The Girl Who Couldn't Quite (1950) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Good Intentions Don't Make A Good Movie
boblipton13 June 2022
Elizabeth Henson has never laughed since her father died. Her mother, Betty Stockfield, and the rest of the veddy upper-class household are concerned. Then one day she spots tramp Bill Owen in the garden and laughs, so Miss Stockfield persuades the touchy Owen to help his daughter. He does so by teaching her generosity, which impresses everyone save Miss Henson's grandmother.

It's based on a stage play by Leo Marks, and is typical of a string of British movies of the era which emphasized low-key, amiable compassion -- my favorite of the type is LAST HOLIDAY, with a fine script by J. B. Priestley and J. Lee Thompson, humorous direction in a minor key by Henry Cass, and a typically spot-on performance by Alec Guinness. This movie, in contrast, seems a bit of a muddled translation, showing its stage origins in its stereotyped characters -- although Owen is fine. Some fine black-and-white photography by Geoffrey Faithfull.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A Strange Comedy/Drama That Couldn't Quite . . . .
reprtr9 December 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Think of Chaplin's City Lights (1931), or Lewis Milestone's Hallelujah, I'm A Bum (1933) -- the latter a vehicle for Al Jolson and, in effect, his "answer" film to City Lights -- recast in the era of psychological awareness and you'll be able to wrap your mind around The Girl Who Couldn't Quite. Whether you'll think the latter activity worth doing is another issue.

The whole film is neither quite . . . comedy nor drama, but skittering between the two, and especially from drama to physical and slapstick comedy, from shot-to-shot and scene-to-scene as it works its way through a story of psychological trauma that might well have played much better as a shorter, somewhat more purely dramatic piece for television. Elizabeth Henson (whose screen career seems to have been confined almost entirely to television, apart from this starring role) plays the title character, a "teenager" (she was 23 when she did the part) who has not smiled since the age of five, and has been given to sudden fits of temper and aggression that have made her a blight on her family's existence and a terror for their long-suffering servants. In the opening 20 minutes of the movie, she's seemingly suffering from something akin to autism or PTSD, and is singularly sad and less than sympathetic. Only her chance spotting and hearing of a cheerfully self-reliant tramp (Bill Owen, in the best performance in the film) seems to bring her out of her perpetual miserable take on life and living, and her family engages the unwilling interloper to keep up his intervention. They overcome a lot of mistrust on his side and chaotic emotions on her side, and she eventually reaches a point where the source of her trauma is revealed, to the benefit of all except for Owen's tramp.

The author behind the work is Leo Marks, a former wartime cryptographer who was heavily involved with the defense of England during the Second World War, and who knew his way around psychological terms and subjects. His major work as a screenwriter was the script for Michael Powell's career-destroying thriller Peeping Tom, but he had numerous other strings to his bow. Here he seems to have wanted to tell a serious story (I haven't read his original play), but director co-screenwriter Norman Lee, who was better known for coarser, more comedic subjects going back to the 1930s, appears to have had other ideas. The resulting film is a strange mix, indeed, of amply-telegraphed slapstick and somber familial tensions, in which only Bill Owen as the carefree wanderer Tim rises above the limitations of the script and the direction.

There is also a bit more humor in here than may be obvious for some audiences in the twenty-first century, but wouldn't have been lost on viewers in 1950. The most telling of those moments is when the title-character's mother tries to draw Tim's attention to a particular book -- he nonchalantly and with a wicked gleam in his eye replies, "Miss Blandish -- I've read it!" referring to James Hadley Chase's notoriously salacious novel No Orchids For Miss Blandish (itself a rewrite of Faulkner's Sanctuary), which the same production company, Renown Films, had released in a film adaptation a couple of years prior to this. It's an inspired flash in the script -- I'm just not sure that it belonged in this particular script.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Life for Ruth
richardchatten27 February 2020
The vast amount of ink spilled on the subject of Michael Powell's 'Peeping Tom' (1960) is inclined to overlook this garrulous little curiosity (Norman Lee's directorial swan song), based on a 1947 West End hit by 'Peeping Tom's author Leo Marks. While Powell's film was ahead of its time in anticipating the way the camera shaped life, the hapless family in this film have spawned a young Goth decades too early ("We've taken her to the highest doctors and the lowest comedians, and still she can't laugh!"), with a backstory of child abuse by a responsible adult which anticipates both 'Peeping Tom' and Sam Fuller's 'The Naked Kiss'.

It would be interesting to see what a modern student of psychiatry would diagnose young Ruth's problem as...
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Mildly salacious sex comedy is a strange link between "Strip! Strip! Hooray!!!" and "Peeping Tom"
Cheekily-titled programmer is a fitting swansong for director Norman Lee, responsible for "Strip! Strip! Hooray!!!"(1932), a very early British "nudie." The audience was no doubt expecting something sexier than what they got: the young woman in question (Elizabeth Henson) can't quite smile. She appears to have some form of autism or schizophrenia and shocks her family by falling in love with a tramp (Bill Owen). In time-honoured tradition the odd couple change each other's lives. The action is stagily confined to a country house and perhaps appropriately the performances (with the exception of Owen) are strictly provincial rep. But seekers of the unorthodox should note that the film is based on a play by Leo Marks, who went on to shock the world with "Peeping Tom", a far more sensational exploitation of psychosis. "Malcolmgsw" is wrong to state that Marks went on to make glamour and nudist films. He's thinking of Harrison Marks. Leo Marks had nothing to do with the screenplay of this film, whose low comedy is quite inappropriate for the theme. At one point rough Owen puts posh Henson over his knee for a spanking and there is a close shot of her bare legs kicking. But otherwise this is about as far as it's possible to get from Lady Chatterley and her gamekeeper.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A movie that isn't quite
handelian-7784717 May 2021
This movie certainly has potential going for it - Bill Owen for a start. But it is dreadfully let down by pretty indifferent acting and a muddled script which can't make up its mind what it is. Is this serious or comic? It deals with a serious theme - mental illness. Then throws in some comic bits that are beyond the point presumably because Owen is in it. Then the acting is so wooden. I mean we know Henson is frigid, but after being put over Owen's knee and soundly spanked, would she act as if nothing has happened? The movie adds unlikely scene to unlikely scene till a not very convincing ending.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Dull working of an unusual subject
malcolmgsw12 September 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Bill Owen plays a tramp who makes a mentally ill girl smile.She comes to depend upon him rather than her family.The girl looses her memory and Bill becomes a fixture in the home.However she regains her memory and does my recognise him.The family decide that it would be for the best if he were to leave.At first he is resistant but then realises it is for the best.The film is based on a play by Leo Marks,once of the secret service,who would later go on to make glamour and nudist films.The film is unusual in that it deals with mental issues.However whilst sensitively done nevertheless it is deadly dull.It is extremely wordy and betrays its stage origins.Well meaning but a bore.
7 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Beautiful film (in places)
dfrench_43010 August 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Interesting film. I enjoyed the beautiful beginning but not the unpleasant bits and sad ending

Bit like " La vita è bella" (1999)

I wanted to add to the earlier review that said the only saucy bit was the spanking:

That reviewer must have missed Ruth pulling up her skirt to get the sketch out of the top of her stocking

Servants bumping their posteriors together looked a bit rude.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Never gets going.
debbiemathers6 July 2022
Ruth (Elizabeth Henson) hasn't laughed since her father died so when the passing tramp (Bill Owen) raises a smile from her his services are commandeered by the insufferable family. Of course Owen predictably teaches everyone a new way of living, but Henson remains frigid in her acting apart from in the scene where Owen puts her over his knee and gives her a good spanking. The scene is the liveliest in the movie, with Hensons legs flailing over Owens knee as he spanks away, but then she immediately returns to type as if nothing had happened. Surely after a spanking like that she would least be rubbing her bottom but no, she is so frigid that one wishes the tramp would repeat the dose. Sadly, the movie gets duller and duller from then on! 'As refreshing as a breath of spring air' as says the publicity? Hardly!
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed