"Death in Paradise" Murder from Above (TV Episode 2018) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
15 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Enjoyable, fluffy, easy viewing, strong start for Ardal.
Sleepin_Dragon4 January 2018
It was nice to see Ardal O'Hanlon make his debut on the island, DI Jack Mooney settled in quickly and was quickly doubting a woman's apparent suicide. If I'm honest I'd say he settled quickly into the role, I didn't need time to adjust to him like I did when Kris Marshall took over. Ardal was bright and funny, the show is wonderfully fluffy, easy viewing, and being the third comic actor in a row to head the show he'll do well. I wasn't bowled over by the story, my major annoyance watching it was why on Earth did they cast the fabulous Elizabeth Berrington in a role that let's face it could have been played by anyone, a total waste of her acting talent, arguably the most charismatic actor in the episode, such a waste. I'm already looking forward to next week's.

A good opener, but not happy about Elizabeth Berrington's thirty second role. 7/10
25 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Murder from Above
studioAT25 June 2020
Warning: Spoilers
A nice start to S7, that certainly keeps you guessing to how the murder actually took place.

Ardal O'Hanlon is growing on me as the new DI. It's a bit like when Doctor Who changes and it takes a bit of time to adapt to the new person, but having the rest of the team remain the same helps the transition.

The Dwayne subplot is as annoying as ever (why do they bother??), but other than that this was a lot of fun.

It's a shame the daughter has left though, she would have brought a new element to a show that sticks to such a rigid format.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Good but unoriginal
nicholls_les30 August 2018
I love this program and don't want to overly criticize it. Any program with crime set in the gorgeous Caribbean is a hit with me, but the story line for this one has been done before and the locked door scenario is now over used. The now need some new writers for this excellent idea of a show.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A new detective.
yoonejune30 October 2018
Love Jack Mooney!! The show needed something new and refreshing. DI Jack Mooney clicks with the cast. The writers are doing a great job of new cases and new twist.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Such fun
victoriajayne-332809 February 2020
I do love the gentle humour and style of this programme ..think the other reviews are wanting a complexity of a Morse or a Luther both of which I love but this is perfect Sunday viewing ..decent scripts and plots ,good photography and the new inspector is a peach ....highly enjoyable
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Episode 7.1
Prismark105 January 2018
What made Elizabeth Berrington fly out to a idyllic Caribbean island for a 30 seconds role on Death in Paradise?

Berrington plays Diane Smith, due to marry wealthy Philip Marston, owner of a chain of hotels. Just before the ceremony she gets bad news of a past incident and then her body comes crashing down.

Everybody tells DI Jack Mooney that it is suicide. Marston's grown up children from his first wife do not like being questioned. Mooney is not sure that Smith meant to kill herself, something about the bride who only painted one fingernail gives him cause for concern.

Ardal O'Hanlon seems to have effortlessly stepped into the shoes of his predecessors. Mooney has enough quirks and craftiness about him with a touch of Columbo about him. As an older person, the writers do not have to worry too much of giving him a romance angle. However I get the feeling his daughter was found to be dull and superfluous, she has been dispatched to university off the island.
15 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good start for Mooney but the stories need to diversify
ghsoumya11 January 2018
Nice start for Ardal O'Hanlon as DI Jack Mooney except for a split second at the Limbo game where he dropped without making a real effort. I thought the starting sequence with Mooney, watermelon and the trafficker was really good. Unfortunately, from there on the story recreates similar patterns and familiar story structure without much of a surprise. Maybe for a change there will be a story in one of the future episodes where everyone will be sure of a murder that will turn into a suicide. The well-liked supporting crew of Dwayne, JP, Florence and Commissioner play their part seamlessly.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
New Guy new way of solving murders
ctyankee129 January 2019
The story is about a woman that falls from a hotel building the day before she is to marry a billionaire Philip Marston. Marston owns the hotel and has 3 adult children. People think Diane committed suicide.

Most of the adult children work for him and have an alibi when Diane the future stepmother dies. The new DI Mooney gets a feeling Diane was murdered and he goes on to try to prove it. Dwayne, JP and Florence are not used to him yet as their supervisor but they stick with him. I like Mooney better than Goodman he is not as nuts the way he solves crimes like Goodman did with his quick movements when putting together the clues.

Things I noticed in the show. Officer J.P. Hooper played by Tobi Barkare wears a bracket with a cord on it with a Cross. I have seen the Cross on JP in many episodes and I love it. I did a search and found he really is a Christian and is proud of it. There is a video on Youtube being interview by Lady T on Gospel Drive

What I like about this series is that it has suspense and humor. They also show kindness and understanding with eachother and suspects.

What I don't like is they are always seem to promote drinking as reward for their success.

The thing I don't understand is in all the seasons of this series is criminals just calmly stand up and let the cops handcuff them and take them away. In my opinion not many criminals and killers in the real world are submissive or calm when arrested.
4 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Another mixed bag!
harrykivi3 July 2020
Warning: Spoilers
After the sixth season of "Death in Paradise" was fine, but not great for me, I hoped the 7.season to be much better. "Murder from Above" is better start to a season than "Erupting in Murder", but it still stays in the area between decent and solid.

Let's start with what is good about this episode.

. The production values are great as usual. The direction's gorgeous with beautifully framed shots and the music fits the scenery. The acting is very good all around.

. The case itself is intriguing with some welcome twists and red herrings. The solution to this mystery (there are more than two killers) was quite satisfying too.

But...

. At times the story is a bit too silly. The most stupid part being the chase scene, which ended in absurdity. Some charm that Dwayne once had, seems to be gone as well. His dismissal of the suicide case was not funny, only weird and out of place. The humor does get child-like as well.

. The concept behind the case: suicide, which is a murder, has been used for so many times before in "Death in Paradise" that it has gone old. There are very few ideas in the script here!

Overall, a real mixed bag of an episode.

6,5/10 HK
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Evidence, anyone?
prolifik525 March 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I realise that it's a trope in this type of show that the brilliant detective will unravel the case largely through ingenius surmise and conjecture. With that said, the last few episodes seem to have completely dispensed with the need to provide even a shred of evidence before arresting people for what usually amounts to first-degree murder. Given how outlandish some of these plots are, one would think the murderers could earn acquittals simply by keeping their mouths shut and forcing the police to prove their case in court.

This case is a perfect example. First of all, it involves three siblings playing parts that could have easily fallen apart at every turn. What if the father had managed not to confuse his own daughter's voice with that of his bride-to-be? What if said bride could not be convinced to meet the son in his room? What if even one bored onlooker - or anyone else on the hotel grounds - had managed to glance towards the balcony while the fiancee was being murdered?

It's such an absurd plan, with a motive so flimsy (three adult children of a billionaire "didn't want" their new stepmother), that it would take extraordinary evidence to back up DI Mooney's theory of murder, and he provides... none whatsoever. He just tells everyone what supposedly happened, and they all accept it as gospel. Could the police not have even lifted one of Pearl's fingerprints from Diane's phone to support the claim that she sent the suicide text? Nope, they didn't even bother with something as basic as that. Of course, Mooney's "deductions" are so brilliant that one suspect immediately breaks down and confesses instead of calling for his lawyer.

Well over 100 years ago, Sherlock Holmes was taking more pains over gathering evidence that could actually hold up in court than these guys have in recent episodes. It's just lazy writing.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Dumber by the episode
tehck19 February 2018
This show was unique, interesting, and funny in its first season, but it's been going slowly downhill ever since, and this episode is rock bottom so far. First of all, it is at least the third example of an identical plot structure. Newly installed DI Mooney responds to what appears to be a suicide in which anyone with a possible motive to murder the victim seems to have an airtight alibi. But Mooney suspects otherwise based on no real evidence whatsoever. But that is no more unlikely than the reaction of those closest to the victim, who immediately accept and vociferously defend the idea that a woman who was literally minutes away from walking down the aisle to her nuptials would instead throw herself off a balcony in front of the assembled guests. And this includes the man she was to marry, who has no trouble whatsoever believing that his fiance would rather be dead than spending her life with him.

Mooney's suspects -- all members of the would-be groom's family -- are a catalogue of stereotypes -- the driven career girl, the wastrel son, and the entitled, air-headed daughter. The plot is equally flimsy and predictable. With none of his staff sharing the DI's conviction (another redundant trope), Mooney continues his investigation despite repeated threats from the commissioner to pull rank and shut it down. But of course he never does and never would, as we viewers know all too well.

And then comes the ludicrous denoument. As per the show's long standing formula, Mooney has all his suspects gathered in one place so he can reveal to all of them (and us) who the killer is and how he knows (as always followng some trivial incidnet that inspires his epiphany). Never mind that no police investigation would ever conclude this way, but its result is a foregone conclusion for viewers who've seen more than one episode. All it takes for the nefarious villain(s) to surrender and confess is for Mooney to narrate the "real" events of the murder. No one seems to care that Mooney has not one iota of actual evidence to verify his story, but his logic is so dazzling and his assumptions so accurate that they can't help but immediately incriminate themselves for him.

Following a formula does not automatically condemn a detective series. Many excellent shows employ a similar approach. However, this show has some of the laziest and most insulting writing I've ever encountered. But as long as Josephine Jobert continues running around in those short-shorts, I'll probably keep watching.
11 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
PAINFUL DEATH OF THE PARADISE
bartzronald17 March 2019
A bride falls from the balcony of an hotel - again? It was an original idea in the second episode of the first season but now it's only embarrassing! What's wrong with the authors? No more ideas , no inspiration or simply too much Caribbean rum? Mooney's performance is horrible and without any charisma - he should rather be called Woody! And hey Florence - acting means more than pretty appearance and five or six wardrobe changes each episode ...! Oh, how I miss DI Poole and Camille!
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Why cant we comment to OTHER comments?
woodchip222 October 2018
The new guy, bad story lines, & bad acting from the accused, do NOT make a good plot.

But....the original actors on the island are doing a great, believable, job!

Why cant we see the 2nd inspector, now in London, solving crimes THERE too!? They traded places, but we're not seeing the one in London! I think the writers have run out of story lines. Too bad, it was a great show with good writing, & believable actors.

They could rotate episodes! (Island, London, etc.)
4 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Ardal is still wooden, brings out a lack of emotion from other cast members too
snootusmaximus5 January 2018
When season 6 ended, I noticed that Ardal's acting seemed wooden, strained and forced - unnatural. While Ben Miller and Kris Marshall both brought in enormous energies and exaggerated quirks of character, Ardal seems to be missing both - and that lack of energy seems to "osmosize" into the other characters like Florence, Dwayne and JP. In most of his lines, Ardal seems to miss... inflection - he's flat. The physical facet of his acting seems to be poor too - for example, in the scene where he's supposed to limbo, he falls/fails like a sophomoric, school boy-actor.

The story and screenplay have been the standard formats that have been this series' signatures, perhaps with a little less "beach" and more "people" this time. Danny John-Jules is close to brilliant as usual, but he can't carry the series by himself. I'm afraid that if subsequent episodes are like this, this may well be the last season in this series.
6 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Not the good mysteries of 1st 2 seasons
woodchip222 October 2018
I realize the reason for the 1st inspector leaving the show (to spend more time with his young son) and....he was killed on his last episode....(director making sure he could not come back..!.)

Then the next inspector was a tad clumsy, but solved the crimes brilliatlt. But....he went to London to solve a crime, & to find his one true love. So, he & the London inspector traded places. Well, we see the London inspector fumbling along in the small island but nothing of the former inspector now in London. The one on the island tries to carry the role of the former inspectors, but it lacks the personalities of the 1st 2 inspectors. Too bad....it "was" an enjoyable "who done it show" I miss the 2nd inspector.

I hope the newest inspector finds his "niche" & the writers do better than they are now, & write better scripts, like the 1st 2 seasons. The actors are weak, forced, & overbearing......(yawn.)
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed