Even the music in this movie is great with Bon Jovi - Wanted Dead or Alive! See this movie, I am sure you will have a great time and maybe even more fun with a bit of alcohol :)

I read some comments on this movie before watching it since it had been rated so low. To start with it made me angry when someone compared this movie with Saw since I happen to love the Saw movies a whole lot. This movie is not even close to Saw, the only thin in common was a cop and a serial killer, which I believe there normally is in every horror movie ever made more or less including a serial killer, there has to be a good cop to try to stop him right?! Anyway I do not wish to spoil your fun. I rated this movie 6/10 because there were a few things that I thought was kind of stupid in the movie, but this didn't spoil my fun watching it. People seem to analyze and reanalyze movies that I think were made for our pleasure and entertainment. Ever since the 80's these kind of horror movies has been made, but in the 80's people didn't complain about how stupid or unreal the movies were, when people died in their sleep in "Terror on Elm-Street" or how stupid the women looked running half naked in "Friday the 13th". This kind of movie is there for our entertainment and some people really needs to push the brain button off while watching some movies. I am a horror movie fan and have been for over 20 years and I have seen a lot of bad movies in my days. "The Fear Chamber" is not one of those, a bit stupid and missed to give me the "creepy feeling running along my back", but accept for that is was totally OK. This movie gave me fun and pleasure for about 1 hour and a half.

I watched this film and was fascinated by it. It contains the little things that many movie makers seem to miss out. This film is never boring and it keeps up an interest thanks to the great actors and the story. After watching the original movie I wanted to see the remake with Naomi Watts and am sad to say that this was a flop. I like Naomi as an actress, but the story had been changed a little here and there and all the sudden it was not "the little things" special anymore, but seemed to be more about showing up Naomi's underwear :). Naomi is a great actress, but one person doesn't normally make a movie good. In this version I found the actors more sincere and real than in the remake from 2007. I am like someone else who had reviewed the remake, guessing that Haneke wanted to make a remake on his own film only for a bigger public. He made a few changes in the remake also which annoyed me because there was no good reason for them as far as I could see. Remakes can be done better than the original movies if they are made either the same or completely different, but changing smaller details when they were thought through from the start will only make them annoying. This original version was how ever very interesting, so interesting that I didn't want to stop watching it. The bad guy gave me the same feeling that only one person in one role has given me before. That is Robert Carlyle as Adolf Hitler in "Hitler, the Rise of Evil". I would say that Haneke had probably found the perfect actors in this first version of this sick and wicked story. Sorry Naomi, you are a terrific actress in the right role, but this remake was not it. In other words I would recommend this movie to everyone who likes seeing odd and funny stories, but not the later version of Haneke's "Funny Games".

I have seen the original movie and loved it. It has been a few years since I last saw the original "When a stranger calls", but it is kind of stuck to my mind because it's a brilliant horror movie with class. In this remake the actors did good, really impressing and at first I loved this remake of my old favorite horror movie, but it kind of falls into pieces along the way. What happened and what did I miss? Why ruin such a great story made from the beginning with an ending familiar to 10 other horror movies done the last 10 years. Honestly, if you are to make a remake of something brilliant, then make sure you make it a better version then the original one. This is not my favorite movie from the 1970s and I'm sad I ever watched it now to be honest. Some things are better left the way they were!

I have now seen "Red Dragon" twice. I must say that was a huge mistake! I have seen Manhunter (the original "Red Dragon" movie) 5 or 6 times. The whole point with Manhunter is to show the world what kind of a man Will Graham, William Petersen is. We get to see that he is smart. He is different thinking. He is thinking exactly like a killer would think in order to catch the killers. I am not sure weather Edward Norton is doing such a bad job on purpose or if it is just the script? He is probably doing his very best, but after seeing the original movie, this makes me sick. I was 9 or 10 the first time I watched "Silence of the lambs", just watched "Hannibal" a couple of years back and thought to myself that I loved them. "Silence of the lambs" is more than great! Jodie Foster as (agent Starling) is doing a great job and she and Anthony Hopkins work great together. And, a big and this is, the atmosphere is there. The atmosphere that makes you scared. But off course it did. I was young back then, watching a scary movie. But I still think "Silence of the lambs" is great. What my point is about "Red Dragon" being so bad is that this is not only a remake of "Manhunter"! This is a disaster! What makes "Manhunter" what it is, is probably because of Michael Mann, the man behind "Miami Vice". Like "Miami Vice", "Manhunter" has a special feeling to it. This is a story told for those interested to watch it, not because it is about a 3 hours long movie, but it is told the way it is. What makes "Manhunter" the better version of this movie is that the story is not short and cut off like "Red Dragon" is. This remake feels more like Anthony Hopkins wanted to play Hannibal once again only because Brian Cox did it in "Manhunter". The thing is that I have seen Edward Norton doing a great job in "American History X", "Fight Club" and "Primal Fear" and I am ashamed of what I have seen here. This remake feels cut off. Most of the original story is missing, the important stuff like who is Will Graham and what does he do? I noticed that clues that kind of melts in and slowly shows up in "Manhunter" are just there in "Red Dragon", this is bad. No, I didn't see it. I stared at the screen and could still not see it. Where was it and what was it. Now this makes me mad! I have always been a huge fan of most of the big names in "Red Dragon", Anthony Hopkins used to do such a great job, but now he feels more like a slob. Brian Cox is doing a lot better because Hannibal is supposed to be ice cold and selfish. Ralph Fiennes, I saw "The Constant Gardener" just the other day and loved it. I have seen other movies as well with him, but he to made me very disappointed here. His role as Francis Dolarhyde was not very convincing in my opinion and he didn't manage to scare me one bit. His eyes may be to honest or something, but it didn't his the right spot. In order to see my point here, you need to see "Manhunter". I promise after seeing "Manhunter" 5 or 6 times and now this disaster twice, I tried to not look to much on "Manhunter" story, but it is impossible to not see all the things that is missing, cut away and the new stuff added that feels like a huge mistake. The ending was different from "Manhunter", but not really to the better. So many things are not right here! Why make a bad remake of something brilliant?

This is one of my favorite serial killers. John Wayne Gaycy is one of the most evil serial killers who ever existed in my opinion and Brian Dennehy makes him Gacy look good. The story and acting is outstanding. To bad these kind of movies aren't made today, but this you don't want to miss so if you haven't seen "To catch a killer" already, please see it! It is hard to believe that Eric Till who directed this movie has also directed "Fraggle Rock" and "A Muppet Family Christmas". It's 2 different categories, but Eric did a great job directing "To catch a killer". I have always loved true stories about serial killers and this is absolutely one of the best movies, based on a true killer that I have ever seen. I would gladly give this 10/10, but probably because Brian does such a convincing job. I really wish there were new of these good old movies made. But today most of the movies are not all to good I am afraid. It was like watching "Dahmer" from 2002 after seeing "The Secret Life: Jeffrey Dahmer" from 1993. It's really quite a difference. Anyway, do see "To catch a killer". It is really one of the best movies ever made.

I read the previous user comment on "The hard easy" and expected the worst. The person said "If u liked this, really, spare no costs, have a brain surgery...". Sad to say, this person must have not seen this movie or needs a brain surgery himself in my opinion. I would say easily that this is the better action I have seen in a long time and that's why I give it 8/10. Names like David Boreanaz, Bruce Dern, Gary Busey and Peter Weller probably made this movie a bit more interesting than it should have been. I will give "The hard easy" extra credit for showing off David Boreanaz very nice shaped upper body. Yummy! Anyway, this is not a movie for highly religious people. The F*** word is there a lot. Actually, that is a word used in every other sentence. But besides that, the story was fun and twisting. The acting was good, even from Nick Lachey who I was not to sure about since he is a musician and has not done much before this. I assure everyone who has some IQ and liked this movie that you don't need a brain surgery! Watch "The hard easy", it is a very interesting movie and if you watch it to the end, you would get the point of this movie as well.

I give "House of the dead" vote 3/10 since this must be the worst movie I have seen in a long time. Jurgen is the only reason this movie get's a 3/10. All though the blond girl made it fun to watch, by being stupid, this was still not a very interesting movie to see. Some of the lines in "House of the dead" were to low for me and I have a sense of humor. I have seen most of the low budget horror movies since the 70s and not all of them are good, but this is worse than all the other movies together. How ever, Jurgen is still Jurgen, but I felt that what on earth was he thinking doing this movie? I read the user comment before seeing this movie and was surprised to see how right the guy was for once. According to the user comment, you would see people running through the woods, flashes of zombies and running people again. This is the typical "Friday the 13th" style and in the early 80s this was actually scary to me. Today it is not! Actually this is so so bad. It is a 90 min movie and it took me several hours to finish seeing it because it was so bad. I felt like someone was trying to rip my brains out from my head from all the flashes. There is nothing more annoying than bad filmed movies and this was one of them. I needed 10 breaks or so in between the bad flashes of people running around like they were not even scared. I don't think it's all to hard playing scared, but I was obviously very wrong. To all horror movie fans out there. This movie is only worth seeing for 1 reason and that is a line from the bimbo that was really funny and a line from Jurgen. The rest of the movie is a pain to watch in my opinion so do yourself a favor and don't watch "House of the dead"! There are a lot more exciting ways to spend a Friday night for sure. I would really hope that someone could do another version of "House of the dead" and do it better. It can be done better!

"Crank" was more than what I expected it to be. I have earlier seen Jason Stratham in movies like "The Transporter" and "Ghosts of Mars". These movies were good, but "Crank" takes the price. Jason is in my opinion a very good actor and he makes his movies fun to watch for the watcher. This is a good action movie without the Hollywood explosions. Actually I find the story in "Crank" rather evil and funny. This is a movie good enough to watch if you are looking for some fun and good action. Mark Neveldine and Brian Taylor are names I don't really know of. But I think they have done great here and hope they will keep up the good work. I would love to see some more of this quality in a movie.

I just saw "Absolute power". I think I have seen this movie years ago and had no idea of the ending. How ever I gave this movie 10/10 since I think the story and the actors are more than great. The story is "true to the heart" so to speak. This is like most of my favorite movies, something that could happen in real life and this is why it is excellent in my opinion. Clint Eastwood, Gene Hackman and Ed Harris is the best combination, they together are doing 95% of "Absolute Power". I doubt the movie would have been the same without the three of them. This movie is "Absolute evil" and it is a must to see this at least once in your life. I wish they would make this great movies now days. Go Clint go!

I stopped watching "Slim Susie" after about 10 minutes in order to get my boyfriend to watch it with me. The first 10 minutes I was laughing continuously and couldn't stop. I have heard about "Slim Susie", but the last few years of Swedish comedy has been kind of boring. The kind of movies where you almost fall asleep because they are all the same and have similar endings, but "Slim Susie" is not. Quite many of the actors are new faces to me. But in this case I think that was more positive than negative. I can't think of a better movie to watch when it's raining outside and you need some fun. This is it, you have found the right movie! Really, I have not seen anything this funny since 1980s. And the best is that Bengt Alsterlind from (Hajk) has a part in "Slim Susie". This movie really shows the Swedish small town humor and when the acting seems bad, remember: I think it was meant that way. I am happy to say that "Slim Susie" is now among my DVD-collection!

"Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas" was absolutely pure torture for me to watch! I had to spend 3 hours watching this movie, rewinding and stuff because I didn't want to miss 1 thing. "WARNING!" People who don't like other people doing drugs, stay as far away as you can from this movie. What do I mean when I say it was pure torture? I mean that I could not stop laughing while watching "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas". I know that Johhny Depp is a brilliant actor, but I had no idea that Benicio Del Toro could act so good. I have seen a few movies where Benicio was a part of, but never really noticed him being there. He is noticed in "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas"! Acting score in my opinion for both would be 10/10. The story, well that's another 10. But I think the most important in "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas" is the movie all together. If you are not used to laughing, you should try watching this movie bit by bit, not all at once. This is a killer!

Maybe "Get Rich or Die Trying'" is not the movie of the year, but unlike the previous "3 year old, looking for Hollywood explosions" I liked this movie a lot. The story was all there. I have never been to USA or the black peoples quarters, but this is pretty much like I imagine it to be. A hard life where you need to fight for what you believe in. "Get Rich or Die Trying'" is not far away from being just as good as "8 mile" with Eminem. All though I think that this kind of category in movie business is the kind of movie where you need to have a brain and actually use it from time to time in order to get what this movie is about?! I can't say how good an actor I think 50 cent is since I have only seen this movie with him, but I think it's important to keep in mind that "a rapper with stile" was needed for this movie and 50 cent has proved to me as a Swedish girl once again that he is top quality! See this movie please if you have some brain, if not don't =) 50 cent rocks!

I read somewhere that some commenter said "a hand was being put up a cows ass 3 times under the time of 15 minutes". Now that is bull actually. If this person would have listened to the things the actors in this movie had to say, he would have understood that the cow was about to give birth and that the person "putting his/hers hand in the cows ass" was a veterinarian that was about to check the calves condition and therefor made a ultrasound on the cow. Anyhow, this movie was actually better than expected. Especially since I read a comment that was no use to me what so ever. I liked this movie because it seemed quite real. It seems like something that could happen. But if you want something including explosions, watch something else. This is not the movie! I have heard that Irish meat could give "mad cow disease" and after "Isolation" I am not eating any more Irish meat. "Isolation" is scaring enough, fun to watch (at least if you like animals), gives a real feeling and this might be why I found it scary. In my opinion the things that scare me the most is stuff that could happen in real life and this could. I liked this B-movie a lot. Enjoy this movie when you are tired of all the explosions from the Hollywood action world.

I decided to give "The Zodiac" 5/10 because I was almost falling asleep watching this movie. I was sure of who the killer was after watching this movie after 30 minutes. I found 2 clues and a motive. The police didn't, instead they were chasing after a shadow. The Zodiac gave the police quite many clues, but instead of looking after the clues and a motive, they seemed really stupid. Maybe I have been watching CSI and NCIS to many times, but the clues were all there and it's sad that the police missed all the clues. The kid seems more intelligent than any other person in "The Zodiac"! Interesting story though, but in my opinion the people in the movie are to stupid. I find it sad to say this as "The Zodiac" is based on a true story, but it's fact. Really guys and girls, if you're looking for a movie just to watch, watch this. It's partly exciting and interesting, but I found it more annoying because of all the stupidity than anything else.

I have seen all the newer versions of Henning Mankell's Wallander series and the ones with Christer Henriksson in Wallander seems like movies for younger people. Seeing Den 5'e kvinnan really made me think =) 90 minutes doesn't really make these kinds of movies all they should be, which the newer versions usually are, to short, doesn't really hit you in the head, do they? It takes a masterpiece to make something that feels real for the viewer and this feels real! Rolf Lassgård should if he has not already get a golden for his part as Wallander in my opinion. Rolf makes Wallander seem like a real person, he is not perfect! No one is and in the newer movies I have seen Christer Henriksson as the perfect police officer who doesn't make mistakes and is nice and understanding to everyone. That's not really real to me and I think that even in movies we watchers need to see the none perfect versions =) I refuse to spoil this movie, that's why I can say that I can't say very much more about it accept for brilliant acting, not only from Rolf. You have to see this movie to understand what I am talking about and as I was stuck for about 4 hours in bed watching it I am sure you won't be disappointed hehe.

If you like horror watch this movie! I watched this movie by mistake, thinking it was "Red Eye" made by Wes Craven, but couldn't stop watching =) I liked this movie from the beginning...I think it's quite unique and creepy which I like. I'm a big horror movie fan and love creepy Asian movies. "Redeu-ai" got lost somewhere along the way somehow though I think. I gave me lots of hope in the beginning and middle of the film but no creepy feeling in the end and that made me a bit sad =/ It reminded me of "Dark Water". Lots of creepy scenes and not much in the end. But I still think it's worth seeing. I really don't hope the Americans try to copy this film to as the have with "The ring", "Ringu" and "Dark Water", "Honogurai mizu no soko kara". The Americans copy very good movies and make a bad version I think. Please leave "Redeu-ai" as it is Americans, I beg of you!