Reviews

74 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Heartstrings plucked? More like torn out!
27 November 2021
Raccoons resolving intergenerational trauam and ending cycles of disfunction. What more could one want!? I was crying by the end: both because I am a generally emotional person, and because the emotional impact was so well executed.
35 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
War Horse (2011)
8/10
A tentative thumbs up
30 June 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I hold horse movies to a fairly high standard, given how easily they can fall into over-indulgent sentimental drivel, and due to the golden standard formed by Spirit (2002). This film fell into that crevasse at times but manages to climb (most of the way) back out. Joey (the warhorse himself) is separated from his human friend Albert and sold to a soldier in the British army at the start of WWI. Joey traverses the battlefield on both sides of the fight, spending time as a german mount, and eventually back as a British one. He is saved from constant danger by his ingenuity and skill, the kindness of a few humans, and his horse friend, Topthorn. When both horses are in the hands of the germans, they are put to work dragging tanks up steep hills. Topthorn has a bad leg, and Joey offers himself for the labor, to spare the other horse. This moment rang false to me. I can accept a friendship between horses and humans, the intelligence of a well-bred horse, and the loyalty of Joey to Albert. However, a moment of altruism from the horse feels hollow and deeply unrealistic, and staggers away from any compelling emotional integrity.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Oh so long
30 June 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Having watched two Tarantino films back to back, I may have burnt myself out on this genre. Perhaps my lack of excitement at the events was due to the blurring together of the two movies, which reduced the sensationalism of the plot, but there is no way to know. For a movie with such graphic bloodshed and exciting backstories, not much seemed to happen. There was no protagonist, per se, and all of the characters were unsavory, making their inevitable deaths feel justified and moral. What saved the film from feeling interminable was the flashback. Going back in time to show how the situation came to be broke up the monotony of men standing around shouting. However, the stakes did not feel real to me. The threat level was so high and critically dangerous that it capped out and became mundane. If everything is violent and aggressively sinister, it doesn't feel special anymore and loses its sensationalism. One scene, in particular, felt forced and unnecessary: Major Marquis Warren (Samuel L. Jackson) informs General Sandy Smithers (Bruce Dern) that he had tortured, taken advantage of s*xually, and then killed the Generals son. It was graphic, and shocking, which was the intention, but lacked any sort of reason why the audience should care. There was no established reason why this event would spark a deep emotional reaction, beyond basic human decency.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Tac-o bout it
10 June 2020
Warning: Spoilers
As sequels go, this is by no means a train wreck. I have seen far more unfortunate and messy sequels than this one. Flint Lockwood and goons of his idol, Chester V, returns to his Island home, which is now overrun with sentient food. Chester V has nefarious ulterior motives beyond scientific fascination. With such a high concept plot, the film is bound to wander into the illogical occasionally but generally retains its integrity. The rules of the sentient food are a little amorphous, but suspended disbelief is a necessity in these situations. The ridiculous physics of the Chesters movement is phenomenal enough to add a star to my rating of this film. Flint Lockwood Senior is a surly no-nonsense man with the emotional range of a teaspoon. As such, his softening during the fishing scene feels like a personal victory, as he shows his vulnerability to the pickle-boys and the audience. This plot point not only gives us the character development that is emotionally satisfying and sweet but establishes the fishing concept for later in the film. One of the directors, Kris Pearn, went on to direct The Willoughbys (2020) and his style can be seen in both films: whimsical and high energy.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Flawed, but good
5 June 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This movie centers around a white man, who saves the lives of another nation. This is problematic on its own. It is not the entirety of the movie, and can, therefore, be simply a demerit, rather than a deal-breaker. American officer Nathan Algren is taken captive by a Samurai village in Japan, and slowly becomes tuned to their way of life. He learns to move on from his past and find stability and peace within himself. This film shows the end of an era, as the ways of the Samurai fall beneath the onslaught of western technology and the Japanese government. Tom Cruise plays the war-worn American well, as Tom Cruise seems to belong in that era, both by his looks and his acting style. A scene that particularly stands out in my memory of the film is the initial encounter between Algren and the Samurai. Algren accompanies Japanese troops through the 'enemy' territory, and they are ambushed and battle with the Samurai's men. The captured general is allowed the chance to take his own life before Katsumoto claims his head in official victory. The middle of the film could have easily sagged, as the action slows down and the plot has to get from plot point to plot point, but it does not. The slower, less sensational portion of the film maintains engagement, as the character growth and skills being learned to carry the film forward. Just as the Japanese custom of Sepukku involves killing oneself to maintain honor in death, this film tanks its ending. The tone of solemnity and genuine emotion that accompanies the end of an era and such a great tragedy, becomes almost saccharine and cliche.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Bug's Life (1998)
9/10
F-Ant-astic
30 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The protagonist of this film is relatable from the first moment we meet him. Flik is the idealistic underdog that just begs to be identified with. Flik is the black sheep of the ant colony, and when his invention ruins the tribute to the predatory Grasshoppers, he needs to right this wrong. He recruits a troop of circus bigs, thinking them to be mighty warriors, and the whole group rallies the ant colony to defeat the Grasshopper invasion. The characters are vivid, outlandish, and provide a logical (if strange) set of skills that come in handy. I tend to dislike movies or shows where a huge plot point is based around a miscommunication that could be avoided/solved with basic logic, but in this context, it makes some sense. I can understand the pressure and anxiety that would accompany correcting someone who has overestimated your worth. The emotional beats in this movie land with grace. When the colony discovers that the troupe is real performers, rather than warriors, the betrayal is palpable, and the loss seems personal. When, in the end, the caterpillar finally gains his butterfly wings, it is a small delightful moment of wish fulfillment. John Lasseter directed some of the most iconic films of my childhood and had the same magic touch in each. Toy Story, Cars, The Incredibles, and this movie all have the same magical sense of whimsy and crazy events that remain anchored in real, relatable people.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ozark (2017–2022)
7/10
Dramatic and a little too blue
19 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I am not usually one to enjoy a dark, gritty, crime-based drama. Any show where the color scale is permanently dimmed, or shaded blue, tends to be a bit heavy-handed for me. But Ozark pulled me in from the start. Bill Dubuque (director) grew up in the area where the show takes place, so his representation of the setting and ambiance is from personal experience. The acting is incredible (I would expect nothing less from Jason Bateman) and the pacing is appropriately slow. Each character seems so precise and specifically logical according to personal conviction. The inhabitants of the area are classic backcountry people, but the clear sense of individual moral compass and the heightened stakes raise the base behavior to a more intentional level. In the beginning, the Byrds are just an unfortunate family, caught up in money laundering as a result of Marty's seedy company. But things snowball at such a delicious rate, and the growth of their high risk/high reward activities moves so fast they couldn't stop it if they tried. The web of lies and betrayal could so easily become hard to follow and muddle the impact of the emotional moments but manages to stay legible and easy to follow. The arc with Pastor Mason and his family really touched me. The absolute injustice of his fate was a spot of morality among a sea of people striving only for their own success and financial gain.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Timelessly perfect
16 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This film will touch the heart of anyone with a shred of fondness left for their childhood. Jim Henson creates a whimsical adventure in a world of whimsy and far-fetched fateful happenings. Kermit and Fonzie Bear journey across the country towards Hollywood and their imagined stardom, picking up the iconic cast along the way. With the company of Miss Piggie, Gonzo, and Rowlf, the troop fight evil froggy-fast-food businessman, Doc Hopper, who wants to make Kermit the spokesperson for the consumption of his species. The splendid contrast of the characters and their tomfoolery is a spot of light in today's troubled times. The pragmatic presence of Kermit gives the viewer a sense of reassurance that at least one member of the cast is using some logic. Director James Frawley had to work very precisely to make the combination of puppets and reality seem cohesive. It was a great burden to direct, given the complexity of the situation and the physical requirements of the rigging needed to pull off such a large puppet operation. As such, it is an impressive feat from an engineering, writing, directing, and entertaining perspective. The movie is great for all ages, as it is simple enough that a child can grasp the events, but still full of details that a more attuned viewer can pick up on.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hook (1991)
9/10
Excruciatingly Nostalgic
6 May 2020
Warning: Spoilers
In almost every aspect of his performance, Robin Williams has delivered flawless and memorable performances. This is no exception and is in my view a jewel in the crown of his career. Peter Pan rejoined the human world and grew into a man, forgetting his fantastical past. When Hook kidnaps Peter's children, he returns to Neverland and must reconjure his boyhood magic, for the sake of his children and his own happiness. Emotionally, this film packs such a sucker-punch, as the nostalgia and bittersweet memories of childhood are shown in such detail. The audience shares Peters wish to return to the happier, innocent days. But just like Peter, we cannot rewind time. Conceptually, this is a logical continuation to the Peter Pan story, and brought it into the adult world, as the original audience had grown older. The movie was directed by Steven Spielberg (a man with a much of a reputation as Williams) and was a splendid showcase of his directing ability and vision. Taking inspiration from his family, Spielberg crafted an entertaining, if emotionally painful, version of events. When Rufio, who took control of the Lost Boys in Peters's absence, is killed in the final battle with Hook, it is excruciatingly symbolic of the true and final death of Peter Pan in Neverland. Michael Kahn was the lead editor on this project and had worked with Spielberg on many films before. This pairing no doubt resulted in a finely tuned product, as they had a feel for each other's style and vision. I give this film a 9/10 rather than full marks for the sole reason that I was left feeling so emotionally wounded, I cannot fully endorse a perfect score.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Gervais has done it again
29 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
There are some logical issues with this movie, but it is overall a delightful and creative experience. In a world where humanity never developed the ability to lie, people live a harsh reality of a blunt and depressing society. "Fat, snub-nosed loser" Mark somehow develops the ability to lie and takes the world by storm. There are some logical gaps in this concept: if lying does not exist, then imagination cannot, and therefore many of the inventions and advancements that mankind has made over the years that are present in this film would not be possible. Additionally, no one seems to ever just not answer, rather than lying, but always spit up answers immediately. Not lying is different than simply not speaking. However, some logic can be set aside for the sake of the overall enjoyable product, so it is not a deal-breaker when it comes to the quality of the movie. Firstly, the concept is delightful and introduces so many built-in social, financial, political, and artistic problems that need to be overcome. Nothing in the plot is surprising per se, but it flows nicely and has nicely proportioned stakes. Directed by the star of the show Ricky Gervais and Editor Chris Gill pieced together a carefully selected group of important world-building pieces. They could have easily overextended themselves trying to solidify and bring validity to the world but managed to avoid that pitfall.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Brilliant Acting, Crass Characters
22 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
The subtle choices these actors make in expression, body position, and delivery make this a fantastic and hilarious film to watch. College boys Bill and Stan are accidentally accused of a murder in a small Alabama town. Their only hope to avoid the death penalty is Bill's cousin Vinny, an inexperienced but aging lawyer. Firstly, the plot is a classic and widely interesting topic: you can't go wrong with a courtroom drama. Courtroom dramas entertain thousands of people on reality television, though this film is definitively a step above. The idiosyncrasies and personal flair that Vinny (Joe Pesci) brings to the film are glorious and unique. Judge Haller (Fred Gwynne) is no doubt the epitome of imposing and somber old men, and his dower and by-the-book attitude clash with Vinny's Brooklyn sensibilities. Jonathan Lynn made precise and brilliant directing choices with this film. He mentioned in an interview that he wanted to create protagonists that were not interchangeable with other generic leading men and women. In tandem with lead editor Stephen Elliott Rivkin, the pair cultivated this wry comedy. Now, the way that Vinny treats his fiancee Mona Lisa (Marisa Tomei) is unacceptable by today's standards. He is rude and dismissive of her ideas, sexist and misogynistic, and actively tells her to put down a book and don't bother learning about the law. She does, in the end, play an important role in the outcome of the case, but she is not treated with any dignity and is dragged into the courtroom kicking and screaming. Overall, this movie is good for a laugh if you enjoy wry humor, and is a fantastic example of how to execute a film with such chaotic content in an elegant and precise manner.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Glad the Meteor Didn't Strike
17 April 2020
Each time I watch this movie I find another small flaw. That being said, the number of small mistakes do not eclipse the good parts of this movie by any means. The little mistakes in logic or character trait are outweighed by stunning visual detail, a compelling and emotional storyline, and a classic tale of advancing from boy to man. (Or rather, dinosaur-boy to dina-man).In this world, the meteor never struck the earth, and as such dinosaurs never went extinct but instead evolved, as one does. Argo, youngest and weakest of his siblings, is swept away from home and forms ties with Spot, the primitive human boy. Spot and Arlo make their way back to Arlo's family farm in a classic western frontier style: facing cattle rustlers, scavengers, and the dangerous unforgiving elements. What makes this more than just a fluffy cute buddy adventure is the dynamic between Spot and Arlo. Spot plays the role of a dog, in essence, as in this timeline humans are not evolved to the point of language and are generally still hunter-gatherers. The two cannot communicate in words, and so the meaningful moments between them require actual thought and care into the presentation. Showing emotion is harder than simply expressing it in words, and the fact that this movie manages to achieve this is a huge point in their favor. Aside from the actual content of this movie, the animation is drool-worthy. There are a lot of scenes involving water and light, and each one has such deliciously perfect lighting and physics. Director Peter Sohn clearly put his heart and soul into this project. Originally, Sohn was co-director, but when he became the primary, the story was simplified to what we now see. His decisions to create the movie with quality being prized over quantity/sensationalism gave shape to the old-west feel of the movie. In tandem with Stephen Schaffer (editor), the wheat was separated from the chaff. Schaffer worked on Wall-E, and as such knows how to shape the scenes to pack an emotional punch.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Frozen II (2019)
3/10
A Sad Sequel
10 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Sequels to hit movies seldom live up to the standards of the original, but this misses the mark by so far it almost seems sad. The animation is stunning, but that is no surprise or even a saving grace.

Elsa hears a mysterious voice calling to her from the northern realm of elemental spirits and ancient people. Aana, with Kristoff, Sven, and Olaf in tow, almost fanatically follow Elsa into a magic forest to uncover the origin of the voice, and learn the truth about the conflict between her kingdom and the native people.

Aana was a strong, determined, loving heroin in the first movie, with solid and clear motives and a desire for adventure. Now, grotesquely, she is reduced to a mood-swinging, abandonment-issue, moping wreck. She follows Elsa like a lost puppy, reacts quickly and illogically to seemingly innocuous things Kristof says and seems to have utterly lost her character traits.

Kristof, similarly, has been knocked down to clueless romantic, and while his song scene is splendid on its own, he pays no significant part in the plot at large.

In the end, when they have released the forest from its spell and the kingdoms are free again, Elsa makes Aana queen of Arindell. This seems like the worst possible move, given Aana's erratic and groveling behavior for the entire movie, and doesn't make any real sense: If the forest is close enough to the kingdom that breaking the Dam would flood the castle, it is close enough for Elsa to journey between the two locations.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Stellar for a Sequel, Just OK on its own
31 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
My first exposure to this movie was the theme song aptly named "The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift". The movie, once viewed, lived up to the expectations I had based on the style and energy of the song. Troubled youth Sean Boswell is shipped off to Japan to avoid jail time and falls in with a group of street drift racers. He befriends the only other non-native people, Twinkie and Neela, and becomes entangled with the local mob and his school peers. There is little need for the movie to exist, but boy is it fun. It feels almost like a playground drama blown out of proportion by the participant's minds, though the death and violence do upgrade the rating above PG. It feels a bit like a "white man saves the day" story, given that it took an American to end Takaszhi's aggression in a flashy race. That being said, the franchise does tend to feature a specific type of leading man, and this is no exception to that theme.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Knives Out (2019)
7/10
Fun, and exactly worth the matinee pricing
31 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This film has a star-studded cast and a plot that was classic and easy to execute. Chris Evans, Daniel Craig, Jaime Lee Curtis, and Michael Shannon starred as an estranged and eccentric family coming together for the reading of the patriarch's will. His nurse and friend, Marta, is left the majority of his worldly possessions, and amidst the outrage of his family and the police investigation regarding his untimely death, there is intrigue abound. Marta is technically the protagonist, but she is more of a vehicle for the plot to develop than a player in the game. She is passive in her fate, and her redeeming quality is her niceness. This is shoved down the throat of the audience so many times in literal phrasing that it becomes distasteful and almost suspicious. If you have to TELL us she is nice, then there is a failure to show us, and it is a missed opportunity. As we see the events of the fatal night play out from many different perspectives, it becomes clear that even her hand in Harlan (the patriarchs) death was accidental and passive. Overall, a fun experience, akin to a game of clue, but rather lackluster in the character category.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Rude Awakening
28 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I think I speak for much of my peer group when I say that this movie marks the disillusionment about death for a generation. While the movie itself is average in execution and world building, it is the potent emotional impact that stays with one for years afterwards that makes this movie worth its weight in gold. Jessie and Leslie escape into a world of their own creation just 'across' the river from their town, and experience untold fantastic adventures of a classical nature. When Leslie attempt to reach their world, Terabithia, after a big rainstorm via the rope swing they usually use, she is caught by the water and drowns. This is a sudden and senseless death, and the lack of meaning to her death (nothing is gained or saved) is a raw experience that leaves an indelible mark on the viewer.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
10 Minutes worth of Plot
21 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Steve Carell is Steve Carell. That is essentially the entirety of the movie. Steve Carell, Barry, plays across from Paul Rudd (Tim) in this ill-thought out vignette. Tim is an enterprising stockbroker and attempts to gain favor with his boss by bringing Barry to a party where the objective is to procure the biggest loser available. Barry's defining qualities are shallow and outlandish, and the very traits that make him desirable for the party are the ones that lead to him unintentionally tearing Tim's life apart from the inside. The movie is a series of disjointed scenes centered around social ineptitude, easily solved misunderstandings, and characters with few redeeming qualities that are hard to empathize with. It feels as if the one-line concept was approved and then never developed further, and somehow reached fruition without anyone realizing how flat and meandering the plot was. Jay Roach, the director, did direct Austin Powers, so his heavy-handed slapstick humor is consistent with his brand. However, where the plot content and vibrant characters keep the Austin Powers films interesting, this film lacked the integral qualities to balance out the lackluster style of execution. The amount of ground covered feels more like an episode in a sit-com rather than a full-length feature movie, and is in my opinion, a smudge (if not a blemish) on Paul Rudd and Steve Carell's careers.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dumplin' (2018)
6/10
Superficial, but with well executed characters
6 January 2020
Warning: Spoilers
This movie feels as if it revolves around the star power of Jennifer Anniston rather than on the weight of its merit. Willowdean Dixon rebels against her aging pageant queen mother, Rosie (Jennifer Anniston), by entering the very pageant her mother holds so dearly. She intends to make a mockery of the contest, rather than win in defiance of the way of life it encourages. Her motives seem based on teenage angst and shortsightedness, rather than any sort of social activism or desire for change. This is entirely valid and realistic and makes the film more tangible and plausible, as this is absolutely how a teenager in this situation would behave. When Millie and Hannah, also outcasts for weight and fashion reasons respectively, also join the pageant, Will is vehemently opposed, seeing this as a violation of her quest to get back at her mother. The actual content of the plot is predictable and not particularly exciting or enticing, and the gratification at the end is shallow and superficial, though minimally satisfying.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Aliens (1986)
6/10
Meh
11 December 2019
Warning: Spoilers
The timeline, rules of engagement, character dynamics, and the end resolution are all fairly unsteady and vague. In the sequel to Alien, this film watches Ripley as she returns to the infested planet and attempts to correct the mistakes made by the colonists and prevent the spread of the parasites. She finds a lost girl, Newt (Rebecca) and saves her in the representation of humanity, at the expense of her shipmates and potential business opportunities for the sponsor of the trip. There plot and concept holes that gape as wide as the holes the creatures leave in the host humans chest, and the characters are not compelling beyond basic human decency. Visually the themes are strong and clean in the alien den. Overall, the movie was not a complete failure, as it does hold the attention, for the most part, excusing the issues and setting aside logical disbelief for the sake of the film.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Se7en (1995)
8/10
Shocking
7 December 2019
This movie is guilty of several of the seven deadly sins that the main antagonist seems to revere so greatly. Detectives Somerset and Mills are the classic idealistic rookie and grizzled veteran pairing and work together to try and catch a serial killer loose on the city. The killer, never identified, and so-called John Doe, kills those he feels represent the spirit of each of the deadly sins, starting with gluttony, and working his way down the list. The murders are brutal and grotesque, and the detectives scramble to catch up to Doe before he claims another life. The dark gritty style and content are well conveyed with the deep shadows, isolated colors, and deeply angled face shots. The dialogue was nothing special or emotionally potent, but what portions were full of emotion worked well within the ambiance of the grim, gritty, horror-filled nature of reality. I felt that the religious themes, while not revolutionary, helped establish the zealotry of John Doe.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Not what I expected, but very good
2 December 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This is not a film that can be done in one sitting, but is also so immersive that it is almost a disservice to break it into separate viewings. Doctor (as he so vigorously reminds people) Bill Hartford's (Tom Cruise) and his wife, Alice (Nicole Kidman) wander through their own repressed sexual feelings in a series of unfulfilling and scandalous rendezvous. The protagonists are unerringly narcissistic, but in such an innocent animalistic way that I do not feel shame or disgust for their behavior, rather a detached understanding of their motives. It is almost a relief that the promised and foreshadowed tardy sex scenes never manifest on screen, as it retains the sense of purity in the exploration. The pacing is excruciatingly slow, and meticulous in showing Bills raw emotional journey, and must be approached with a patient mindset.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ed Wood (1994)
9/10
Ed-venturous
21 November 2019
Tim Burton is mostly known for his whimsical arose animated films starring Jonny Depp. This film has all of these elements but in a far different context. An idealistic and pasty protagonist, a jaded or revolving door of love interests, and some high concept quest as the goal. Ed Wood desires nothing more than to be a successful film producer, director, and actor (and to wear women's clothing on his time off). He is met with failure after failure, between a complete lack of patronage and his relationship issues, but keeps on running. His haphazard dash toward whatever he sees as the finish line brings him into contact and friendship ( a loose term) with old film star Bella Legosi, famed for his role as Dracula. Ads complete lack of awareness of when it is an appropriate time to quit is refreshing, and the clean-cut nature of the roles everyone in his life plays keep an otherwise almost sad to watch series of failures moving at a happy and fun place. Tim Burton certainly knows how to deliver a movie that walks the line between obtuse and obscene and lightheartedly comedic.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Player (1992)
6/10
An Attempt at Self Awareness
16 November 2019
Warning: Spoilers
As a satire, this film presents the shortcomings and social drama of Hollywood executives, and the film industries repeated rewarding of distasteful behavior. Mill is hungry for success, and will go to any length to ensure his success, even resting to murder, though the circumstances around that event are considerably complicated. He treats those around him as players in a game, to be used or defeated in his quest for climbing the film network food chain, rather than as people to cooperate with. The commentary and self reflection posed in the film are satisfying as an audience member, as it is pleasant to see the darker side of film exposed, rather than it being presented as a utopia and wonderland. The way that Mill behaves is unpleasant to see, as it is lacking in normal social aspects, and as such the movie is uncomfortable for me. David Brown (director) had his own meteoric rise to success at 20th century fox, and knows a thing or two about the process, which contributed to the realism of the plot.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Engaging
9 November 2019
Given that this film is almost a character study rather than a dramatic plot based movie, I felt deep empathy for Mabel. The people draw you in, and you see so deeply into their minds and their vulnerable intimate moments that the consequences of their actions feel sad rather than deserved. In essence, you feel invested in the movie, as the creators and characters clearly have invested their entire selves. This was an independent unbacked film, and still reaches emotional depths that million dollar movies have failed to find. It shows a woman struggling with herself and with the world, in a world that seems to throw her one curve ball after another. This ,combined with her unpredictable mental state, create a mess that we watch unravel.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Sorcerer (1977)
8/10
Oddly riveting
9 November 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This film was slow and meandering, and was almost melancholy in terms of the protagonists life stories. Four men who have all dug their own graves, wind up on the lam in an industrial slum in Latin America. Looking for direction and a bit of money (the cause of a few of their problems was rooted in money to begin with) they accept a contract to ferry volatile nitroglycerin across the jungle. Their eclectic short sighted attitudes that landed them here display again, and they make rash decision after rash decision, resulting in danger and explosions. The films pacing enforces the glacial death that the men are enduring after having left their lives behind as a result of their hubris. I felt a mix of pity and exasperation at the events and choices that were made, as all of the punishment was a just desert of their behavior.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed