Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Sing (2016)
7/10
Much Deeper than I Expected
2 January 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Movie Review: Sing Sing is a fun movie. The animation, the, singing, the characters, writing, dialogue is all fun.

In some ways, that's a shame, because the movie, as is, has all the parts required to create a deep and sophisticated story populated with tragic characters. It would be too easy for a family movie filled with cartoon animals to be populated by goofy caricatures. It's not. Every character has a full, multidimensional life, with their own reasons for wanting to sing, and their own tragic flaws threatening to tear down their lives (and the for some the lives of others!) Having everything work out is a given, as it's a family movie, but a couple of tweaks, film it with human actors, and there's a powerful drama at play here.

The characters really do form an ensemble, but the one holding it all together is Buster Moon (Matthew McConaughey) who is a combination dreamer/film-flam man. He wants to bring the world something beautiful, but he just can't.

Rosita (Reese Witherspoon) plays the housewife who is over worked under appreciated and realizes it is crushing her soul.

Mike (Seth MacFarlane) is a Vegas style star that has gone undiscovered. The moment his hopes get up, he lives the big life, which invites big problems.

Ash (Scarlett Johansson) represents the true musician who's life falls apart as she sells out to be popular.

Eddie (John C. Reilly) is Moon's layabout best friend who is spoiled and happy to leave a dull empty life, but discovers he does need more.

Johnny (Targon Egerton) is the son of a thug, and is stuck between gaining his father's approval, and finding his own way in the world.

Meena (Tori Kelly) is the shy singer who doesn't want to be a bother, but we all know has something special. (As a bonus, her elephant family are dressed in the same attire as Babar)

Nana (Jennifer Saunders) is the yardstick for everyone else, the lonely former star who sees the world as lacking, and seems happy to leave the world to itself.

That's a lot going on when they manage to squeeze in 60 pop songs, requisite fart jokes and a supporting cast that actually serve the story instead of presenting visual gags.

The downside is that the movie is too serious for itself. There is no barrage of pop culture jokes, or 'cute' moments, or jokes for the sake of a punchline.

The voice acting is great, the writing feels natural, the animation serves the story. Technically it's a great achievement. I would recommend seeing the movie. I don't see it becoming a memorable classic, rather a movie that people are pleasantly surprised to watch when they give it a chance.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A confusing start builds to a very entertaining finale.
22 December 2016
Movie Review: Rogue One – A Star Wars Story

Disclaimer: for anything bad I'm about to write about this movie, it is easily outweighed by the good. It's fun, it fits where it belongs, and I'm going to see it again and again.

I appreciate the sentiment for 'prequel' stories. Any given story has to take place after previous events (unless they make a Genesis movie), so there's always questions about these previous events. The problem is, a story that answers those questions will necessarily create new questions about events further in the past. Whatever satisfaction is provided by the prequel, is overshadowed by the appetite it creates. In other words, I'm not a fan of prequels. George Lucas himself noted that it was important Star Wars start at 'the good bit', and skip what came before.

Rogue One does fall into this prequel trap. We know how the story ends, so it's simply a matter of connecting the dots so we end up where everyone is expecting us to.

The 'but' is Rogue One does something most prequels don't: it gives us new characters, with unknown fates. We know the story, but we don't know anyone's part in it. There is a story here to discover, and just like reading a map might tell you what to expect, it's still not the same as actually taking the journey.

The most unfortunate aspect of the film is the beginning. There is a tremendous effort given to ensuring we don't confuse this for a 'normal' Star Wars movie. It's not an epic conflict of good and evil, but rather we have some sort of grey area, where it's not entirely clear who are the 'good guys' and who are the 'bad guys'. This is where a surprising number of unanswered questions are brought up. Why is Jyn in prison, then on a prison transport? Who is Saw Gerrara, and why does he matter? What exactly did Bodhi do to get in trouble? Who is this guy in white who is in charge of security yet laughably bad at it, and somehow in charge of the Death Star, even though we saw Tarkin in charge of it in both Episodes III and IV?

As luck would have it, once all these awkward questions are posed they can be safely ignored as the movie gets into gear, and we finally see who is good, who is evil. It IS a real Star Wars movie, there's action, there's comedy, there's camaraderie, there's unlikely allies, there's Storm Troopers who are awful shots (I suppose the guy in white who is laughably bad at security was responsible for their training?)

As the story moves along, we are treated to the best part of a prequel: the fan service. Guy Henry does an amazing impersonation of Peter Cushing as Governor Tarkin. Other characters from Episode IV pop up, usually as a little comic relief, and a few are inserted using original footage from the filming of Episode IV which provides a little authenticity. None felt seriously out of place.

Naturally the two biggest elements of fan service were: 1) the Death Star. We get a better understanding of how it came together, how it works, and how it's seen by everyone. It could have been overplayed or underplayed, but I think it fell right into the perfect zone. 2) Darth Vader. We do get to see what he does in his spare time, plus we get to see how he gets where he's going in Episode IV. We also get to see him kick ass like a good sith lord should.

As the movie moves ahead, the tension ratchets up. We know the rebels are getting the Death Star plans, but we don't know which rebels, or how they'll do it. Is it going to be subterfuge? All out war? The Force? There are many rebels, and they make it clear that it is a rebel ALLIANCE, and like any alliance, there are different points of view trying to achieve a common goal with their own means and ends.

The movie does end in a climactic battle as good as any battle we've seen in any Star Wars movie (and quite honestly, better than most). Again, it's peppered with fan service (so THAT'S why there's no 'Blue Squadron' attacking the Death Star in Episode IV), but it's just a masterful piece of war direction that provides a big picture with consequences, and the small picture character moments that -remind us why we care what happens.

The music is great, Giacchino has large shoes to fill, but the music does fit in with John Williams' previous work while still having its own voice. Yes, he uses Williams' themes for continuity, but it would be jarring if he didn't. The original music is great and still 'Star Warsy'.

As befits a Star Wars movie, the special effects continue to serve the story, giving us an alien world that feels like it exists, and we could visit, and live in. Designs are clearly inspired from previous Star Wars movies, while again featuring their own unique aspects.

Acting hasn't been the defining feature of Star Wars. Certainly there are certain cast members and scenes that are truly fantastic, but as a whole, the acting in Star Wars isn't the main attraction. That tradition continues here. Some scenes work great, others are hamstrung with awkward dialogue, or elements that are forced instead of earned.

So many modern movies have a great setup, and don't stick the landing. Rogue One may stumble out of the blocks, but by the end, it's running smoothly at maximum. For anything bad about this movie, it is easily outweighed by the good. It's fun, it fits where it belongs, and I'm going to see it again and again.

May the Force Be With You.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Suicide Squad (2016)
6/10
Some excellent performances mired in a meaningless story
10 August 2016
Suicide Squad Movie Review

A 'movie' can mean many things to many people. Some people see a 'film', consisting of characters engaged in stories that describe a plot. Some people see a massive spectacle of shiny things and loud sounds. Some people just want to smile a little for two hours.

No one is 'right' or 'wrong'. You pay your money, and either you get something you enjoy, or you don't.

If you're looking for a 'film', this is not it. There is no plot. The stories are flimsy at best, and non existent for long stretches. Some characters appear to have some depth once in a while, but not much, and not for long. Plenty of others are even shallower.

If you're looking for a spectacle of shiny things and loud sounds, there's plenty of those, but Suicide isn't chocked full of them. There are bigger spectacles if that's what you want.

If you just want to smile for a couple hours, then you may well be in luck. Will Smith (as Deadshot) is a Movie Star (capital M, capital S). He oozes charm. He gives his full effort and can pull off gravitas when needed, and timing for when comic relief is needed. Margot Robbie (as Harly Quinn) is his on screen equal, providing a demented gravitas and delivering her lines and actions with perfection. Between the two of them, they form an unlikely couple that at no point ever feels likely, yet doesn't feel forced. The movie rests on their shoulders entirely, but they are up to the task. While Smith and Robbie form the twin pillars supporting this movie, Viola Davis (as Amanda Waller) and Jared Leto (as The Joker) both put in fantastic performances.

Davis plays the stock government agent who isn't afraid to bend the rules to get things done. It is an effortless performance, if anyone could run a shadow world government, it's Davis. The problem is the character simply has an arc that implodes. Davis's character feels worse than wasted, but rather deliberately turned into something useless.

Similarly Leto's Joker is amazingÂ… and entirely pointless. My own 'idea' of the Joker is the Mark Hamill version from the Batman cartoons of the 90s. He's psychotic, but ultimately a crime lord. He wants to be rich. Jack Nicholson's Joker touched on this, but didn't really capture it. Heath Ledger's Joker is, a master performance, but still diminishes the character itself. Leto has captured the same energy that Ledger has tapped into, while grounding the Joker into the world as the psychotic crime lord. The thing is, there is no room in the plot of Suicide Squad for a psychotic crime lord, so Leto makes the most of his screen time, but, the time is not time well spent.

There are other characters and actors in the movie. I don't remember who they are or what they do. Something about killing innocent people. The 'good' guys have a much higher body count than the 'bad' guys, although I'm starting to think that might be the go to move for DC comics movies.

There are a LOT of bad things that I can say about this movie, but honestly, I liked it. Smith, Robbie, Leto and Davis bring it, and their performances deserve to be appreciated. If everyone else was cut out, and we focused on just these four, we might have something truly special.

Instead, we just get something pretty good.

I'm willing to spend 2 hours watching something pretty good.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed