"The Haunting of Bly Manor" The Two Faces, Part One (TV Episode 2020) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
very interesting episode!
hugojordan23 November 2020
The episode does not please everyone ... it is only 7.6 and it may still hurt ... BUT in my opinion, it is really great, we learn a lot about the characters even if there is still a lot of mystery, the episode will not appeal to everyone because it is quite slow, not in terms of duration but in terms of pace and there is a lot of dialogue.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I'll light a candle
Calicodreamin18 October 2020
Good storyline progression and character development, loved getting the backstory on Rebecca. Not much scares, but a definite creep factor hangs over this show enough.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
We Need To Talk About Owen!!!!
wandernn1-81-68327421 October 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Oh Awesome!!! We Start out this EP. with some SOFT CELL, TAINTED LOVE!!!!

+1 STAR FOR SOME SOFT CELL!!!

So Peter Quint, He robbed his employer, and he apparently had a thing for the former nanny who committed suicide. Miss Jessel. Peter is the man figure that Victoria keeps seeing out on the 'parapet'.

It's obvious from the backstory shown that Peter has a thing for Rebecca Jessel. And it is also obvious that whatever the secrets are of WINGRAVE MANOR, that the love story between REBECCA AND PETER are going to be at the crux of it all.

And Peter, boy he got a lot jealous over absolutely nothing didn't he??

And what happened to OWEN at the end? Why did he have to leave??? I'm so lost.

And +1 STAR FOR CREEPY LIGHT EYES AT THE END!!!

7/10
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Part One??
Trey_Trebuchet25 September 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Kind of strange that this is evidently Part One of (I'm guessing) the backstory with Peter. I don't mind flashbacks and time jumps, but I've never seen a show so half a backstory in an episode and save the rest of later? As opposed to just doing a consistent backstory for a whole show? Maybe I'm overthinking this.

It was still a solid episode all around. Very few scares, but the storytelling is interesting and I like some of the main characters. OJC was diabolically good as a characters that's very different from Luke in Haunting of Hill House.

This is a pretty solid show all around. I've not finished it yet, but I don't see why it's got so much average reviewing even in just these first few episodes.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
What did she whisper in his ear ?
aboalhyjaa9 October 2020
Best episode yet. We get to know most of the story, and it forces you to watch the rest of the show. 10 out of 10.
18 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
That ending though!!!
Sleepin_Dragon15 August 2022
Dani gets to learn some of the life of her predecessor, Rebecca Jessel and her bizarre relationship with the twisted Peter Quint.

Interesting, plenty of information being given to you, the mystery certainly deepens.

Pacing, is a little questionable at times, it does move by quite slowly, but again it relies more so on the atmosphere, and the acting. I felt at times that some of what's happening could have been cut out or edited out, but I think it's deliberately moving on quite slowly.

It was great to step back and see Rebecca, we learned about her, and her impact on those around her. I see that there's a second half of this story set to come.

That ending though, who or what, I knew something along those lines was due, but that was freaky.

7/10.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
S1.E3 - Peter the Psycho [8/10]
panagiotis199323 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
(S1. E3) My Live Reaction / Review for The Haunting of Bly Manor Season 1 Episode 3 ''The Two Faces, Part One''. The previous episode was good and I gave it a rating of 9/10. Let's see if this one is better or worse. We get to know two more characters in this episode, Peter and Ms. Jessel and I like that. Now I wanna know what happened to Rebecca. The accents are still a bit ridiculous. There is something really off about Peter, I cant tell exactly what it is though. Ok, Peter is a psychopath, he got extremely jealous and acts like a child. Owen's mom died? That sucks. Overall this episode was good and I enjoyed it. My rating is 8/10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Episode 3
bobcobb30118 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
A little bit slower than the rest, but Miles' rant during story time and some of the real-time scenes saved it. The flashbacks here were a bit boring.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Enjoyable so far...but.
Samthesham6711 October 2020
The series is enjoyable so far, but the researchers/producers need to work harder when they are trying to convince us that this is based in the UK in the 80's/90's. The policeman is decked out in a reasonably close enough uniform but when did the local police ever use truncheons like that? Totally wrong with that one! Plus, they didn't wear utility pouches on their tunic belts!
16 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Pale imitation - Modern day, not 1980's
anthonyjlangford13 November 2020
This episode was not written or directed by Mike Flanagan. And you can tell. It has neither his directorial flair not any sense of story. It's merely jumping all around the place without the feeling that it's moving forward.

It seems more concerned with its Hollywood P.C. ideology than characterization and story. It was silly enough having a black governess, a non white male cook and a female gardener, in 1980's rural England (even having a American au pair was a huge stretch), but now we had yet another black character and of course a bad white male. The ideology they're trying to shove down our throats is really wrong. Worst of all, young people may actually believe that this is how people are, or were. It's all false.

And now there is the hint of a lesbian relationship. This has successfully ticked all of the PC 'diversity' boxes and demonized white males as the current mandate dictates. If that was their purpose, which it is, then set it in the modern day. Don't create a completely false environment by setting it in rural England in 1987. It's jarring. It's not like this is one family we're talking about. You have people coming from all different directions to one location. Would you accept random Middle Eastern people coming from all over America to live in a big house in New York state in 1965? No. That would be inaccurate and silly. It's no different here.

Aside from that, the story is weak. It's going nowhere fast. Things are happening but there's no forward momentum. And no scares. Its made a couple of cliché attempts. The biggest scare so far was the kettle going off in the middle of the night. A 'loud noise' scare. Compare this to the first three episodes of Hill House. The only similarity is the production design of the 'big old house.'

Rather than wait around for the obvious decline of characters from the past so they can pop up as ghosts while witnessing a lesbian relationship and further demonization of white men, I'll re-watch Doctor Sleep or one of Mike's other excellent films like Oculus.

This might have his name attached, and look like a Flanagan production, on the surface, but it is certainly not. It's a tame, lame imitation.
14 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I am done
petewood-5995111 October 2020
The Haunting of Hill House had great source material, a novel take on its inspiration, likable characters, suspense, horror, wonderful jump scares, a premise that made sense and even a sense of humor. This follow up has none of that. It's boring. Nothing scary has happened yet. The characters are all unlikable. I honestly couldn't care less what happens to any of them. I don't get it. How can this be so bad? It's got some of the same actors and some of the same production team, but it sucks. I am done after three episodes.
24 out of 135 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
That's pretty slow
gedikreverdi20 November 2021
Warning: Spoilers
The problem with this unlike other shows and films by Mike Flanagan is that the characters are not that interesting. And it's almost the same as "the Innocents" so far which I already watched.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed