Road House (2024) Poster

(2024)

User Reviews

Review this title
1,363 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Road House 2024
johnnyhbtvs2722 March 2024
One of the great things about the original Road House was seeing Dalton clean house and improve the bar bit by bit. That is severely lacking here with next to no time spent in the actual Road House and barely any screen time is given to the people at the bar. One of the highlights of the Swayze movie was him getting to know the staff and getting rid of the bad elements at the bar. Nothing of the sort goes on in this movie.

Jaoquim de Almeida is wasted as the sheriff and has little to do while Daniela Melchior has less of a role than Kelly Lynch had in the original if that was possible.

The movie's saving grace is Jake Gyllenhaal who is clearly having a lot of fun in the role and has good chemistry with an OTT Conor McGregor in the movies best moments. Best stick to the original cult classic.

(Glad to see Arturo Castro's Moe live, by far and away the best character in the whole movie).
264 out of 346 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Starts well...then Mcgregor shows up
nrshorter21 March 2024
I was expecting a fun action movie, and it started well. Jake is great (as youd expect), and so are most of the supporting cast.

There are also some fun moments and lines. But then Conor Mcgregor turns up and it goes down hill fast. He really can't act, and just stomps around spouting cringe one liners that he can't pull off. You'd also expect at least his fight scenes to be good, but they weren't.

With another actor in the Mcgregor role this could have been a great action movie.

The fight scenes are hit and miss with some looking very fake with some bad cgi at times too. In fact the cgi is pretty poor in general.
416 out of 569 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I wanted to hate this.....
westbayou30 March 2024
Ok fact: remakes suck.

Going into this, I wanted to hate it. Remake of an 80's classic and Jake G? Recipe for disaster. But..... this is a remake in name only. Fresh story, the only connection to the original is he's a bouncer for hire. I'll admit it, this stands up on its own.

For lack of anything better to watch I gave this a shot. Color me surprised but I enjoyed the heck out of it. No agenda, just an old school action movie. Now the AI/CGI was nothing short of terrible, but if you look past that this movie embodies the old school Western movies it clearly mimics (and references several times, a bit on the nose).

Was I entertained? Yup. Was it Oscar worthy? No, but I'll take entertaining over Oscar Worthy every time.

Give it a shot, you may just enjoy yourself.
80 out of 106 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fun self-aware popcorn action flick
darapjohnson27 March 2024
I don't understand the bad reviews for this. It's a film that doesn't take itself too seriously and it's obvious literally from the very beginning that it's self-aware. It knows how to laugh at itself with its over the top fight scenes and at times bad and cheesy dialogue or even the constant wild music being played in the background. Even the way Conor Mcgregor walked and talked was not serious in itself. I mean come on, it's impossible to hate on a film like this. Sure, some movies that don't take themselves seriously can still be very bad, but this one was actually pretty alright if you don't compare it to the original or just go into it with lower expectations. I'd definitely recommend this as a fun popcorn action flick if you're bored.
83 out of 118 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Solid action flick not to be taken seriously
invisiblephrend6 April 2024
Apparently the reviews are getting swarmed by boomers that didn't get their cream of wheat this morning. Do remakes suck? Usually. But this is a solid action flick that doesn't hide what it is: a slapstick action flick packed with ridiculous amounts of alpha Chad characters and protagonist plot armor. It's laid on pretty thick throughout the film that it's meant to be a goofy punchfest of senseless violence and overly eccentric characters.

Even if you haven't seen the original, this film still stand out on its own as a movie that's just fun to watch and at no point takes itself seriously. If you're looking for a deep and thought provoking storyline, then this might not for you. But if you enjoy the adrenaline junkie style akin to John Wick or just about anything Jason Statham, then it's highly recommended.

The most impressive thing that stands out in this film is Jake G's commendable dedication to getting in shape for this role. Jake went through intense amounts of training and discipline to acquire an absolutely shredded physique for this role. The fact that he achieved this while in his 40s is an inspiration to anyone who is trying to get in shape. It's on par with Hugh Jackman's preparation for Wolverine.

Now for the bad stuff. The fight scenes are heavily reliant on CGI body doubles and shaky camera effects that stick out like a sore thumb in several scenes. If they had spent a little more time in perfecting these effects, it may have worked out as more believable. Jake's character also has superhero levels of plot armor that can induce a bit of eyerolling from anyone expecting realism out of the story. Plenty of scenes where he survives moments that would easily kill an ordinary man (i.e. Disarming several men with guns without getting blasted).

You're also not likely to enjoy the ending, as it was pretty intentionally peppered with plot holes in order to allow a potential sequel. This also may come as a shock to some of you, but Connor McGregor is (gasp) not a professionally trained actor. He was hired to play the crazy goon that he is in real life and it worked well for the film, in my opinion. Is it still worth watching? Absolutely.
38 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
its... DECENT!
JackMehoff_5 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
What is all the online hate about this film? I've constantly been seeing all over the internet about how bad this film is but.... It's decent?!

The CGI was a bit choppy in 3 scenes I noticed: The first fight scene with post malone, the scene where dalton was hit by the truck and it fell off the bridge into the water, & lastly the yacht explosion scene in the middle of the ocean

Conors acting was exaggerated, sure, but it fit his character SO well. It was like he was coked out of his mind the whole film, it really gave his character that "CRAZY" aura. For his first film, he did a decent job.

The storyline was a bit corny though, for a film being 2 hours long, you could have made it a bit more interesting rather than the usual "drug bad guys want to take over" kind of movie.

But apart from that, I enjoyed it. I feel like a lot of the online hate is just coming from Conor McGregor haters, I mean some of the hate reviews I read were so blown out of proportion...

SOLID 7/10.
20 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Flat
SaidNDone22 March 2024
"Road House" feels like the highest budget 'made for TV' movie ever. Despite the money thrown at it, blockbuster director, and casting of Jake Gyllenhaal the movie overall falls completely flat with awful dialogue, uninteresting characters, and a storyline so thin you can see through it.

The only positive about this movie is there were some very creative shots in the fight scenes, but even those were relatively uneven. And Connor McGregor was given far too much (poorly written) dialogue which combined with his vapid delivery takes you right out of the movie.

Overall it feels like "Road House" was the product of someone giving a 13 year old boy absolute control of a Hollywood production. The upside to this is the chaotic mess they left behind is somewhat entertaining.
510 out of 668 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Loved it, hope they do a sequel
Freakazoid11756 April 2024
I don't understand the mixed reviews at all. What were you expecting? I think it was more like a 8 but gave it a 10 because of all the ridiculous people giving 1's or 2's. This movie did exactly what it set out to do and that's be a fun popcorn movie. It may not be quite as good as the original but it's close. If you wanted a scene by scene of the original just go watch that. First of all, Jake Gyllenhaal is great in everything he does and this is no different. The thing that impressed me the most was Conor McGregor. He did a great job for his first time acting. I know people either like him or hate him and the people who don't like him have all showed up in these reviews. I don't care if you like him or not he did a good job. If he wasn't one of the most famous fighters in the world and some new actor you haters would've loved him. Yes, he was a villain out of a comic book but that's how he was written and he played the part great. I hope to see him in more movies in the future. Both Jake & Conor put in the work in the weight room too, both have always been in great shape but not like this. This was perfect for a movie to just have fun with and turn your brain off. I'll probably watch it again in the near future.
73 out of 94 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Entertaining and Watchable
hardikb-4376818 April 2024
It's a decent action movie.

Acting : JG is great Conor can't act, he overdid simple scenes with CRAZYness. It felt like he was asked to play himself in the movie. Other supporting actors did okayish.

CGI : It was bad and felt incomplete.

Story : Added some drug and mafia element because the plot was way too simple for a movie and it was also decent enough. If you're looking for a deep and thought provoking storyline, then this might not for you.

All in all very enjoyable movie which is getting unnecessary hate from audience. Even if you have not seen the original movie, this movie stands out on its own.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Forced Casting
NicoleM122 March 2024
Casting felt very forced which pulls you out of the story. Jake does a good job. Some of the fighting scenes were interesting. You could tell this was a very new Hollywood update of a classic movie. Some of the dialogue needed work.

McGregor was also an odd choice. His permanent smiling expressions and him walking like he had hemorrhoids was very hard to move past. Sometimes you couldn't understand what he was even saying.

Overall the movie was fun and if youre looking for a time killer its an okay option but I would probably just stick to the classic movie where the story and characters feel less contrived.
410 out of 558 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Vicariously enjoyed this remake
EarthDragon1511 April 2024
As someone with a connective tissue disorder that prevents me from lifting heavy weights and forces me to live as a "skinny guy" (despite my conflicting underlying passion for weight lifting and physical fitness), I was able to live vicariously though Jake and Connor in this movie. While I will never know why I have to endure this odd and frustrating fate while on Earth, it was cool to see the shape of these guys' bodies, even if I get jealous at times for not having the same opportunity in life. My unfortunate fate aside, I loved the action in this remake, and I loved the unique cinematography. Jake is a top actor, as always, and Conor also did very well.
24 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
So ridiculous in the best ways
masonsaul22 March 2024
Road House is exactly what it needs to be. A self-serious yet simultaneously very silly modern day riff on the Western that's packed with testosterone, crunchy action and jokes in the most unexpected places. It feels like a streaming movie in some distracting ways but it still remains one of the better ones.

Jake Gyllenhaal brings a natural intensity to Dalton as well as an impressive physical commitment. It's the possibility of his rage that he always keeps at bay that makes him so watchable in this role as he beats up his enemies and then makes sure they're okay before actually driving them to the hospital.

From the moment he's introduced, Conor McGregor is definitely something. It's the kind of performance that's never boring and never good. Every single line is delivered in hilariously awful fashion and yet he's one of the best parts of the film as he takes a very generically unhinged villain and makes it his own.

Doug Liman's direction certainly has a lot of energy as it alternates between fights in the first person, drone shots and simply getting as close as possible to the action. The fights themselves have a real weight to them with the heaviest blows really being felt however, some of the CG flourishes used to stitch them together distract rather than enhance.
217 out of 349 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
lazy NOT Swayze
MartynGryphon22 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
If there's anything good to say about the 2024 remake of Road House, is that it will get people reaching for the classic 1989 movie to cleanse the palette and the more people who watch the original the better, as it is simply a brilliant film.

Sadly, I can't say the same about this steaming pile of double deuce I have just witnessed. Is it even a remake? The similarities between the two are sparse. The main character is a bouncer named Dalton and he's hired by a bar owner to 'bounce'..... that's it, the only thing that would even make you think this was a remake.

Missouri is replaced with Florida, mullets are replaced with bullet heads and actors are replaced with Conor McGregor and Billy Magnussen.

With the occasional exception, (and I mean VERY occasional), remakes always fail. A lot of the time it's because they are being judged, at times unfairly, against the original. Others are simply bad movies trying to cash in on an illustrious name. 2024's Road House definitely falls in the latter category.

In 1989, the Double Duece was a bar that Dalton was hired to clean up because of the trouble makers that frequented it, the fact that the entire town was being run by a crime kingpin running a protection racket. Is just an extra problem he encounters and has to deal with.

In 2024, Dalton is hired BECAUSE of the crime kingpin, who wants to demolish the bar to realise his his real estate ambitions and Dalton isn't told about this until he runs foul of the goon squad sent to intimidate the bar and its patrons.

At least in the Double Duece there was usually reasons fights broke out. In the Florida Road House, people seem to pick fights because the guy next to him was turning oxygen into carbon dioxide too loudly.

To be fair to Jake Gyllenhaal, he does turn in a good performance given what he has to work with and he is the best thing in the entire movie. However, one thing is unforgivable, the CGI/AI action, it looks fake, cheap and takes you out of that reality instantly.

The character of Dalton has also been changed. Patrick Swayze's Dalton was good man, firmly in control of his emotions and attitude to life, spirituality and clinical in his profession. Gyllenhaal's Dalton is not even a bouncer to start with, he's an ex UFC fighter hustling the illegal fight circuit for PIN money who falls into 'bouncing' by chance and while occasionally getting involved in the action, he seems to be collecting $5000 a week for sitting down at the bar watching all the other 'bouncers' do the grunt work for him under his 'guidance'. He is also mentally disturbed and sometimes can't keep a lid on it. He is also suicidal...for about 2 minutes at the start, never to be mentioned again.

To show how unhinged this new Dalton is, he plants a bomb on a boat that is moored to a yacht that his girlfriend is held hostage on, and then detonates it remotely when they're still on board. You see, explosions are funny things, they're unpredictable and Dalton would have had no way of knowing whether that yacht would sink in 10 minutes or 10 seconds, a hell of a risk to take with an innocent life.

Now let's talk about two people I briefly mentioned earlier, Conor McGregor and Billy Magnussen. Jeez they are bad? McGregor is so over the top that any realism that this person could actually exist in real life is gone in a second. You've heard of over egging the pudding? Well here we have no pudding at all, just lots of egg.

Magnussen is as equally bland as he is bad. Again, this may not be his fault and the blame can certainly be placed on the script, as in one scene, he is seen getting a shave on the stern of his yacht in choppy seas, and the barber is using a cutthroat razor of all things and this absolute idiot seems shocked that he's getting hacked to bits by the barber with every stroke. I mean what did he think was going to happen?

2024's Road House is an OK action flick that suffers more for trying to pass itself off as a remake of a bonefide classic.....a bonefide classic I am now going to go and watch as it's always been a rewatchable favourite. However, I'm not going to be watching this version again anytime soon....if ever.

Enjoy!
302 out of 417 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I liked it for what it was
NateWatchesCoolMovies2 April 2024
So... the Road House remake. Am I allowed to say that I liked it as much as the original? I only saw the Swayze one for the first time last year and really enjoyed, but I also really dug Doug Liman's recent update with Jake Gyllenhaal too, for different reasons. Jake himself is one of those reasons, he's breezy and effervescent as Dalton, disgraced ex MMA fighter relocated to the beautiful Florida Keys to defend a beachfront bar from relentless goons. The Keys setting is also another reason why I liked this a lot, it adds so much laidback atmosphere and picturesque scenery as backdrop for this simple, straightforward action flick that fills the shoes of the original adequately enough. I think that having a marauding meathead like Conor McGregor as the head goon was a bit of a misstep though; the guy is clearly not an actor and thinks he'll win over the screen by chewing more scenery than Gary Busey, but a modicum of restraint on his part might have kept his performance this side of the moon in terms of subtlety, and let other aspects flourish to the forefront. Sultry Daniela Melchior, smarmy Billy Magnusson and always terrific Joaquim De Almeida are good in supporting roles. I really liked Jake's performance here though; he adopts this laconic affability that hides a sickening darkness in his past, something he's always on the run from. The action is fearsome and often quite funny, the tone tropical and easygoing. My only gripe is it could have been a bit longer to flesh certain elements out and focused on Mcgregor's seething villain a tad less to pivot more over to other aspects the film has that it seemed to want to take more seriously. All in all a really good time and easily as enjoyable for me as the OG Roadhouse.
35 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not bad at all
olisilumea14 April 2024
Road House (2024) serves up a nostalgic punch of action-packed entertainment. With nods to the original and fresh twists, this reboot revs up the adrenaline with intense fight scenes and charismatic performances. While it occasionally veers into cliché territory, it's saved by its undeniable charm and stylish direction. Fans of the classic will find plenty to enjoy, but newcomers may also be won over by its gritty, high-energy vibe. Overall, Road House (2024) delivers a satisfying cocktail of nostalgia and modern flair, making it a worthy addition to the franchise.

In my opinion was ok/good movie maybe not the best.
16 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Pretty enjoyable
Tropicc30 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Pretty enjoyable film with two (in my opinion) bad things. The first is the CGI used as can be seen at the bridge when Dalton is nearly run over and for example in the big bar fight. The camera just doesn't move naturally or in normal speed. Second is Conor McGregor. He seems like a bad videogame boss-character in the way he moves and the lines he uses. And why does he talk so stupid? Or is that how he talks in real life as well. First half of the movie was very fun and good story. Second half is a bit over the top and forced in my opinion.

Jake surely did a great job on his physique, almost as big as in Southpaw.
19 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Started bad and got worse
S-John-hall22 March 2024
The film is beyond terrible and the acting even from Jake Gyllenhaal seems off, The dialogue is beyond terrible to the points where Jake Gyllenhaal asked (in the movie) is roadhouse, two words or one. I really wouldn't bother a very disappointing remake and to have it called roadhouse and the bar actually be a beach house on a beach is beyond confusing..

The CGI and fight scenes don't seem to work. I don't know why they're used so much CGI for the fight scenes to the point where Conor McGregor doesn't even look like his punching Jake Gyllenhaal. The whole film just felt unnecessary and if Jake Gyllenhaal wasn't in it, I think it would've been classed as a B movie.
226 out of 312 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Very fun film... with expectation management
sxxpkpdk7 April 2024
Think of The Expendables, think of Fast and Furious movies, think of most Jason Statham movies... that's what you're getting here.

(**the first 15min are the weakest parts of the film; push through, and it dramatically improves) Is the storyline predictable? Yes.

Is the acting a bit stiff? Yes.

Are there... odd jumps in plot evolution? Yes.

However, it's a VERY fun movie. The "main characters" execute their roles very well, it's not so cringey that it's tough to watch, and the fight scenes are FANTASTIC. And in my opinion, Conor McGregor performed impressively for his "first ever" film. He was a natural on camera. This is the perfect movie to just turn your brain off for a little bit, sit back, crack a beer, and enjoy a fun movie after a long day. That's exactly what I was looking for when I chose to watch this movie, and it didn't disappoint. It "went in", it did its job (with all of the silly cliches), it looked cool, and it left. It was a great Saturday night action flick. I smiled, I laughed, I gasped, and I audibly said "oooo... ouch" on a few occasions (aka - that's gunna hurt tomorrow).

My only complaint was the sound mixing. I run a rather high quality 5.2.2 system, and the dialogue from the center channel was quite distorted at times. It was mainly only an issue at the beginning of the movie, but I wish they would've cleaned up the sound editing to make it more balanced and clear.

Apart from that, please disregard the 1/10 reviews. It's a fun movie. Don't go into it expecting some grand, groundbreaking action thriller. Manage your expectations, and enjoy it for what it is. Overall, I very much enjoyed this movie. I won't rewatch it, but I'm glad I saw it.
33 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
DO NOT WATCH THIS FILM; IT IS TERRIBLE
emperorsclothes25 March 2024
Everything about this film is exactly what you should not do. The acting is terrible by everyone, including JG. It is cliche. Every actor's voice/breath is disconnected.

The direction is terrible; oh Doug Liman, how far you've fallen.

The editing is terrible, but maybe the editor tried their best with what they were given. There is nothing gritty about this film. This is masturbatorial film.

Watch the original film. It's great. It's not a masterpiece either, but it's fun and kind of supposed to be a bit lower budget pulp fiction (genre not film). Everyone from Swayze to Sam Elliot are awesome in it.
23 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Better than I thought
alexivalle7 April 2024
I'll open by saying that I've never seen the Patrick Swayze one, but if you're worried about this film ruining the original, there's already a direct to DVD sequel in the 2000s you should hate more.

Now to this movie...I'm a big UFC fan, but I'm not a Conor fan, and I also like good action movies and cheesy action movies. This is the latter. I liked it. Overall, I thought it was slightly better than a "one time watch" movie. It's in the dumb fun category, basically.

I liked Gylanhaal in the interpreter, and I thought he was was decent here. Furthermore, some of the fight choreography was good. The setting and story were ok, and even though it's over 2 hours, I was pleasantly surprised to find that it didn't drag too much. Conor (who is basically playing an exaggerated version of himself) was entertaining, and I thought the UFC angle was integrated well into the plot. This film also has a lot of humor and I found that a decent amount of it landed. One henchman (I'll try to keep this spoiler free) had me laughing often.

Now to the negatives: some of the acting is bad, like really bad. The sheriff guy in particular, although he isn't the only one. Then there's the VFX. Oh my gosh, they are bad. This movie looks like it was made in iMovie at points. They also did some CGI body double thing to make the punches land during the fight scenes and at best, they are unnoticeable, and at worst, look awful. There's another scene where a character is hit with a car (all done in CGI) and it looks like Sharknado.

For a remake of a cheesy "so bad it's good" movie from the 80s that also feels like an athlete's vanity project, you could do much worse. I was looking forward to watching this one hoping it would be fun. Obviously, I wasn't expecting Goodfellas. And when the movie was over, I felt mostly satisfied. I would probably watch it again, but likely years later and not right now.

If this seems like a movie you'd be interested in, and you have Prime, check it out out of curiosity and grab some beers before you do. I already have Prime so the fact it was essentially free for me gives it some points in its favor.

I don't regret watching it. There's enough here to be fun for a couple hours.

6/10.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Poor story made worse by mcgregor
eddie57821 March 2024
Swayze will be turning in his grave. What started off decent quickly turns to absolute muck. The story is very poor but with the appearance of Conor Mcgregor and quite possibly the worst acting performance ever seen with that ridiculous swagger and stupid grin the movie goes downhill FAST. Whoever cast him ruined any potential this remake of an 80's classic ever had.

Another ridiculous remake of good old 80's movies, this remake and Point Break up there with two of the worst ever, what did Swayze do wrong to get two of his cult movies murdered by remakes. Honestly don't even waste your time with this.
257 out of 357 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Difrent
pjernholm3 April 2024
The fight-scenes was low quality, but it's not bad somehow i actually think, that it made the movie better with the camera mivement and angels going insane while people are fighting, is something we need to see more of in movies.

McGregor was also put in the perfect rolle as a mad psyko that beat people up and still being him self, funny and energetic.

And of course they had to top it of and get Gyllenhaal in the headrole as the most deadly guy ever with the wildes mentallity. I never saw Jack as the actor that could act as a cold and aggressive person, but he proved me wrong.

This movie is close to a masterpiece.

I need more if this👌🏼
28 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not bad, not great
ohheyitsmissjen21 April 2024
It wasn't as bad as I was expecting it to be. Jake Gyllenhaal was a great casting for the part.

The one biker guy that was super oblivious to situations and had all the funny one liners was my favorite, he was a well written side character that was just there to add some humor.

The CGI was not good, it was super cheesy and took away from the more serious vibe. 3 scenes in particular were really overdone CGI, I won't detail them as to not spoil things.

Conor McGregor is not a good actor - the creepy smile he maintained throughout the entire time he was on screen, and the weird tough guy walking made him seem like he was a video game villain, it was just TOO over the top. Honestly, majority of the side characters weren't good actors - the sheriff was especially bad.

Overall though, it wasn't bad! I'd watch it again, but definitely glad it wasn't something I needed to pay to watch.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
What's the point?
chenp-5470822 March 2024
Was remaking Roadhouse necessary? Because this one was pretty dreadful. Sure, the original Roadhouse wasn't a perfect movie but its non-serious tone, charm between the cast, and the intentional over-the-top action worked well to create a charming 80s flick. However, this remake fails to understand what makes the original pretty good as this remake provides an uneven script, terrible dialogue, weak performances, and a tone that takes itself way too seriously.

Doug Liman's direction is bland and uninteresting and some of the dialogue really feels like something written by ChatGBT. I love Jake Gyllenhaal but unfortunately, despite Gyllenhaal having a solid performance, he wasn't able to save the movie from falling down. Including some casting choices that are really off-putting.

The non-serious and over-the-top charm has disappeared and it makes this remake boring and bland to observe. In the end, this remake stinks.
333 out of 477 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
okay
voigaswolpertinger16 April 2024
Obviously, as a ton of other revierers pointed out, this is not the original nor has it the charme and character building of the classic with patrick swayze. If you can overcome that, it is indeed quite a fun action flick, that has a strong 80s or 90s vibe. The fight sequences are properly coreographed and at times the violence is over the top, tho there is definitley lack of blood for the hard blows that are traded. One thing or person that did not at all fit in, was connor mcgregor. He does put a great act as a boxer or mixedmartialarts fighter, but he sure is not an actor.

Overall it's a fun flick to watch without having to think too much about it all. Could have been much worse.
10 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed