Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Deadpool (2016)
7/10
.Funny and Irreverent
13 February 2016
Deadpool, starring Ryan Reynolds, is the cinematic origin story for the "Merc with the Mouth" Marvel superhero. It follows Wade Wilson, a wise-cracking anti-hero who becomes the titular character after participating in a body enhancement program to overcome cancer.

What really makes this film work is its humor. From the opening credits to the closing credits, the jokes flow in a rapid fire of obscenity, vulgarity, and irreverence. The film frequently breaks the fourth wall and takes aim at pop culture elements ranging from movie studios to Ryan Reynolds himself. I was expecting a funny movie. What I got was a hilarious movie. Reynolds absolutely nails the role of Wade Wilson/Deadpool. He has the perfect personality and screen presence to embody the snarky, anti-heroic character. His timing and delivery are impeccable. It was also refreshing to see a superhero movie that does not shy away from showing graphic violence. With the R- rating, the filmmakers were able to show much more than your average PG-13, special effects-laden superhero movie. The graphic visuals lent themselves well to the humor and the brutality of the action.

While I mentioned "special effects-laden superhero movies" as a contrast to this film, there is quite a bit of CGI in Deadpool. Some of it works, some of it doesn't. I was not a big fan of the CGI towards the end of the film. The end sequence did not feel real to me due to what I would call fairly questionable CGI. In addition, while the dialogue of the script is witty and creative, the structure of the story is mundane. It follows the same beats and turns as many of the other superhero origin stories. The film gets away with this for the most part because of its self-awareness, but it would have been nice to have a more original story behind the great dialogue.

Overall, this is definitely a film worth watching. People who have been suffering from genre fatigue due to oversaturation of superhero movies may want to give this film a shot. It doesn't reinvent the story wheel, but its dialogue and bloody action raise this a notch above its contemporaries in the genre.
2 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Virunga (2014)
9/10
Mandatory Viewing
11 January 2016
We watch some films for entertainment. We watch some films for an escape from reality. We watch some films for the emotional effect. Finally, we watch some films because we should. Virunga is one such film. It is a documentary that everyone should see.

Virunga follows four people in their quests to preserve Virunga National Park in the face of war and illegal oil exploitation. The Park, aside from its incredible beauty, is renowned for being the last natural habitat for the critically endangered mountain gorillas. The gorillas provide the visual and emotional backbone for the film. The two main threats to the Park include M23, a Democratic Republic of the Congo rebellion group, and SOCO International, a British oil company.

The cinematography in this film is often breathtaking. Wide shots of the beautiful Virunga landscape appear with regularity throughout the film. In addition, there are moments of extreme tension thanks to the use of hand-held and hidden cameras in dangerous situations. The filmmakers succeed in establishing a hard-hitting dichotomy between the "heroes" and "villains." When I say villains, I mean villains in every sense of the word. When you listen to what the SOCO-affiliated people have to say, it often sounds like something straight out of a comic book movie.

The heroes of this film are incredibly relatable due to their various obligations. One character is obligated to telling/exposing the truth. Another character is obligated to the gorillas. Still another character is obligated to the park in general. In seeing these characters discuss why they feel obligations to different things, we as viewers gain a greater understanding of what it means to be a "good human." We have a moral obligation to undo damage that has been done as well as preserve places that have escaped our contamination. Further, we have an obligation to blow the whistle on people who seek to further damage our earth. The film does a great job of emphasizing these points through its characters.

I think it's important to note that the film never comes across as overbearing or "preachy." The filmmakers simply show what happens. The characters and the action do all the talking in terms of the politics and morals of the film. The situations happen organically. Nothing seems staged or contrived.

Finally, I think that it is worth discussing the gorillas. As I mentioned before, I believe that they represent the backbone of the film. The filmmakers often return to the gorillas, showing them interact in an all-too-human manner. The similarity of these animals to humans gives us human viewers a more visceral reason to care about what could potentially happen to Virunga National Park. The gorillas tie back to the central theme of the film. Unfortunately, this could be one of the last films that shows these animals in their natural habitat. It would be a shame to see a species that lies only two branches away from humans on the evolutionary tree go extinct.

Ultimately, I believe that Virunga is mandatory viewing for any audience. You don't have to be an environmentalist, a biologist, or a gorilla enthusiast to appreciate this film. It gives us a greater understanding and appreciation of what it means to be a morally responsible human being in an increasingly irresponsible world.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It's Back
9 January 2016
Warning: Spoilers
One of the most popular film franchises in history is back. Star Wars: The Force Awakens begins 30 years after the conclusion of Return of the Jedi. A new threat has arisen in the galaxy in the form of the First Order. Led by Supreme Leader Snoke and his right-hand men, General Hux and Kylo Ren, the First Order has constructed a new weapon with the capability of destroying planets. The Resistance, led by General Leia Organa, seeks to stop the First Order and destroy their weapon. It is up to a scavenger abandoned on a desert planet, a former stormtrooper, and a couple of familiar faces to aid the Resistance in their mission. Against this backdrop, the mystery of Jedi Knight Luke Skywalker's whereabouts looms.

As a fan of Star Wars, I have to admit that I was hit with a wave of nostalgia as the opening title crawl appeared on the screen, accompanied by John Williams' famous score. Nostalgia certainly seems to be what the filmmakers were aiming for with The Force Awakens. Between the brilliant use of practical effects and the return of some familiar faces, this film makes good use of the old to supplement the new. However, the success of this film hinged on whether audiences would buy into the new characters. I am happy to report that the new characters are fantastic. Rey, a young scavenger, steals the show. It is refreshing to see a woman in a starring role as a strong character in a blockbuster like Star Wars. Daisy Ridley does an excellent job of portraying Rey, particularly in her facial expressions. The revelation that Rey is in fact the force-sensitive character responsible for the film's title surprised and delighted me. I'm excited to see a female Jedi featured in more than a cameo role for the first time in the Star Wars films. Finn is probably the most dynamic character in the film, changing from a reluctant stormtrooper to a brave and wisecracking Resistance fighter. John Boyega exudes energy and excitement in his performance. It is easy to tell that he was so excited to be in a Star Wars movie. Poe Dameron, an immensely likable character, unfortunately doesn't receive as much screen time as he should. BB-8 is the cute droid that serves in an R2-D2-like role. To my surprise, I found him to be a very funny and likable character. Kylo Ren, or Ben Solo, is a well-developed and complex villain. Adam Driver plays him as a powerful, but impatient and often whiny user of the dark side. The revelation that he is the son of Leia and Han Solo was not particularly surprising, but it is handled well. Furthermore, it provides the backdrop for the most emotional scene of the movie in which he kills his father. The characters, action set pieces, and special effects are by far what work best in this film. There is also a surprising amount of humor in this movie, and most of it works well. However, there are some flaws.

The most-discussed flaw of The Force Awakens is its adherence to the plot and formula of the Original Trilogy films. Once again, the big bad enemies have constructed a massive, planet-sized weapon that destroys planets. Once again, the planet-sized weapon is aimed at the resistance base. Once again, the much smaller, ragtag resistance must destroy a shield in order to blow up said planet-sized weapon before it destroys them. Rey fills the Luke Skywalker role of this film, BB-8 fills the R2-D2 role, Kylo Ren fills the Darth Vader role, and Supreme Leader Snoke fills the Emperor role. Once again, a father figure for the main character is killed while the main character watches. The film definitely suffers due to its reliance on many of these familiar beats and tropes. The viewer gets a sense of having seen it all before. In addition, there are a number of plot contrivances that require immense suspension of disbelief. One, in particular, is when R2-D2 magically turns on to reveal the final piece of the map to Luke Skywalker. We get no context as to why R2 turned on at that particular moment or why he couldn't turn on earlier to avoid most of what happened in the film. Though the prequels are crucified for their portrayal of the galaxy's politics, I would have liked a little more information on the politics of the New Republic. We never actually see this government, so we don't know its size or its role in this film. We don't know much about its relation to the First Order or the Resistance. While the return of old characters was welcome, the results were mixed. Harrison Ford occasionally slipped into the crotchety old man routine that has defined his later career, though he did an overall good job. Carrie Fisher was oddly stiff as Leia. It was great to see Chewbacca again, though. There is one scene in which Han Solo and Chewbacca are introduced that seems random in the context of the rest of the film. An elaborate chase scene ensues after the characters meet that serves no purpose and contains no connection to the overarching plot. In a film with such frenetic pacing, it seemed odd to include that chase. On the note of pacing, Finn's turn on the First Order also seemed abrupt. After being so scarred over the death of his fellow stormtrooper, he killed a bunch of them minutes later. However, the richness of the characters and high production values generally redeem the film in the face of these flaws.

For me, The Force Awakens wasn't bad. It wasn't great. It was a good, solid, enjoyable film. Ultimately, we won't be able to fully judge this film until its two sequels arrive. Its context in the trilogy will better inform us on its quality. However, it is undeniable that Star Wars is back and off to a good start.
1 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed