Luck (TV Series 2011–2012) Poster

(2011–2012)

User Reviews

Review this title
42 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Difficult beginning due to jargon, accents and pre-existing conditions. But then...
savannahkhan20 February 2012
Although the first episode of this series was painful to get through, each episode thereafter gets better and better. After an inaudible beginning "Luck" just might careers and an industry.

As a horse lover and long time fan of Nick Nolte, I wanted to like this show but the first episode was loaded with track jargon, slang, broken English, low quality sound, and heavy accents. There also wasn't much seen of Nolte in the first episode. Fortunately I had the first 3 episodes programmed on the DVR so I had a vested interest in at least watching these recorded episodes. By the third episode I enabled closed caption so that I could follow better. I wish I had not deleted the first episode because I would have re-watched it in closed caption. This first episode is chock-full of information and innuendos, probably why it was so difficult to get through.

This is unfortunate because the series gets better with each episode and I'm sure the lack of clarity in the beginning has meant the series has lost viewers.

Viewers should know, however, that Nolte and Dustin Hoffman are not in this series for nothing. Nolte, whose notorious good looks is now replaced with grey hair and lots of character is a nostalgic owner/trainer brokenhearted over the past with a keen sense of a good race horse. Hoffman starts out stiff and almost out of place, but then his character is out of place due to a series of previous events.

Integrity and love is really what this series is about. The four gamblers, you find, after a few episodes, really love each other. The jockeys love to ride, Nolte loves horses, and Hoffman loves his right hand man. What seems evident is that some day soon, all of these characters will come together in an as yet unknown common experience.

The sound quality of this series is perhaps the only flaw and it's a big flaw. This seems to be common in today's movies and series. You understood every word Bogart said in Casablanca. It is called "projection." Old school directors and actors knew about this. I don't know what happened or why contemporary films ignores the need for people to hear and understand what characters are saying. It's almost as if they think this some type of technique but it isn't and is surely the reason, perhaps the only reason that this show may not get the viewers it deserves. Despite this,I rate this series high which says just how good this series could be.

If you love horses, racing, Nolte, Hoffman or Farina, I highly recommend this series, despite the audio issues which I hope, given a second season, they fix. If you love a good race, which there seems to be one in almost every episode, this series is also for you. "Luck," given the chance, may revive the horse racing industry. It reminds you of just why this sport is the "sport of kings." Hope they will fix the audio, first time I can remember sound being such a "handicap."
50 out of 54 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A challenging watch
afgec21429 March 2012
To appreciate this show you must study it. It's obtuse. You need to ask questions and answer them with guesses until you finally get confirmation (if you ever do). It's an investment.

Is it worth the trouble? I watched (and re-watched some) episodes to to be sure I wasn't missing the subtext of LUCK. The Nick Nolte character turns out way too enigmatic to care about. The juicy "Rosie" character turns out frustratingly lovable. Frustrating because you learn to love her while the plot pushes her outward from the center of the plot.

Dustin Hoffman does his best work posing still for intensely brilliant camera shots. He doesn't act much. That surprised me. You feel the director is building up tension for a wild explosion that will eventually occur. I'll admit, it's fascinating, but vexing at the same time.

Now that we know the series is canceled, there is no hope the suspense will be relieved and resolved. The characters will remain obscure. One exception is Marcus, played by Kevin Dunn. This disabled gambler is a reincarnation of Andy Sipowicz (the acerbic cop from NYPD Blue) with all the vinegar and cynical wit, but a genuine human heart. This is the one character we will not forget (those of us who studied this ill-fated series).

Sorry this bold artsy gamble didn't pay off. It was a deal gone bad.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Richard Kind amazing performance
willcallaway14 January 2019
Minor? actor Richard Kind (as Joey Rathburn) in shorter scenes with just a few stuttering lines hits massive grand slams, basically stealing the entire series from giants Hoffman and Nolte. Everybody is excellent but Kind wins the 'race' by 20 to 30 links.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
I never thought I would get so worked up over horses...
wandereramor15 May 2012
Luck is the kind of grand sociological series that creator David Milch and to a lesser extent HBO as a network are known for. It presents a cross-section of one out-of-the-way spot in the dying world of horse racing. That sense of death and decay pervades the entire narrative, which stars an assortment of broken-down men headed up by Dustin Hoffman and extending to the quartet of hard-luck gamblers that are perhaps the soul of the show. And yet there's a sense of hope that occasionally shines through and makes it all not just bearable but beautiful.

This all makes it sound arty and kind of dull, and indeed the series has a very deliberate pace that might turn some viewers off, although that's an essential part of its style. But even without the overdose of sex and violence you can get from other HBO series, Luck provides some exhilarating sequences, most notably the brilliantly-shot horse races. Add that to great writing and acting and you have a show that satisfies on every level.

Well, up until the end, that is. Luck is doomed to be a one-season wonder, cancelled not because of low ratings but because of a series of horse deaths on set. It still works as a whole, but with only nine episodes, it's hard not to wonder what could have been. Still, what we have is a gem of a series, and well worth checking out for any fan of high-quality drama.
21 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Shakespeare on the track
jmiklos726 March 2012
I am devastated. "Luck" has been dropped by HBO. It was an exquisite moment - beautifully crafted and executed. I loved the balance between the struggles of the mighty mobsters on one side of the track and the struggles of the clowns on the other. In the middle, the mysterious world of horses translated to the spectator by two seasoned trainers, and the demanding life of jockeys (who knew they suffered like runway models?)and the go-between, the manager.

I remember the first episode. (I'll try just about anything once.) I saw the wronged chief returning from exile, the unworthy king's fear of the wronged chief's return, and I heard it all in iambic pentameter. I do believe, it's the first time in a very long time, I actually smiled at the TV set.

The cinematography was art - if anybody reads this who actually has a say in the show: I'd like a large still of Dustin Hoffman in shadow with the curtain of drying bandages. Or the clowns feeding their horse a carrot for the first time. Or Nick Nolte with his dog by his side waxing philosophical. The list is actually longer than space permits - wrap up flashing. I truly hope that another channel steps up to the plate and rescues this fine show. Everybody involved in this project deserves the highest praise and the opportunity to finish the telling of this tale. Imagine the Scottish Tragedy abandoned at the end of Act I. That's what happened here.
32 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A lesson in impermanence
chaos-rampant25 November 2014
This was cancelled early, it's unfinished work, so that even after 9 hours of narrative time it feels like only the first few pages have been turned; but were we any better for having seen six seasons of The Sopranos rather than two, did it enrich that much more?

I came to it for Mann, one of the preeminent makers of the alert eye in our time, the finished thing turned out to be in the template of The Sopranos and Deadwood where the actors and word are the vessels for drama. It is complex plotwise and immersive enough because colorful characters articulately snarl at each other; but complex expression is not deep intuition, immersion is not concentration.

So it might seem like complex work if you get caught up in the schemes for money and ownership and here is where the lack of resolution will disappoint, it ends just as the stage has been set for conflict. But if you don't get tangled up in them, you can discern all that matters.

The racetrack as the stage of drama with desperate souls caught viewing by the sidelines at what they have chosen to have a stake in. The Jewish mobster who wants to buy off the racetrack will win against his rival but at what cost to his soul? Loved ones will perish, it could be a grandson or a horse, so that we finally awaken at what had been valuable all this time.

It's all in the horses and what they exemplify, magnificent creatures that everyone should spend some time with. Characters of course ignore the horses as anything more than ticket slips that buy them a seat in that arena of spectacle where their presence can be rewarded with the anxiety of winning or losing. To what purpose? So they can carry the drama with them in unfulfilled lives until another scheme the next day.

So this is the insight to leave this with, it's in Mann's pilot and the last episode. The horses race marvelously simply for having the exhilarating capacity to do it, there is no "horse race" for them and only running, doing without ego. The viewers watch from the sides transfixed. Would any of this have meaning for them had they not hedged a bet that imbues the beauty with the anxiety and drama of winning or losing? Would they be at all there? Would you?

So if you're disappointed that we don't get to find out how any of the schemes pans out (Turo's race fixing, the old man's legal trouble), you become like they are, bogged down in meaningless schemes. Meanwhile what has the capacity to enrich had been right under your nose all this time, simply being there to take care of something for its capacity to be what it is; the woman who arranges the horse caring program for inmates inserts this notion in the small portion we have.

But with the caveat that it will not always be there for you to postpone it. A horse might have to be put down. A show might be cancelled.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I knew nothing about horse racing!
rainmanrey20 October 2014
Right from the start I was inundated with lingo and betting techniques, horse owners, trainers, claiming, buying ... WOW. The acting is so good and I appreciate that although I am probably like the majority of viewers, who know nothing about horse racing, they do not treat the us like idiots. I am learning as I go, picking up a little more of the subtleties as the season progresses. It's an entertaining show without a doubt; even if you are new to the racket.

In short, I recommend this show to anyone who like sports, mob/crime or just really enjoy when bog names like Dustin Hoffman grace the little screen. On that note, this show is jam packed of well known actors from the big and small screen... give it a couple episodes!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Hollywood finally gets horse racing right
rwestjr60631 January 2012
As someone who has grown up on a Kentucky horse farm and who has been to racetracks all over the world, it was very gratifying to hear that someone with as much talent as David Milch was going to take on the genre in a T V series. It doesn't hurt that he has experienced some of the highest highs and lowest lows that racing can offer since he has owned a racing stable for over 20 years. Everyone in the thoroughbred racing and breeding world knew that the stories are out there just waiting to be told. Just look at how successful Dick Francis was with his string of best selling racing related mysteries. The problem has always been, how do the stories get told without being terribly corny, like "Secretariat"? The temptation has always been to "dumb down" the dialogue to appeal to a broader group of non racing savvy viewers. Milch has taken a big chance by just going straight ahead without trying to pander to his audience. In the end, there is a chance that people will be turned off by the backstretch patois that only aficionados can translate. I hope that the intensity of the story line and beauty of the settings will draw viewers in as Milch has so successfully done with shows like "Deadwood" and "NYPD Blue". It's especially gratifying to see Hall of Fame jockey Gary Stevens and upcoming Canadian jockey Chantal Sutherland get a chance to showcase their acting abilities and if I know Milch's style, Stevens will end up with a very intriguing role, at least based on his character in the first two episodes. LUCK has been picked up for a second season as of today 1/31/12) which can only serve to give the show the chance to succeed that it so richly deserves.
32 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A good beginning but lots more hopefully
pavanratnaker9 April 2012
Of course lots of us will see it for the big star here...but there's much more than him. The story itself, in series one ,starts off at a slow place and tends to keep the same pace till the end. This isn't an action series , it's a drama. But as we start understanding the plot it just pulls you in. I feel in this series they just have scratched the surface and story writers have lots more up their sleeve. So will be a superb series to start following. The cast is quite good and don't thing there needs to be any change to that.Though there are quite a few of them it doesn't tend to be confusing as they are grouped well with the race track being the common focal point. The director has done a good job in working towards the series finale but each episode in itself could have been a it more exciting. The soundtrack suddenly gets quite exhilarating but tends to be drab at other times. All in all, a well recommended series and will be looking forward to the next season.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Major Mistake for HBO to Remove Great Moment for Viewing
lukeinsandiego-125 March 2012
Not only is this one of the best attempts at drama HBO has ever produced, the finished product has a quality and sheen rarely achieved in this venue. This cast is beyond belief with an interaction I have never seen before. Hoffman, Ortiz and Nolte make the simplest gestures memorable. The writing is so mesmerizing it seems to be over before it's barely begun. The other less-obvious fact no one gets is that this effort has the potential of cult status which many thought John from Cincinati aspired to but did not fulfill, trailing off instead to mediocrity. It would be very simple for the brilliant writers to create (with long-shots, archival footage and slow-mo} a finished product which relies mainly on clever writing and (God forbid I say it) Artistic Action Sequences. This wonderful attempt should not be scrapped--it should be re-thought.
27 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
When you're explaining, you're losing.
jbradleyclarke19 March 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I think the unexpected cancellation of Luck is the saving grace of the series. So much about Luck was done right. The actors, the set, and the jargon are all great, and there is no question that Milch worked hard to give the audience an authentic experience. I think this series was not going to be a long term success, however, for the same reasons Milch's Geronimo was not a great success: You have to entertain an audience as much as you educate them. In the case of Luck, the series was really palatable for just horse racing fans. I struggled to follow what was happening, and I could not become especially excited by any of the characters. I hope Milch will pursue another series and try harder to strike a balance between excellent acting, an authentic story, and an entertaining sex appeal.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
All-stars on all sides transport us to an exciting, sad world in style.
SentientMeat29 January 2012
LUCK is fast and stylish. Michael Mann is exec. producer of LUCK and director of the first episode. Mann is the writer/director of "Heat" and LUCK has the same pace and style.

There is plenty of insider chatter here. The kind of dialogue that is second nature to the people associated with horse racing but that leaves the rest of us a bit dizzy. LUCK is the clash of very different characters and it gives Mann as much contrast as the cinematography that has become his signature. Washed up gamblers, hungry employee's, wealthy owners and the people one step from financial ruin or rejuvenation are painted in different colors of neon or grays as success and/or slime in all its forms contrast with the strength, beauty and earthiness of the central characters: Horses, fodder for the justification of so much excitement and sadness.

LUCK is a convergence of who's who at Santa Anita. I'm grateful that so many deserving thespians wanted in on this project. I'm sure they know much about their peers but their on-screen "history" with each other is believable. Can the script justify the talent? So far, yes. The writing seems to have as much good teeth as its all-star cast - pay attention and hold on.

This premier reminds me of "Mad Men" on AMC, a channel I ALSO got for free for the first 3 (enjoyable) episodes. I did not bite on AMC but LUCK is making a good argument for HBO.

I'm certain the language will soak in with the rest of the story but I have the inside on "bug", as the agent calls the young Jockey. "Bug" is a moniker used for substitute jockey's. Any rookie that replaces an expected rider is noted on a racing program with an asterisk and an asterisk looks like a bug (the definition is courtesy of David Milch).
27 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The disaster starts with the intro music, and it never ends
bayou_hannibal29 May 2012
Warning: Spoilers
My wife and I are big fans of The Sopranos, Game of Thrones, True Blood, and Sex in the City. Needless to say, we were excited about the arrival of a series with a pedigree like Luck. Hooray -- a totally unique drama, with interesting subject matter, starring more big names than a typical Hollywood blockbuster. After watching the first and only season, I'm amazed at how utterly awful this series turned out. Luck is a completely garbled mess with a disastrously bad script, which it tries to cover up with lots of style and music. If you are thinking about watching this train wreck, I have one word of advice – don't. If you have watched a few episodes and you're checking in to see if this series gets better, then let me tell you – it doesn't.

Where to begin, where to begin? Should I start by telling you about the horrible theme song? It's the first HBO theme song that I have ever had to fast forward through. Should I start by telling you about all of the characters who mumble and are painful to listen to? Or should I start by telling you about the endless parade of side plots and undeveloped ancillary characters, whose fates we're supposed to care about, but don't?

Nope. I think that I'll start by telling you about how none of the plots in the show make sense, and how they don't even overlap. Luck could almost be split into five different TV series, and you wouldn't miss anything. There's the feature story, that of Dustin Hoffman getting out of prison and scheming up what appears to be some kind of revenge against his former partners in crime. Dustin Hoffman is totally unconvincing when it comes to being a wealthy, gangster-esque criminal. Then there's the #2 story, the story of four racing junkies who practically live at the racetrack and sleep at a nearby motel. Then there's an Irish jockey, Rosie, and her boss Nick Nolte, who owns a fast racehorse and mumbles about the "horsekillers" who killed that horses father. Then there's the story of Leon, a young jockey trying to break into the business who has trouble losing weight, and his stuttering agent Joey. Then there's the talented old jockey Ronnie, who has had problems with injuries and drug addictions. Then there's the insufferable jerk trainer Escalante and his bitchy veterinarian girlfriend.

There's almost no dialog overlap between any of these groups. I don't remember Dustin Hoffman sharing screen time with much more than Escalante and a few characters I didn't mention. The four racing fans buy a horse with Escalante as their trainer, but they pretty much stick to their own story. This is par for the course. You know how in True Blood and Game of Thrones, the first season started with essentially all of the main characters in one place as part of one big storyline? It's the complete opposite of what happens here.

Within each of these little groups, there are all kinds of convoluted little stories -- stories where it sounds like there are years of background that is never given to you, and stories loaded with nonsensical behavior and huge plot holes. Do you want some examples? Here, I'll give you examples… A. The Four Guys talk about buying a cheap horse. One of them thinks it's a terrible idea. The next day, they chip in for that same horse for FOUR TIMES THE COST, and everyone is suddenly hunky dory about it, with no explanation as to why this one guy changed his mind.

B. Dustin Hoffman's story centers on some huge scheme, whose workings we never understand. It has something to do with buying a horse track and casino gambling. We never learn if he really wants to buy a track or if it's just a ruse to get his enemies to invest in it. It doesn't make sense. His entire swindle/revenge plot is a confused mess.

C. Dustin Hoffman hires a young hotshot to work for him as a go between for this scheme. He states that he hires the kid because he's both naïve and annoying. But then he's genuinely upset when the target for this unexplained scheme (Michael Gambon's character) angrily kills the kid. Why? Is Dustin Hoffman a complete moron?

D. Rosie is in the last turn of a tight race. She has a fast horse, but she thinks that she might not win. So she whips it, and wins easily. Nick Nolte (the owner of the horse) explodes with anger, grabbing her riding crop and throwing it into the garbage. Rosie cries and apologizes a million times but she still gets sacked. She won the race, but apparently she wasn't supposed to work the horse that hard, or something. What if one of those other horses found a burst of speed and she lost? What did I miss here?

Those are just a few examples of something that happens in every episode. You expect to learn something later that explains what happened, and you never do. In addition to the stuff that makes no sense, there's all kinds of stuff that you don't care about. Ronnie snorts painkillers. *yawn* The horse trainer is pregnant. *yawn* Dustin Hoffman has an awkward, completely devoid of chemistry romance with Joan Allen. *yawn* The only entertainment value in that part of the show is looking at Joan Allen's wrecked face.

The only good parts of this show are Dennis Farina's character and the story of the four horse racing junkies. They have good chemistry together, and you actually care about what happens to them. That's the kind of quality that you expect when you watch an HBO series. Other than that, Luck is a complete fiasco.
13 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A bit hard to follow but gold when you do...
sshome0128 January 2012
There is an undeniably large amount of jargon used in the pilot episode, however with a little bit of careful listening the meaning of almost all of it can be easily 'sussed' out. The pilot stands out in my opinion for the creative use of camera angles which allow the viewer to immerse into the horse race. The editorial work is also quite slick. The performances of Nick Nolte and Dustin Hoffman are quite good and I am excited to see Patrick J Adams in the coming episode.

I terms of story-telling and plot lines, the last few minutes of the pilot do help clear up some of the prevailing confusion regarding the direction of the story. All in all the pilot is a solid effort and achieves its goal of setting up the stage for a potentially gripping series.
32 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
The Most Ironic Series Title, Ever.
AMichaelL29 March 2012
Luck was an epic show. In only 9 episodes, it weaved together numerous, insanely complex story lines which many people probably had trouble following. But what started as a 'too dense for anything but pretense' project soon turned into an amazingly broad show whose characters included mafia, rounders, trainers, jockeys, agents, horse owners, and many others - to create an incredibly smart show which, in my opinion, sought to expose the world of horse racing to the many who are uninformed, or simply would not normally care. The characters and writing were top notch, and this definitely should have been allowed more time to flesh out.

Hopefully another network won't be as scared of PETA and will pick it up.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I still know a peach when I see one
zen10120 December 2011
"I still know a peach when I see one"

Depth and character , extremely promising series..

The first thing that strikes me when I saw the pilot was the incredible choice of music , it carries the expectation of what is about to unfold perfectly. Acting is first grade as with most HBO productions and the cinematography superb, the only aspect greater than the series itself are the incredible animals and the romance the wicked mix of gambling and limits of animal performance has to offer.

Knowing the success of "Deadwood" I am willing to bet my gold stake that this series will deliver and cannot wait to see more.
27 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Perfect Show
floere-11 April 2021
This is film at his best.

All the characters and dialogues are perfect ; casting and filming outstanding.

And THE missed chance for a second season.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
BOOOOORING and difficult to follow
Board9 August 2012
I subtitled five episodes of "Luck", and although at times it seemed promising, and Dustin Hoffman was great as always, it always seemed like it never took off. The pictures were mostly beautiful, and everything was as well-filmed as a great Hollywood thriller, but the storyline couldn't keep up. Every episode seemed to simply faze out in the end with Dustin Hoffman falling asleep in his hotel room. I don't necessarily need a cliff-hanger like in Prison Break, where Michael Scofield said "We break out… TONIGHT!" at the end of each episode, in every single episode of a show like this, but there was barely anything in this show that made me want to watch another episode. Besides this, the dialogue was extremely cryptic. I've been making subtitles for a living for five years. At times I get a documentary about some strange subject I don't know anything about, so I have to look up a lot of things, but never before have I had a fictitious show, where the dialogue has been so difficult to understand as in this one. It wasn't so much that they mumbled, but the lines were just strange. Maybe it was supposed to be the way "real people" speak in this environment, but it didn't exactly help the viewer. This mostly happened when the four friends who were betting on race horses were on screen. They were of course at times using "insider language", but most often it was just non-sense they were talking. Although I'm not American, I doubt if most Americans would understand the dialogue in this show. I was lucky to have a script when I had to subtitle what Nick Nolte said. I would think barely any native speakers would be able to understand what he said, as it sounded like he was speaking through his death rattle.
11 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Santa Anita
jotix10013 February 2012
Warning: Spoilers
HBO, the innovative creator of series made for television, comes up with a new venture in "Luck" about horse racing and the people in that world. Created by David Milch, who was behind another HBO venture, "Deadwood" teamed with Michael Mann, a man that has had great successes in the past as they take a look at the world of horse racing and all that goes behind the scenes, with all the shady characters the sport seems to attract.

The cast alone is worth a look. Dusting Hoffman, who is involved in the series as a producer, is seen as Ace Bernstein, a man just recently out of prison who comes back to team with Gus Demitriu (Dennis Farina) seeking a revenge from the people responsible for the three years he spent inside. The cast of the pilot was superb. Nick Nolte, Kevin Dunn, Jason Gedrick, and the others created the right atmosphere, something that reminded us of the novels by Dick Francis, with an American flavor.

The plot was a bit hard to follow as so many things are happening at once. Also, not many of us are quite knowledgeable in different track situations. The beautiful Santa Anita racetrack is seen at its best. Mr. Mann shows some thrilling moments in the two races shown in this episode. The editing team should be congratulated for the excellent finished product.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One great show! I am sad to see it go. 10 out of 10
Right-Wing-Man3 April 2012
This was pretty much the best mew show out there... incredible story, directing, acting, writing, producing the whole lot of it. Dustin Hoffman, was so brilliant in this role it was mind-blowing. The whole cast was just perfect as actors, I enjoyed every moment of this. It seems these days that anything Michael Mann touches is really, really good. I think if this show would have got higher viewer ratings they would have fought the animal rights groups, but instead opted to pull the plug rather than fight the fight. The Human Society and PETA are two organizations that I do not like nor appreciate. They only want attention for themselves, but rarely do anything good for the actual animals themselves, which is sad, but true. Sue, sue, sue... is the only name in their games. Anyhow, don't want to veer to far off topic. Once again hats of to an incredible show.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Timeless. Worth watching even in 2020
saurabhjayswal10 October 2020
Frankly, first two episodes went over my head. Couldn't able to understand the horse language or exactly where the things are going.. but and its a big but, without even having a slightest understanding of the context or horce racing, the first shot got me hooked.. and another round of "when you planned to watch a show for a month but ended up watching in binge till 6 a.m. "

This is a timeless classic, mark my word, someone will be wrting great reviews in 2040 as well for this show.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Promising
knucklebreather30 January 2012
"Luck" follows a bunch of people who hang around at a race track - degenerate gamblers, jockeys, agents and the quasi-criminal owners of the horses themselves. I think there's a lot of potential here, it's a beautiful setting that's rife with natural drama. Of course Dustin Hoffman is the big name among the cast but I could see some of the others, especially Dennis Farina as Hoffman's driver and seemingly naive but enthusiastic assistant, being memorable in their roles.

I worry that the characters don't have enough to do with each other to sustain a series, similar to the gambling-themed "Tilt" a while back, which was awful. The degenerate gamblers don't necessarily interact at all with the jockeys and owners, or if they do it's just a fleeting thing, I'd think. I hope it's not just a long series of "Oh hey we're going to have a caper with those random guys we always have capers with" stories, that would seem contrived and would be easy to do if the writers have to keep coming up for stuff for unrelated characters to do together.

That aside, Luck seems promising enough. There's all kinds of intrigue these guys could get into, and the political angle could be great. On the whole I'm glad that "Luck" has been added to the stable (sorry about that) of mature cable dramas.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
LUCK is spot on ..
jkiernan-120 February 2012
LUCK is absolutely true to the " sport " ( business ) of horse racing . It is indeed a petri dish of our society as 1 reviewer has put it . The cast is sterling . The imposition of slots into the pari-mutuel industry is a fact of life today as well . The aging demographics at the track today underscore the need for other types of " gaming " alternatives for the public to have a reason to visit the " track . " The advent of slots at tracks have enabled the tracks to increase their purses for each race which , in turn , helps to insure that owners will continue to run their horses there . This is a " business " after all as LUCK so accurately portrays .
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
...until a child cries out, "But he isn't wearing anything at all."
MOHawg26 February 2012
Or, if an "Emperor/Clothes" metaphor doesn't do it, how about horse racing? In short, a horse (show) with this pedigree (in this case actors + producer + director + HBO) ought to be a lot more fun to watch.

If these Students of Acting were trying to re-create a Greek-Chorus-Style-Tragedy for study in post-graduate Theatre, or something that accurately captured the nuances of horse racing / breeding, they did a fine job. If they were trying to create something entertaining to the hoi-polloi (the rest of us), they got scratched at the gate.

Being avid fans of Deadwood, Six Feet Under, and the Sopranos; we really wanted to like this. Now, it's "what else is on?"
10 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Good "Luck"
stevenball229 January 2012
All the factors that make a good movie (or TV series) have come together in "Luck". Directing - Michael Mann gets better & better especially with that hand held camera technique. He is becoming the master at editing too. Writing - excellent check. Some critics have complained that the accents are difficult to follow. Still you should be able to understand what's going on without subtitles. Robert DeNiro won an Oscar for Godfather II & he didn't speak a word of English in the movie. I love Mel Gibson's movies. Apocalypto & Passion of the Christ were not in English. They are both masterpieces of world cinema. Acting - all the major stars & supporting cast are excellent. Cinematography - I've never seen a better movie on this subject. Horse racing. & that includes Seabiscuit & Secretariat. Costumes & music are great. I've only seen the pilot but I look forward to the rest of the episodes as well as the DVD with director's commentary
9 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed