Reviews

9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Unique
13 January 2024
The voice acting, let's admit it, is far from great. The first episodes are slow and contemplative, setting the stages for the later developments, so if one expects fast pace with lot of action and thrilling suspense, that's not the case. The storytelling is clearly not in focus, as after four episodes I feel like I learned nothing new than the the things that I already knew after the first one.

Yet, the show is awesome in its originality, in its attention to creating a picturesque unique world, in many other aspects. The creativity in describing the new world is indeed unparalleled. It's science-fiction at its best.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Sometimes plain cringe
31 January 2023
I wonder what bet had Serban Pavlu lost to have to take this role. He is a good actor and trying to imitate Rowan Atkinson doesn't suit him well.

In the attempt to be funny some scenes get to be borderline cringey, super childish and plain embarrassing. The script might have been original in its initial form, but after the execution it just feels as yet another retake of the same old quarrel between two noisy neighbors. The second half gets worse, and the film was already draining and feeling like it is way longer than it should be.

I could imagine some people enjoying it though. But not many though.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bad Blood (2017–2018)
8/10
No Sopranos but still ok
22 October 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The first season was better. Anthony La Paglia wasn't very expressive but he was charismatic enough to create a complex character. Kim Coates was better suited to play the underdog, unlike in season two where he's hardly a credible boss. Plus, season two comes with some lazy writing, especially in regard with the two villain twins. Or the Reggie character that came out of nowhere, deus-ex-machina style, just to help with Declan's plot, evolution and vulnerabilities.

Still, I like the show, it's got its intriguing parts, some good actors, not bad overall.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Westworld (2016–2022)
5/10
Season 3 is horrible
30 September 2020
You've probably already heard that Season 3 of Westworld managed to be even worse than Season 2. Not even the additions of Aaron Paul and Vincent Cassel could save this pretentious mess. The actions scenes are too many and yet too unimpressive, bringing nothing new or original with them. As for the plot, both the motives and the modus operandi of the main characters seem to change on every episode, or just to remain a clusterf... of confusion. Just to give the impression there's some philosophical depth somewhere out there. I'm gonna do myself a favor and skip season 4, if there will actually be one.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ad Astra (2019)
4/10
Failure can come in many forms
15 July 2020
You've got a Tommy Lee Jones and Brad Pitt playing at their best, you've got a script with so much potential, you've got visual effects that could create great artistry, and yet the resulting film is utterly dull, unprovoking, lacking any real substance and feeling. Not only it feels superficial, but it comes with all kinds of bad science type of goofs and inconsistencies that makes it almost ridiculous at times.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Extinction (2018)
7/10
Nice twist
27 July 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The first half of the movie is pretty boring and reminds quite a lot of a cheap 90s B-movie. Then there's the twist, and things get a lot more interesting. I felt like... my patience was at least partially rewarded.

Pena's acting is decent, but not impressive. I liked more the new guy, Israel Broussard, and Lizzie Caplan.

I still feel like the script had a lot more potential, but this movie is anyway better than its initial ratings show, especially since it comes after a pretty long series of recent Netflix disappointments.
111 out of 161 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Vikings: Mercy (2016)
Season 4, Episode 3
6/10
Rant time
4 March 2016
Warning: Spoilers
The episode felt longer than it should. It has a bad pace, at times nothing interesting or even remotely relevant seemed to be happening.

Anyway, worst of all was the bear fight scene. It was so cringeworthy and badly-executed that I was hoping to end sooner. I get it, this is no Revenant and Bjorn is no Leo, but still, that bear didn't look perilous at any moment of the whole scene. It moved slower than my grandpa and it took worse decisions than a toddler.

The good parts of the episode were the Athelstan apparition, which gave me goosebumps and was neatly done, and the Berserker part, which unfortunately only lasted a couple of seconds.

Oh, and the episode should've been called "Bjorn screaming", it would've made so much more sense.
11 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Vikings: A Good Treason (2016)
Season 4, Episode 1
9/10
Good start (No spoilers)
19 February 2016
Quite a few surprising decisions taken by the main characters in this episode, some of them creating dismay, others satisfaction, but in the end, all helping shape up their future paths.

It's a really good season start, even the single fight scene of this episode, seem to be improved considerably.

Overall, the show gets even more captivating as the plot divides into even more parts, focused on different locations and characters. Now besides the old Ragnar's path, there's also a Bjorn's one, Rollo's, Lagertha's, Aslaug's, Floki's... Even the English part, even though it's completely missing from this episode, won't be left aside (as presented by the end-episode teasers). In other words, the show's plot have become a lot more intricate than one could've foreseen two seasons ago. And that's not a bad thing at all.

Furthermmore, there are a couple of scenes that will surely be appreciated by those interested in history and historical accuracies. Some of them will probably create some debates, but in the end, Vikings cares to remind us that it's a historical show after all, and that's perfectly fine by me.
29 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Vikings: Warrior's Fate (2015)
Season 3, Episode 3
8/10
Battles Keep Being Awful
9 March 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Action-wise, the shaky cam during the fights is awful, it's annoying the hell out of me. At least from time to time they pause to focus, in slow motion, on the faces of Ragnar or Rollo. But still, they use the infamous cinematic means of shaky cams or sporadic slow mos during the battles, and this already greatly downsizes the season in my eyes. It's starting to bother me that the producers just don't care enough for the battle scenes.

Tactical-wise, I cringed badly too, as many other people as it seems, at both the "splitting the forces" idea of the first episode, and even more now, at the incredibly stupid Mercians standing in that valley and making themselves easy targets, just like that, without proper explanations or something.

If all this was to show how inexperienced Burgred was as a commander, then OK, I get it. It's still quite incredible how such inapt people got to be leaders, but I get the point nevertheless.

I just reached a point where I desire there will be little, or no battles at all throughout the season, so that I can still enjoy and love the show as I do so far, yet we all know, the Paris siege is coming...
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed