Reviews

The first part of OMG franchise was about the directly God. One shopkeeper lost his shop by an earthquake which was not a man-made disaster but God. So, he filled a case against God, because he failed to filled case against insurance company etc etc. So, it makes sense. But in this part, there is no relation between God and the victim. A school student who is a teenager and everybody knows a teenager may have various fantasies, including sex. He masturbates in the school toilet and this incident is captured and professionally made by his same aged students. The father filed a case against all of them, the school, who expelled his son for life, the shopkeepers who sold the stimulant medications to him. Nobody filled a case against God, so why God is here? (on the logic of the first part). The father is glorifying Kamasutra and lots of primitive sexual acts, books and sculptures. He also glorifies masturbating in this sense. (Masturbating is not good for health, even for adults and more harmful for teenagers.) Though it is not mentioned in their holy books. But this doesn't mean it is good for health or society. The accused school boy was admitted in the hospital due to this. Here it is clear whether it is good or bad. So, creating questions about its effects is not necessary. Also, nobody raises fingers towards the boys who intentionally captured the video to make their rival infamy in the eyes of society. And also, why here is God to help them? If here is God here to help them why not he comes to each and every movie Bollywood makes? Thus, it's a baseless plot and screenplay. But overall, Pankaj Tripathy is just an underrated actor in Bollywood. He did a great job here. That's all.

A king, who thinks he is not happy. (I didn't get it) He travels his own properties to look for happiness. (Here I asked myself, whoa, am I still happy? LOL) He encounters an object; he becomes happy right at that moment. (I don't know, who understand it) The dwellers, who look like a group of tribals, not actually villagers, suddenly appear. When the king wants that object and promises to give them anything they want in exchange for that. The villagers (more wild than general villagers) want the properties in exchange for happiness. That is, the villagers will give the king happiness/the object, but he has to give the jungle properties to the dwellers.

Here I have listened to hoarse screams, I have seen everything, the object, the king, the villagers, but I didn't see the happiness.

When the next generation claim the properties back, a dancer, but the villagers consider him God-like, vanishes without trace. It is not clear to me, who is the pig? Is that vanished dancer who born again as a pig. However, the demigod of the 2nd generation was the father of 3rd generation hero.

The 2nd generation claimer dies without reason (some will say it is because of the villagers' curse). (I don't think it exists)

Then the story starts with the 3rd generation of two parties.

I won't repeat the story. The thing that disturbed me was that the 3rd generation claimer is a very good person in the entire movie. But suddenly becomes rude and violent (as if, the writer can write anything any moment), on the other hand, the (rude and bad) policeman becomes so gentle suddenly, despite almost killed by the 'hero' (as if, the writer can write anything any moment).

Many are dying in the battle no one cares, but when a fatso (a joker friend of hero who has nothing to do with the story) dies, everyone after him.

The hero is a superman, he can fight even with 100 and win despite taking (sedative charas, we called it ganja). This superman almost dies, but suddenly a ghost appears within him, he screams and screams, as if he is trying to make his viewers laugh. This superman cum ghost cum that dancer which vanished in the 2nd generation moment fix everything. And the villagers don't have to leave their homes.

Then without any reason, the hero vanished like him, I already told twice who vanished.

I don't know why this crap is called a masterpiece. What have other viewers found in this average movie but I don't find them. Very much overrated and overhyped. I think it is marketing (hype) which makes it very enjoyable for some masterpiece callers (or maybe paid reviewers and paid ratings).

The hero has no quality of being a hero of a movie, I am not talking about the actor, I am talking about writing. How a hero who takes weed, kills animals, destroys jungle, makes chaos with the police, wrongfully.

In some cases, the property owner has the right to get his property back. It is the villagers who wrongfully occupied the property.

In one scene the 3rd generation son told his disabled son that, "there was a king who was disabled like you". It makes a point. Why a king would find happiness? What kind of nature of a person is this? Why would he find lots of happiness in an object? The villagers and the dancer cum demigod misguide the king and thus occupied his properties.

Okay, let finish it, some I like are, the heroine, the jungle and some comedy.

1 out of 5. Not recommended.

The 2021 Spider-Man becomes revealed to everyone so he, Mr. Peter Parker, and his family and friends face fame problem. On the other hand, Spider-Man only faces accusing problems as well. So he goes to Dr. Strange to seek help. Dr. Strange has a spell that may erase the memories about the real identity of the Spider-Man from the people of the world. So Peter Parker may not relate to the Spider-Man. Peter Parker agrees and requests to proceed with the spell. While Mr. Strange spells his magic, Peter Parker requests to exclude his girlfriend from the magic. Then he again requests to exclude his best friend and then again his Aunt May. Thus the spell of Mr. Strange was interrupted which results a bug in his spell. The Super-Villains of the past Spider-Man series' come back to the 2021 world. The 2021 Spider-Man wants to get back their humanity to the Super-Villains so that they lost their powers and be normal people. But Dr. Strange denies it. Thus, the 2021 Spider-Man clashes with Dr. Strange which leads to some unexpected events and the movie story deals only with it.

Since this movie got a great number of viewers and got great ratings so, this movie may define logically. That's why the question 'logical and illogical' comes.

One of the silliest stories in a superhero movie. The director knocks on the door of the writer and he gives a deadline to the writer to write a story which brings all the supervillains of the Spider-Man series and all the Spider-Men in his next spider-man sequel. So the writer does it. He make his desired story and put it in this movie. What a silly idea!

What an interesting wrong spell of Dr. Strange. He was trying to scratch some of the memories of the people of the world, but it reforms the Spider-Man's super-villains only, nothing matters with the memory errors. I mean, his wrong spell may spoil the people's memories about spider-man, not re-welcoming the super-villains only. What a coincidence! This type of coincidence only happens in Bollywood.

Ned's spell doesn't bring the last, the most recent, and the most relevant spider-man but the older ones.

The older spider-men come to the world of 2021 but they both were not very surprised by entering through the fire circles. They become familiar with Ned and MJ very quickly.

The older spider-men recall their tragedies and become emotional. If they come from their present universe, so how do the villains come from the past universe?

All three spider-man has their aunt Maries, uncles Bens, MJs. What logic! I'm recalling these characters because this movie has shown us that the previous spider-man movies aren't the same. They are different. If they are different so why their character names are same?

The 2021 Spider-Man tries to show his human characteristic to the viewers he even clashes with one of his co-super-heroes, one of his fellow friends (as they both are the staff of the Marvel cinematic universe). So how does he becomes great if he clashes with another superhero who holds the same responsibility to the human as he does?

I never knew that Spider-Man is also a scientist. He can invent chemicals that destroy the villainous powers of the villains. Which they used at the last moment of the movie in a syringe pushing into the necks of the villains.

I have seen the villains wait until the conversation ends in some scenes. One villain with one spider-man. (When the 2021 Spider-Man fights with the Green Goblin, the other two spider-men were enjoying the fight.)

I don't know why the Statue of Liberty had a renovation in this movie. As if, it would be helpful to ride it and to fight with the villains for Spider-Men. Like this, the writer adds his desired modification in many logic to fit his script.

The all spider-men vs the all spider-men villains. Nothing new here. (Except the 2021 Spider-Man villains.) I was expecting a new one though. So when I found it not, I was frustrated.

If Doctor Strange has the power to bring back the dead villains, why 2021 Spider-Man didn't request him to bring back his dead aunt? Or undo her death incident?

Maybe I didn't understand this movie. Maybe this movie has a broad story and message which flew away over my head.

Overall, for entertainment reasons it is okay but in fact, this movie is very overrated. Rating 6 means fair, 7 means good, 8 means great. This movie is rated 8+ which means it is great. But it is not. In terms of rating, it is fair. But I hated it. The whole movie doesn't make any sense. The story is very silly. This superhero movie doesn't deal with those supervillains who are a threat to humanity. Rather, it deals with the over-acting of the newest Spider-Man who invites the clash between him and the villains denying his fellow Doctor Strange. Those villains had already faced their consequences, so how does he want to reform them? Very tried to glorify this Spider-Man more than the previous ones. What a silliness! Illogicness has its limit! Just I need all spider-men and all his villains in one movie, I need to make a script of my imagination and the people will watch it clapping wow wow.

A remote village is attacked by a team of ruthless bandits. They can't resist the bandits robbing their everything. So, they look for Samurais who can fight with the bandits in exchange for food and shelter. Thus they find a group of unemployed Samurai who agree to take the challenge to defeat the bandits in any way.

One of the masterpieces from director Akira Kurosawa. A prominent director in the history of cinema. Though, many find this movie his best, but I don't think so.

I liked the cinematography very much, the dialogues, the leads, especially Takashi Shimura and Toshirô Mifune. I liked the madness of Kikuchiyo. I liked the leadership of Kambei Shimada. I liked the way he plans to attack the bandits. I cried when the youngest Samurai cries in the rain and burst to take revenge for the death of Kyuzo, the bravest Samurai. I become sad when Kikuchiyo revenges the death of his fellow Samurai and welcomes his own death. I liked the way the rain wash out the entire helplessness of the villagers. I liked the direction which is an example for the whole world. I liked the last dialogue: "The farmers have won. Not us."

Watching this movie is a great experience, in fact. Recommended 90%.

A young governess sent to a village of England when she has two children, who are siblings, to care for. There she discovers the past governess has a dark secret which must not affect the children.

Very atmospheric horror and mystery. Party thriller.

I watched it alone at the late night, so I enjoyed it a lot. But the ending discourage me to rate it high.

Spoiler ahead!!!

The young boy, Miles, sadly dies without a reason, while he dies closing his eyes but when Miss Giddens holds him on her lap, he was opened eye. Just it manages similarity to the eyes of Peter Quint when he was died. But what about Flora? It was not answered.

Recommended 70%.

Spoiler alert!!!!!!! I almost loved the episode until the use of gun. The gun is also a mechanical object which should also be disabled like cars, machines etc. Spoiler ends!!!!!!!

I loved the base, as it deals with human's inner instinctions. They don't need a third party to destroy them. They themselves are enough.

What about the aliens! Watch it!

Recommended 70%.

The encounter indicated by the title of the movie, Brief Encounter, is actually not a brief one, it's a long encounter. They meet on more than 5 Thursdays. So how could it be a brief encounter?

Laura, the protagonist, has her family, married for almost 10 years. Having 2 children. Having a caring husband, she still falls in love with a stranger. How funny. Not funny actually, how ridiculous! Not only fall in love, but they also pass the intimate time with each other. They kissed each other many times, even they tried to become more intimate while getting a chance of an empty flat.

One of the most unfaithful wives.

Not only this, his love interest, the stranger was also a married man with two children. Thus, both are very unfaithful to their life partners.

Having a married life means you've some restrictions you must have to maintain. This movie, by the way, promotes unfaithfulness in marriage.

Otherwise, The movie is good. Very talkative and background talking a lot. Just talking and railway platforms all over the movie.

The ending is like that if you can't pass more times with your illegal relationship, just come back to your husband, as you have no choice. As your illegal partner is no more available.

So it stands, if Alec doesn't leave for abroad, they would remain in their illegal relationship long with more and more lies to their legal partners, husband, wife, children.

I don't recommend adultery with another one while being a married person.

To be honest, the movie-making was very good. I liked the use of lighting and shadows all over the movie. Those who will watch this movie must notice this. Besides this, the ending is just very abrupt and meaningless.

So save your time from this.