Reviews

2,294 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
The Fall Guy (2024)
4/10
Not funny. Not thrilling. Not original. Not credible. It's a nothing burger!
1 May 2024
Warning: Spoilers
The bad: Supposedly an action comedy, but I didnt laugh once, nor was I aware there was anything to laugh about to begin with, although I did hear one single person laugh loudly ocassionally, so perhaps some folks could still be amused by it...

More bad: It is not romantic at all, although the first hour is sort of a budding romance, between Ryan Gosling and Emily Blunt, but this is a budding "romance" without ANY sparks. No chemistry whatsover! Bummer.

Even more bad: the first hour NOTHING happens and then out of the blue the second hour is full on action packed with Ryan Gosling suddenly being accused of killing a moviestar and having to fight for his life, dodging bullets.

A LOT of very darkly lit scenes however did make me wonder who was fighting who, because often I could not distinguish the bad guys from the good guys because of this annoying low lit photography. And the action was dull as dishwater to begin with, so I didnt miss much...

Not any good then? NO. This story just DOES NOT MAKE SENSE at all. It's neither a good romance, nor is it a solid action movie, nor is it a comedy. This story AND it's characters are totally NOT credible. What a MISFIRE of a script!

I am a big Ryan Gosling fan, but it's better I forget this movie was ever made, because it was a complete nothing burger!
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Street Kings (2008)
7/10
Has got some credibility flaws, quite big credibility flaws, still a nice watch.
28 April 2024
The bad: I blame the script writer for several annoying credibility flaws that make this movie hard to watch, because of the level of stupidity of several plot turns that just do not make sense whatsoever...

Because of these stupid plot turns the character Keanu Reeves is playing is simply not believable, which kinda destroys the entire thrill and suspense of this story.

Keanu Reeves is playing a real nasty DIRTY cop, BUT he somehow, someway suddenly grows a conscience and starts digging his own grave and that of his collegues. Totally NOT credible whatsoever.

The good: but this movie does have cojones. It's a straight forward macho dirty cop movie with all the usual ingredients and with lots of terrific actors starring in it. The shootouts are pretty thrilling as well.

Mixed bag. Could have been a lot better, with a more credible script. Still enjoyed it watching it for a second time...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The beginning of the end of Keanu Reeves' career.
27 April 2024
This movie sorta started the downfall of Keanu Reeves' great career. UP UNTILL this very movie he had been making hugely succesful blockbuster movies or independent smaller quirky arthouse movies. But those days have been...

The bad: this movie is meant to be taken seriously, but even the trailer looked pretty silly and when watching the movie I experienced the worst cringefest, because this movie tries SO hard to look daunting and deep, but achieves the exact opposite: RIDICULE.

Not any good? Well, we have still got the great Keanu Reeves and Jennifer Connely, and those two do soften the blow of watching this flawed flick, but not enough to not warn others that this one is a full blown flop!

"The Day that Keanu Reeves' career went down the drain..." would have been a better title...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Exposed (III) (2016)
4/10
The always cool and charming actor Keanu Reeves can star in a flop as well. And so it goes...
27 April 2024
Quite disappointing watch. I had missed this movie when it was released but I didnt miss out on anything worthy to watch...

The bad: what's most disappointing is the disjointed storyline. It feels like there are 2 movies instead of one. And what's worse this story never becomes supsenseful or exciting, the opposite is unfortunately true, this is quite a dread to watch.

More bad: even the acting performance by Keanu Reeves was kinda mediocre. He has played a cop before and it isnt that the man cant act, but this time around his performance looked uninspired and flat.

To be avoided, even for the Keanu Reeves fans, of which I am one...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A quirky, slowburning comedy, with a bunch of terrific actors, but which wont really set my pants on fire...
27 April 2024
Directing DEBUT of actress Judy Greer. It is quite a warmhearted, nicely made quirky, slowburning comedy, but it somehow didnt ignite...

The bad:there is a fine line between quirky and silly. And quirky comedy is the kind of jokes that are created out of weird, but true to life situations. Silly comedies however, are created out of absurd NOT true to life situations. This movie tried to mix quirky with silly jokes and that was it weak point.

I liked this movie when it tried to be serious and true to life. I did not like this movie that much when it geared into silly territory.

The good: a bunch of great actors, acting really well. Lots of original, witty dialogues. Lots of funny plot turns. And an overall really warmhearted spirit of caring for one another, packaged inside a bit of a silly story of marital infidelity and office shenanigans.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Siberia (2018)
5/10
Misfire!
27 April 2024
Now I know why I missed out on this Keanu Reeves picture, it was quite a misfire of a movie!

The bad: it isnt a terrible movie, but it is quite slow. Now slow doesnt have to mean boring and it aint boring for sure, but it aint exactly exciting or thrilling either.

We get to see Keanu Reeves try to sell diamonds to some shady folks in Russia. And will he be able to make a diamond deal and come out alive? This story sounds exciting, BUT it is the opposite of an action movie. It is SLOW slow.

More bad: the romance with a Russsian lady isnt convincing, nor is it in any way romantic or dramatic. It's just a rather unbelievable fling, which could have easily been cut out of the movie entirely.

Not any good? The suspense is quite good. The acting by Keanu Reeves is quite good as well. And all the other actors are okay. But this movie was cheaply made (mediocre direction, mediocre photography, mediocre soundscore). This movie simply misses that extra umph that would make it thrilling...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Challengers (2024)
4/10
I cant understand the hype. I adored Luca Guadagnino's earlier work, but this movie bored me!
27 April 2024
Luca Guadagnino has made some EXQUISITE movies before which I truly adored, but this is not one of them. Dont believe the hype...

The bad: I blame the casting firstmost, because these 3 leading actors just did not ooze any charisma. There wasnt any actor's chemistry of any notice either. Quite a failure in casting these mediocre actors.

More bad: this story is BORING. Try making a tennis match dramatic. Not gonna happen. What would have been possible is to make a love trio dramatic and exciting. Did they succeed in that? NO! There simply is no true intense drama. There isnt even a hot romance.

This movie is just going through the motions. Earlier fans of director Luca Guadagnino's work be warned, this is definitely NOT his finest hour. It's his worst!
15 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Bleak and dark tale of violence and innocence...
20 April 2024
Beware, this movie starts out quite slow and uneventful, but it ends in a complete bloodbath of violence. And actor Stephen Dorff (the reason I chose to watch this movie) has only got a tiny supporting role of about 3 minutes, but nevermind that, because ALL the other actors involved delivered rock solid performances! I was really impressed!

Beware (a second time) that this is NOT a glorious, funny gangster movie, this is as bleak, true to life and depressing as it gets! But it definitely is one of the better crime dramas I have seen the last couple of months. Memories of The Coen Brothers come to mind...and that is about the highest compliment I can give!

The good: this movie has got a dark cloud of doom hanging over it, envisioned by the bleak photography and underscored with dark and twisted music. From the start till the very last breath, this movie oozes slowburning despair, hidden evil and violent chaos, but somehow this movie is about innocence as well...somehow this movie succeeds in letting evil turn into something good and wholesome...

The story: a desperate salesman, in financial dire straits, who cant support his family and his sick son, takes on a job with the mob. He "only" has to drive a bag of drugs towards a delivery point and collect the money for it. All things spiral out of control in a vicseral vicious and violent way I havent seen come along in a while.

Wow, terrific direction, solid acting performances, vicious storyline, what a great movie! I dont dare reommend this sort of hardhitting movie to my friends or family, but only to those who can stumach a slowburning ACTOR's movie, which is as bleak, violent, depressing and dark as it can get...
7 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Supposedly a horror movie? Really?
20 April 2024
This story sounded interesting and it made me curious enough to wanna see this movie. How disappointed I was...

The bad: supposedly a horror movie, which it is definitely NOT. It has ZERO suspense or thrill and I mean really absolute zero. What is it then? It's a really incredibly tedious portrait of a seventies talk show that isnt doing well in the ratings. And that's it.

Endless talking heads sitting in this talkshow talking to each other, with NO point at all. And the actors ALL fail to impress me. The leading actor is completely void of any charisma.

What was the point of this movie? I got beyond bored, beyond sleepy, beyond annoyed by this total lack of spark and punch.
15 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Problemista (2023)
5/10
"Problemista" has got some problems...
20 April 2024
Problem nr 1: it aint really funny. It wants to be quirky and weird and really tries hard to deliver the jokes, but they just dont land, they just dont make me laugh. Not even an smirk.

Problem nr 2: the chaotic and disjointed storyline just left me behind feeling disappointed and confused.

Problem nr 3: the actors. I am a HUGE fan of Tilda Swinton and because of this I had been waiting for months for this movie to be released. And I must admit that her performance just did not impress me. Not bad for sure, but a bit over the top.

The leading actor however was really mediocre (at best), which was quite annoying because the entire story evolved around him and him alone.

Not recommended, not even for the Tilda Swinton fans, of which I am one.
18 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Die Hard in an airplane! Suspenseful. Fun. Action packed. Nice!
18 April 2024
Kurt Russell fighting terrorists on a plane! Yippikayee! Heavily leaning on the succesful Die Hard format, which was a HUGE worldwide boxoffice hit a few years earlier. Lots of similarities with Die Hard, which isnt a bad thing at all...

The good: all a grown up boy needs in an action packed blockbuster: a vicious bad guy, a great hero (Kurt Russell), lots of slowburning suspense, a few good jokes and tons of action!

Any bad? Well, I feared the worst, because many (MANY) cheesy airplane disaster movies have been made, but besides a few dated special effects and a few corny plot turnes this is still one heck of an enjoyable airplane terrorist flick. Solid 7 stars! Recommended for the fans of this genre!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
U.S. Marshals (1998)
7/10
Nothing extraordinary, but it pushes the right buttons!
18 April 2024
The sequel to the (better) first movie (The Fugitive), but this one will certainly do as well...

The good: you want action? You got action. This is simply a well made action packed movie which wont surprise you, but it has enough heroism, double crossing, shootouts and chases to entertain me for the full 2 hours.

More good: we have got the always solid Tommy Jones, who does an excellent job as the head honcho in charge of capturing a fugutive, played by Wesley Snipes.

Any bad? This sequel has got quite a few scenes that lack in credibility. Several plot turns are quite cringeworthy because they dont ring true at all. But these are only minor gripes I had, which didnt prevent me from thoroughly enjoying this action flick!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Angel Heart (1987)
4/10
I remembered something was fishy with this movie and now I know what it is...
15 April 2024
The good: a terrific bunch of actors, with Alan Parker directing. I was all in for this movie. BUT I remembered (having seen it decades ago) that something was wrong with this movie and after half an hour I noticed what the problem was...

The bad: the story is gibbledigook nonsensical. Now there are a lot of stories that dont make sense, but still do thrill or mesmirize, but none of that...

It supposedly is a DEEP and MYSTERIOUS story about the devil, but it ended up flexing my laughing muscles, because it all looked SO SILLY while it was definitely meant to be taken very seriously.

All these terrific actors and the wonderful director Alan Parker as well, all have made several terrific movie classics before and after this movie, but Angel Heart was definitely a flop at the boxoffice and for good reasons...
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Renegade (2004)
Terrific actors, wonderful direction, but somehow it didnt become one.
14 April 2024
Difficult to rate this movie (therefore I didnt), because this movie has a lot going for it, but it somehow just didnt excite. And I know the main reason why!

The bad: I am a big fan of the French actor Vincent Cassel, who is a huge legendary star in his homecountry. I have only one BIG problem with Vincent Cassel and that is his terrible French accent when he tries to speak English. He tries to masquerade his French accent with a thick fake American accent but it doesnt work (for me it doesnt).

Everytime I hear Vincent Cassel speak English I cringe a bit. And they even gave him as few as possible lines to speak, but it nonetheless ruined this entire movie for me.

Not any good then? Hold on, this movie looks the part, with eyedroppingly gorgeous photography and a beautiful soundscore. The other actors are really great and worth watching. The direction is out of wack. Such a pity it just didnt become one solid movie.

Give it a try if you are into SURREAL Westerns, because this movie is so much more than another straight forward Western, because it has got lots of Indian mystique and lucid dreams that dont make much sense but are quite mesmirising and intrigueing...

Surreal Western which has got some flaws, but also some goodies, probably best suited for the arthouse movie fan of surreal stories.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Damaged (2024)
4/10
I am a big fan of both Samuel L Jackson AND Vincent Cassel, but this movie flopped.
13 April 2024
I had to see this movie, because it featured two of my favorite actors, Samuel L Jackson and Vincent Cassel, but what disappointment it all turned out to be...

The bad: this movie was cheaply made and it shows! Everything from photography to sound and supporting actors looks and is mediocre. The only good thing going for it are these 2 stellar actors, but even they cant elevate a cheaply made product into something worht watching.

More bad: there is NO real supsense or thrill. And that is the whole point of this sort of movie. It should have been exciting, but it turned into quite a sleeping pill. And what's with Vincent Cassel trying to talk English? Kinda cringeworthy...
17 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Jean Reno and Vincent Cassel deliver!
13 April 2024
The good: what joy to watch these two legendary great French actors work together as a couple of detectives! Great chemistry! They both are THE reason I started watching this movie and it was all I hoped for.

The story starts out slow, but steadily increases in suspense AND thrill. I have seen it several times now and it is still a rock solid crime movie, with some witty moments and a few horrific ones.

Any bad? The final is a bit silly and over the top, which didnt really suit the spirit of this movie, but it can be forgiven.

The story: 2 (out of control) detectives have to solve a serial killer mystery that seems to be of the supernatural kind at first or are they being deceived? Duh!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Light (II) (2024)
1/10
Cheap and inferior copycat.
10 April 2024
Deep sigh. Believe me I really didnt want to review this movie, but it was SUCH a disappointment that I had to WARN others who might make the mistake to actually pay for this cheap and inferior copycat.

The bad: bring a search light, because this movie is SO incredibly sparsly lit (no pun intended) that you dont see much at all during the ENTIRE movie. Using dark lighting techniques is an effective way of covering up that there is no money available for good looking sets. But they went to the extreme with these dark looking sets. Terribly annoying to watch!

The really bad: let's forget about the fact that one cant see anyhting, let's judge what we CAN see in the dark and that is these actors trying to perform in HELMETS all the time. Oh man, does this look silly.

Please avoid. You have been warned. This is nothing more than a cheap and inferior copycat of other much better scifi movies.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Civil War (2024)
4/10
They cant make such a lame story thrilling, no matter how hard they tried...
10 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Beware: dont be fooled by the trailer, because this is NOT a thrilling action movie, because the action scenes are quite lame and not thrilling at all. What is it then? It's a (artsy fartsy looking) moralistic story about the press (Kirsten Dunst) being "the white knight on a horse", defending democracy, in a time when the Amercian president (big hint at Tr*mp) refuses to leave the White House.

The bad: what's really laughable (and I mean REALLY laughable) is that we get to see FOTO journalists, who are directly in the line of fire ALL the time, BUT they never get hit! Neverrr! What miracle! Only at the very end, (for "dramatic" effect), 2 of these FOTO journalists AND the president get shot and that's the end of this entire lame movie as well.

The story in it's entirety is quite tedious actually. And repetitive. We get to see Kirsten Dunst as a FOTO journalist travelling by car with some other FOTO journalists from New York to Washington DC (about 800 miles). They travel. They travel some more. They shoot many (MANY) pictures with their FOTOcameras of soldiers fighting (mediocre CGI effects). And then they travel some more...NO real thrill. NO suspense. NO real drama. NO surprises. It just toddles along...

Not any good then? It's not a B-movie. They put money into this! It's photographed as if it were a slick commercial, with lovely fuzzy lighting techniques of nature and humans caring about each other, with serene, soothing music in the background. We get to see FOTO journalists CARE about America. We get to see democracy being defended and WIN in the end. And we get to see an evil president being shot. Justice prevails! If you are into that, be my guest and have a go at watching it!
135 out of 271 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
This sequel (in this trilogy) was the lesser one, but still worth a watch
6 April 2024
I love a good knights movie and I was really pleased with the first part of this trilogy, (which I saw a year ago), however this sequel was a bit underwhelming compared to the first part.

The bad: many new characters were introduced in this second part and these new characters took away much of the screentime from the 3 musketeers. Besides that disappointing fact, the build up of the story was less tightknit and less riveting and fun compared to the first part. I blame the writer...

Beware: better watch the first part closely before watching this sequel, because I had some troubles remembering who was who and what had happened beforehand.

The good: it's still worth a watch though, because of the great actors, the great photography and the passionate story, however disjointed in some moments.

Just a solid knights movie, recommended for the fans of this genre.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Solid performance by Michael Keaton, but this story just would not catch fire...
6 April 2024
I am big fan of Michael Keaton and he was THE reason I wanted to check this movie out. His performance was rock solid! In an understated, subtle way Michael Keaton made his character (suffering from fast deteriorating dementia) come across as sympathetic and true to life, BUT...

The bad: this story simply would not catch fire. It would not become thrilling or suspenseful or really mesmirising. The opposite was kinda true actually, because at moments this was quite a tedious watch.

More bad: the supporting actors arent terrible, but they surely arent great either. And that matters, because there is no real chemistry between Michael Keaton and the other actors.

Beware: this is NOT a thrilling crime / gangster drama. It is a well made portrait though of a hired gun with dementia that never really catches fire though. There I said it for a third time!
10 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Patriot (2000)
4/10
It isnt meant to be funny, but it is...
31 March 2024
The bad: Mel Gibson trying to act seriously did provoke my laughing muscles. It definitely is not meant to be a comedy, but Mel Gibson's performance just is NOT the right choice for this story.

After having so many big blockbuster comedy hits in the nineties, Mel Gibson wanted to be taken seriously. BAD idea Mel! The guy is good at mischievous funny characters, or stereotype macho characters, but he aint no good at serious dramatic acting. I cant help it, but I had to chuckle many times when he tried to act seriously any ways.

Dont get me wrong I am a big Mel Gibson fan. I love his comedies and his action packed thrillers as well. I really do. But every actor has it's good sides and bad sides and acting seriously is just not what Mel Gibson was gifted with....
0 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Disappointing...
31 March 2024
What can I say? This movie was quite a disappointment. I expected to see thrilling warfare, I expected to see subtle drama, I expected to see a fascinating story. But NONE of that...

The bad: some movies work, some movies fail. What went wrong when making this movie. I blame the direction and the writing. I mean come on, when making a war movie, at least get the action scenes thrilling, but none of that. They looked quite lame. This isnt a war movie first, this is more of a chick flick, with way too many soft "drama" scenes of wives sobbing about their husbands. That's no basis for an entire movie. But they tried anyway. And failed!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Signs (2002)
6/10
Great start, disappointing ending. The terrific acting performances make it worth while a watch.
31 March 2024
Director Shyamalan is known for his suspenseful, mysterious and spooky plots. But he is ALSO known for letting these plots implode by disappointing plot turns later on in the movie that completely erases the whole feeling of mystery that he had build up so carefully.

This movie is no different. I have seen it several times. And EVERY time I am disappointed when the truth about "the mystery" is revealed towards the end.

The good: what's still worth while to watch is the start of the movie, when one cant yet explain or understand why certain things are happening.

More good: the acting performances are really solid. How couldnt they be, with such great actors like Mel Gibson and Joaquin Phoenix!

Mixed bag. Promising, suspenseful start. Disappointing ending. If you can live with that, go ahead and give it a try!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Beaver (2011)
5/10
There was an excellent movie burried in here...
31 March 2024
Somehow this interesting storyline did not come to fruition. All the ingredients were there, but it turned out to be a bit underwhelming...

The bad: I blame director Jodie Foster, who is an excellent actress, but who has only made mediocre directing achievements during her career. One can see that there is a much better movie burried in here somewhere, but director Jodie Foster did not succeed in bringing it out.

The good: the acting is solid though, how couldnt it have been, with 2 of these great actors starring in it. The storyline and the dialogues are good as well. So this is definitely not a flop or a silly misfire. BUT... it kept nagging me that were was no TRUE drama.

Mediocre directing attempt by Jodie Foster. Not terrible, but lacking...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
How did it all go wrong...
31 March 2024
The original television series were fabulous, intrigueing, masterfully written AND performed. But this cheap copycat got it all wrong...

The bad: supposedly a comedy (while the original was NOT), but I did not laugh once. What's a comedy without any laughs I ask you!?

More bad: they over did it. They tried FARCE and it flew right back in their face. Making a good farce is very difficult, just being silly just doesnt cut it.

The actors are great and it is quite fun (for a LITTLE while) to see them act out these silly characters. Especially Mel Gibson's transformation into a baldheaded doctor is quite amusing for a LITTLE while. But one cant make a movie just by showing some silly characters.

To be avoided if one can. This is one heck of a MISFIRE. Good intentions for sure, BAD result!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed