Crossfire: The Plot That Killed Kennedy (2014) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Read The Book - This Documentary Only Touches The Surface
DKosty12310 July 2018
When I saw the author of this book had made this documentary, I was interested in it. After watching it, I highly think reading the book gives one a much better view of the plot to kill JFK. This is a one man show plus some very interesting pictures which were only released publiclly the last few years. This along with the late Jim Garrison's "On The Trail of The Assassins" was used for Oliver Stone's film "JFK".

Here we get into the facts and the fact that "Case Closed" by Gerald Posner is a poorly done case closing of the JFK file. Posner's entire fictional novel is based upon the conclusions drawn by the Warren Comission, never addressing facts about the event that they ignored. The Comissions Conlclusions were based upon an effort by the Government to ignore the facts and get a politically correct conclusion to this case. So while Case Closed is PC, it is as flawed as the politics of the conclusion. We are presently getting a lesson in the flaws of politics not reporting facts. The whole reason to seal JFK's records is that there was a lot to hide from the American Public. That is why some of these records are still sealed today.

The book Crossfire has a ton of back ground material from World War 2 about the people involved in covering up this murder. For example, Richard Nixon's ties with the mob during the War. Earl Warren, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court who headed the comission was put up for that office by Richard Nixon who feared Warren politically as he was the Republican front runner for President in 1952 before Ike Eisenhower declared he was going to run as a Republican (Ike was courted by both parties to run that year).

The book covers backgound on Cuba, including Nixons connections, along with Nixons connections with the FBI and CIA. Once I read Crossfire, I realized he was the most connected person who could have headed a conspiracy to kill JFK. LBJ has been brought up in recent times, and he had some of these connections, though Johnson's ties with the mob are not as clear.

Marrs original book brings up so much background that making a film out of all of it would be impossible. This documentary only covers the photos and direct evidence that brings into question the original conclusion of the Warren Commission. That is plenty of material but in order to get the full idea of all the players and the real Crossfire, the novel has so much more than a film can cover. Marrs one man show here is a teaser, the book is the main event.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
With respect, absolute nonsense!
jimandjess24 March 2019
Everyone will see and believe what they want to see. Sometimes with "off the cuff" "out of the blue" events such as this, it is sexy to read too much into a horrific event. I believe that the author / narrator believes in a conspiracy theory ... but "never let the truth get in the way of a good story!" Every piece of visual evidence he presents can be interpreted 5 different ways. And if there were more photos presented, would add 25 more theories. As sad as it is that many people have written books (and movies spawned) on the subject, they (being outside the intelligence or law enforcement community) have all used the same pictures to try and raise the conspiracy theory. The theory raised by Marrs is based on fuzzy pictures, incognito umbrella people giving signals, and a timed spectator release to raise questions ... to heighten the intrigue of a sexy scenario of a plot to kill an American President. Shame on you who empower those who profit on this tradegy! (I too am one who saw the original release of "JFK" long ago). For a solid hypothesis on the tradegy, refer to Mark Fuhrman's analysis ("The Fuhrman Diaries") of the evidence and events, from a detectives point of view. And if you think he is part of the conspiracy, he was 11 years old at the time.

Again, nothing against Mr.Marrs for seeing what he sees, just that it had dollar signs attached to it ... makings of a good fiction writer to make a reader salivate for a juicy, alternate ending!
0 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed