Cooking competitions are supposed to be about talented chefs competing with each other, with the best of them crossing over the finish line.
At least that's my take on it, so it's utterly ridiculous to watch a show where the winner is the chef who keeps going on about his family and why he wants to win but is far from the best cook in the competition.
The judges say they voted for him based on his growth during the competition, but by the finale, he was still serving raw meat, so did he really grow? Is that what a cooking show is supposed to be about?
One chef talked about his cooking and why it mattered to him and the other chef actual did the work to show that it mattered to him.
You could see the envy on their faces as they looked at Mike. Sad. The whole thing was sad and a waste of time.
At least that's my take on it, so it's utterly ridiculous to watch a show where the winner is the chef who keeps going on about his family and why he wants to win but is far from the best cook in the competition.
The judges say they voted for him based on his growth during the competition, but by the finale, he was still serving raw meat, so did he really grow? Is that what a cooking show is supposed to be about?
One chef talked about his cooking and why it mattered to him and the other chef actual did the work to show that it mattered to him.
You could see the envy on their faces as they looked at Mike. Sad. The whole thing was sad and a waste of time.
Tell Your Friends