Yes! It can be done. A serious, engaging drama without profanity and sex scenes. Serious human dilemmas handled masterfully. Wonderful singing and dancing, old-style Hollywood. A revival of the day when those who appeared on screen had to be able to sing, dance AND act. When you have those elements, there is no need to devolve to gutter language and salacious scenes. So kudos to the producers, writers, directors, and actors for a touching and very entertaining movie. Audiences need more of this type of art. A world in crises DOES NOT need more gory action movies. It needs a call back to civility and decency. This movie is multiple steps in that direction. Thank you.
Reviews
28 Reviews
Vernon, Florida
(1981)
A Slower Pace of Life. Nothing to Be Ashamed Of.
28 March 2018
I lived in Florida a good part of my life and traveled to areas like Vernon. I had "country boy" friends in these areas, people I truly enjoyed visiting. They had time for life and time for others. I once came into Perry, Florida to see a preacher friend, but did not know where he lived. I stopped in the first church I came to and asked if they knew him. I was motioned into the pastor's office, where the senior pastor was seated in camos sharpening hunting knives. He got on the phone to my friend (who pastored another church a few miles away) and said, "Boy! Got folks here lookin' for you."
After supper as we were getting into our van to go to Wednesday prayer meeting, one of his goats jumped in and sat proudly on my velour seat. My friend said, "Yep . . . She'll load up on ye."
So, this documentary is true to life in slower rural areas. The folks seem funny, only because we are used to our fast-paced and so called "intelligent" suburban lives. In the final analysis, who ends the game happier, he who took time to live, or he who lived wishing he had found time?
After supper as we were getting into our van to go to Wednesday prayer meeting, one of his goats jumped in and sat proudly on my velour seat. My friend said, "Yep . . . She'll load up on ye."
So, this documentary is true to life in slower rural areas. The folks seem funny, only because we are used to our fast-paced and so called "intelligent" suburban lives. In the final analysis, who ends the game happier, he who took time to live, or he who lived wishing he had found time?
Doc Martin
(2004–2022)
An Engaging British Show with the Occasional Turd in the Punch Bowl
5 January 2018
Warning: Spoilers
As a videophile, I love finding series like this gem. When I tuned in to the first episode on Netflix, I turned it off after about 15 minutes when I was introduced to the disrespectful, incompetent receptionist "Elaine." Fortunately, she was replaced with a much more competent and likable/lovable receptionist "Pauline" in the second season. This series like many of the British productions I have reviewed provides engaging entertainment with a minimum of salacious material and scenes.
Dr. Martin's aunt "Joan" seems to be there to provide the "warm" grandmotherly presence in the series, but instead is portrayed as a selfish and profane woman of life-long loose morals. The series largely avoids sex scenes (which I appreciate) but the writers thought it convenient to include a gross episode of "Aunt Joan" satisfying her base and selfish instincts with a younger man. Yuk and totally off-putting. Thankfully her character is replaced with "Aunt Ruth," who appears (so far) to be much more palatable as an aunt with some reasonable basis from which to provide guidance to the doctor.
The character of Louisa is captivating. She is beautiful and one wonders why still single in her mid 30s. However, she provides a blessing to Doc Martin and their evolving relationship keeps one coming back, cheering for a good outcome. Louisa is absolutely stunning as a bride. Doc Martin definitely got the best part of that bargain!
Bert and his son Al are lovable sad sack characters, who always seem to mean well, yet never quite make it to their goals in life. However, they are "there" for just about anyone in need, making them a source of stability for the series.
It is always entertaining to watch as the town pharmacist Mrs.Tishell melts and snaps to every time the doctor comes into the shop . . . somewhat like a lieutenant admiring the general every time he enters the room.
The only character that is not believable is "PC Joe Penhale." His character is a comical caricature and certainly not a person any town would continue to employ as a peace officer. Not sure why the writers went this way with his character. It is like juxtaposing an otherwise believable clannish town with the antics of the Keystone Kops. Would never happen in real life.
I would give this series a 10 for the dramatic interplay of Louisa and Martin alone. But I must subtract a point for dirty "Aunt Joan" and bumbling "PC Penhale."
Dr. Martin's aunt "Joan" seems to be there to provide the "warm" grandmotherly presence in the series, but instead is portrayed as a selfish and profane woman of life-long loose morals. The series largely avoids sex scenes (which I appreciate) but the writers thought it convenient to include a gross episode of "Aunt Joan" satisfying her base and selfish instincts with a younger man. Yuk and totally off-putting. Thankfully her character is replaced with "Aunt Ruth," who appears (so far) to be much more palatable as an aunt with some reasonable basis from which to provide guidance to the doctor.
The character of Louisa is captivating. She is beautiful and one wonders why still single in her mid 30s. However, she provides a blessing to Doc Martin and their evolving relationship keeps one coming back, cheering for a good outcome. Louisa is absolutely stunning as a bride. Doc Martin definitely got the best part of that bargain!
Bert and his son Al are lovable sad sack characters, who always seem to mean well, yet never quite make it to their goals in life. However, they are "there" for just about anyone in need, making them a source of stability for the series.
It is always entertaining to watch as the town pharmacist Mrs.Tishell melts and snaps to every time the doctor comes into the shop . . . somewhat like a lieutenant admiring the general every time he enters the room.
The only character that is not believable is "PC Joe Penhale." His character is a comical caricature and certainly not a person any town would continue to employ as a peace officer. Not sure why the writers went this way with his character. It is like juxtaposing an otherwise believable clannish town with the antics of the Keystone Kops. Would never happen in real life.
I would give this series a 10 for the dramatic interplay of Louisa and Martin alone. But I must subtract a point for dirty "Aunt Joan" and bumbling "PC Penhale."
Father Brown
(2013– )
Series Ruined by a Few "Modern" Episodes
27 December 2017
I normally rate British mystery series highly, as they are creative enough to not have to pander to modern immorality. However, with regard to this "Father Brown" series, I am sure that G. K. Chesterton, and the priest he sought to portray in his books were not milquetoast approvers of poor theology and sensational immorality (promiscuity and homosexuality). On one hand "Father" lectures other men for their poor performances as fathers and husbands, while winking and nodding at the promiscuity of his inner circle "helpers." "Father" soothes the rightly troubled consciences of murders who killed their homosexual lovers, bu saying, "Ah . . . You were in love. (i.e., "Nothing wrong with you morality.")
Why some writers and producers think they have to descend into the darkest recesses of immorality and promote the darkness as an alternate reality is beyond me. Why not just take what was written by Chesterton and be true to the material? The same is true of modern adaptations of "Sherlock Holmes." Sure there was "period appropriate" "dark" material enough in Doyles writing to pique the interest of the reader. There is no need to go beyond in order to sensationalize the story. It takes no creativity to add filth to a story, any high school drop out can do that in their sleep. I wish these writers would try to display their "genius" and "creativity" by adding some period-correct flourishes rather than "politically correct" trash.
So this series gets a "7." I could have gained a "9" from me if the writers avoided the nonsense.
Why some writers and producers think they have to descend into the darkest recesses of immorality and promote the darkness as an alternate reality is beyond me. Why not just take what was written by Chesterton and be true to the material? The same is true of modern adaptations of "Sherlock Holmes." Sure there was "period appropriate" "dark" material enough in Doyles writing to pique the interest of the reader. There is no need to go beyond in order to sensationalize the story. It takes no creativity to add filth to a story, any high school drop out can do that in their sleep. I wish these writers would try to display their "genius" and "creativity" by adding some period-correct flourishes rather than "politically correct" trash.
So this series gets a "7." I could have gained a "9" from me if the writers avoided the nonsense.
American Crime Story
(2016– )
Very Realistic Casting - "Social Justice" Shown for What it Truly Is
5 October 2017
I have seen many reenactments in which the actors looked nothing like the actual historical figures. In this series, every actor except the one portraying O.J. looked almost identical to the true-life person they portrayed. Very well cast and very well acted. John Travolta as Robert Shapiro gave a very convincing portrayal, as did the actor playing Johnnie Cochran. I refused to follow this farce of a trial when it originally happened back in the early 90s. This movie properly portrays how unjust the outcome (and the thinking of the jury) really was. . . . Four hours to arrive at a verdict?! The deck was stacked for "social justice" to prevail over true justice. The black prosecutor's statement that the trial was the first time a man was acquitted just because he was black was an excellent summary of what happened. The producers and director did an excellent job of making this ten-part series binge-watching worthy.
I did not appreciate all the foul language, but realize that such language was probably representative of the mouths of the persons portrayed. It is notable that the "church" within which Johnnie Cochran received his religious support had no problem asking their "god" to bless Johnnie as he attempted to help a murderer go free. Just as in many such churches, "solidarity" in getting back at "the man" trumps any transcendent truth the Bible they wave around may have in it. Such a shame, but again faithfully reported by this movie.
I did not appreciate all the foul language, but realize that such language was probably representative of the mouths of the persons portrayed. It is notable that the "church" within which Johnnie Cochran received his religious support had no problem asking their "god" to bless Johnnie as he attempted to help a murderer go free. Just as in many such churches, "solidarity" in getting back at "the man" trumps any transcendent truth the Bible they wave around may have in it. Such a shame, but again faithfully reported by this movie.
Sherlock
(2010–2017)
Trying to Compete with Skyfall and Captain America
15 September 2017
I generally enjoy BBC productions and British creativity. One of the main reasons I enjoy British productions over American productions is that the British artists are more creative, imaginative, and less sensational in their presentation, providing a compelling story and photography, without all the non-stop unrealistic action and special FX that the less imaginative American productions rely upon. Unfortunately, in this series the Brits have delivered the same material as the Bond series and the super hero series, with Holmes and Watson becoming macabre quasi-supermen.
I would prefer a believable story, where Holmes, Watson, and their nemeses accomplish things that are humanly possible, versus things that only a super hero with magical powers and nanosecond timing could accomplish. The original Sherlock Holmes, although genius in his deductive reasoning, was a believable character doing things conceivably possible for a human. These stories by Conan Doyle were compelling and watchable. After watching this series, I almost need to spend three hours decompressing on my analyst's couch (if I had an analyst). Just TOO much death, perversion, psychosis, and other human dysfunction crammed into a few characters in a single movie/episode. Very dark, depressing, and difficult to process.
However, I will watch the next one when available on Netflix. Sometimes we are gluttons for abuse.
I would prefer a believable story, where Holmes, Watson, and their nemeses accomplish things that are humanly possible, versus things that only a super hero with magical powers and nanosecond timing could accomplish. The original Sherlock Holmes, although genius in his deductive reasoning, was a believable character doing things conceivably possible for a human. These stories by Conan Doyle were compelling and watchable. After watching this series, I almost need to spend three hours decompressing on my analyst's couch (if I had an analyst). Just TOO much death, perversion, psychosis, and other human dysfunction crammed into a few characters in a single movie/episode. Very dark, depressing, and difficult to process.
However, I will watch the next one when available on Netflix. Sometimes we are gluttons for abuse.
Wild Pacific
(2009– )
Unimaginative Yet Predictable Writing
30 May 2017
This series follows the same banal story lines as National Geographic documentaries: feature a zoom view of the mating ritual of some local animals then feature some pagan, sensual ritual by natives dressed in loin cloths and a zoom view of their genital sheaths, and don't forget to remind people that the earth is billions of years old and that man and animals all evolved from the same rock in a primordial mud puddle.
I wish they had spent more time on the beauty of the South Pacific, its wildlife (minus the gratuitous mating scenes), and on more modern historical events (like notable castaways, World War II battles on the islands, etc.). Frankly watching some primitive, mud-encrusted, would-be savage get beaten with sticks and dance around a fire with plumes on his head is about as interesting and inspiring as watching paint dry. Then again, it makes me thankful that God allowed me to be born in the US, instead of in the jungle of Irian Jaya or on the banks of the Zambezi.
I wanted to watch something serene, educational, and tasteful with my 9 year old daughter. This series does not fit that description.
I wish they had spent more time on the beauty of the South Pacific, its wildlife (minus the gratuitous mating scenes), and on more modern historical events (like notable castaways, World War II battles on the islands, etc.). Frankly watching some primitive, mud-encrusted, would-be savage get beaten with sticks and dance around a fire with plumes on his head is about as interesting and inspiring as watching paint dry. Then again, it makes me thankful that God allowed me to be born in the US, instead of in the jungle of Irian Jaya or on the banks of the Zambezi.
I wanted to watch something serene, educational, and tasteful with my 9 year old daughter. This series does not fit that description.
Sing
(2016)
A Classic Story Retold
31 March 2017
I have watched dozens of movies made from the 1930s to the 1960s that mirrored the theme of an underdog musical or theatrical company, that endeared the viewer and brought them to cheer for their success. The producer/theater owner plays a lovable part as do the musical characters. The "twenty-something" llama who lives in his parents pool house and plays video games all day is very recognizable in most homes. The old matriarch of the theater who comes to save the day is also a standard character of dozens of classics. I was glad to see this plot played out in animation in a way that gladdened the heart of the viewer. A solid eight from this old videophile.
The Boss Baby
(2017)
Harmless, But No Real Message to Take Home
31 March 2017
The "Boss Baby" introduced early on in the movie reminded me so much of the cold-hearted, self-absorbed, not interested in hearing others, clueless to his own obnoxiousness type of boss I thankfully had only once and for a short time in my long career. Unfortunately, I was sort of blinded to the movie as I revoltingly relived that chapter in my life. But at least they made this type of "Boss" the "bad guy," for which I am thankful.
The only positive message I could glean from this movie is, "It is better to be a helpless baby who loves and is loved, than to be a know-it-all who neither loves or is loved." All in all, I could have spent my $60 in a more productive way. But getting to have time with my nine year old daughter made it worthwhile. I encourage spending time with your children. Just pick another movie.
The only positive message I could glean from this movie is, "It is better to be a helpless baby who loves and is loved, than to be a know-it-all who neither loves or is loved." All in all, I could have spent my $60 in a more productive way. But getting to have time with my nine year old daughter made it worthwhile. I encourage spending time with your children. Just pick another movie.
Hacksaw Ridge
(2016)
A Respectful Treatment of History
6 March 2017
I recently gave "The Pacific," a modern treatment of the Pacific Theater by Tom Hanks a two-star rating for his poor portrayal of our troops during WW2. Like many modern treatments, they highlight the lowest level of language and behaviour.
Mel Gibson did an excellent job of avoiding the seedy trash talk and sexual content so many others make as their focus. He also highlighted the Christian faith of the main character, doing so in an honorable way. The gore of battle was a little too graphic for me, and made it not viewable by my younger children. However, that is what the "R" stands for.
Mel Gibson did an excellent job of avoiding the seedy trash talk and sexual content so many others make as their focus. He also highlighted the Christian faith of the main character, doing so in an honorable way. The gore of battle was a little too graphic for me, and made it not viewable by my younger children. However, that is what the "R" stands for.
The Pacific
(2010)
Another Modern Desecration of Our History
3 March 2017
I am always dismayed when modern filmmakers handle history, reflecting the present-day lack of morality and respect for our past and our forebears. As I began this series with hope that Tom Hanks would do better than that, it took less than two minutes before the F-bomb was shoved in my face multiple times. I turned it off and in effect tossed the series in the can, having seen the direction it was taking. "Maybe" it got better. But I doubt it. If you arrived for a blind date, and the first words our of your date's mouth are vulgar and crude, do you stay for dinner to hear more? Not me.
My father, who is still alive, was a tank driver in WW2 and in the Battle of the Bulge. He says that although the "f" word was sometimes used, it was nowhere near as prevalent during the war as modern movies want to make it. For heaven's sake, why can't we treat history with respect? We know people went to the bathroom, and that some cads spoke of women in vulgar terms, that soldiers cussed some, and that there was some promiscuity. Folks know that and don't need to be feed those images in order to "get it." When we have to dish up the lowest levels of human behavior in order to be "relevant" to the times, it is a good indication that the filmmakers lack the artistic creativity to present a compelling story without lurid details.
I wish filmmakers were interested in helping viewers rise above filth and become connoisseurs of real fine art. But since most in the business today are students of a generation of America-degrading "artists," we instead get inartistic productions that make our forebears into sleazeballs. I reject that. My GGG grandfather fought in the American Revolution and at Yorktown. My great grandfather was an honorable cavalier in the Confederate Army, not a Simon Legre. My grandfather was a sailor in WW1 and behaved honorably. My father was an honorable WW2 soldier. I will never dishonor their memory by watching movies in which others dishonor them.
My father, who is still alive, was a tank driver in WW2 and in the Battle of the Bulge. He says that although the "f" word was sometimes used, it was nowhere near as prevalent during the war as modern movies want to make it. For heaven's sake, why can't we treat history with respect? We know people went to the bathroom, and that some cads spoke of women in vulgar terms, that soldiers cussed some, and that there was some promiscuity. Folks know that and don't need to be feed those images in order to "get it." When we have to dish up the lowest levels of human behavior in order to be "relevant" to the times, it is a good indication that the filmmakers lack the artistic creativity to present a compelling story without lurid details.
I wish filmmakers were interested in helping viewers rise above filth and become connoisseurs of real fine art. But since most in the business today are students of a generation of America-degrading "artists," we instead get inartistic productions that make our forebears into sleazeballs. I reject that. My GGG grandfather fought in the American Revolution and at Yorktown. My great grandfather was an honorable cavalier in the Confederate Army, not a Simon Legre. My grandfather was a sailor in WW1 and behaved honorably. My father was an honorable WW2 soldier. I will never dishonor their memory by watching movies in which others dishonor them.
No Redeemable Elements
26 June 2016
This was purported to be a flashback to the 1890s and a more "true" depiction of Conan Doyle's Holmes. It was a dark and hopeless episode centered on Holmes overdosing on cocaine and hallucinating the entire story. Holmes was at his worst: arrogant, aloof, and depressed. Death, infidelity, murder, and quasi-homosexual obsessions and innuendo between Holmes and Moriarty made for a totally unedifying movie. It starts out dark and ends even more darkly. Never a ray of virtue, hope, or wholesome values.
The writers and producers of this episode seem proud of their work. But unless you are a Goth drug addict who wants to wallow in darkness for 90 minutes, this is not for you, and definitely not for family viewing.
Sherlock Holmes with Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce, did a good job of interpreting Doyle without dragging the viewer into total darkness. The screen writers, directors, and actors of their many movies provided some sunshine at least at the end of the story.
When "artists" have to resort to continual and amplified displays of gore, lust, sexual innuendo, and drug addiction, it is a sign of a lack of creativity. Modern "Hollywood" has spent years nurturing in its audience a taste for unsavory, crude, and bawdy junk-food entertainment and fills its menu with nothing else it seems.
As you can tell, I am disappointed with the new "normal" in movies.
The writers and producers of this episode seem proud of their work. But unless you are a Goth drug addict who wants to wallow in darkness for 90 minutes, this is not for you, and definitely not for family viewing.
Sherlock Holmes with Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce, did a good job of interpreting Doyle without dragging the viewer into total darkness. The screen writers, directors, and actors of their many movies provided some sunshine at least at the end of the story.
When "artists" have to resort to continual and amplified displays of gore, lust, sexual innuendo, and drug addiction, it is a sign of a lack of creativity. Modern "Hollywood" has spent years nurturing in its audience a taste for unsavory, crude, and bawdy junk-food entertainment and fills its menu with nothing else it seems.
As you can tell, I am disappointed with the new "normal" in movies.
The Silent Service
(1957–1958)
Well-Done Realism
15 October 2015
This series (which I found on YouTube) was well-done with its weaving of real WW2 action footage with scenes filmed onboard the loaner submarine they used. It makes you appreciate the valor of those who chose the silent service: cramped, dank, hot quarters; enduring unrelenting depth charge attacks; going without decent air and electricity; and paying the ultimate price of going down with all hands (over 50 boats did so in WW2). To think that men clamoured to be part of this elite service, knowing the dangers involved is a testimony to the backbone that once was present in our men and our culture. Having been done in the 50s, this series shows a military in which ladies provide a supporting role and men provide the combat presence. How refreshing to look back on a time when our society and military were more in sync with the Creators order.
Being a child of the 50s and a son of a WW2 combat veteran, I am proud to see what our military once stood for. Well done and a tribute to better times and a stronger nation.
Being a child of the 50s and a son of a WW2 combat veteran, I am proud to see what our military once stood for. Well done and a tribute to better times and a stronger nation.
Field of Lost Shoes
(2015)
Great Costumes. Somewhat Fair Treatment of the South
10 April 2015
I thought the acting was fine and the costuming and photography was good as well. Unfortunately, the writers/producers made the war about slavery, when there were higher issues at play, such as states rights and a northern industry-controlled federal government that was violating the Constitution under the leadership of a man who had little regard for the document. That having been said, I am pleased that the Southern characters were not made to be Simon Legrees, but were instead shown as thoughtful and caring humans. As the VMI cadets tried to help the black VMI baker and the black woman trapped under a wagon, it showed a real picture of the more common relations between black and white people in the South. I am pleased that this aspect of human relations was shown.
The film appeared to be fairly true to the events leading up to the battle and during the battle. It was a terrible war (and one that would never have happened if the North had not invaded the South). But it is nice to reminisce about a time when men were gentlemen, women were ladies, and race relations were not as volatile as they are today (after 150 years of government meddling).
The film appeared to be fairly true to the events leading up to the battle and during the battle. It was a terrible war (and one that would never have happened if the North had not invaded the South). But it is nice to reminisce about a time when men were gentlemen, women were ladies, and race relations were not as volatile as they are today (after 150 years of government meddling).
Meet John Doe
(1941)
Excellent Film. Made Me Cry.
20 January 2015
Warning: Spoilers
This film came out before the US went into WWII, but at a time when many were awakening to what Hitler and other fascists were doing in Europe. So when the paper editor speaks of the dangers of a "fifth column" it was at a time in our nation when there were active fifth column operations attempting to align with Hitler. This is one undercurrent that was appreciated.
The overwhelming story of how common folks can speak to and encourage other common folks and produce a powerful movement was touching. It was not far-fetched either, as it could very well happen with the help of the media. But unfortunately our media rarely promotes "feel good" causes. The power of words is shown, as people can be turned to corporate good or corporate evil by the use of a good spokesman and the right words.
I love Gary Cooper, always believable and lovable in his roles. Barbara Stanwyck is also effective. Two great actors and a great plot. I was especially touched in the final scene when the work of Jesus on the cross was referenced as the ultimate story of a "John Doe" dying that others might live. Just a wonderful movie.
The overwhelming story of how common folks can speak to and encourage other common folks and produce a powerful movement was touching. It was not far-fetched either, as it could very well happen with the help of the media. But unfortunately our media rarely promotes "feel good" causes. The power of words is shown, as people can be turned to corporate good or corporate evil by the use of a good spokesman and the right words.
I love Gary Cooper, always believable and lovable in his roles. Barbara Stanwyck is also effective. Two great actors and a great plot. I was especially touched in the final scene when the work of Jesus on the cross was referenced as the ultimate story of a "John Doe" dying that others might live. Just a wonderful movie.
From Hell to Texas
(1958)
Good Clean Entertainment
19 November 2014
Another example of a movie made before 1960 that is creatively able to portray anger, violence, love, and romance without profanity, nudity, or crudity. The character Tod is virtuous as are the characters of Chill Wills and his family. The western vistas are captured well by the photographer Dennis Hopper, known in more modern times for non-western roles plays a spoiled and insecure youngest son of the antagonist a role similar to his in the Gunfight at the O.K. Corral.
I always enjoy Chill Wills. He adds authenticity to any western. I have never seen him play a villain. This movie is no exception. He is a kind, upstanding, generous family man with a lovely daughter.
Just all in all an enjoyable movie. Just wish it did not have to end with the typical "riding off into the sunset" scene. I would rather have the movie 15 minutes longer and develop the good guys after the villains are gone.
I always enjoy Chill Wills. He adds authenticity to any western. I have never seen him play a villain. This movie is no exception. He is a kind, upstanding, generous family man with a lovely daughter.
Just all in all an enjoyable movie. Just wish it did not have to end with the typical "riding off into the sunset" scene. I would rather have the movie 15 minutes longer and develop the good guys after the villains are gone.
Murdoch Mysteries
(2008– )
History Poorly Handled
29 July 2014
This series purports to be set in "Victorian Era" (1837-1901) Toronto, Ontario. From the technology used (telephone, AC electricity from Niagara Falls which came circa 1870-80) it appears that this is set in the late 1800s. However, the "modern" writers cannot keep themselves from injecting present political issues (from a liberal viewpoint) and making the characters opine present-day politically correct views. A prime example is the episode where Mr. Murdoch wants to abandon his faith (Catholicism) because God condemns homosexuality, wherein also the female coroner defends homosexual behavior with dubious "scientific" data often cited today, but certainly not a part of the scientific ethos of that day, and claims that God "made them that way and put those desires in their hearts, hence how can God judge them," another modern contrivance.
The writers seem to try hard to include sexual content both by allusion and by graphic violent scenes, regularly including sexual crimes with full detailed descriptions as part of the story. This is entirely unnecessary. Mysteries can be captivating WITHOUT these crude sensual additions. The show has a dark tone throughout, with very little if any uplifting content.
I am always in search of "family-friendly" shows, ones that would edify (or at least not mortify) my whole family. I do not see the need for the "adult" and "child" dichotomy in programming. Frankly, if it is not good for a child, it isn't good for an adult.
So for this show, which could be family-friendly very easily by the removal of the above-stated accessories, I must give it 4 stars. Another modern obliteration (or rewrite) of history to suit the progressive-liberal agenda of many screen writers of today.
The writers seem to try hard to include sexual content both by allusion and by graphic violent scenes, regularly including sexual crimes with full detailed descriptions as part of the story. This is entirely unnecessary. Mysteries can be captivating WITHOUT these crude sensual additions. The show has a dark tone throughout, with very little if any uplifting content.
I am always in search of "family-friendly" shows, ones that would edify (or at least not mortify) my whole family. I do not see the need for the "adult" and "child" dichotomy in programming. Frankly, if it is not good for a child, it isn't good for an adult.
So for this show, which could be family-friendly very easily by the removal of the above-stated accessories, I must give it 4 stars. Another modern obliteration (or rewrite) of history to suit the progressive-liberal agenda of many screen writers of today.
Once Upon a Time
(2011–2018)
No Moral Compass
22 July 2014
This show does a good job with photography and special effects. The acting is fairly good as well. However, for a "family-friendly" show I have to give it three stars. There is no moral compass other than how thecharacters "feel." So a woman is cautioned to not have an affair with a married man (who has amnesia) if it "feels wrong." However, when this man decides to leave his wife for the woman, then the green light is on because it now "feels right." Later in the series someone says that doing something "wrong" is okay if the results feel right.
This "sleepy" town lacks any church presence (absolute moral compass). But then again, if there was a church holding to biblical principles, the church would deem the whole mess occultic and in need of exorcism. I know these stories are extrapolations of what were "innocent" fairy tales. But the dark side is shown more than any light side. Darkness is magnified and any true goodness is rarely seen. There are lots of unnecessary salacious scenes. This is just a modern idea of what "family-friendly" means. One night stands, sensual darkness, etc. are seen in our society as "light" fare. This show has no moral compass because we have no moral compass. The characters use their own "feelings" as does our modern secular-humanist society.
Hard to warm up to.
This "sleepy" town lacks any church presence (absolute moral compass). But then again, if there was a church holding to biblical principles, the church would deem the whole mess occultic and in need of exorcism. I know these stories are extrapolations of what were "innocent" fairy tales. But the dark side is shown more than any light side. Darkness is magnified and any true goodness is rarely seen. There are lots of unnecessary salacious scenes. This is just a modern idea of what "family-friendly" means. One night stands, sensual darkness, etc. are seen in our society as "light" fare. This show has no moral compass because we have no moral compass. The characters use their own "feelings" as does our modern secular-humanist society.
Hard to warm up to.
Stella Days
(2011)
Lacks Imagination
4 June 2014
Two stars. This story was a profane look at the Catholic Church. It contained unnecessary language and sexual content, both of which indicate to me a lack of imagination on the part of the writers. There were no virtuous messages gained from this movie. Pictures in the 30s and 40s were able to be captivating without language or sex. Why do modern writers and producers lack the ability to present a story without salacious content. As I was always told, when a person uses vulgarity or obscenity to express themselves, it is an indication that they lack the ability to communicate intelligently.
The priest has no biblical Christian values to share with the audience. Martin Sheen is supposedly a Roman Catholic in real life. He makes the priesthood look like nothing more than a new-age, "god within you" sort of role. He overlooks and actually condones the sexual immorality of a parishioner, and sides with the adulterers as if they are the heroes of the story. The movie uses profanity that I know was not common in the 1950s. Just overall a lackluster, meaningless movie.
The priest has no biblical Christian values to share with the audience. Martin Sheen is supposedly a Roman Catholic in real life. He makes the priesthood look like nothing more than a new-age, "god within you" sort of role. He overlooks and actually condones the sexual immorality of a parishioner, and sides with the adulterers as if they are the heroes of the story. The movie uses profanity that I know was not common in the 1950s. Just overall a lackluster, meaningless movie.
Never Got Off the Ground
12 February 2014
I rarely pan a movie. But this one never got off the ground. I watched for 50 minutes and it still did not get past the "setup" that should fuel the remainder of the movie. I loved seeing all the faces: Mickey Rooney, Jim Backus, Don "Red Ryder" Barry, Wally Cox, Jack Elam, Noah Beery, Jr., and more. Yes, lighthearted and family-friendly. But poor Dan Blocker, who was supposed to be the highlight of the movie just never perked up. I wish the lady who was supposed to show up on the train had actually come. That would have been something to wrap the movie around.
Watch for nostalgia.
Not late at night. it will put you to sleep.
Watch for nostalgia.
Not late at night. it will put you to sleep.
The Agony and the Ecstasy
(1965)
Presents God in a Proper Light
2 January 2014
This movie is a credit to the producers. It shows the Pope of Rome as human, and as a man who understands his weaknesses and God's greatness. I am a Baptist and hence do not hold to Roman Catholic theology. However, it is fair to say that the two main characters, Michelangelo and Pope Julius do a good job of pointing to the bigness of God and the smallness of man.
The movie has some very good statements about God and His sovereignty. The Pope in a weak and humble moment is found by Michelangelo kneeling with a candle at the top of the scaffolding under the panel depicting creation. He asks with awe and wonder about how Michelangelo came to the image of God and man. The Pope then stated, "There is God Who created man, and the artist who was moved to paint the image . . . I am merely a Pope." And he meant "merely a Pope." He understood his smallness. At the end the dying Pope says to Michelangelo, "When I stand before God in judgment, I will place this ceiling in the balance against my sins . . . perhaps it will shorten my time in purgatory." Again, I do not hold to purgatory. But the Pope understood that only those things done for the glory of God will last. Good movie and does honor to history, WITHOUT bad language or sexual content. Good family fare.
The movie has some very good statements about God and His sovereignty. The Pope in a weak and humble moment is found by Michelangelo kneeling with a candle at the top of the scaffolding under the panel depicting creation. He asks with awe and wonder about how Michelangelo came to the image of God and man. The Pope then stated, "There is God Who created man, and the artist who was moved to paint the image . . . I am merely a Pope." And he meant "merely a Pope." He understood his smallness. At the end the dying Pope says to Michelangelo, "When I stand before God in judgment, I will place this ceiling in the balance against my sins . . . perhaps it will shorten my time in purgatory." Again, I do not hold to purgatory. But the Pope understood that only those things done for the glory of God will last. Good movie and does honor to history, WITHOUT bad language or sexual content. Good family fare.
Island at War
(2004)
Does Not Reflect Well on the People of the Islands
24 December 2013
The show is dark and depressing throughout, with no bright points or themes the viewer could rally around. The series makes the people of the Channel Islands look cowardly and compromising at best. Many of the island women are shown as trollops who easily give themselves to the Germans. The few characters with any virtue are killed in the first two episodes, leaving the remaining, less than admirable characters to finish the series. There is one exception in the town constable, who openly disdains his captors and works to undermine them. His wife too remains virtuous. However, their characters are overshadowed by the loose and easily manipulated young women who provide nothing for the viewer to warm up to.
Just overall an unedifying series full of lechery.
Just overall an unedifying series full of lechery.
Poirot
(1989–2013)
Excellent Visuals
26 November 2013
At first Poirot seems like a comic book character, and really that does not change much. However, once the viewer is inured to the fantasy-like stories, it becomes very entertaining. What strikes me most about the series is the superb photography, the choice of vistas, the colors of the scenery, of the vehicles, and of the characters' clothing. The "art deco" look of the buildings, art, furnishing, and clothing is eye candy.
Poirot's supposed genius and ability to figure out even the most convoluted situations is gratifying for those who want the bad guys caught and the good guys rewarded. His ability to admit his failure is notable, but sometimes it is as if he is saying, "I am sorry I thought myself wrong, when I was really right." Poirot's sidekick Captain Hastings is much like Holmes' Watson, about a step and a half behind and a day late. Much as with Watson, one wonders what good Hastings does, but sees clearly the impediment he is to Poirot.
A classic and characteristic exchange between Poirot and Hastings shows the contrast between the shallow Hastings and pensive Poirot. After speaking with the "Veiled Woman" (a villainess posing as blue blood), Hastings says, "What a stunning woman!" Poirot replies with a knowing smile, "I sometimes think mon ami, that you are too easily stunned."
Chief Inspector Jap at first is the bumbling, jealous cop who resents Poirot and gets in Poirot's way. As the series develops, Jap's respect for Poirot grows as does Poirot's for Jap. Eventually Jap becomes an ally and helper for Poirot. It is funny to see the contrast, as Poirot stays in the finest hotels while on a case, while Jap shares a bed (out of fiscal necessity) with another cop in a hostel. When Jap visits Poirot's office, he is served coffee in a plain cup and saucer, while Poirot drinks his nog (looks like Irish coffee) from a fancy clear, silver-handled tankard.
All in all this is a very good series, and fuels the addiction of movie-lovers like me. Another well-done British production; head and shoulders above anything on American TV. This from an American reviewer.
Poirot's supposed genius and ability to figure out even the most convoluted situations is gratifying for those who want the bad guys caught and the good guys rewarded. His ability to admit his failure is notable, but sometimes it is as if he is saying, "I am sorry I thought myself wrong, when I was really right." Poirot's sidekick Captain Hastings is much like Holmes' Watson, about a step and a half behind and a day late. Much as with Watson, one wonders what good Hastings does, but sees clearly the impediment he is to Poirot.
A classic and characteristic exchange between Poirot and Hastings shows the contrast between the shallow Hastings and pensive Poirot. After speaking with the "Veiled Woman" (a villainess posing as blue blood), Hastings says, "What a stunning woman!" Poirot replies with a knowing smile, "I sometimes think mon ami, that you are too easily stunned."
Chief Inspector Jap at first is the bumbling, jealous cop who resents Poirot and gets in Poirot's way. As the series develops, Jap's respect for Poirot grows as does Poirot's for Jap. Eventually Jap becomes an ally and helper for Poirot. It is funny to see the contrast, as Poirot stays in the finest hotels while on a case, while Jap shares a bed (out of fiscal necessity) with another cop in a hostel. When Jap visits Poirot's office, he is served coffee in a plain cup and saucer, while Poirot drinks his nog (looks like Irish coffee) from a fancy clear, silver-handled tankard.
All in all this is a very good series, and fuels the addiction of movie-lovers like me. Another well-done British production; head and shoulders above anything on American TV. This from an American reviewer.
Foyle's War
(2002–2015)
Subtly Addictive
10 November 2013
I gave this series a nine. But it borders on a ten. When I began in episode one of the first season, I was not sure. It seemed depressing and the character D.C.S Foyle seemed unemotional, cold, and hard to warm up to. As I continued in the series, Foyle did not change much, but I adapted and began to truly appreciate the work that went into creating feature-length episodes with intriguing plots and subplots. There is genius in the writing, producing, and acting. The sets and period equipment are very well done and seem very consistent.
I am an avid videophile, and watch all the "old fashioned" stuff, whether made from 1930-1950 or made to depict this period. Nearly all the "modern" attempts to depict the Word War II period take such liberties and do such violence to the memory of the people and cultures involved, that they are distasteful and unwatchable in my assessment. This British-made "modern" treatment is, on the other hand, superb. The idea of mixing wartime England with a police/mystery story is just amazing and well done. Both elements are given appropriate coverage and the balance is artistically maintained.
I highly recommend this series for its quality. It serves as a pleasant respite from the poorly-researched and purposefully irreverent and salacious junk on TV and the screen today. Well done Foyle's War.
I am an avid videophile, and watch all the "old fashioned" stuff, whether made from 1930-1950 or made to depict this period. Nearly all the "modern" attempts to depict the Word War II period take such liberties and do such violence to the memory of the people and cultures involved, that they are distasteful and unwatchable in my assessment. This British-made "modern" treatment is, on the other hand, superb. The idea of mixing wartime England with a police/mystery story is just amazing and well done. Both elements are given appropriate coverage and the balance is artistically maintained.
I highly recommend this series for its quality. It serves as a pleasant respite from the poorly-researched and purposefully irreverent and salacious junk on TV and the screen today. Well done Foyle's War.
The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes
(1984–1985)
It Grows on You as You Watch
22 April 2013
Before I began watching the series of one-hour TV shows, I watched the associated 103 minute TV Movie, "The Sign of Four." At first I was put off by the frequent hints that Holmes was a needle drug user (apparently cocaine and morphine according to Watson's allusion). Once those hints went away as the season progressed, I became more interested in seeing a now clear-minded Holmes pursue his adventures. Holmes did appear rude, bombastic and unpredictable in temperament at first, but that too seemed to improve with time. Once these poor character traits seemed to subside (or I became inured to them), it became almost impossible to not be glued to each episode. One in particular, "The Red Headed League," was most exhilarating to watch, as Holmes dealt with corrupt royalty, a silly pawn shop owner, and Professor Moriarty. It is a "three pipe" challenge to Holmes, meaning he has to smoke three pipes of tobacco while mulling it over.
This series of Sherlock Holmes shorts has Watson a much more perceptive and helpful assistant to Holmes as contrasted with the Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce version, where Watson is an addled and unreliable hindrance to Holmes. Watch for the episode where Sherlock's older brother is introduced. It is entertaining to see them both deducing much from looking at a random man through the window. For any who would enjoy a fairly "family-friendly" fully engaging mystery series, this is one for you.
This series of Sherlock Holmes shorts has Watson a much more perceptive and helpful assistant to Holmes as contrasted with the Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce version, where Watson is an addled and unreliable hindrance to Holmes. Watch for the episode where Sherlock's older brother is introduced. It is entertaining to see them both deducing much from looking at a random man through the window. For any who would enjoy a fairly "family-friendly" fully engaging mystery series, this is one for you.
Tell Your Friends