When I saw they were telling Johnny's story first I knew what side these "documentary" makers were on. They clearly intended people to initially tend to side with Johnny, because that's the side most people were on anyway (though 50% of his story was repeated in the second part) and would then be blown away by Ambers side of things.. and boy did they fail!
By far most of the arguments made by the people on Ambers side were about how unfair she was being treated, the public vilifying her and having their mind made up no matter what evidence there is to the contrary. And that would would be very true, íf she was actually speaking the truth! Which she wasn't and everybody knew it.
The evidence they mention is statements from previous psychologists saying Johnny had substance abuse issues, which he had already atmitted to and wasn't on trail for. No evidence whatsoever proved he actually laid a finger on Amber.
This was just pathetic.
By far most of the arguments made by the people on Ambers side were about how unfair she was being treated, the public vilifying her and having their mind made up no matter what evidence there is to the contrary. And that would would be very true, íf she was actually speaking the truth! Which she wasn't and everybody knew it.
The evidence they mention is statements from previous psychologists saying Johnny had substance abuse issues, which he had already atmitted to and wasn't on trail for. No evidence whatsoever proved he actually laid a finger on Amber.
This was just pathetic.