I'll start by saying that this isn't a bad film. It's watchable and necessary in the sense that it's a huge step forward in normalizing LGBTQ+ representation in mainstream cinema. I for one never assumed that it would open in my hyper-religious, homophobic country and yet it did, for all of two weeks.
However, what I had expected to be a charming coming-of-age/coming out film didn't really deliver, or rather it delivered but withheld the charm. I'm not one of those people who raises a fuss when a movie doesn't live up to the book it's based on. If the movie is good, regardless of the changes made, I can still appreciate and enjoy it. But with "Love, Simon" I felt like everything that made the book dynamic and unique was lacking in the film and so I can't help but compare them. Whereas it seemed like the writer made sure not to portray overly stereotypical characters, the film went with the usual, predictable John Hughes-esque teen tropes that we've been inundated with for decades. The best example would be the character of Nick. In the book he's a popular soccer player who says very little and disappears into his own world whenever he's playing guitar. He's crushing on a girl but doesn't actively pursue her. In the movie, he constantly runs his mouth, cracking jokes like he'll die if he takes a minute to breathe and the reason I find this problematic is because they made the decision of making the character a POC and as a POC myself, I'm tired of always seeing us portrayed as loud-mouthed braggarts. Or, in Abby's case, who is also POC, educating the "ignorant white folks" about hip-hop culture and the like. For a film as innovative as this was meant to be, I guess they only felt the need to tackle one form of representation at a time. Also, where the book managed to make you see the humanity in/feel some sympathy for the blackmailer Martin, the film character, once again, was as cliche as you could possibly get.
Now I'll get to Simon himself. I've never had a problem with Nick Robinson in anything I've seen him in but I don't feel like he really tapped into the emotional depth of the character. Part of the reason this happened, I believe, is that the writers basically had him looking for "Blue" in every guy he met, to the point that he even asked a couple of them if they were Blue. It didn't feel like he was looking for THE Blue so much as A Blue: as if ANY Blue would do. It ruined the mystery and sense of, I don't know, possessive safe-keeping that the book had. Blue was his special secret, his person, not a name to be spoken aloud and to guys whose gazes only lingered on his for a few extra seconds no less. Book Simon wanted badly to meet Blue but for the majority of the book he cherished their online relationship more than his growing feelings and desires and he understood Blue's reluctance to come out and did his utmost not to out him. I suppose this doesn't matter much since there was no mystery to Blue's identity to begin with. They made it obvious from the get-go who he actually was. He may as well have been wearing a stamp on his forehead.
Another huge mistake that the movie made is the big public reveal. In the book, Simon told Blue through their usual form of communication that he'd be waiting for him on the ride. When Blue did show up, there was no huge spectacle. He didn't come out to the entire school the same time he revealed himself to Simon. In fact there was hardly anyone around. It made it all the more special and intimate.
So in summation, I guess my biggest gripe with the film is that it took something that was fresh and touching, gave it the Hollywood treatment and made it into yet another teen movie, only with a gay lead. I suppose as far as normalizing gay cinema, they're on the right track in that respect. No special treatment there. But it could have been so much more than that and since I really looked forward to it, I regret that it wasn't.
However, what I had expected to be a charming coming-of-age/coming out film didn't really deliver, or rather it delivered but withheld the charm. I'm not one of those people who raises a fuss when a movie doesn't live up to the book it's based on. If the movie is good, regardless of the changes made, I can still appreciate and enjoy it. But with "Love, Simon" I felt like everything that made the book dynamic and unique was lacking in the film and so I can't help but compare them. Whereas it seemed like the writer made sure not to portray overly stereotypical characters, the film went with the usual, predictable John Hughes-esque teen tropes that we've been inundated with for decades. The best example would be the character of Nick. In the book he's a popular soccer player who says very little and disappears into his own world whenever he's playing guitar. He's crushing on a girl but doesn't actively pursue her. In the movie, he constantly runs his mouth, cracking jokes like he'll die if he takes a minute to breathe and the reason I find this problematic is because they made the decision of making the character a POC and as a POC myself, I'm tired of always seeing us portrayed as loud-mouthed braggarts. Or, in Abby's case, who is also POC, educating the "ignorant white folks" about hip-hop culture and the like. For a film as innovative as this was meant to be, I guess they only felt the need to tackle one form of representation at a time. Also, where the book managed to make you see the humanity in/feel some sympathy for the blackmailer Martin, the film character, once again, was as cliche as you could possibly get.
Now I'll get to Simon himself. I've never had a problem with Nick Robinson in anything I've seen him in but I don't feel like he really tapped into the emotional depth of the character. Part of the reason this happened, I believe, is that the writers basically had him looking for "Blue" in every guy he met, to the point that he even asked a couple of them if they were Blue. It didn't feel like he was looking for THE Blue so much as A Blue: as if ANY Blue would do. It ruined the mystery and sense of, I don't know, possessive safe-keeping that the book had. Blue was his special secret, his person, not a name to be spoken aloud and to guys whose gazes only lingered on his for a few extra seconds no less. Book Simon wanted badly to meet Blue but for the majority of the book he cherished their online relationship more than his growing feelings and desires and he understood Blue's reluctance to come out and did his utmost not to out him. I suppose this doesn't matter much since there was no mystery to Blue's identity to begin with. They made it obvious from the get-go who he actually was. He may as well have been wearing a stamp on his forehead.
Another huge mistake that the movie made is the big public reveal. In the book, Simon told Blue through their usual form of communication that he'd be waiting for him on the ride. When Blue did show up, there was no huge spectacle. He didn't come out to the entire school the same time he revealed himself to Simon. In fact there was hardly anyone around. It made it all the more special and intimate.
So in summation, I guess my biggest gripe with the film is that it took something that was fresh and touching, gave it the Hollywood treatment and made it into yet another teen movie, only with a gay lead. I suppose as far as normalizing gay cinema, they're on the right track in that respect. No special treatment there. But it could have been so much more than that and since I really looked forward to it, I regret that it wasn't.
Tell Your Friends