Reviews

25 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Great story of a boring anti hero
6 January 2022
Boba Fett, you gotta love 'm. In retrospect I thought the first episode, on first sight boring, was actually a great fit to the BF character, who I find has the character traits of both a somewhat boring anti hero ánd a great hero with super actions. The first episode was somewhat lame, a character trait BF posesses. The slow pace and lack of action mimics the lame anti-hero in BF. The second ep definitely highlights the hero in Boba, with it's great action and interesting changes of different scenes and landscapes.

So the series really does give great respect to this interesting Star Wars character. Let's hope it will continue like this.

Speaking about Star Wars, Joh Favreau is the true one and only successor of George Lucas. George can be content that his legacy is finally in safe hands.
0 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lethal Weapon (1987)
1/10
a 1 for bad acting
5 January 2021
Can acting really be this bad? Yes it can. I've seen only bad films from Mel, but this surely is his worst.
8 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Mandalorian: Chapter 14: The Tragedy (2020)
Season 2, Episode 6
2/10
Gustavo Fring in Space
4 December 2020
Despite Gustavo Fring in Space , compaired to season's 2 first episode wherein so much was happening, ep2-6 could have all been put in one episode easily.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Mandalorian: Chapter 10: The Passenger (2020)
Season 2, Episode 2
10/10
In it's Form, the Best
7 November 2020
Warning: Spoilers
A great concept to have a main storyline which allows for smaller sidestories inside the larger whole. It's been done before of course, with other great series; comes to memory is Star Trek Voyager. That's the chosen format for The Mandalorian. If you take for example another popular series from the past 'Breaking Bad', this works slowly and constantly towards the conclusion. But this is a completely different framework here.

I find this episode one of the best. It has all the elements which build up to great entertainment. At the same time, it's never lame. This episode clearly focusses on further character deepening of The Mandalorian. We see how he kills the Jawa without any remorse, which even makes Baby Yoda frown, and he shows a great part of selfishness when he's hold by the pilots of The New Republic. Hearing the words 'May the force be with you' coming from the mouth of Mando, a phrase he clearly not believes in, is only spoken by him to mislead the fighterpilots of this huge New Republic, making it almost sound like 'Heil Hitler' in the haydays of Nazi Germany. When finally he is saved by the same fighterpilots later in the episode, it is clear these pilots were in fact goodhearted, whereas Mando comes to the fore as a biased, selfish loner who has lost fate in the goodness of people.

What also further adds to the ongoing, greatly entertaining element of 'incorrectness' in this series was the moment wherein Baby Uoga eats the eggs of the Frog-lady. As soon as Baby Yoda lay his eyes on the eggs of this sweet frog, you were hoping the eggs would be safe, which of course was never the case. Despite all that, the Frog-lady remains sweet towards Baby Yoda, making her already one of the greatest characters of this series for me!

These character sketches are for me the most interesting parts in this episode, although I really love all the entertainment, from the über-cute Frog-lady, to Ice-spiders, to a great spaceship chase, to the dreamlike sequence in which Baby Yoda walks through the field of spider eggs..

Also love that DR Mandible is an insect, which by itself alone holds material for an entire new series.

Overall, I find that what makes The Mandalorian such a great watch and so much better than all Star Wars films (except for the first three) is that it pairs good entertainment with character building. All characters have a certain level of depth, whereas all recent SW films, the main characters were flat, without any depth of character. For me this is the main key why The Mandalorian works so well.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Better Call Saul: 50% Off (2020)
Season 5, Episode 2
9/10
Nice
25 February 2020
Don't know what happened to the series, but it has become 100% better than what it was in the previous 4 seasons. Clearly it's closer to Breaking Bad than it was before. Must be the reason then. Finally, after 4 boring seasons, things start moving!
8 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Orville: Identity, Part II (2019)
Season 2, Episode 9
4/10
Dissapointing
1 March 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Quite a dissapointing episode after the promising part I. The behavior of the Kaylons is inconsistent and not very credible. The writing of McFarlane is simplistic. Entertaining and boring in one go.
14 out of 69 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Breaking Bad: Felina (2013)
Season 5, Episode 16
10/10
Fantastic Series. Too bad of its prequel Better Call Saul
17 October 2018
This series had deserved a great prequel. Really too bad its legacy is a little bit deminished by the very bad prequel Better Call Saul. I even prefer to forget BCS exists because it really takes away a lot of the charm BB has. The two series just don't mix.
4 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Better Call Saul: Coushatta (2018)
Season 4, Episode 8
1/10
Better Call "How we spread the story over 5 seasons what we could have said in one episode" Saul
25 September 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I'm glad my life is pretty eventful and full with nice exciting and invigorating things. So when I want to have a boring evening, I'm happy it is time for Better Caul "How we spread the story over 5 seasons what we could have said in one episode" Saul. It's soo boring. It could have been said in one episode. But, then they spread it over 5 seasons. Probably there will be a Better call "How we spread the story over 5 seasons what we could have said in one episode" Saul OFFSPRING; the son's nephew of Better Call "How we spread the story over 5 seasons what we could have said in one episode" Saul. Looking forward! <3 <3 <3

NB: This review contain spoilers. Namely: Boring
15 out of 152 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Better Call Saul: Talk (2018)
Season 4, Episode 4
1/10
Better call Boring
29 August 2018
Warning: Spoilers
As I understand it, this series is going to be 5 seasons in total. We can now already see a sort of a storyline-curve of the entire series, since we know where it will end- in Breaking Bad. I'd say the tension curve of the series is rather weak. It was till now mostly a depiction of a series of events which didn't have a direct link with the series of events in Breaking Bad. Unless you see it as a psycho-analytical explanation why certain characters (especially Saul) became the person he became in BB. In that perspective the series isn't even very coherent, because for instance the character of Mike rarely sees any character development. Nor does Gus or Lydia. In Episode 2 of season 4 there was finally a strong move towards the BB storyline, but this episode totally breaks this down again. I find the BCS series very disapointing in the overall storyline and weak in tension curve. It may still go closer to BB, but for me the moment wherein it should have happened was somewhere in Season 3. They can never make this up again in 1,5 season.

Overall, it all is just too casual. Self indulgent and forced arty. But by that, it totally missed the point.
12 out of 68 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The X-Files: Rm9sbG93ZXJz (2018)
Season 11, Episode 7
10/10
Afraid to rate negative
1 March 2018
Warning: Spoilers
After seeing this episode I'm afraid to rate The X Files negative ever again. Rate a 10.
23 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Orville: New Dimensions (2017)
Season 1, Episode 11
10/10
Blueprint for future TV series
1 December 2017
Best episode thus far. Excellent mix of entertainment, literary references, humor, scientific mumbo jumbo (which should be in every itself respecting SF series) and even social comments (the made reference between the 2 dimensional society and equality in a society). The total mix is quite a grown up form and almost a blueprint for future TV series.
37 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Orville: Firestorm (2017)
Season 1, Episode 10
10/10
Clowns in Space
17 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Nice Episode. I'd only like another ending better; when Alara is finally lying in her bed peacefully, she turns to her other side to see the clown AGAIN! Fade out... Nonetheless, a top rate episode & gets a 10... NB: I can see a whole new SF-Horror genre of clowns in space! This episode is a good crossover of genres. I also liked the previous episode a lot. Star Trek Voyager's holographic Doctor (Robert Picardo) plays Alara's self-centred father Ildis Kitan.
18 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Orville: Majority Rule (2017)
Season 1, Episode 7
5/10
Enjoyable and Boring
28 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
I thought The Orville series had a pretty good start, but now after 7 episodes I've also seen a couple of episodes with a bit of a boring content. The series has so much more potential but the writer chooses often for an easy option.

I find it really very unlikely that there will be a planet anywhere in the system which looks so familiar to 21st century earth like the planet which was pictured in this episode (they even wore jeans? common...). If this was meant in a humorous way, the writer clearly failed to be clear about it.

Jack of all trades Mc Farlane is the writer. Does anyone ever acts as a mirror to this American guy? In my opinion he could definitely use a writers group to help him brainstorm about better ideas. I like to compare it to the series Breaking Bad, in which the main writer Vince Gilligan had a whole group of writers helping him to see the full potential of the series and make the series better as a whole. At this point I find the full potential of the series The Orville is by far not being approached. Mc Farlane surely is a gifted writer, but it will be better to have some other writers reflect on (his) ideas. I personally doubt this has happened thus far.

Hopefully in a second series of The Orville (if it ever happens), a writers group will help him to create the series.

About the series as a whole thus far, I haven't seen a really bad episode yet. One was pretty good (ep4), some fine, but some where rather mainstream and boring. At the beginning of the series I gave it a 9, but since my rating of the series has dropped to a 7. I hope next episodes will be better.
7 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Orville: Pria (2017)
Season 1, Episode 5
5/10
Disappointing
5 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Not the best episode of The Orville thus far. Some decent writing but a bit on the conservative side. I'd rather have seen the Orville being trapped in the future and to see how a 25th century crew will survive in a 30th century environment from this episode on. Would have been a nice nod to ST voyager with potentially interesting writing possibilities. Instead I found the ending disappointing and a sort of an anti climax.

Charlize Theron is a fine actress, but not a spectacularly good actress. A bit overrated in my opinion.

Overall, disappointing.
9 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Orville: If the Stars Should Appear (2017)
Season 1, Episode 4
8/10
Excellent, but raises some questions about the script writing
2 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Excellent episode of The Orville which comes very close to some of the older Star Trek series, only with much better CGI. Beautiful bright colors and the judicious use of colors make it look like there's been put a lot of thought in the visual attractiveness. It's like a warm bath for your eyes, all the saturated blues and reds...

That said, the show does raise a few questions. Like, why did I see an actual 3 wheeled Piaggio in one of the scenes on the planet / starship? Why does the city look like a 21th century city (like New York) on earth? Why do the people basically look like humans? Since the starship is approx 2000 years old it should be from around 417 AD (since the story of The Orville happens around 2417; 2417 minus 2000=...) So how's about the New York look of the city and the Piaggio than? Unanswered questions here...

For the rest, an excellent show.
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
crap
20 September 2017
What an utter disappointment this was. I'm a fan of the original film. But this almost adds nothing to the original. The actors are mediocre at best, but especially the writer fails terribly. The choice to hint already early in the film to vampires totally missed the point why the film was so successful artistically in the first place. I stopped watching at series one when they entered The Titty Twister. It went downhill so fast, not only the writing but the acting as well, like the actors totally lost inspiration as well. Till that moment I would have given the film a 6- but after, I give it a 1- . Do not bother watching this.
4 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Orville (2017–2022)
8/10
Great Star Trek / Star Wars / Starship Troopers amalgamation
17 September 2017
Quality is something which shows instantly. You don't need to wait for things to get better after the first doubtful minutes or even seconds. You recognize it in a second if something's good or not.

The Orville is a good mix between (mostly) Star Trek and a dash of Star Wars (Some of the exuberant creatures (like the jelly blob crew member of The Orville) could have been in Star Wars) and a great film like Paul Verhoeven's Starship Troopers (which was another great example of mixing SF with humor. Plus it borrows from it it's 'shocking' gore (like when the scientist on the planet turns into a 125 year old corpse)) Like Starship Troopers this is proof SF and humor can be mixed without becoming dumb. So much better than crap like Galaxy Quest.

Well written and good actors (The casting is so much better than that of last Star Trek series).

And thank god finally some lightness in SF after all this gloomy humorless shite of Batman, X-men etc.

Thumbs up and hopefully this will last many seasons!

Nb: written after s01/e01 so we'll see how things develop...
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Valmont (1989)
5/10
The Cuckold of Dangerous Liaisons...
6 August 2017
Valmont and Dangerous Liaisons differ so much in story line it makes me wonder which of the two comes closest to the original story. At any rate, I found Valmont, although well made, a bit boring and not something I'll remember for long. Dangerous Liaisons is a true classic with much spectacle. I have seen DL twice. I rate Valmont a 5 and DL a 10.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Better Call Saul: Sabrosito (2017)
Season 3, Episode 4
9/10
Let the show begin now...
2 May 2017
Finally after 2 full seasons of slow character building which I sometimes felt was very hard to sit through, episode 4 of season 3 promises a more action based future for BCS. The show very much felt like a Breaking Bad episode which was basically the first reason why I started watching BCS. At hindsight I can understand from a writers perspective especially, the slow character building has a certain amount of appeal, but for me it could have been much less (3 or 4 episodes of BCS at max.). I basically found the first two seasons boring and disappointing because the totally different pace and content compared to Breaking Bad. Of course the writers didn't want the same kind of build up as BB. But for me the first two seasons of BCS were much to arty in this perspective. The writing of BB was especially good because of the mixture between good character building and plain entertainment (dark as it may be). And I especially liked the action parts better than the character build parts. I now am finally looking forward again to new BCS episodes.
9 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Pretty good plot, badly executed
4 March 2017
Basically I like the film. Unfortunately I find the performance of Mel Gibson mediocre at best. Really to bad. Gibson simply doesn't convince me. The main character would have deserved a more lived through performance. With Gibson I have the feeling he simply can't do better. Would have liked to see Brad Pitt as the main character. Would have been fun. Could perhaps have been an exceptionally good film than. Basically the characters of Gibson and Roberts somehow reminds me of Bruce Willis and Kathryn Railly as the so-called psychiatric patient and his psych in Twelve Monkeys which was released one year before in 1995. Only the execution of that film was considerably better.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lunacy (2005)
10/10
Highly underrated Masterpiece.
29 March 2013
This is a very good film. By now I've seen all the films of Svankmajer, including his early shorts and later long movies. It took me some time to really appreciate his longer films since they are somewhat different from his short movies. For me personally his short films still form the basis of his work and come the closest to art. The lack of a storyline and of a conventional structure rank his shorts among the most original in cinematography. His longer films have a more traditional structure with a storyline. For that reason his longer films didn't appeal the same way to me (as his short films does) for a long time. With 'Sílení' this came to an end. The film starts with Svankmajer himself introducing the film in his own personal nihilistic style. The film itself is a mixture of a 'normal film' with actors and on the other hand the inclusion of disturbing stop motion cinema. Svankmajer's most beloved actors, the cut off Tongues (I believe they are Cow's Tongues) are seen many times, often together in a twin pair depicting scenes of disturbance, violence, sex and in general Lunacy which is the name of the film. The actors are very good, especially the person who plays the Marquise (De Sade). But also Anna Geislerová (who plays the unstable Charlotte) and Pavel Nový (Servant Dominic) (who played a main Character in 'Conspirators of Pleasure' as well) are excellent. In 'Sílení' Svankmajer seemed for the first time to have found a convincing form for his longer films. It's very balanced through out and the film has a constant feel of threat over it. Svankmajer himself introduces his film as a horror movie. And in fact it is, but in a nihilist typically Svankmajer kind of way. The horror element is not about visual shocking effects, but much more psychological since it touches deep human fears. In this perspective I place it in the same row as Polanski's great films 'The Tenant' and 'Repulsion'. The sex scenes give the film an erotic element, although in a deranged way; The theme and story are very original. The film has a pleasant weirdness, but is never cheap like many of the director's who are influenced by Svankmajer. This film get's a 9 from me.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent film
16 April 2012
This film shows the inadequacy of the point-system of IMDb. Most people here who give points let themself lead by personal 'like or dislike', not being able to look at the film objectively. The film aims not at being liked, instead it wants people to dislike it, because of the horrors it shows. In that perspective it succeeds entirely. The film, although I've only seen it one time (and never ever want to see it again) has some of the most disturbing images in cinematic history. The film comes very close to deep levels of the human psyche, and therefor stabs you right in the heart. This film gets a 10 from me because of the impact it has.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Tenant (1976)
10/10
Best of Polanski
12 March 2012
I always wondered why Polanski didn't make more movies like 'The Tenant', 'Repulsion' And 'Rosemary's Baby'. These 3 films form a trilogy based around themes like Fear, Hallucinations, mental Decay. They all find place (mostly) inside the walls of an apartment. This is Polanski at his best. From these three films 'The Tenant' also has an element of humor, although black as the decay it portraits. It is this humor which makes this film a little more bearable compared to 'Repulsion' which in fact also is an incredibly beautiful film. Both films are a showcase, a teaching of Filmmaking. So masterfully made and with a deep human psychological element. This is the element which is not to be found in his other films (except for 'Rosemary's baby' although in the trilogy this is the lesser one in my opinion)(his other movies, although perhaps skillfully made have never left me satisfied because they stagnated in simple entertainment). The hallucinations in both films are so real and recognizable. The decay comes so close to what is real that it is frightening on a deep psychological level. Where most horror movies use simple shock elements to create tension, these two films create tension by a slow build up of progressing craziness of the main character. Polanski plays the main character himself in 'The Tenant'. His best performance as an actor. Also to be seen is the beautiful Isabelle Adjani. On my list of best films ever this one comes on place 1 (closely followed by 'Repulsion', 'Otto e Mezzo' and 'La grand Bouffe'...)
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Renegade (2004)
7/10
Excellent film
10 March 2012
This is a film which I guess is not for everyone. Personally I find it a really good movie. Like in the Blueberry comic the film shows an America which is really rough, stripped from false heroism so often displayed in most westerns. This surely is a western, but with many Indian-American elements, like there is the use of hallucinogenic drugs and shamanism. Combined with typical western-action elements and the search for a treasure makes this movie an interesting mix. I haven't read all Blueberry comics, in fact only one or two albums, but surely will go through them now. Giraud was a master comic-maker, and a great influence for many. Today he died; 10-3-2012. If you want to check out his work, read the 'Incal' series, which was made together with writer/filmmaker Jodorowski. This comic was an inspiration for the film 'The fifth element' (when you read it, you'll see that the fifth element was an ordinary theft). Back to Blueberry; I give this film a 7.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Overrated...
14 January 2012
This is a nice film. But. I would say highly overrated. When you notice at this film database that films like 'Manhattan' and 'Annie Hall' only get a few points more than this one, things are a little out of balance. I take these films (Manhattan, Annie Hall) as the standard for Woody Allen because they are his very best. I would personally give these films a 10 rating because it has all Allen can give, in terms of originality, Personal handwriting, Craftmanship, etc). Compared to these great films 'Midnight in Paris' only gets a 6 from me, perhaps even a 5. It's a nice film, but I'll not remember it soon after now, while I will always remember his best films. Also in the 80's he made a few nice ones, although not as good as before mentioned films.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed