Reviews

35 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
Trump: An American Eagle
14 June 2020
This show does a great job at displaying Trump's success in America. It gives every single reason why Trump is our president. He lives and breathes for the American dream. He is the American Eagle we all deserved. He's the American hero we could ever ask for. I will be here for Trump 2024 and after. The leftist media can try to bash and slander Trump all they want, but I know what he really is. He is a true patriot, godspeed Mr. Trump.
5 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Wannabe Taxi Driver with Talentless Cast and Crew
9 April 2018
This is a very incompetently made film. The directing style was boring and copy and paste. Lots of bad composition and very choppy camera work. The amount of times lighting was out of continuity was distracting. The jump cuts are jarring and serve as a pretentious purpose to try to make violence as non glorified. This director does not understand how to use violence. Not showing violence or showing violence, it all depends on the tone the violence is presented in. Joaquin Phoenix is one of the most overrated and talentless actors in existence and this proves he is another incompetent actor who does nothing. His performance is awful and annoying. The score was constant noise as this is no surprise from a horrible composer like Jonny Greenwood who has composed many pretentious work for awful director Paul Thomas Anderson. This is another irritating soundtrack from failed guitarist of mainstream era music boy band Radiohead. There is no story, but it rather copies everything Taxi Driver did. Focus on the psychology nature of this man who was once a war vet. Word for word and even visual for visual copy of Taxi Driver. The only twist is it tries to be French New Wave full pretentiousness. Lynne Ramsay has crafted another awful movie alongside a really bad thriller called We Need to Talk About Kevin, Morvern Callar, and Ratcatcher. Do yourselves a favor and never watch this movie, you will never get your 90 minutes back. 0/10. No style, no substance, just very try hard stupid.
23 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Worst Movie of the Year
23 November 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This is one of the most poorly written, produced, directed, acted, edited films I've seen all year. It's all entirely incoherent with 0 logic put into it. From characters to story, everything is done completely wrong. The directing is very bad. You won't see anything more pretentious than the shots and color grading of Three Billboards all year. It's a lot of slow pans, hand-held, and shots of billboards that has no significant meaning. The lighting is also very unnatural too. There is a super pretentious deer scene that supposedly represents incarnation? What does that symbolic metaphor supposed to represent if her daughter is dead? UGGHHHHH. The music is absolutely horrible. It's this typical Coen Brothers esque music. Actually the entire film feels like a Coen Brothers rip off. There is also this obnoxious Southern music that will fill your mind with toxic. The characters and the story represents a Southern country. Another movie glorifying these obnoxious conservative Trump tards. The more we support these vagrant trash, the more the world will suck. Three Billboards is one of those cynical depressing movies that doesn't help anyone. "OH LIFE IS SO DEPRESSING, LOOK THE COPS DON'T HELP FIND THE RAPIST AND WE MAY NEVER FIND THE RAPIST SO LETS GO DO SOMETHING IMMORAL OR KILL OURSELVES." Seriously? The message is so bad in this film that it doesn't even make sense. The acting is some of the worst I've seen all year. No one is good in this movie and the characters are just down right awful. All of these characters have problems and they are so unlikable that you just don't care for them. They also make absolutely 0 sense. So, Frances McDormand is supposed to be this strong female character, but she is dependent on the cops catching her criminal? SHE ENDS UP GOING AFTER A RAPIST THAT ISN'T HER RAPIST, SO WHY DIDN'T SHE DO THAT WITH HER RAPIST IN THE FIRST PLACE? Oh yeah, to even add more heat to that ending. Apparently Sam Rockwell knows where that rapist lives just by getting his car plate number and the blood from him beating him? He's not a cop anymore, so why is he able to get confidential information that he shouldn't have access to? OKKAAAAYYY that makes no sense. Sam Rockwell becomes from a racist cop to good cop for some reason because he read a letter from his dead chief. Why? He despised his chief in the first half, so that right there is a plot hole. The editing is absolutely poor. Sam Rockwell decides to go beat up redhead boy funding the billboards after his chief kills himself cause I guess he think those billboards killed his chief? We never saw any of that anger so it is just came left field without reasoning. The chief killing himself also makes no sense. There was absolutely 0 development that he was struggling with cancer. Just one cough of blood here and there and some dark jokes about cancer. The movie failed to deliver that aspect and so him killing himself after making sex jokes with his wife made no sense. Here is where the movie gets even more messy. The town blames the billboards for what caused his death, but before that happened. Frances McDormand says to Woody that everyone knows he had cancer. SOOOOO WOULDN'T HIS STRUGGLE WITH CANCER BE THE REASON WHY HE KILLED HIMSELF? WOULD THAT BE A POSSIBLE EXPLANATION AND NOT THE BILLBOARDS? Way to contradict yourself director/writer. This film is full of contradictions like these. The movie itself overall doesn't work well as a dark dramedy. The comedy is not funny and repetitive. It's a lot of derogatory jokes and "oh that's from a book, oh that's from a movie." Those ships have sailed long ago. There is nothing original about this film at all. Anyways, this movie gets a 0/10.
42 out of 98 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good Time (2017)
1/10
Plagiaristic copy of Martin Scorsese's Awful After Hours
7 November 2017
This movie rips everything from Awful Hours (directed by one of the most overrated and terrible directors of all time, Martin Scorsese). The plot is essentially After Hours, the characters are guilty and stupid. Setting is contained within an entire day till morning again. The soundtrack is like a time clock and extremely obnoxious. Only this time, IT'S ALL CLOSE UPS. WOOH Shaky CAM, GO LOW BUDGET. The directors are such idiots that they once again make the mistake of what made their movie Heaven Knows What extremely mediocre. HIRING PEOPLE WHO WORK THEIR OWN JOBS. They aren't acting cause they can't act, you can tell when a police officer is an actual police officer or a nurse is an actual nurse. Way to be so lazy and not hire actors to challenge them to try to be a legitimate police officer or nurse. Where's the ambition? You're gonna use the same piece of crap narcotic crackhead that got real jail time years ago from Heaven Knows What? Really directors? Also, Ben Safdie is insulting to mentally handicapped people. His performance is so wrong in so many ways. Wow, such genuine directors. Way to make fun of handicapped people JUST WOW! Robert Pattinson once again cannot act. What an idiot, he ruins method acting just as Jared Leto. You don't starve yourself in a basement and look like a homeless hobo when the character clearly isn't supposed to look like one or act like one. He literally has a nice apartment and his parents are wealthy enough. This is one of the first times I've seen an actor add plot holes to a movie. The cinematography is pretty bad. It's filled with obnoxious pandering metaphors using neon colors. Oh, when they're in the red. It's danger. When it's pink, it's love. Are you serious? You are going to play the audience dumb because you think they can't process information without visual cues? Who do they think we are? Sunjay Gupta? JUST LET US THINK FOR OURSELVES. OH YEAH, lets not forget about that ending. Holy in god, what a pretentious ending about rehab and therapy.

0/10.
19 out of 79 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Unnecessary Politics
26 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
The first Kingsman was subtle with Obama's head exploding. This here is just pandering and irritating. 2016 and 2017 are the years Trump gets bashed a bunch by angry voters and celebrities. At this point, it's real old and it's not funny anymore. It is so ham fisted in your face in this film that you just want to die. Basically, Trump is an evil man who wants to kill all the druggies so that no more drugs will be distributed. Then, they have Hillary Clinton who is the vice president. By the end you know it all, Trump's impeached. Hillary becomes the president of the United States.
34 out of 82 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Stalker (1979)
1/10
One of the worst movies and directors of all time
22 September 2017
Awful in every way. The cinematography is bad, the shot composition is bad, the editing is bad, the music is garbage, the writing is cynical, the entire film is a piece of crap. Andrei Tarkovsky has a extended filmography of crap after crap after crap. It has really terrible long takes that are easily made with no complexity to the lens whatsoever. All the performances are crap. The message is, LIFE IS BORING, WE NEED TO BREAK INTO A MUTATED FACILITY BECAUSE IT CAN MAKE US RICH. Yeah, greedy unlikable criminal scum characters and we're suppose to support them? Nope. What's even wrong with this film is that throughout the film, it is hamfisted in your face with monologues and dialogue of the writer telling the audience about his cynical life because he's just another crappy Communist who can't make or write films. Cannot believe people praise craptist like him. It's these pretentious people that make Hitchcock, Kubrick, and all these other crappy filmmakers high regard. Screw em.

0/10.
9 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A Ghost Story (2017)
1/10
Ripping off a boring dull craptist like Andrei Barfofsky
21 September 2017
This director tried so hard to rip off that sack of Russian craptist, Andrei Barfosky. There was another craptist called Alejandro Inarittu who tried to copy Barfosky with The Revenant and that was a slow, boring, technically pandering piece of crap too. This here is no different. Long takes, static shots, really bad cinematography, and just ugly like every Barfosky movie. What do we get in a world full of overpraised craptist like Emmanuel Lubezki, Andrei Barfosky, Ingrid Bergman, Alejandro Inarritu, or the king of sack of them all, Hitchcock? We get pretentious cinema, nothing more. All their movies suck and this one sucks just the same.

0/10 like every one of their films.
10 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mother! (2017)
1/10
Plagiaristofsky Strikes Again
11 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
After plagiarizing Perfect Blue with Requiem for a Dream and the entirety of Black Swan, here comes another movie he plagiarizes once more. This time it is Roman Polanski's horror masterpiece Rosemary's Baby. It is a shot for shot remake. If you've seen Rosemary's Baby, you basically know what happens. The only thing is that it is filled with horrible performances from the likes of modern thespians such as Jennifer Lawrence, Javier Bardem, Ed Harris, and Michelle Pfeiffer. Just terrible actors who can only act modern and you could easily spot who they are each time they are on screen. It's also poorly directed with bad CGI, bad camera work as usual, bad editing, and just crappy color grading. If you hate Aronofsky's look and style, you'll definitely hate this one even more. Darren Aronofsky proves himself to be an incompetent director who only knows how to steal from others once again. Do yourselves a favor and boycott this movie.

-100/10.
39 out of 123 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
It (I) (2017)
2/10
A Potty Mouth Adaptation that misses the point
8 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is filled with ridiculous amounts of profanity after another by little kids telling jokes every few minutes because people think kids yelling the F word, C word, S word is funny. Not, this movie is horrible and completely misses the point of what It is supposed to be. It is supposed be terrifying, dangerous, grueling, grim, and depressing. Not this joke fest they've made. Completely overdone and only has 10% of gore of what the book has to offer. This film was supposed to offer NC-17 level violence and even controversial scenes such as a child having sex with another child. There's none of that in here. There's only an arm rip scene, which was done in the most non-disgusting way. Probably because Hollywood has a cynical view of cinema and they can't go all out because they're too wussy to take their ambitions to greater heights. The production is mediocre. Lots of fake looking sets, cheap digital effects that may put the audience off. The child performances are horrible as always. Just straight up cringe. Bill Skarsgaard is okay, but at times he is way too obvious. Once again, a horror film reduced to dumb characters making very dumb decisions. The cinematography was standard, shot composition was below average, lighting wasn't too good, color grading is the blue and orange teal and every Hollywood movie. Do yourself a favor and save yourself from It. It will just irritate your mind the more you watch It.

2/10.
25 out of 57 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Death Note (I) (2017)
2/10
A movie that gets 98% everything wrong
25 August 2017
This movie was a mess. From a directional standpoint, to acting, to script writing, everything. The VFX is horrible in this movie. It's so low budget, you'd imagine it be a cheap TV show. Ryuk's forehead is too big and feels nonexistent within the mise-en-scene. Light Yagami is everything wrong, changed to a bullied kid to feel politically relevant and correct. He's just eccentric, over the top, and a creepy looking mofo. Mia is supposed to be Misa? She is changed to a typical short girl cheerleader who follows Light around. Also, why would anyone name their kid Light in America is beyond me. This movie was rushed. From the start, we already see the book falling down. There is no build up to this or tension, it just falls and it's one of the cheapest looking movie production props I have ever seen. The design is something you'd see from a fanmade film. Then, the title sequence. They got the colors right at first, but then they went with complete blue, when it should be red and a bit of purple. All of the dialogue is awkward and choppy. Terrible line deliveries from each actor, just overcooked and several mumbling moments. The deaths were immoral, stupid, and just goes to Final Destination B-movie horror territory. The writers they hired wrote Immortal, a terrible movie with Henry Cavill. So, it was doomed to suck to begin with. They hired Adam Wingard too who directed the overrated The Guest. He's just bad, they should stop hiring him. His camera tricks are cheap, choppy, and horrible to look at. Blair Witch was unwatchable, this one is almost too. Ugliest looking cinematography of the year, muddy, unsmooth, bad shot composition, and student film level. The music choice is pop/techno like music and it is all wrong. Death Note was Gothic, operatic, and heavy metal. The only thing they got right was Ryuk's voice.

2/10.
377 out of 530 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Defenders: The H Word (2017)
Season 1, Episode 1
3/10
A nearly unwatchable mess
18 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This episode is just so cringy, derivative, and poorly done. The beginning fight scene was over stylized and unwatchable due to how many cuts the editor constantly made second after second. The narrative was as rushed as the typical introduction to the characters in Suicide Squad with weird music choices to unnatural dialogue. The part where I just decided to turn off the episode was when Rosario Dawson says "shall we get that coffee?" Cringe, then the sex scene rapidly edited with cheesy slow music, cringe even more. I am not even going to bother to watch the rest as I can already see this show being crap due to the producers being so clueless of what they're doing.
4 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Atomic Blonde (2017)
1/10
One of the worst action movies ever.
27 July 2017
This is period one of the worst action movies I've ever seen. It failed on every technical level. Shoddy fight choreography, horribly edited sequences, bad camera work, sound effects sucked, and repetitive. The amount of neon lights and unnecessarily dark blue cinematography was jarring to look at. Such ugly cinematography, some of the ugliest cinematography since the John Wick films. Apparently, Leitch hired Johnathan Sela again. Probably the crappiest cinematographer working in Hollywood today. The script is awful as same goes to the original source material. It's derivative, contrived, boring, and predictable. I cannot believe Fox would hired such a crappy director. John Wick 1 and 2 were already awful enough and they go and hire this guy. I don't understand. Now Johnathan Sela is the cinematographer for Deadpool 2. So, brace yourselves. Deadpool 2 will be a total piece of trash and will look like one as well. It's already looking like garbage with it's blue looking colors in that Deadpool 2 teaser before Logan. This guy has an obsession with blue and Deadpool is never meant to look blue. Such a bad cinematographer.

0/10.
65 out of 141 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dunkirk (2017)
9/10
Traumatizing, Unbearable Movie
21 July 2017
Never has a movie been so unwatchable because of how intense it is until this came along. This movie was just all around intense, scary, and realistic to the point that I wanted to leave early. This is not a good film to watch and eat popcorn/drink soda. It is very much a depressing and intense thrill ride. The craftsmanship is off the charts, but the movie is way too vicious for its own good. It didn't even feel like a movie. This is not a healthy movie to watch, you might get sick or be traumatized for life. I don't recommend it for everyone. I'd definitely show this film to any young kids who wish to become soldiers. Show them that they are wasting their time and they will regret signing up for war.

9/10.
4 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Most Boring and Mediocre Film of the Year
15 July 2017
This movie was beyond boring. It was also very pretentious. There were so many plot holes in this film. Way more plot holes than Dawn of the Planet of the Apes. The cinematography was very mediocre. It's the same bland, darkly lit look from the previous Dawn of the Planet of the Apes film. Camera placement wasn't very good and it had no use of the quadrant system when it came to framing either. The CGI is probably the best it's ever been, but it's nothing special. It's just a bunch of talking apes riding horses and shooting machine guns with one arm. The direction had no style, it had weak action sequences that were very stupid with very little inventive camera work. The OST composed by Michael Giacchino might be one of the most laziest OST I have ever heard. It tries to be deep and biblical, but it just ends up being laughable. This is one of the worst films of the year and probably one of the worst films I have ever seen. Highly overrated.

0/10.
137 out of 344 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Baby Driver (2017)
4/10
A Rather Mediocre Flick
1 July 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is a mess. The action was hamfisted and mediocre. While the stunts are okay on a professional standard, they're horribly shot and edited. There were so many quick cuts in this film. I understand they are trying to sync with music, but action scenes are nothing when YOU CAN'T SEE ANYTHING. The tequila scene gave me Tak3n syndrome and it was god awful. The story is very simple/mediocre typical story. All characters are archetypes of 70s - 80s action flicks. They're very one dimensional and it's just not original. The film takes a lot of influence (both narrative and visuals) from 1978 thriller The Driver. Lots of shots of vehicles closing in, drifting, pov shots, rear views, inside shots, etc. The main character is even a mute, but he's autistic and has tinnitus for the sake of being an annoying plot device. The music was the most annoying part of them all. They just put in some crappy pop and rock old music and try to be all hipster. This film starts with one of the most autistic and cancerous scenes I've seen all year. It was worse than the entirety of La La Land. It was cringeworthy bad. There is a bait and switch in the film that ruins the rest of the 3rd act. Jamie Foxx is basically killed off and Jon Hamm's stupid booboo starts playing Rambo at a point blank range. It's stupid stuff characters do like that that gets themselves killed. Then, Mr. Buddy blames Baby for the reasoning why his stupid wife died. From that course, we get an over the top performance from Mr. Hamm as the main villain. Baby of course kills him. The ending is your typical cliché happy ending.

4/10.
27 out of 63 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Greatest Movie Ever Made
21 June 2017
This movie is a master class direction from Michael Bay. It's full of substance and amazing technicality. The visual effects are god like beyond anything Andrei Tarkovsky has ever made. Cinematography is easily a 10/10. This Michael Bay guy is a legend. Anthony Hopkins gives the best performance of his career. Mark Wahlberg is the best ever. I am glad they added the new little Nickelodeon TV kids because they were really important, funny, and added so much to the story! They are all great actors too. It is cool what they did with the mythology, this is certainly a masterpiece and the best film I've ever seen! This film will be remembered as the most important artifact to humanity! It is history in the making upon us! It dives deep into the psychology of why and what makes technology tick and why we should be worried about robots from outer space! 10/10, GREAT FILM. A LANDMARK IN FILMMAKING, FORCE DE TOUR, MASTERPIECE, EXTRAVAGANZA FUN, THE BEST MOVIE OF ALL TIME!
95 out of 205 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Worst SJW/Crybaby Complaining Movie I've Ever Seen
10 June 2017
This writer director wrote and directed this film based off of his father's death from cancer. Boohoo, who cares. If you are going to make a 90 minute movie complaining about your father's illness, then you are a big and weak baby. There are millions of children dying in Africa with no water or food. Your father was just one human being get over it. This movie is completely mis-marketed because he knows the general audience doesn't care about his father and wouldn't want to watch a 90 minute complaint. For 90 minutes, it is another pretentious and clichéd drama with racist stereotypes all around. All the black people in this movie have the worst acting compared to the whites. Clearly, the director intentionally did that so he can start controversy about white power and whites being better than blacks. The movie ends abrupt with no questions answered. The truth is, this movie is about the illness of paranoia and what it leads to. The message that there is just bad and good in the world has been done over thousands of times in other movies. There is nothing original about this film, it just copy cats sources from other scripts. The direction was shoddy, especially the inconsistent lighting and continuity errors. At one point, the director forgot to even use the 180 degree rule. The cinematography was pretty bad. A lot of repetitive camera movement and every framed look like a bad student film. Not a single frame looked like a painting. People should boycott this movie and sue this guy for plagiarism as well misleading his film in the marketing department.

0/10.
7 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wonder Woman (2017)
8/10
A Good Movie, Not Great
3 June 2017
As a lot of DC movies so far, Wonder Woman suffers from a lot of heavy exposition, pacing problems, and rushed villains. However, what keeps Wonder Woman strong is its interesting story, characters, and world building. It has a 2 sided argument between man's and woman's world and it's very well balanced. The characters have real conversations now and not like a bunch of cut board robots. The tone and style of the film presents Wonder Woman in an accurate way. There's colorful cinematography that reminds audience of the first Superman films. Although, it may not look like true technicolor was used, it's still breathtaking to watch. The action is standard to above average. There's several moments of distracting slow motion, but it's not abused compared to 300. The visual effects or fine, sometimes they will be very distracting, but it's a movie about gods and superhero people. Of course there will be a lot of CGI. There's a whole lot of good DC has got right instead of bad, but they still need to work on their marketing skills and fix things the MCU has not fixed. There are three villains in Wonder Woman and they are all rushed with barely much screen time. They are not underdeveloped to the extent of Doomsday in BvS, but they are wasted potential for sure. The performances are average to good, Gal Gadot does a good job as Wonder Woman, except for one over-dramatic part in the final battle. The best performer is Chris Pine as Steve Trevor. He brings a shred of charm and courage to the film and he is a great side man for Wonder Woman. Robin Wright and Connie Nielsen also do great jobs as convincing mentors of Diana. The villain performers on the other hand very much overcooked their performances. They were over the top and they weren't all that great. Where the movie falls and rises is the third act. The final battle adds tons of heart and character to Wonder Woman as well as the message the film accumulates to, but like any other superhero flick, a wasted villain. Do not be surprised if the villain twist was so predictable, I blame it on early Wonder Woman marketing that Warner Bros. didn't keep as a secret.

Overall, I give it a 7.6/10. Definitely the best superhero flick so far this year.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An Entertaining Stupid Film
30 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This film is on all levels of stupid. The characters are entirely clueless and are like caricatures of the previous groups in the Alien franchise. Yes, this film does destroy the mythology of the Alien franchise. At this point, who cares though. If Ridley can cash in and become lazy by turning the Alien films into slasher flicks like Friday the 13th or Final Destination, let him. Either you pay to see or you avoid. They're 100% stupid, funny, and entertaining. There were pacing issues and boring points of talk about evolution and dying species, but when the action kicks in, it's terribly done and it's just all funny. I have never laughed so hard at such a self serious film as Alien: Covenant before. Everyone took it so seriously that you almost feel bad for the entire cast and production. Michael Fassbender carries this film a lot and he says some of the most ridiculous things with a serious face. This is essentially a villains film. It's as much as a villain film as Split was. I question though, how did Ridley Scott knew Shyamalan was going to make a villains film? They must have been exchanging emails or texts and decided to copy each other. Is it possible Shyamalan wrote Alien: Covenant. oooooooooooo.

Jokes aside, I will give this two ratings.

5/10 - overall.

8/10 - entertainment.
1 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
John Wick (2014)
1/10
An Awful Movie with Competent Style
29 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
This film has to be one of the most manipulative films to date. While gangsters did kill his puppy and take his car, it gives him no right to go after and kill them. He thinks revenge is justice and besides, he kills people for money. How are we supposed to care for this disgusting person? The whole film is him getting revenge, it's boring and uninspired. The fight choreography here is decent, predictable and repetitive at times, but it works. It certainly doesn't scream "best assassin in the world", but it's better than most modern action films. The cinematography is slick and cheap, but does give the world an ominous and gloomy atmosphere. The music is as expected, generic club music probably produced by some amateur artists. It's technically competent, but it's still an awful film regardless.

1/10.
8 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
An Awful Sequel to an Awful Action Flick
29 May 2017
This film is just a terrible sequel. The story is about how manipulative John Wick is. He thinks he can just walk in and take stuff without asking. He has a dirty history of violations towards the Continental. He does terrible things to innocent people and we are supposed to care about him? The sequel has ruined the John Wick character. The first one was awful too, but I never expected the sequel to be this awful. Lets talk about the technical aspects of the first film, it had competent cinematography and action sequences. Here, it feels like the director wanted a long fish lens to use to show the action more wide, but all it does was create unnecessary on screen space that turns the action scenes into dull art. The colors are much more vibrant than its predecessor, but there was no reason to do so. John Wick's world is supposed to look dark and ominous. It isn't supposed to look like a world full of rainbows. The cinematography just destroys the tone of the world that was competently created in the first film. The fight choreography and stunts are very mediocre and unimpressive. It's slow and it's so fake that you could easily tear it apart. There's tons of continuity errors where ADR does not match or the scene before doesn't match up with the continuity of the next scene. The sound design is too loud and it's obnoxious to listen to. The music is bloated as if Hans Zimmer composed it. There were times where I noticed the camera man had a difficult time following the action sequences, it was very annoying and laughable considering that they used a wider lens for this. There is an abundance of shaky cam and it's not intense at all, it's lazy. This is an overall lazy sequel that doesn't deserve its rating. Keanu Reeves may have pumped up the training for this, but the directors obviously told him to lay low. The fights got more slower and slower and predictable each minute.

I would give this a 1/10.
6 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
As Stupid as the Trailers Present the Film
27 May 2017
Warning: Spoilers
As expected, this is a thriller about a very stupid person who doesn't have common sense. The girl meets a stranger and decides to ride along with him. It is no wonder she is later captured and locked away in his house. How is this possible? There is no explanation why she is so stupid, but she just is. Her parents must've failed her considering the fact she trusts strangers. She would be raped anywhere she goes. It's a very generic film, with very little performances or any artistic integrity. The film is shot with a fuzzy lens and lots of shaky cam. The soundtrack is an eerie rip off of Misery. This film is a cop off of Misery, except Misery doesn't have a stupid character. This is easily a rental at best.

5/10.
13 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
War Machine (2017)
4/10
A satire on war that is confused what it wants to be.
26 May 2017
This addition to Netflix seems much like a waste of money. The budget is 60 million and 70% of it very much looks like a TV film. The direction is as standard as the cinematography. At one point, it broke the 180 degree rule during a 60 minute interview, it just didn't work. Brad Pitt plays a general who is often serious, over the top, and funny? His performance is fine, aside from his crazy one eye mannerism. He's able to capture multiple emotions with several looks and it kinda works. The performances from the supporting cast are fine. They are just not given much screen time. Lakeith Stanfield is a stand out. His scenes were brief, but he was able to display an impressive range of emotion. The biggest problem with this film is it's just flat. There's no stake or ambition. It is a very safely crafted film. It is generic and uninteresting told with heavy narration and exposition. I guess the film is trying to display how some military folks have an obsession with war. The general here is quite irresponsible, egotistical, and seems deranged. The same with his crew as well, but just not as much. There's a large amount of tonal shifts from being serious to comedic and the film doesn't know which one to choose, so it ends up uneven altogether. There are times where the film switches hard rock to rap then to classical music creating uneven scenes with abrupt jump cuts that just makes no sense. I am guessing it was meant to be comedic, but it just didn't work. Overall, I think this film is quite a mess.

4/10.
67 out of 151 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Manifesto (III) (2015)
1/10
Proof That Being a Chameleon Does Not = Good Acting
13 May 2017
Chameleon actors are bad once they are too over the top. Does it really matter if an actress or an actor is not recognizable? If the intentions of an actor/actress does not translate on screen 100%, they are surely giving an awful performance. Jake Gyllenhaal has for a decade been described as a chameleon actor, but even he has his limits. This film proves Cate Blanchett is not an amazing actress because she has limits. What do I consider amazing? Marlon Brando and Daniel Day Lewis of course. Those are the only true chameleons that have never given a terrible performance. All these subpar actors in Hollywood today are just beginners. She's not acting for survival, her mind is about giving a good performance, not survival. It's what modern actors get wrong, the focus on your performance does not equal a good one. Acting is a survival mechanism, so you have to use it like you want to survive.
15 out of 80 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Bit Too Student Level
12 May 2017
The crafting of the story is great, but the way it is shot makes it feel like a student film. There are at times where the camera man screws up the framing and movement. This film deserved better cinematography and the use of digital killed the period it was going for. Should've used 16mm cameras to have that 80s feel. The actors are fine, I would've liked the husband to be more bigger in size so it's a bit more realistic because he sure looked like a weak skinny bag of sticks. There are some disturbing imagery and it works. It's a good watch if you're into psychological thrillers. The film is quite a slow burn, so be patient.

7.0/10
7 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed