"Bodyguard" Episode #1.6 (TV Episode 2018) Poster

(TV Series)

(2018)

User Reviews

Review this title
33 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
I have to confess...
isabellacheng24 September 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I was waiting for a car bomb to go off too, like the 2 reviewers above.

This episode has been awesome up until the bomb defusing scene.

Why was the kompromat not in the water heater? How did Budd bury it outdoors when it was expected that he was being monitored? Why was the viewer being misled to think it was in the heater? That was a pointless misdirection except to provide a convenient rope to facilitate Budd's escape.

Speaking of which, why wasn't the Secret Service already monitoring Budd all day? And what was Budd hoping to achieve, walking into Luke's lair alone?

While I respect the reveal about Nadia, how did she build all the future bombs after her arrest? I'm not saying she couldn't have built them beforehand and changed their purpose/target afterwards, but explanation has been scant.

By the way, TATP is Triacetone triperoxide. Just in case someone else is thinking the bombs were made of different explosives like I did, because both names were used in the show. In case my IP was flagged because I was googling explosives, it was the writer's fault forcing me to fact check, dear MI5/SO15/SCO19/GCHQ/...

How did Luke possess a jihadist suicide vest to frame Budd? Did he commission it from Nadia, for fun? And this one has tripwires not found on the first vest! Did Nadia relay the mod instructions to her friends from prison too?

The only useful information provided by bomb disposal was how to trick the dead man's switch. Then Budd miraculously knew how to disarm the bomb from shunting the controller to cutting the power all by himself. How?

Furthermore, did the writer forget about the other suspects that he used to misdirect the audience? Like, why was Anne Sampson reluctant to talk about Luke Aitkens? Because "that was some time ago"? And Mike Travis and Rob Macdonald having a shady conversation solely to cover up their "prank"? And Secret Service has been innocent all along?

Finally, the biggest plot twist and disappointment from the show: there was no car bomb.
28 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An intense, gut-wrenching episode butchered by a unexpected, unnecessary twist
soknopaiou24 September 2018
Warning: Spoilers
There is only 1 writer for Bodyguard, and for the past 5 episodes he has managed to gain a massive outpour of support from around 10 million fans of the show.

However, this episode was extremely rushed towards the end. Something that hasn't happened before. The whole episode up until Budd clears his name has been one of the most stressful, gut-wrenching piece of television I've ever watched. But, after Budd manages to clear his name, it seems as if the writer took a turn for shock value. Instead of going the most logical route and making it so Julia's death was staged to reveal the conspiracy by the Security Service and having what could've been the most saddest scene we could see (Julia revealing she is alive to Budd), we get a shock valued twist.

Turns out, the suicide bomber victim from the first episode, Nadia, was the mastermind behind all the bombs. This seems very sloppy to me. In the first episode, Nadia was pressured into setting off a bomb by her terrorist husband. Budd managed to defuse the situation. If Nadia's intention was to commit terrorism and kill innocent people, why didn't she ignore Budd's pleas in the train and just do it? Why go along with it and risk being arrested? And why stay quiet for so long? Why wait until the police eventually finds out you were behind the bomb and disband the crime organisation you were apart of? Just to brag? I don't get it. A better ending would've to replace that with revealing Julia was alive. Throughout the whole season, we were hit in the face that Budd and Vicky were never going to get back together and would eventually file for divorce, leading to Budd taking solace in Julia. So why didn't they make it a happy ending?

I sincerely hope we get another season exploring more of the Security Service. They left out so much details about it.
39 out of 70 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Fantastic
EpimetheusA119 March 2019
Great ending to a great show. The British really know how to up the ante. I vaguely thought that that one character was a villain all along but, as that character explained, it was so easy to believe that they were innocent based on their outer appearance that I let my suspicions go very quickly. Needless to say that I wasn't expecting that big reveal in the interrogation room AT ALL. Madden is a superb actor and everyone who was a part of this really helped make a masterpiece of a miniseries.
13 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Oh...my....days...!!!
Sleepin_Dragon28 October 2018
I don't know what my fellow reviewers have been watching, but the ninety minute episode that concluded this series off, was I thought incredible. An episode that has broken all records, with an enormous audience, and no wonder, there is no way on Earth people would have watched in such high numbers if this wasn't top class viewing.

More tension then anything I've seen since probably Line of Duty Series three, I thought it was scintillating viewing. Richard Madden has been fantastic throughout, he peaks in this episode for me, delivering a truly powerhouse performance, Gina McKee was terrific also. It's been full of surprises the whole way through, that trend definitely continued here, so much going on.

The filming was incredible, I loved the location work, have it a big production feel. Jed Mercurio may not be John le Carre, but he isn't half writing some incredible stuff. He always manages to deliver the most unexpected twists, I must have imagined every possible outcome, bar the actual one, incredibly written and delivered.

Explosive drama. 10/10
73 out of 90 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
One of the most suspencefull episodes ever
snake-9661516 November 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Put in TV. Nerve wracking exciting and because you know they can kill the main character; the outcome was very much in doubt. Ignore these pathetic reviewers who apparently are experts and have faced bomb threatening negotiating proceedings before ( eye rolls ). Great acting throughout and one great final twist. Again pathetic reviewers know what goes on in the minds of these crazed terrorists ( another eye roll ). Great acting throughout, tense and did one pathetic reviewer say it was dull? ( my eye is beginning to hurt ). Terrific season or series finale when so many overrated lauded ones fail to be so. Do not miss!!!!!
22 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Incredibly suspenseful!
bernardinu31 March 2019
Warning: Spoilers
From the opening scene on the train in episode 1 til the very end of episode 6, this was a brilliantly tense, twisty and exhilarating show, typical of the incomparable Jed Mercurio. Great cast and an excellent finale, I won't give too much away if I say, I can't wait for season two. The twists were plausible within the context of the show, and the great twist at the end was chilling. Easily a show I could recommend to anyone...
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
S1: Slickly engaging as it makes its own logic work
bob the moo9 March 2019
This show was one of a couple of high profile BBC productions that got a lot of publicity and success, and that I had to catch-up on after the fact. The plot is reminiscent of Fox's 24 in the way it places its ordinary agent at the core of something bigger, and then proceeds to cast doubt here there and everywhere, so the viewer is not sure what is coming next. Like 24 it also does set-pieces very well, producing moments of genuine tension paced well throughout the episodes. It has yet another connection to 24 in the way that it doesn't always connect to reality, but yet it drives itself forward convinced of its own logic.

This makes it engaging rather than pulpy, dramatic rather than cliched, and slick rather than silly. The short run helps it too, as it is well paced and doesn't have to engineer too many twists and turns to fill out the time. Performances are decent, with plenty of faces familiar, and the production itself has high standards - with good use of London locations in particular. The conclusion is a bit too tidy and abrupt, but otherwise it builds well throughout the short series. It isn't the brilliant drama that you've heard of, but it is entertaining, slick, pulpy, and enjoyable for what it does. It carries a serious tone, but only because it sold itself, it doesn't need you to be.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Magnification
Hitchcoc15 December 2023
Those that are rating this so low seem to be fixated on the person who ends up as the second culprit. I thought that it was as good as anyone they could have developed as a villain. For me, the whole process of keeping up suspense as efforts are made to disarm the bomb and keep from being shot, a dozen rifles pointed at him. Even though we pretty much know the outcome, there is still tension as he works every wire, every step, to survive. I've always been a sucker for movies about disarming bombs. The Hurt Locker, for instance, is a masterpiece of the genre. Once again, I'm glad I took a chance at this show. The characters are flawed, including David, but that's what makes it work.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
What a shame :(
clmcleish7925 September 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Well I've finally caught up with the rest of the UK and watched the finale. Gutted. I was so excited to settle down to immerse myself in it after binge- watching the other five since last Sunday evening. I was expecting twists and turns and to almost break my husbands hand off like I did during the pilot. Well the credits rolled and his fingers were still intact and we both said "oh..."

The acting, let's face it, was bloody awful from more than one member of the cast. It was only saved by Richard Madden who is consistently brilliant - thank God. For all the big British stars I could count (including two from Jamestown and one from In The Line of Duty) I was expecting more. I wanted fireworks (bombs and bullets would have sufficed) I wanted a character assisination and more importantly, I wanted to be left gripped for another season. Instead I got a load of loose ends tied quickly into a pretty bow and some, frankly, unbelievable character traits that had nothing to do with anything they had promised in earlier episodes.

Oh Bodyguard, you promised so much and your writers let you down. It peaked mid season and limped home - shame.
31 out of 53 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Disappointing ending
Sanctimonious_Bakuto17 April 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Loved the show up to this episode but I have to say that the ending ruined it. Everything that was calculated and clever from the previous episodes just went straight out the window and we were left with characters making hugely illogical, self-compromising choices.

Budd confronts Luke and Craddock and, even though he's the fugitive on the run, armed with a gun, the Police come to arrest Craddock, all because Budd says "it's over"? It doesn't make sense. Despite no evidence other than the fact Luke was there, which could have easily been explained a million ways, she just straight up confesses to everything. The same goes for Nadia who, when confronted, basically puts up her hands and says "ya got me", despite there being no reason to since she was under very little suspicion.

I really don't think the writers thought it out.
28 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Episode 1.6
Prismark105 October 2018
In some ways the final episode takes you back to where it all began.

Back to a bomb vest but this time it is on David Budd. So he was set up to be a patsy all along.

Maybe a lot of viewers felt wrong footed, yet writer Jed Mercurio still delivered tension in an over the top melodramatic manner.

I liked the way that a lot of dangling loose ends seemed to be wrapped up. A ratings bonanza for the BBC.

I can hope that a lot of new serials will now get out from the blocks with a bang rather than turgidly build up atmosphere and character that soon puts the audience to sleep.
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Disappointing
hazzaboombatty24 September 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Thoroughly enjoyed all preceding episodes but this finale was like the ending to a different show. Suddenly Rayburn had turned into a shouty, belligerent idiot who wouldn't listen, then they let her run off alone with this Kompromat. Then when he gets the best off he just literally disappears, surely he was just a few feet away!? Budds ex looked like she had enough hair and make up to go out on stage with girls aloud! And don't even mention the reveal, talk about a damp squib! I couldn't help but think more was coming. It wasn't. Very strange, why did she confess to everything so easily, why did nadiya do the same?? There was no explanation for why she suddenly decided to effectively blow her cover and take this blame. Ridiculous.
62 out of 104 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good but overhyped
esther708 December 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The story is nothing new if you've seen 24 and Homeland. It is fast paced and intelligent enough. Acting is good overall but Richard Madden's performance is overrated. In first to fourth episode, he couldn't get his internal turmoil across from his outward calmness. He gets much better in the last two episodes when his character starts to lose control. The last plot twist of Nadia being the mastermind seems totally ridiculous. Victim or not, she is a suicide bomber with links to terrorist cells. How can she feed information to others without anyone knowing? Why wasn't her background vetted and no one know she is an engineer? It's beyond crazy that she could continue to make bombs without anyone the wiser.
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Well......
matthewcrammond23 September 2018
That went from gritty to gash pretty fast.

5 episodes of one of the most genuinely gripping and unpredictable shows that the BBC have churned out for a while.

Then they seem to have hired a group of 12 year olds to tie off all the loose ends. It was JUST about better than him waking up and it all being a dream.

Never thought I'd be sitting there praying for a car bomb to go off. That's the worst bit. It's made me someone I don't like anymore.

Cheers
83 out of 154 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Another Jed Mercurio Letdown
Warin_West-El25 May 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This episode explains why this series is often panned in reviews. For four solid seasons, writer Jed Mercurio churned out a fabulous series: Line of Duty. But then season five was barely passable and season six took a nose dive.

We have the same phenomenon here in Bodyguard. The first five episodes were daunting. And as another reviewer pointed out, the courage to kill off Home Secretary Julia Montague was a stroke of genius. Her death made the drama come alive. Because it signalled every one of the characters was in peril.

But then, the final episode was totally unrealistic. No one with a brain is buying the notion that David standing there with his face all bloodied looks like he's a terrorist. Or that the cops are so daft as to not figure out he's telling the truth.

The first five episodes were great. Followed by the inevitable Mercurio crash.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Terribly written episode
jjsoltis10 November 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I have never watched a more poor example of negotiating by police. Everything said and done during the scene with the police and the vest was anything but logical attempt to end the crisis.
34 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Season One
zkonedog2 July 2019
There are a lot of things that feel timely in the U.K. series (distributed by Netflix) "Bodyguard". From differences in political opinions to post-traumatic stress disorder and how to best deal with the continued threat of terrorism, this is a show that has plenty of material to mine. While it does get into some very "good stuff" content-wise, it also makes enough odd and perplexing decisions to prevent it from being truly great.

For a basic plot summary, "Bodyguard" tells the story of David Budd (Richard Madden), an ex-military officer now assigned as the personal protector of Britain's Home Secretary Julia Montague (Keeley Hawes). While Budd seems to be the ultimate professional, he's also going through marital problems with ex-wife Vicky (Sophie Rundle) and suffering from PTSD from time in Afghanistan. Topping it all off is a relationship with fellow war-buddy Andy (Tom Brooke), a visibly-scarred vet who is disgusted that Budd could stomach working with a political regime that believes in the cause that so injured their minds and bodies. When the Home Secretary proposes a piece of legislature that gives Security Services more freedoms than ever before, some assassination plots ensue and Budd must make some hard choices (both personally and professionally) on how to treat his conscience versus his professionalism.

The way I look at "Bodyguard" after its first season is thusly: The first episode is great, the last episode (#6) is great, and the four in between are very up-and-down. As I mentioned, there's no doubt that this show hits on some very emotional and practical issues present in todays political landscape. First and foremost, how can one dutifully protect a person who he feels is wrong in nearly ever political aspect conceivable? And then, minor spoiler alert here, what happens when an emotional relationship creeps into the picture. Combine this with some great action scenes and those tremendous bookend episodes, and "Bodyguard" does a lot right in its freshman effort.

The problem dragging this season down, though, is that the show just seems to make a lot of head-scratching plot and character decisions. I'm not sure if this was intended to be the case or not, but it seems as if just when a certain plot thread or character gets really interesting, they dispose of it and move on to something else. Thus, the effect I had watching this show was akin to that of a roller-coaster: upon reaching its greatest heights, it would immediately plummet down to earth in order to build the momentum necessary to crest the next hill. I wish the journey to the ultimate climax would have been a bit more of a straight arrow. While there were times I has 100% connected to the events, there were other times I was somewhat bored or lost as to what exactly was trying to be conveyed. Not helping matters in this regard was a decidedly too-large cast of players, many of which get lost in the fury of names and titles. A lot of the fat could have been trimmed away to produce a tighter story with less confusion.

Overall, though, "Bodyguard" did make at least somewhat of a positive impact on me, and I would easily jump back into a second season if one is ever planned. Despite some odd decisions, the show did enough to stimulate my creative/dramatic interests and I'd love to see some of these characters deal with whatever comes next in their celluloid lives.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Disappointing
joelsaturne7 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I know i'm late but i just had to review this episode. This show was very good and gripping in the beginning. But this last episode wasn't very good. It didn't feel true to the characters at all, and the ending wasn't at all satisfying. It felt as if the writers put us on a roller coaster ride and at the top made us get off. The ending was missing the shows usual tension that made the rest of the show so great. Also, it felt really lazy that the 'mastermind' behind the whole thing was Nadia. It doesn't make sense that she would admit to making all the bombs. It would have been cooler to have seen the prime minister, the interim home secretary and longcross finally get what was coming to them, but they didn't.

Well, whatever. My general consensus is that the show was good, just an unfortunate ending.

It's really ironic considering Richard Madden was in Game of Thrones and that show also had an unfortunate ending. He was great, as always though.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cheesy police work
snrnp-897976 April 2022
Louise was written a bad part and it completely drew away from the ending. The Deepak character wasn't much better. Overall the show was pretty solid with just some directions that could have been better.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Well....
ChrisRyles9523 September 2018
To borrow the words of the previous reviewer, that went from gritty to gash very fast.

This show had the guts to kill main characters and the skill to keep you on the edge of your seat, but throws that away with an anaemic ending. I was expecting the gut punch of a shocking death, of a twist, of a conclusion from left field that I didn't expect and that would be fitting of the episodes that came before. Unfortunately it seems that the writers couldn't muster that.

Bodyguard is still a quality series, it's just a shame that they couldn't stick to their guns for the conclusion. I was also waiting for a car bomb to take my breath away, what I got was the credits rolling and a distinct feeling that there could have been more.
40 out of 73 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
are you serious
notonoers4 November 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Guys i can't believe how you can be so shocked about how "bad" the ending was. What do you think this series is, an effing game of thrones? You must have been exaggerating it soo much in your eyes. This was a very mediocre ending, which suited very well with the rest of the season. The season was full of flaws and inconsistencies as the ending has. Also i actually liked the twist about nadia.
0 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Worst plottwist ever
kaspercmhermans20 January 2019
Good first 5,5 episode, great acting, lots of tension and then... What kind of an unlogical plottwist was that? It was just a plottwist that no-one predicted for the sake of having a plottwist that no-one predicted. But no-one predicted it, because it just doesn't make any sense.
20 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Wonderful screenwriting turns thriller into comedy
d-8290219 July 2020
Warning: Spoilers
It is almost comedic how no one was listening to David during the negotiation scene. it's like trying to argue with a child: you try to talk sense into them but child logic functions in a totally different world so you give up and laugh at yourself for trying.

On top of that I cannot help myself from laughing at the utter ridiculousness of David walking down the streets with bomb on himself. I have no idea how big the London area is, but I'd like to imagine it can easily take more than an hour with the speed he had to keep. Surely there are more realistic ways to resolve the plot than this.

I know it is sometime necessary to dumb down characters so your audiences feel smarter and better about themselves, but to lower the audiences' intelligence to this level is quite an extreme step to take. Compared to the dialogue of the train scene in the first episode, it's unbelievable those two episodes were written by the same person.
11 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Anti-climax
bbroeksma15 January 2019
It's hard to believe that this episode was written by the same person as the previous episodes.

After the first episode, I was happily surprised, as this show was actually pretty good. I wouldn't just say this one ruined the series, but it definitely left me with a very sour aftertaste, as the ending could've been so much better.
15 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Too bad...
yamxt60023 December 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Unfortunately I have to agree with some of the other reviews, the "Nadia" resolve is stupid (too say it politely) and quite the letdown after 5 3/4 episodes.

So why didn't she blow herself up in EP 1?

Or: If she's that good of an engineer and evil - why would she try to blow herself up in EP 1?

Does make no sense at all.

But with Julia Montague being really dead and David, Vicky and the kids being a happy family again, I guess there wasn't a second season planned anyways.

Too bad, this had potential, but it's like someone told the author after having written most of Ep 6: "don't bother with any meaningful end, it will not continue after this anyways".
11 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed