Nick of Time (1995) Poster

(1995)

User Reviews

Review this title
167 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Good movie.
barberoux3 April 2000
I thought this was a pretty good movie. A suspenseful movie, Hitchcockian in that an innocent man gets involved in a deadly plot. An intriguing plot that had me thinking what I would do in the situation. Christopher Walken was, as usual, creepy and Johnny Depp was believable. The rest of the cast was very competent. I'd advise renting it. Not a special effects extravaganza but a nicely written fast moving movie.
68 out of 76 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Real time conspiracy
Prismark1016 May 2015
Nick of Time has a rather novel concept of taking place in real time some years before the TV series 24 made this its central conceit.

Johnny Depp plays an everyman accountant whose young daughter is kidnapped by villainous Christopher Walken and ordered to kill the Governor of California or else his daughter will die.

Walken gives him a gun and a time limit of 90 minutes and it has to be done when the Governor is giving a speech in a hotel.

Depp in an unusual role playing a normal guy has to keep his wits about him and try to find help but Walken and his cronies are watching his every move. Depp still manages to unravel a conspiracy.

The film may have a preposterous plot, surely there are easier ways to kill the Governor but the film kicks in quickly and director John Badham clearly brings a Hitchcockian sheen to the film. You seem the time motif regularly in the film and an increasingly frantic Depp as time goes on.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
intriguing thriller premise
SnoopyStyle5 February 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Accountant Gene Watson (Johnny Depp) arrives on the train with his daughter Lynn from San Diego. Mr. Smith (Christopher Walken) and Ms. Jones (Roma Maffia) are debating about people at the train station and pick out Gene and his daughter. They flash a badge and take them back to their van. They kidnap his daughter and demand that he murder Gov. Eleanor Grant (Marsha Mason). He has less than ninety minutes. With Smith watching over him, he is finally able to convince Grant's assistant Krista Brooks (Gloria Reuben). Smith kills her revealing a big conspiracy within Grant's inner circle. Gene has only shoeshine guy Huey (Charles S. Dutton) to turn to.

It's an intriguing premise of a thriller taking place mostly in real time. It does feel like the movie is trying too hard. Walken keeps coming by injecting his weirdness as threats. It needs a few moments of quiet to build up the intensity. I would also think that Gene would take the shot when he has Jones cornered with his daughter. There are a few moments where the movie stuck me as wrong. I like the premise more than the result.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Clever little thriller
bob the moo17 October 2001
A clever idea - an thriller played along real time to involve the viewer directly in the tension and pressure of the deadlines. Depp is forced to kill a senator or his daughter will be killed by Walken and Maffia. He is given a gun and a time limit to carry it out.

As the basis for a thriller it doesn't quite work - the real time concept falls apart a few times, but with this much talent on board it still holds it own. A throwback to the Hitchcock everyman thrillers of years ago, Depp plays his character well and you always believe he is just an ordinary man in an unbelievable situation rather than an action hero in the making while Walken does what he does best and plays the villain well.

The plot holds together well and you really find stuff out at the same time as Depp does. Some of the conspiracy stuff towards the end of the film is obvious and doesn't add anything to the film, but the main story revolving around Depp and Walken is tense enough to carry the film.

It doesn't contain any explosions or martial arts but the tension is good throughout. It's not a classic thriller but it's quite an original idea and plot and almost manages to keep the tension for the whole movie.
79 out of 97 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Has some nice elements, but very flawed
rbverhoef6 December 2004
Warning: Spoilers
The first time I saw this movie a couple of years ago I thought it was pretty good. Seeing it again I can't remember what I thought was good about it. There are some enjoyable things like Johnny Depp and Christopher Walken; it seems that everything these actors do has some joy in it. Another nice thing is that the movie plays in real time. The movie is ninety minutes long, and so is the story.

Walken orders Depp to kill a woman, the governor of California (Marsha Mason), and to persuade him he and some others kidnap his little daughter. He is given a gun by Walken. He has ninety minutes to do so and we see that ninety minutes. My problem with this movie is the Walken character. Although he is enjoyable to watch, he pops up everywhere, only to serve the plot and make things harder for Depp. Help comes from Huey (Charles S. Dutton), how I will not reveal, but his qualities and handicaps are only there to serve the plot, again. There are some clever moments, I liked them, but I kept wondering things.

Pretty early in the movie we learn that almost everybody is in the conspiracy to kill the woman, including members of the security. There must have been an easier way to kill this woman when security is on your side. I kept thinking about that, spoiling parts of the movie for me. Still, if you like Depp or Walken you might enjoy this since both are on screen almost the entire time.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Very Suspenseful For One Look
ccthemovieman-16 November 2006
Warning: Spoilers
This is one of the most suspenseful movies you'll ever see, but that good for only viewing. After you've seen it, the impact is greatly lost for further viewings.

It got panned by many critics for having too far-fetched a storyline, and I agree. However, if you can put your brain on "hold" for 90 minutes, you'll enjoy the movie. The only annoying part for me was the typical Liberal bias in here where the Liberal politician is the target of a Conservative fanatic. They never show you the other way around. At least the writers here were somewhat subtle.

As interesting the characters as Johnny Depp usually plays, the two villains in here were more fun to watch than him. Christopher Walken and Roma Maffia were riveting as the killers. Depp actually played a normal person, which is not normal for him.

The suspense was so good, I could hardly watch parts of this. That was the best part of the movie. The worst may have been the so-overplayed cliché of the killers hesitating before shooting and then, because of that, being shot themselves. That is so tiresome. Or sometimes the crooks talk instead of shoot, and then are shot. It's one of critic Robert Ebert's biggest pet peeves and I agree with him. It's another reason this film got low grades by most critics.

However, this "real time" movie (trying to get the viewer even more involved), is guaranteed, if you've never seen it, to give you an entertaining hour-and-a-half.
31 out of 40 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Nothing all that special, but it's a fairly enjoyable timewaster.
callanvass5 November 2013
(Credit IMDb) An unimpressive, every-day man is forced into a situation where he is told to kill a politician to save his kidnapped daughter.

This isn't your typical Johnny Depp film. It's quite surreal to see him play such a usual, everyday man role. While this isn't exactly original, and it's undoubtedly derivative, I still managed to have some fun with it. It has some fair suspense, and Johnny Depp makes for a likable, if flawed hero. It does get a little convoluted in the second half, but it moves at such a swift pace, I managed to block it out. Christopher Walken can do this type of stuff in his sleep. He always makes for a fantastic villain. Charles S. Dutton plays a shoe shiner, and is Depp's helper. He did a pretty good job, and adds solid presence like he does in most movies. Courtney Chase is quite tolerable as the daughter. With kid actors, I can't ask for much more than that. It's not original, it won't make your day, but it's fairly entertaining. If you need time to kill on a slow moving day, this is your ticket

6.3/10
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Tense and suspenseful Neo-noir film with an exciting race against time
ma-cortes5 May 2008
This Hichcockian movie deals with an accountant named Watson (Johnny Depp) arriving in L.A. Union Station accompanied by his little daughter named Lynn (Courtney Chase). He's approached by a pair of rare people (Christopher Walken, Roma Maffia). The daughter is taken hostage into a van and Watson suffers a blackmail , he's given a gun with six bullets and he must go to the Bonaventure Hotel and commit a murder on a known people (Marsha Mason) . Watson is only helped by a shoeshine worker (Charles S Dutton).

Gripping, original action movie with Depp desperately trying to find the means to avoid his daughter to be murdered. Excellent thriller full of intrigue and tense , this is a fast-paced, stylized action-suspense film . The tension of this picture keeps snowballing as the clock ticks ever close for killing the starring's daughter . The tale appears to be unfolded in real time as the many on screen clocks will verify. Most unusual is the device of having the victim play desperado and hunt the killers, and saving his daughter , as time runs out. Casting is frankly magnificent, Johnny Deep as a tormented businessman who becomes involved into a twisted plot , Christopher Walken takes honors as a psychopath who attempts to turn the tables on the victim before he can inform the police . Plus, a good secondary cast , such as Peter Strauss, Roma Maffia, Gloria Reuben, Marsha Mason, G D Spradlin, among them . Adequate musical score accompanying the action by Arthur B. Rubinstein and inventively photographed by Roy Wagner. The motion picture was well directed by John Badham. He's a nice director who achieved his greatest success in the 80s . He directed several hits (Saturday night fever, Short circuit, Blue thunder, Drop zone, War games, Skateout), though today making TV movies (Jack Bull, Floating away) and television episodes (Crossing Jordan ,Psych, Las Vegas , Standoff, Heroes).
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Interesting time waster
mls41825 March 2023
This isn't too bad. It has some huge implausibilities and plot holes but try to set those aside. It tries to be original but falls back on a few bad cliches.

Depp is adequate but he is never challenged. Walken phones in a crude, mean and menacing antagonist. The rest of the cast are full of fun quirks and pretty likeable and entertaining.

Interesting to see Marsha Mason as governor of California. Even more interesting to see Peter Strauss as California's first husband. I bet he only got scale for this.

You might be a bit nonplussed by the ending resolution, but there is a bit of comic relief to distract you.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Walken and Depp Make the Movie Worth It
andrew485822 July 2003
I am a huge Christopher Walken fan so that was my motivation for seeing this film. I must first say that it is similar to "Speed" but I thought this was much more entertaining. The movie is entertaining and it has a few great little speeches by Mr. Walken. Johnny Depp is cool as a normal guy trying to be the hero. Watch this movie if you love these two actors. If you do not like Walken then you will probably not like the film (but who doesn't like Christopher Walken?!)
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
So bad!
jv-181-3468834 January 2014
Everything in that movie is phony. The basic thing if you want to make a good suspense film is that the situation is believable and you can identify with the protagonist and think: "Oh my Gosh that could happen to me" "If it does, I would react exactly like this"... In this film a very strong and professional outfit (Christopher Walken) wants to kill the governor of California (we'll never know why) during a political meeting (so corny, already in 1995).This outfit include almost everybody except the governor herself, including all the security crew (!??). And in order to do that they kidnap some guy (Johnny Depp) and his daughter randomly at the train station, give a gun to this guy (who has never used a gun before in his life) and tell him that if he doesn't kill the governor at 1:30 pm they will execute his daughter. Off course the guy doesn't want to do it and try to escape them but Christopher Walken keeps popping up from everywhere to keep the pressure on Johnny Depp.

So the question is: "Why didn't they hire some hit-man to do the job????"

Because there would have been no film? Yes, it's true but it would have made more sense.
19 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Suspenseful and Entertaining.
Brad K.12 December 1998
Warning: Spoilers
I've read a lot of poor reviews for this movie. I don't understand it. The move is very good, it's not a 5 star movie, but it's still good. Johnny Depp (Edward Scissorhands, Ed Wood) stars as an average guy whose wife has just recently died. One day on the way home, Depp and his daughter are kidnapped by two people, one of them being Christopher Walken (The Deer Hunter, The Dead Zone). They tell him that his daughter will die if he doesn't kill a certain person. He soon finds out that this person is the Governor of his state. They give him a gun and tell him that if she's not dead by a certain time his daughter is dead. This is a great premise for a suspense movie and is carried out very well. The great Charles S. Dutton (Rudy, Mimic) plays a shoe-shiner who helps Depp. Depp is solid as the father in a role that's different from a lot of his earlier roles. The always excellent Walken is, as usual, awesome as the bad guy, a role I always love to see him in. The film keeps you going, by offering a couple of nice twists. Ignore the reviews and rent this movie.
62 out of 72 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not really special, but certainly worth a watch.
philip_vanderveken30 November 2004
This may not be the best thriller I've ever seen, but it sure wasn't the worst either. At first it is a bit chaotic and not always as intense as you might want to, but as the movie progresses it gets better and better.

First you see a man and his daughter arriving at a train station. The police immediately takes them into custody, forcing them to come with them to their van. Their they make the man an offer. He has to kill a woman who he doesn't know. He gets 1.5 hours for it and if he fails or refuses his little daughter will die. Soon he finds out that the woman he has to kill is the governor and that he is involved in a conspiracy.

As I already said the movie isn't really great at the beginning, but from the moment on that you are past the half way point it seems to shift up a few gears and it does exactly what you can expect from a thriller. That's why I give it a 7/10. Not really special, but certainly worth a watch.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Overwrought and under thought
pyrocitor25 May 2008
The consistent struggle for originality in the genre of action thrillers has lead to certain less than outstanding premises being lauded as innovative - Nick of Time being a perfect example. While the premise of an everyman being blackmailed into murder to prevent his daughter's murder is undeniably a clever one, showing glimmers of Hitchcock, it was hardly an instant meal ticket to a successful film. In the hands of a sturdy, capable filmmaker and boasting a taut, terse script, Nick of Time might have evolved into a nail biting masterpiece of tension, but as it is, the results fall disappointingly short of initial expectations.

While the idea of the film's plot unfolding in real time is intriguing, despite its concise hour and a half length the film still feels overlong, as if it is pushing its slight concept over too extended a period, leading to many repetitions or slack moments as opposed to the taut, gripping thriller it intended to be. Director John Badham (name related puns were just bound to surface given the quality of his work here) appears uncomfortable with the notion of an intense, claustrophobic thriller, and continually inundates the film with long shots, as if attempting to broaden its scope - the result being an expansive laxity of the tension which was ultimately necessary to make the film a success. Similarly, despite its "thriller" classification, the action in the film is restricted to only two brief setpieces (one being an ill- advised dream sequence), suggesting its being primarily fuelled by suspense and emotional tension - however, apart from the odd patch of effectively generated tension, the film is so poorly executed on these fronts that it is often simply a lackluster, or simply uninteresting watch, falling short of expectations that were never terribly high to begin with.

The paltry, often laughable script offers nothing more than poor lines, a mostly entirely absent sense of palpable tension and frequent absurdly inexplicable character motivations (seeing as Walken's character oversees the pending murder so closely, why not simply do the job himself?) leading to plot twists which make little sense. Even the initially appealing premise reveals itself to be a thinly thought out one, complete with dollops of plot holes too large to be swallowed up by the pithy enjoyment factor. While some peculiar cinematography adds a mildly unique quality to the film, the ever so subtle recurring visual motif of clocks or watches serves to slow the film down rather than amp up the tension.

Despite being deprived a venue for his usual lunacies, Johnny Depp does what he can with the role of a harried everyman blackmailed into an assassination plot, exuding enough charisma to keep the thin premise afloat. Christopher Walken has a great deal more fun, oozing wild eyed menace as the mysterious captor coercing Depp into murder, and delivering the only really noteworthy performance of the film. Charles S. Dutton is amusing as a jovial shoe shiner swept into the midst, though his character's offbeat humour more often than not seems out of place considering his grim surroundings. Roma Maffia puts a slightly inventive spin on the archetypal hostage captor, but Marsha Mason gives an embarrassingly melodramatic rendition of the threatened senatorial candidate, Depp's target. Similarly, Courtney Chase fulfils just about every "irritating little girl" cliché in the book as Depp's kidnapped daughter, doing little to sympathise the character in the audience's eyes.

While the film can hardly be described as anywhere near as downright despicable as it might have become, disappointing is indeed the word of choice as a decently intriguing premise is overwhelmed by inattentive, lacklustre directing and lazy screen writing generating hardly a scrap of tension in a film intended to thrive on it. While the odd sliver of enjoyment can frequently be extracted from the experience, most would be well advised to avoid Nick of Time apart from those willing to tolerate its glaring inadequacies.

-5/10
14 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Riveting thriller with an excellent cast
MovieAlien1 February 2002
Johnny Depp takes a break from his usual roles as outcasts, in this playing a clean-cut accountant who travels by train back to LA with his daughter after the wake of his deceased ex-wife. Upon entering the station, 2 people show him a police badge, take him into a van, and blackmail him into assassinating the governor in one hour or else they'll kill his daughter.

The remainder of the entire movie takes place in a hotel where the paranoid atmosphere gives clues about how big the conspiracy is and the political motives behind it; with nearly everyone keeping their eye on him and very little time, he's faced with the difficult task of getting out of this situation.

A must-see if you like edge of your seat excitement and an excellent cast, with Depp (great as Gene Watson), Marsha Mason, Charles S. Dutton, and Christopher Walken, playing the most despicable bad guy since Laurence Olivier in "Marathon Man".
48 out of 60 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Mild Entertainment…Worth a Watch for Johnny Depp and Chris Walken
LeonLouisRicci17 August 2015
Shortly after this Box Office and Critical Bomb, once Acclaimed Director John Badham Migrated to TV and has been there ever since Doing Episodes of Various Series. Not to Say that this Midland Movie was to Blame but although it does have some Energy and Engaging Scenes, as a Whole the Film Fails on the most Basic Level.

Our Old Friend "Suspension of Disbelief" won't cooperate and keeps it from becoming an Involving Thriller. It is just too Contrived and Forced to be much more than a Time Waster and considering Johnny Depp and Christopher Walken manage to bring Their Characters to Life, the Film itself is on Life Support from the Get Go.

It's one of those that takes Place in "Real Time" and the Minutes Count Down as the Plot Unfolds as Clocks can be Seen Full Face or in the Periphery in almost Every Scene.

But as the Characters Tick-Toc in and out of the Frame the Film becomes a rather Failed Mechanical Exercise. There is one Dream Sequence that Works and the Movie as a Whole isn't awful (thanks mostly to Depp and Walken) it remains a Failed Attempt at Worst and a Mild Entertainment at Best.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nick was Nice
view_and_review7 September 2020
Movies like "Nick of Time" take skill to do correctly. The entire movie occurs in roughly an hour and a half movie time so you have to craft a good script to capture that little bit of time in a feature length movie and still be compelling. "Nick of Time" did that.

A man named Gene Watson (Johnny Depp) is visiting L.A. with his daughter. They don't even get out of the train station before two law enforcement types rustle them up and whisk them away in a van. At that time Mr. Smith (Christopher Walken) tells Gene that he must kill Governor Eleanor Grant (Marsha Mason) by 1:30 or his daughter will be killed. That's a doozy of a decision for anyone. Doubtlessly, you're going to do any and everything to save your daughter, but killing a governor is morally detestable as well as a one way to ticket to prison. Besides, he can't think that they'll leave him alive after the job is complete.

With that hanging over his head and the ever-watchful eye of Mr. Smith Gene went into action. I don't want to make it sound like he had some ingenious plan to avoid killing the governor and save his daughter because he didn't. He went into action sort of like an old jalopy--sputtering, wheezing, and barely moving.

It was an intense movie though. Johnny Depp captured the sheer fright, anxiety, confusion, and hopelessness of his situation. Walken was masterful as the omnipresent evil pall hanging over Gene. And even as far-fetched as it was, I liked the script. It was something different, and in a good way.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Well acted thriller
perfectbond18 January 2004
Nick of Time was a very enjoyable thriller in the Hitchcock tradition of an ordinary man caught up in an extraordinary situation. Depp and Walken are very authentic and entertaining in their roles and I was very interested in their fates. The staging in the hotel was very nicely executed by the director. Strongly recommended, 8/10.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Average Thriller
Luigi Di Pilla21 July 2003
It is definitively not a must see. I discovered this one in a dvd shop. Before buying it I read the IMDb critics. I don´t know why many say this is an underrated movie. I don´t find so because every time the victim fails killing the governor he gets a new chance. Nothing really happens until at the end when the shots falls. I have to admit that there were some good jokes from the shoes cleaner but that´s all. Well done but just average. Running time is okay. My wife and I vote 6.5/10.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Riding thin Mr Badham
videorama-759-85939110 November 2015
Nick Of Time is one of those short nifty films that just gets by by being cute, (so darn cute here) throwing everything in, but the kitchen sink. Depp and daughter arrive at an L.A. train station where they are approached by two mysterious figures (Walken and Mafia, like you've never seen her before) posing as plain clothes cops. At the flash of a badge, the daughter is snatched from Depp, and Walken gives him an ultimatum: assassinate this senator (Mason) within 75 minutes, of the daughter will be killed. These pro killers will carry out on their promise too. So we're working with real time, where it's hard to believe all of what Depp goes through, happens in this time space. I'll be honest, it's almost improbable, and you will notice by the cut back to time readings, time moves slow. It is interesting though in how Depp does his own thing, using his smarts, trying to figure an answer out of the dilemma, and what he resorts to. There are holes in this film, trust me. Depp plays it down the line, Mr Goody clean, in one of his sanest roles. He's superb, where Walken is fantastic as always, and menacing where Mafia is scary and disturbing. Mason with her doting public figure character, couldn't be finer, where Strauss, as a bad guy? yeah, and Mason's husband, does well. There are some thrilling turns in this, where Depp must outwit a sea of good and bad guys, but on the whole, NOT is weak, get by thriller, written by the guy who strangely enough wrote 94's dark, flat, adult pic, The Pornographer, where his baby was 82's The Beach Girls. NOT does have a truly thrilling and spectacular climax, bringing it's quality up, in something too little, too late. It isn't one of the brightest films, or brightest written, parts, involving dialogue too, seemed to be made up as it went, by a writer who's written his share of pics, and a consistent director, who's made his share.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Fairly Interesting Film
Rainey-Dawn11 December 2017
Johnny Depp is Gene Watson. Gene is a man with a good career, a wife he's divorcing and a daughter, Lynn, he loves dearly. Everything was fine until Gene was approached by Mr. Smith (Walken) and Ms. Jones (Maffia) - a 'couple' with a hard bargain for Gene: Your daughter is kidnapped, you have to kill California governor Eleanor Grant in 90 minutes or less, or Lynn will die.

The film starts out a bit slow but it builds into a suspenseful thriller. Not my favorite Depp or Walken film but a good watch from time to time.

6/10
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Really Disappointing
gavin694226 August 2016
An unimpressive, every-day man (John Depp) is forced into a situation where he is told to kill a politician to save his kidnapped daughter (Courtney Chase).

I simply cannot express my level of disappointment. Johnny Depp has his good movies and bad movies, and so does Christopher Walken. But together, you would think this would be a surefire hit. Walken is pretty good as the menacing bad guy... but Depp, he just seems lost in the material.

The concept and plot are fine, but it seems to run on and on, and how many times can one guy bump into the governor? There are some plausibility questions, but we can ignore those. Really, it just comes down to Depp not selling the role.
14 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
How are we gonna' get out of this fix?
mdlee5 September 2003
When you see the name Wes Craven, John Carpenter or Brian de Palma, we know that we can trust that we're in for a couple of hours of fine entertainment.

Although not as much a household name as the directors above, John Badham knows how to tell a suspenseful story as well as any of the other "kids on the block." Please look up his filmography and see all the countless house of excellent entertainment he has brought us; not only on the big screen but on television as well.

In "Nick of Time" John carefully guides us through one disaster after another. Johnny Depp conveys his frustration and fear that he might not be able to prevent any of the bad things that will happen.

Christopher Walken again proves that he is as comfortable being the "heavy" as he has been the "hero."

At a time when sometimes the good guys don't always win and the bad guys sometimes "get away with it," this is one cinematic thriller that should keep you on the edge of your seat the whole 90 minutes.
34 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The only thing that stands out is that the time in the movie is the same time in real life
The-Sarkologist18 October 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is a simple action movie with a little twist. The twist is that it is filmed in real time. That is the time that passes in the movie is exactly the same time that passes in the real world. Thus the movie plays out over about an hour and forty minutes, and the same amount of time passes in the world of the movie.

An accountant comes into Los Angeles with his beautiful little daughter after going to his ex-wife's funeral. At the railway station, two people, claiming to be police officers (and I do not doubt that they are police officers) approach him and ask him to come with them. Once they are in the van, they hold his daughter hostage and tell him that unless his kills a specific woman within one and a half hours, his daughter will die. It turns out that this woman is the governess of California.

The plot is interesting as it turns out that a lot of people have conspired to kill the governor. The reason is that she broke a number of promises when she was elected, and these promises were to her sponsors. She got into office on a business platform, and once she was there, she took a social justice platform, and her one time allies did not like this. This seems to be central in American politics. This I will look at after I look at the plot itself.

Everybody was involved in this, but the accountant was simply a scape goat. This becomes even more evident in the closing scenes where at least three people draw guns. What happens though is that there is an Asian guy with a video camera who keeps his eye on the accountant. This is because the accountant is a scape goat and will take the brunt of the public anger while the real conspirators escape. Yet the accountant is very willing to go through with the deed, but only if he does not get caught - this is seen when he is alone in the room with the sleeping governor - but once she awakens his attitude changes. He will do it to save his daughter, but he knows that if he does it, he will go to gaol - or be executed, which is more likely, and his daughter will probably die anyway.

This is interesting that the movie also deals with the battle between the left and the right. The right has always been for less state intervention and the free market economy, while the left has been for social justice. Social justice infringes on the free market and as such the right does not like it. LBJ, one of my favourite presidents, was very much for social justice. This movie represents, in a more violent way, the struggle between the right and the left in America - and the right is very much stronger, as we see here. In 1968, when Nixon was elected, it is said that the left and the New Deal, which is represented by the governor, was finally defeated and that the Americans went for a free market economy. It is interesting that the ones who have the power in the movie are those behind the scenes, while everybody seems to be supporting the governor.

This movie was alright, and it is that real-time aspect of it that makes it interesting. It is also a decent action movie, and Johnny Depp is a pretty cool actor - especially how he seems to devote himself to independent movies. He actually seems to play the innocent accountant much better than the punk cop.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Extraordinary stupid... let's employ blackmailed rando assassin instead of the 1,000 conspirators
bgaiv13 December 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I watched this movie for the first fifteen minutes expecting that the idea the Depp character was supposed to assassinate the Governor was just a gag before the real plot began... but that gag never ended.

Depp and Walken certainly sounded like a fun ride, but oh dear no.

I do enjoy the type of 80s and early 90s movies that are fun romps that don't really make sense, but that doesn't work when they try to get heavy. This is of the Judgment Night ilk, but this one is far worse.

We're supposed to believe this man has to assassinate the Governor by a certain time, or his child will be killed... not the worst plot at all, except it goes on and on, and all the governor's staff is in on the plot too. And Depp even tells the Governor of the plot and it goes on!

It's truly astonishing.

Again, this works for a Ferris Bueller type story, and maybe more heavy than that, but nowhere near this heavy. There's an early scene where Depp has his daughter in a van with the hostage taker claiming to shoot the girl. Well, if I were Depp (who was given a gun) I would have concluded these people are insane and shot her in the face. If I could not have personally done that, I would have danced around the van screaming this woman has a gun on my daughter, they are blackmailing me, etc.

And of course at the end, Depp shoots Walken, instead of earlier.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed