Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare (1991) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
346 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
4/10
They saved the worst for last
ericstevenson18 October 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Freddy is back again in his worst movie from the original series. They waited six movies until finally telling Freddy's full backstory. At his death, he was approached by three dream demons who gave him his powers. The CGI on these things is so ugly looking. This film was 3-D and it's easy to tell how these ugly things stand out so well. They were trying to cram way too much backstory in the film and it truly makes you wonder why this wasn't spread out. Freddy's kills are the goofiest in the entire series. It's hard to say he's really weakened because he still gets rid of his victims well.

I have no idea why this movie would depower Freddy. The characters do absolutely nothing out of the ordinary to beat him. The film is needlessly rushed and there's so much going on at the end that a lot of the movie just seems like filler. He does come back in "Freddy Vs. Jason" so this is once again a misleading title. It's just a dumb pointless movie and even more so than most slasher films. It shouldn't please any fan but at least it's not as bad as the remake. It's a stupid poorly paced film and it makes you realize why most people don't like slasher films. *1/2
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
He's Dead, yeah right!
CharlestonNole26 August 2003
My least favorite of the entire series. While not a total loss, you do come away feeling cheated. The redeeming qualities of this flick are: the continued exploration into Freddy's past. (HELLO NEW LINE - DO THE NIGHTMARE PREQUEL - IF YOU MAKE IT WE WILL COME!) This was one whacked joker. The 3D sequences were good, but the ending totally blew.

Pros: Opening Sequence -- Cons: Ending -- Bottom Line: Still better than alot of other horror crud 5/10!
27 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Happy Father's Day
claudio_carvalho30 March 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Freddy Krueger (Robert Engund) brings the last survivor of Sprinwood to a big city. The police withdraw the teenager with amnesia from the streets and bring him to a shelter under the care of Maggie Burroughs (Lisa Zane). She finds a picture of her hometown Springwood in his few belongings and decides to take the John Doe (Shon Greenblatt) back to the town trying to recover his memory. During the travel to Springwood, she finds three others interns hidden in the van. When they reach Springwood, Maggie discovers that she was adopted by her mother and her father is Freddy Krueger.

"Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare" is the sixth part of this classic movie and is a very weak and disappointing sequel. The story is silly, with a dark humor that never works, despite the cameo of Johnny Depp. Further, it shows a total lack of imagination of the writer, and proves that the franchise is exhausted. My vote is five.

Title (Brazil): "A Hora do Pesadelo 6: Pesadelo Final – A Morte de Freddy" ("The Hour of the Nightmare 6: Final Nightmare – The Death of Freddy")
25 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Guilty Pleasure
swannyswan7 May 2003
freddy's dead, jason goes to hell, mikey gets a razor in his candy?

this is the ultimate WTF? film. the beginning alone, with the map, and the computer stuff across the country, WTF?!? no returning characters, WTF? freddy riding a broomstick from wizard of oz, WTF?

some redeeming qualities: i don't like to know too much in horror stories, it's part of what makes them spooky, we learn too much of freddy here, though the flashbacks are well done, like the razor/pain thing

freddy has a daughter and that's why he went nuts, but we haven't heard of it until now, WTF? tom and rosey, WTF? that town is supposed to be where the last 5 films took place? WTF? demon ghost skulls? WTF? 3D (and i still have my 3D glasses from the theater), WTF? cheap excuses to amaze us in 3D??? WTF???

but... alas, it is fun to watch, and ultimately degrades the original and cheapens the franchise, but it is entertaining, a true guilty pleasure flick... though, why does it kill him here and not when nancy does it???

series rating: 2/10 guilty pleasure rating: 7/10
35 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
OK, I think this is Freddy's 6th death already
Smells_Like_Cheese11 November 2003
Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare, the sixth installment of the Nightmare on Elm Street series and once again another bad sequel. I think this is tied up with the last sequel of the Dream Child. I was lucky enough to get the Nightmare on Elm Street series box DVD set for my birthday, so I got to see all the sequels. May I say that I'm just getting more and more disappointed though with these sequels, at least the past two, it just seems like Freddy lost his edge. It's almost like the writers were trying to give Freddy a soul and they're just destroying it instead of reinventing the story. This was a sequel that wasn't needed, sorry to Robert Englund, but this was very much below what Freddy Krueger represents.

Freddy is back, but he's got something we don't know about, a daughter. Maggie, she's not aware that he is her father, but soon she finds out what his dark secrets are and he wants her help. She has to do her best to resist his powers, but it's hard with all the good memories she has of her loving father. Ironic, isn't it? But Freddy isn't giving up without manipulating her into his ways.

Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare is also presented in 3-D, radical, huh? Note the sarcasm. This is one of the worst sequels, it's tied up with the fifth sequel of the Nightmare on Elm Street series, I'd rather watch the second Nightmare on Elm Street to be honest. This just had bad acting, stupid editing, and just over all a bad idea for a story. I didn't like the concept of it and it just ruined the whole idea of who Freddy Krueger really is, the death master of nightmares, not Father Knows Best.

2/10
78 out of 118 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
So bad, it is good!
NpMoviez16 October 2019
One of the most horrendous films I have ever seen. And one of my favorite movies, for all the wrong reasons. Nothing gets more atrocious and hilarious than this!

Normally I divide my reviews into good, mixed and bad parts. But for this film, there's just good - very little of genuinely good and a lot of good things for all the wrong reasons. Genuinely speaking they are really bad, but as I didn't really hate them, I didn't want to call them as "bad".

Speaking of actual good, Robert Englund shows off his comic skills and goofiness really well. It's being done in a completely wrong movie. There are homages to Tom and Jerry and Looney Tunes. Again in a completely wrong movie. By the tone, you might have guessed it (correctly) that it's a guilty pleasure of mine. Now let me just say what were really good. As I said, Robert Englund has a really good comedic side to him, and he shows it off well. There are Looney Tunes references and are great in what they are. Also, it has the flashbacks of Freddy's past and we get to see the pre-boogeyman Freddy. I have always wanted to see a full fledged Freddy origins movie or a short film. So, I liked those parts. And that's all about it. The movie is an absolute trash. I can agree with that, though I like it. The comedic and slapstick parts were the totally wrong choices for a Nightmare film. Robert Englund might have shown his comedic skills, but Freddy doesn't have them. It is the worst incarnation of Freddy. They lost their balance between maniacal Freddy and goofball Freddy since part 4. Here, they went full on bonkers with goofball Freddy. The kills involve Freddy playing Nintendo games with power gloves to kill a moron, and literally says "boing, boing, ... boingboingboingboing". John Doe kill reminds me of a generic Road Runner episode with Coyote planning to kill the bird. And the Carlos kill is my favorite! Freddy simply scratches a blackboard and blasts the heads off! You need to see the reaction of Carlos in the entire sequence. If that doesn't make you laugh, nothing will. In fact, this movie is a complete package of laughter. So, what makes it so bad for so many people? Despite all of this, it takes itself seriously. While a lot Freddy fans get enraged by the seriousness, I get more of a laugh out if it. It's so atrocious that it is entertaining! All the actors have given incredibly terrible and over the top performances. Really dumb and corny, making the movie more entertaining. I can appreciate the basic ideas for 4 & 5, movies which I didn't really like. This doesn't even have that sort of an idea! Every idea that has been put in it are the wrong ones. And those wrong ideas are implemented in the worst way possible. . . Conclusion : All of the things I liked about it are absolutely wrong for a movie like this, but more appropriate for a parody of the same. Freddy's past is shoehorned like anything, and if you're in a serious mood, this movie is infuriating as hell. You need a right time to enjoy the atrocity of it. I do like it for all the wrong reasons, but in all seriousness, even I would say "F" THIS MOVIE!

Rating.

Score : 2.2/10

Grade : F
17 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Okay...
Derek2372 August 2003
Well, I hate to spoil the movie for you but Freddy dies in this one. For what should've have been a grand finale to the series ends up only okay at best. The body count is low and there is just general goofiness all around. Freddy is a joker, and is not threatening at all. I suppose this makes some sense, because with all the power Freddy had it would only take a matter of time before he got so cynical in his killings. Just getting the job done, and having a good laugh while at it.

Since the series has been such a success, there actually is a budget on this and there's good Special Effects. But even with all the effects, it'll be the clever camera tricks that will have you thinking "how'd they do that?" There are only 3 deaths but they are pretty good and creative ones at least. In part 5 a kid is sucked into a comic book, in this one a kid is sucked into a video game. The results of this are way better than in part 5.

Then there's the plot- which is stupid. But at this point in the Nightmare On Elm Street series, you can't expect anything good. It's reached the point of campiness and for some reason I just went with it in Freddy's Dead. It's a goofy, somewhat enjoyable flick that I'm sort of on the fence about. It's not scary at all but it will keep you entertained, unlike Parts 2 and 5.

My Rating: 5/10
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Lots of fun
mattymatt4ever7 March 2003
I guess I'm part of the silent minority who enjoyed this film. Is it one of the best of the "Nightmare" series? Maybe not, but I had lots of fun with it. Freddy Krueger reaches his evil, wisecracking potential. Since parts 4 and 5 kind of lagged the series down, I felt this so-called final installment ("New Nightmare" is the real finale) brought the series out of its slump. There are some great nightmare sequences, including one where Breckin Meyer plays a stoner who gets trashed, falls asleep and gets stuck in a video game to which Freddy controls. This is both a highly original and hilarious sequence, especially when we see him out of the dreamscape, hopping around like Super Mario. And Freddy belts out the funny one-liner, "Great graphics." And since the movie was made about 10 years ago, it brought back memories when Freddy started controlling the game with the Powerglove. Anyone who remembers the first 8-bit Nintendo remembers the Powerglove.

The cast is superb. Lisa Zane is perfectly cast in the lead. I haven't seen Yaphet Kotto since "The Running Man," and I think the last time I saw that film was about 5 years ago. He's another great, underappreciated actor who possesses a powerful screen presence. And who can forget the cameos? The best one is by Johnny Depp (from the first "Nightmare") playing a spokesman for an anti-drug commercial.

The 3D sequence at the end is really awesome! So for those who are looking to check this film out--please rent or buy it on DVD! Hopefully all the editions come with the 3D glasses, but I'm sure the video edition has the 3D element removed.

I personally didn't see many things wrong with the film. It even elaborated on Freddy's backstory. The film is a great mix of humor and scares, and the gross-out effects are terrific. Could this have given better justice to the franchise? Of course it could have. But Rachel Talalay did a fine job. And finding the perfect conclusion is easier said than done.

And in closing, I loved the montage over the opening credits. Fans of the series will be delighted, and will look at it as a tribute to beloved Freddy.

My score: 7 (out of 10)
62 out of 93 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Words fail me...
mentalcritic29 November 2002
Actually, they don't, but they certainly did when trying to think of a singular line that adequately summarises how terrible this entry in the series really is. There were some moments that could have been good, but they are mostly outweighed by their own conversion into missed opportunities, and don't get me started on the bad.

The wasted opportunities are pretty obvious, but I will recap them here in case anyone cares. Anyone who hasn't seen the film and genuinely gives a toss would be advised to stop reading at this point. The first, and potentially the biggest, wasted opportunity, was the plot with Freddy's long-lost child. Now, the extreme mental illness that Freddy appears to suffer (and I might hasten to add that less than one percent of mental patients are a threat to other people, leave alone to this extent) is HEREDITARY, so why not a mystery-type slasher in which Lisa Zane's character dreams of Freddy murdering the teens, only we later discover it's actually her doing all the killing? Sound like a good plot idea to you? Obviously it was above the heads of Talalay and De Luca.

Then there's the trip to Springfield, where the entire adolescent population has been wiped out, and the remaining adults are experiencing a kind of mass psychosis. Funnily enough, said mass psychosis was actually depicted in a realistic and convincing manner, although this has a fair amount to do with the fact that we are never shown too much. We are just given quick visual hints of the massive loss of connection with reality that would stem from the grief of every youngster in town dying for reasons beyond one's comprehension and control. The essential problem with this plot element, however, is that the town is abandoned too quickly, and with no real answers. This collection of scenes would have been far creepier with ten minutes of say... one sane citizen explaining to these visitors why the Springfield fair looks like a horror show.

Of course, horror films are never noted for their character development, unless they're the kind of horror films John Carpenter used to direct, but how are we supposed to really care when characters we know next to nothing about die? At least Wes Craven took the time to set up his characters in the original, and used a few cheap tricks to draw the audience in. That, in a nutshell, is probably the biggest problem with Freddy's Dead: it just doesn't try at all, leave alone hard enough.

On a related note, I feel kind of sorry for Robert Englund, now that he is more or less inextricably linked with the Freddy character. He has played far better characters in far better productions (the science-fiction miniseries "V", for example), and to be forever remembered as "the man who played Freddy" is selling him rather short. It seems he will never break the mold of horror films now. As for the rest of the cast, well, I think their performances here speak for themselves. They deserved to be permanently typecast as little more than B-grade horror props. Even Yaphet Kotto doesn't escape this one unscathed, as his character is one of the most childishly written in the history of B-films.

All in all, Freddy's Dead gets a 1 out of me. I'd vote lower, but the IMDb doesn't allow for that. FD is really a testament to how a writer's inability to exploit a concept to the fullest extent can ruin not only a film, but an entire franchise.
58 out of 104 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
They tried burning, they tried burrying, they even tried holy water but now they wanna try dynamite n stabbing.
Fella_shibby1 September 2020
I first saw this in the early 90s on a vhs which I used to own. Revisited it recently on a dvd which I own. This film takes place years after the events of the previous one. After killing every child and teenager in the town, Freddy confronts the last survivor from Elm street in dreams but spares his life. The boy is taken to a youth shelter by a cop where the boy meets other teens n becomes a patient of a psychiatrist. This one shows Freddy's life story n for the first time we have a good opening sequence. Here the setting is good initially of that of a desolated town without any kids n the van trapped in the time loop. But then the whole shelter home stuff gets silly. Freddy's humor is back too. The scene where he dances behind the kid with the ear prob is darkly funny. But the tormenting of the kid by Freddy is too much. We have a young Breckin Meyer n Johnny Depp in a cameo appearance.
16 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Quickie Review: Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare
The-Social-Introvert25 April 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Wow. What we have here is a magnificently senseless and silly Elm Street film. I know it's a taboo to say, but it can't get any worse than this – and it won't, since this abomination is technically the whimper that the Nightmare franchise ended with, since Freddy vs Jason happened via a retcon and New Nightmare is a different breed.

I first thought that this may not be the wisest hour and a half I've spend in my life in the opening five minutes, where the protagonist is subjected to the 'horror' of rolling down a hill for five minutes, moaning like he's giving birth through his anus, but not before witnessing Kruger on a broomstick dressed up as the Wicked Witch of the West taunting him. Speaking of Kruger, was the makeup department on strike or something during production? It looks like they just mashed bubble gum on Englund's face.

After some more silly moments in the opening half hour or so, the film has four unlikable twats travel to Springwood, where all the kids and teenagers have long since been bumped off by Freddy, and as a result the adults all are a bit retarded. This is where the film pretty much runs out of whatever steam it had and becomes a bore fest, going through the typical motions of misguidedly and amateurishly exposing the villain's unnecessary backstory about being bullied as a kid and revealing a protagonist's disturbing rape during childhood at the hands of her own father, but not before we get to see Freddy play Nintendo in 3D and bust out dance moves behind a deaf guy. It's uneven to say the least.

Stale acting and the worst special effects in all the movies mean there isn't much to take from The Final Nightmare, unless you want a lesson in how to strip a horror icon of all his dreadfulness.

Best Scene: The end credits (how embarrassing is that?). It showed us snippets of previous films, making me long to watch them instead of this turd-fest
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
This silly sequel is grim looking but it has some good moments.
hu6756 January 2006
Now all the kids and teenagers of Springwood, Ohio are all dead expect for one teenager (Shon Greenblatt) is still alive. Freddy (Robert Englund) is letting him go and the teenager doesn't have much of a memory, when he's arriving in a new town. When a tough female psychologist (Lisa Zane) tries to break though the new patient. She's finds out, where he's from. She brings him along to Springwood to spark some memories but three teens (Lezlie Deane, Breckin Meyer and Ricky Dean Logan), who unexpected came for the ride. Once they arrived in Springwood, the psychologist has some memory that she did lived in that town before as a child. While Freddy knows the true secret of her true identity.

Directed by Rachel Talalay (Ghost in the Machine, Tank Girl) made a grim but somewhat oddly different sequel with some visual style and funny moments for this horror/fantasy/thriller. Yaphet Kotto (Alien) has a supporting role as a Psychologist expert on dreams. This has some ingenious visual effects (Not everyone will love the climax, especially in 3-D) and some good style in its storytelling. This one did out gross some of the film's series at the box office.

DVD has an strong anamorphic widescreen (1.85:1) transfer (also in Pan & Scan) and an strong-Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround Sound. DVD has the original theatrical trailer, Jump to a Nightmare opinion and Cast & Crew information. The "Elm Street" Series Box Set, the eighth disc has interviews with the the cast & crew of this sixth film. The sixth film is also in 3-D for the film climax but you could watch it at 2-D also. This is the last of the "Elm Street" films until Wes Craven resurrected Freddy into a different, darker style in "New Nightmare" and the silly but surprisingly enjoyable spin-off horror film "Freddy Vs Jason". Watch for Robert Shaye (Co-Owner and Co-CEO of "New Line Cinema"), Roseanne Barr, Tom Arnold, Johnny Depp and Alice Cooper in amusing cameos. Written by Michael De Luca (John Carpenter's In the Mouth of Madness). From a story by the director. (*** ½/*****).
29 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Freddy's Dead? The Nightmare on Elm Street Franchise.
Captain_Couth6 August 2005
Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare (1991) was the last film to feature Freddy Krueger as a solo act (not as an entity or a co-star). The years of killing have taken a toll upon the town of Springwood. It has gotten to the point that the little city has become a virtual ghost town. The parents who killed Freddy Krueger so many years ago have all paid the ultimate price. Only the mad inhabit the town and the survivors are scattered everywhere. But that doesn't stop Freddy from seeking out his final revenge. No matter how they try to stop him, he always comes back for more. But this time he finds out a little more about his old life. Can the kids finally stop Freddy for good? What is this secret that is buried in Freddy's twisted mind? to find out you'll have to watch Freddy's Dead. the end was originally filmed in 3-D.

A fitting way to end the franchise. Freddy learns something about himself and his perverted life and he gets to go out in a bang! Lisa Zane, Yaphet Kotto and Freddy Krueger star in this final installment. Rosanne, Tom Arnold and Johnny Depp make special appearances. A whole lot better than the last one but it's filled with a few dated jokes. If you enjoy the series then you don't want to miss out on this one.

I have to recommend this movie for Freddy fans.
30 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Out Of Steam
ReelCheese25 August 2006
Often people will have low expectations going into a film like FREDDY'S DEAD: THE FINAL NIGHTMARE. How good can the sixth installment of any series be, let alone a string of low-budget frightfests? Yet I am not of the belief that horror series are doomed to run out of steam. Heck, I think Friday THE 13TH got better with age. But although I had an open mind while watching what was supposedly the last NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET film, I found it a bitter disappointment in every way.

Once again, our favorite grotesquely-disfigured dream stalker is after a group of teens, dispatching them one by one as they sleep. Yet none of the creativity or style of the previous films is present. Whatever happened to sequences such as the waterbed from Part 4 or the marionette from Part 3? It's as though producers cobbled this together just for the sake of making another Freddy film.

Other shortcomings abound. While other NIGHTMARE entries have been nothing short of brilliant at making the most of a limited budget, FREDDY'S DEAD looks the cheapest of them all. This is especially true when we see a younger Freddy meet the computer-generated dream spirits. It was reminiscent of a third-rate Saturday morning children's show. Humor was attempted here, with cameos by Johnny Depp and Roseann Arnold and a video game sequence with Freddy at the joystick, but it all falls flat. The acting is stale and Rachal Talalay directorial debut uninspired.

The finale is a particular disappointment. Of all the memorable ways Freddy has been killed in previous films, is having his daughter turn his own glove against him the best they could come up with? Granted, the idea of bringing the killer into the real world was a good one, but its potential was not fully explored.

Overall FREDDY'S DEAD is arguably one of the worst -- if not the worst -- films in this popular saga. And yes, that includes Part 2 and the overly artsy DREAM CHILD. One has to believe that if they had it to do all over again, the people behind this film could come up with something a lot better than this.
18 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Film Series Dead...
mcfly-315 September 2004
Warning: Spoilers
I grew up on these, but somehow had never seen part 6, so thirteen years later, I checked it out this morning. I should've slept in. Not just the worst "Nightmare" movie, but one of the worst films of all time. Yes, Freddy hasn't been scary since the second film, but at least he had some good joke writers up until part 4. New Line execs Talalay and DeLuca thought they could write and direct a film...not-uh. This time around it's like a ten-year-old penned his quips that are eye-rollingly bad. Freddy on a broomstick?? Freddy playing Nintendo?? Man, not only is Freddy dead, the series has been dead since the end of part 4. Although I can say I'd still watch part 5 over this. The plot is the worst slog of any of the films, as Freddy even disappears for a half hour while the thing is laid out. The lead that is carrying it all is one of the weakest actors I've encountered, Shon Greenblat. His look and delivery is all wrong, the same going for Ricky Dean Logan. His death scene is one of the stupidest things I've ever watched, as he's agonizingly slain with a Q-tip (stop laughing). Screaming endlessly in a dorky pitch, it's painful for the viewer as well. The Nintendo death is horrifically idiotic as well, as all slasher-film tone is demolished as a victim jumps all over a room in a trance, ala a video game character. Complete with jump sound effects and superhuman strength, it was the moment where I raised a hand to the screen going "Come on, what is this crap?". And after Freddy is dead, star Zane and her "Freddy's dead!", and head-tossing smile puts a cap on this steaming mess of a movie. Later Fred, thanks for the 80s memories, I don't blame you, but the writers.
27 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
"Every town has an Elm Street"
The_Movie_Cat25 September 2000
Warning: Spoilers
WARNING: REVIEW CONTAINS MILD SPOILERS

A couple of years back I managed to see the first five films in this franchise, and was planning to do an overview of the whole Elm St. series. However, just two years on and I find I can't remember enough about them in order to do it – I guess they couldn't have made much of an impression. From what I do recall, some of the sequels – Dream Warriors in particular – weren't as bad as is often made out, though even the original was no classic. Generally, the predictability of the premise (if people fall asleep they get murdered in their dreams) doesn't lend itself to narrative tension. But while I cannot recall much of the first five films, I do know they never plumbed the depths of Freddy's Dead.

An indication of how sick of Freddy the public was at this point can be judged by the fact that the film was promoted solely on the character's demise. The fact that the movie's conclusion is not even hidden, but in fact the entire purpose for the film's being goes to illustrate how vacant, soulless and cynical this venture was.

Taking the morally questionable idea of having a child molester as the charismatic villain, Robert Englund's in-no-way-scary interpretation booms with laughter. I always thought Freddy's mockery of the teenage victims was less aimed at the characters than at the teenage audience that could ever watch this tripe. It's like Englund's crying out "we know this is garbage – but you're paying to see it, so who's the one laughing?" And I'm sure victims of child abuse would be disheartened to see such an insensitive depiction of their plight. Was Freddy's appearance in the films always so rudimentary? All he gets to do here is a few "haaaaaaaaaaaaaarr – har – har – hars" and that's it. If this was the only Elm St. film you'd ever seen you wouldn't get to know the character at all. Even as the character pre-death in a flashback Englund plays him as a boo-hiss pantomime villain with a slop of Transatlantic (ie. overstated, misplaced and not at all funny) irony.

Acting is almost universally poor. Just look at how many times Breckin Meyer overacts with his hand gestures and body language. Only Kananga himself, Yaphet Kotto, keeps his dignity. And when Roseanne, Tom Arnold and Alice Cooper show up, you can almost visibly see the film sinking further into the mire. The script, too, is absolutely lousy, almost wholly without merit. Carlos (Ricky Dean Logan) opens a road map, upon which the Noel Coward-like Freddy has wittily written "you're f**ked". When prompted for the map, Carlos responds "well the map says we're f**ked". Who wrote the screenplay, Oscar Wilde?

Or how about the scene where Carlos is tortured by Freddy, his hearing enhanced to painful levels? So Freddy torments him by threatening to drop a pin – a potentially fatal sound, given that all sounds are magnified. Oddly, the fact that Carlos shouts at the top of his voice for him not to drop it seems to have no effect. "Nice hearing from you, Carlos", quips Freddy, hoping some better lines will come along. It's also worth noting that dream sleep doesn't occur instaneously, so being knocked unconscious wouldn't allow instant access into Freddy's world. Though as part of the narrative contains a human computer game and a 3-D finale plot logic isn't that high on the list of requirements.

The teenagers heading the cast this time are really the most obnoxious, dislikeable group in the whole series. Tracy (Lezlie Deane) is the only one who gets to greet Freddy with "shut the f**k up, man" and a kick in the scallops. And was incongruous pop music always part of the ingredients? Freddy's Dead. No laughs. No scares. No interest. No fun.
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
hilarious
seanclark-222 January 2008
Yes this is a bad movie for the horror generation but it was more like a comedy spoof to me. I saw for this movie for gender part comedy, damn right it is. It has a bunch of cheap but funny one liners so thats why i'm not taking this movie seriously.

We've saved the best for last, yeah that defiantly false advertising. I mean come on, the last 2 were awful you know this one's gonna be bad. The first one was a masterpiece and then by part 3 or 4 they were turned into comedies and Freddy's Dead is by far the funniest of them all.

So this is my review of Freddy's Dead a cheesy yet funny movie and that is why i'm giving it a 5/10
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A Joke. It Has To Be
forrestwrs12 September 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I… I am confused… Am I even watching an Elm Street movie anymore? This cannot be an Elm Street movie. This feels more like a spoof of an Elm Street movie. A bad spoof. The Final Nightmare, bullshit. This is Freddy Movie 6.

How bad is Freddy's Dead? It's a joke. The whole movie is a joke. It has to be. And it's just plain pathetic, too. I mean, it's so bad, even the puns are stupid ("Nice hearing from you, Carlos!" give me a break). I can't even start talking about the lack of characterization or bad dialogue. That's a little like saying "Yeah, the Titanic did have a bad paint job, didn't it?" Watching this film was a strange experience. You know how some people will complain that their favorite book was turned into a movie that left out all the good parts and they felt like the film was in fast-forward? That's what Freddy's Dead feels like. Like the film is in fast-forward. The story goes from event to event so fast that I don't even have time to digest what had just happened. And I have no idea what's going on in the story anyway. It lacks any kind of coherence and flow.

It's just so over the top and goofy that I could not take much of this movie seriously at all. Was I suppose to? There is a scene in the movie in which Freddy kills a character by scratching his nails on a chalkboard. The kid's head promptly explodes. In a scene shortly thereafter, Freddy is controlling a kid by using a video game. The kid is bouncing around in reality, complete with BOING! BOING! sound effects. That absolutely cannot be meant to be taken seriously.

So, does Freddy's Dead have any redeeming qualities? Believe it or not, yes. Some of the goofy stuff going on actually gets a couple laughs. Not a ton, but enough to make those scenes tolerable. Also, I will say that the acting is, in fact, an upgrade from the previous two movies. Even Robert Englund is a little better here than last time.

But that's it. The movie as a whole is borderline unwatchable. Lack of intelligence and general logic makes most of this film unbearable. Oh, and something else that bugged me. A bunch of films that came out in the late 80s and early 90s tried the 3D gimmick. And in a lot of films that tried it back then, most of the 3D revolved around random objects being pointed straight at the camera. It happened here too. And it was really annoying. It does not look cool. And here's something that was the dumbest part of the 3D gimmick: in the film, a character actually put on and took off magical 3D glasses to let the audience know when to wear the glasses and take them off. I wish I was making that up. That was as low as Freddy has gotten right there.

Freddy's Dead is a mess. This could very well be the worst Elm Street movie. The visuals look bad, the screenplay is beyond idiotic, the characters are stupid, there is no directing style, it's overly goofy, and its best attribute is its incredibly mediocre acting. Freddy's Dead is a nightmare in itself. It is just plain painful.

1/10
9 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Great film...for a comedy
jmcgee-125 December 2003
FREDDY has gone from scary to funny,in this 6th installment in the Nightmare series.

It's been 2 years,well actually 11 since this film takes place in 2001.And FREDDY has killed every last kid on Elm street except one,John Doe(Jacobb from part 5,even doe the film gives on hint who he is),in which he uses to bring more children to come to Elm street.Not only does FREDDY gets his wishes,but he also gets his daughter back to Elm street.When she finds out what is happening,she and other kids decide to kill FREDDY once and for all.We also get to see some of FREDDY's eerie backgrounds.

Rachel Talalay,who has been contected to the nightmare series for a long time by now.Many people hate this film,but I liked it.It tried to bring out what FREDDY was doing with his wisecrackes...COMDEY and makes the series more funny than scary.So this film is really a comdey sore to speak.It is not the wrost in the series,part 2 still holds it.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Fans, steer clear!
paulclaassen2 July 2018
The official final chapter in the series and I officially did not enjoy it one bit. The effects and make-up are reminiscent of a B-movie. More of a spoof than to be taken seriously. Extremely disappointing.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A decent mix of Horror and Comedy.
If your a hard core Freddy fan then you might not like it. This seems to be a spoof of the nightmare series. Not much to see here. The only reason it holds it self up is the back story on Freddy.

The one thing that is always great in Nightmare movies are the death scenes. But the death scenes were very crappy in this. The visual effects were great and the acting was OK but the back story was excellent. Basically Freddy's story comes full circle in this.

I have read bad reviews for this but i actually enjoyed this despite its many flaws:

1. A Nightmare on Elm Street. (8/10)

2. Freddy's Dead: The Final Nightmare. (7/10)

3. A Nightmare on Elm Street 4: The Dream Master. (7/10)

4. A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: The Dream Warriors. (7/10)

5. A Nightmare on Elm Street 5: The Dream Child. (6/10)

6. A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge. (3/10)

I recommend it if you enjoy the series. This is were Freddy is fully explained but thats all there is. Next on my list Wes Cravens New Nightmare.

(7/10)
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Literally one of the WORST films I've ever seen!!!
leonmessyb4 June 2022
This film is hard to take seriously and I'm honestly not sure you were meant to. Elm street went from being a genre of horror to parody and comedy. This was basically Freddie Kruger meets Scooby Doo!! AWFULLLLLLL!!!!
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Perfect finale ( and I do not care about what you say )
timefreezer72 June 2001
Warning: Spoilers
***SPOILERS*** ***SPOILERS*** What 's the matter with you people ? Why is EVERYBODY trashing this film ? It is usually the same persons who dislike part 2 which was also neat. Not only Freddy 's Dead is good , it is very good because it contains everything : inventive plot twists , engaging reoccuring dreams , hallucinating atmosphere ( a city on the border of reality and fantasy with weird adults and no kids at all ) , marvellous flashbacks and FINALLY a reasonal explanation about the Freddy Krueger phenomena. After 5 movies it was NEVER explained exactly how it is possible that a dead person torments people in their dreams and manages to kill them by manifesting nightmares . At last , we have some substandard explanation . After the horrible #4 and the mediocre #5 not only we have improvement scriptwise but we have very interesting characters . Sure the video game sequence is kind of corny but the rest of the deaths were frightful. If anyone of you says that was not scared with Freddy killing the kid with the hearing problem is a total liar . The girl who plays Tracy simply kicks a** . She is dynamic and fights for her live in a very realistic way . Towards the end you will find yourself GLUED in your couch . You are very concerned for the lives of the characters . The script has a few inconsistencies like it is never explained how Freddy erased the existance of his victums from the memories of the others . It does not matter . The basic premise is for a teenager who believes he is the long lost son of Freddy Krueger and

is stalked by him . He ends up in an asylum and being supervised by a male and female doctor who consider the idea of hypnosis and dream manipulation ( OK it reminds a bit of part 3 but we can forgive that ). The female doctor escorts him in a strange city to investigate for his roots and Freddy . Along with them go 3 more kids with problematic domestic backgrounds (e.g. one of them is Tracy being sexually abused by her own father) . I won't spoil the rest . The scenes in the strange city are Gothic and effective . The final showdowns between the heroes and the killer are the most intense in the entire series , excellently tied up with delusional flashbacks which after 6 movies are original

and prove that the dreamlike atmosphere can STILL be accepted and not a tired rehash . The writers made a perfect job . We learn all we wanted to know about Freddy 's history and the script neatly ties most of the loose ends of the series . There is a complaint " Why again drag him into the real world ? It didn 't work when Nancy(in #1) and Jesse(in #2) tried it " . I will have to remind you that they never actually managed to KILL him . He was defeated but not destroyed . Part 6 is not the best but one of the best in the series . FORGET the bad reviews and give it a

shot . There is an extra bonus : you finally see what is the real face of Freddy before burned ( this scene is also included so you MUST SEE IT) . There are also slight references to the prequels . And a very cool hint : the vast ARSENAL of weaponry in the end !!!! See it alone and very late at night . You will be spooked. Fab cast , fab script , fab SFX and direction , fab fun.

EXCELLENT !!!! 8.5 / 10

(and for God 's shake skip the tragedy of part 7 at all costs)
27 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Now you're playing with power!
Anonymous_Maxine24 July 2004
At this point in the series it seems clear that the movies realize that they are no longer horror films but gory comedies, since they have long since lost what little power they ever might have had to be scary. The alleged Final Nightmare starts off with a quote from Friedrich Nietzsche which carries an unusual amount of dramatic intensity for a Nightmare on Elm Street movie since it fits so well with the series' running theme, and is then followed by a sophomoric quote from Freddy at his classiest, 'Welcome to Prime Time, B**ch.' This is followed by a parody of The Wizard of Oz in which we see Freddy flying on a broom and yelling, 'I'll get you my pretty! And your little SOUL too!! HAW HAW HAW!!' And thus is the tone set for the rest of the movie.

Instead of taking place at the setting of a mental hospital, this one takes place at a zero security shelter for disturbed kids. And I say 'zero security' very literally. Police find junkies on the streets and send them to this place rather than deal with the paperwork involved in putting kids in juvenile hall, and yet detention at the facility is literally based on encouraging them not to leave. It's like attendance is based on the honor system. At one point, one of the counselors (and the main character in the story), takes John Doe, their newest guest, on a trip back to his home town to confront the demons that are messing up his cognitive function. On the way there they find three kids stowing away in the company car (which is a decrepit old white van covered in obscene graffiti), planning to escape. Rather than return them to the facility, she has them drop her and John Doe off at their destination and promise to DRIVE THEMSELVES BACK IMMEDIATELY!! What kind of a detention center is this anyway? In case you were wondering, no thought was wasted on how she and John Doe were meant to get back themselves.

That being said, the rest of the movie really isn't that bad, as long as you keep it in context of such scenes as that described above. The movie takes place 10 years after part 5 left off, and our John Doe is a mystery character who suffers from amnesia and is not all that anxious to have it cured. The basic premise is that Freddy has a kid running around somewhere who he intends to use to bring him fresh victims, giving him more time to concentrate on expanding his territory ('There's an Elm Street in every town!').

The movie smartly concentrates on the possibilities offered by the blurring of the line between reality and the dream world of unconsciousness, which is the exact thing that made the original movie so successful. Back then, you had a villain that was morbidly likable and a premise to which anyone could relate to because it's based on the real life crossing of that line, which you never really notice doing. Unfortunately, the movie trips all over itself with a series of ridiculous killing scenes which illustrate the sheer extent to which writers are running out of clever ideas for how Freddy should claim his victims. One poor kid gets his ear cut off, then Freddy gives it back to him, the kid picks it up and says, 'Yes!!' and then puts it on the other side of his head (the side which still has an ear attached to it), and Freddy proceeds to make loud noises until the kid's head explodes. What the hell was that?

Breckin Meyer makes an early appearance as some Freddy fodder and suffers a video game fate in which the entire movie stops in its tracks so that Freddy can put his feet up on the desk and kill someone with a joystick. It's not hard to tell that this movie was made at the height of Nintendo hysteria. We do get an interesting look into Freddy's past in which we learn not about the disturbing method of his conception, but what hid life was like before he became the Freddy Krueger we know. The kids in the movie come up with a pretty clever (and long overdue) plot to kill Freddy once and for all, but it's good that this was not the final installment in the series, if only because it would have been such an anticlimactic close to a series that had thus far spawned five sequels and fans around the world.

The film originally featured a thrilling 3-D conclusion which, to the best of my knowledge, has been scrapped by the DVD production, I imagine because of the necessity for 3-D glasses. Still, we get a look inside Freddy's brain as well as a host of other scenes (including Freddy's alleged death), which surely must have been a blast to see in 3-D. Sadly, the rest of the movie probably couldn't even have been supported on this gimmick alone, because it certainly doesn't have a lot else going for it.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Final Embarrassment
Coventry14 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Unimaginably stupid, redundant and humiliating closure to the "Nightmare on Elm Street"-series! Part 6 is so incompetent that it looks like director Rachel Talalay intentionally wanted to turn Wes Craven's initial premise into one big bad and tasteless joke. This isn't just the worst entry in the "Elm Street" saga; it's also one of the most embarrassing horror movies ever made and it downright offends fans of the genre! The story is dumb, the character drawings are ridiculous, the structure is all murky and – most of all – the special and visual effects resemble those of a Tom & Jerry cartoon. The sequences in which Freddy Krueger murders his victims are endless and very uninteresting. Were we supposed to be petrified when a jabbering Freddy turned Breckin Meyer into a video game-character and pogo-sticked him around the walls of a house? The story takes us back to Springwood and it appears that Freddy all of a sudden has a middle-aged daughter. You'd think he would mention that in one of his previous adventures, but no… There's only one teenage-survivor in Springwood and Krueger uses him to get into contact with his long lost daughter. Another reason why this final installment is so awful is the completely illogical structure. The John Doe-boy is introduced as the leading character but then all of a sudden he dies and the plot continues to revolve on two adults! How about that: Freddy Krueger, who spent five entire films killing nothing but teenagers, eventually gets beaten by two adults wearing 3D-glasses! Sort of like ruins the whole essence, doesn't it? As far as I'm concerned, "Nightmare on Elm Street" has always been a dreadfully overrated series but, up until now, even the weakest entries had at least some redeeming elements. "Freddy's Dead", however, is simply unendurable and nobody should waste his/her precious time watching it.
22 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed