User Reviews

There is nothing here that would warrant a 10 out of 10 rating. This is a very lukewarm paranormal investigation. That hyper focuses on such things as a rocking chair that happened to rock when one of the Paranormal specialists happen to walk by it. That's the height of all the evidence in this extremely boring paranormal investigation. There's a whole lot of drama with a certain investigator who basically throws himself on the ground and then gets up and says he needs air. Oh and then there is a faucet running in one of the bathrooms but of course there's no cameras to capture when it turns on. What do I say to all these 10 out of 10 hyper enthusiastic ratings. Take a look at the dates of these over the top reviews. It looks very very suspicious. And there's no shortage of fans of these guys since they're all YouTubers. Most of the 10 out of 10 ratings come within days of each other using words like masterpiece over and over again in supposedly separate reviews. Much of the language in the overabundance of 10 out of 10 ratings is the same. I give it a 1 out of 10. Cuz I don't think you can give it a zero out of 10. This was the biggest waste of my streaming time. And all the hype doesn't really add up whether it be watching the whole thing which I don't recommend. This is a paranormal failure if anything. And if you do make it through this tedious documentary. Please help out by setting the record straight and give your honest review of this POS.

People either believe in the paranormal or they don't. Depending on where you stand on that spectrum, this "documentary" will prove your theory. Why? Confirmation bias. Nothing that is recorded: sound or movement proves anything one way or another. But, there are some perfectly silly moments. For example, the rocking chair that moves on its own. Just as the investigator steps, the rocker moves. Then there is a cutaway, and then the investigator jumps up and down to "prove" it wasn't his step. Yet, video of the chair shows clearly that one rocker blade is pinned against the baseboard, keeping it from moving. Who moved it and why the video cutaway? Was it the ghost, or someone very alive who manipulated the scene? Also, there is the radio that finds interference. Any first responder with an LMR has experienced this at times. Cellphones have tower in one place, and just inches away, have none. Such is the issue with electronics. Ghost, or not? Shot in one dimension, video makes it easy for the ordinary to appear extraordinary. The film abounds with noises, moving doors etc. In a mid 18th century structure. For the non-believer, physics and age are the cause. For the believer, it is the paranormal. So, how do you break the confirmation bias tie? By adding what almost no paranormal investigator will add: on-scene neutral parties and individuals from the non-believer side to prove what is presented to us as true. It's good science to do so, adding positive and negative controls to the experiments to remove any possibility of filmmaker shenanigans or scientifically explainable occurrences. Without controls, this is nothing more than people who make their living and bind their reputations to the existence of the paranormal, showing viewers what the filmmakers want the audience to see. A sad confirmation biased reality.

We were very excited to see this and it was such a letdown. Amazing how with great equipment, nothing was caught live. Lots of the usual suspects, guys with black baggy clothes, a hipster beard, tats, solemn faces, scowls and hysttiond behaviour. A perfect place to film yet nothing gets captured. The obligatory rocking chair movement in old wooden floorboards, the "possession" and being pushed by an "entity" and running out of the house into the darkness to get "fresh air". 🙄 Interference thru the walkie talkie, please. You're never showed anything paranormal.. These YouTubers need to stick with just that,YouTube. The only thing that was real were there imaginations and bad acting. One of the worst things is when "investigators" continually talk and move around filming their idiotic "expressions" in night vision. Like I said, we were hopefully, only to be horribly disappointed. Good drone footage and slightly eery music, but too much and at the wrong places.

The trailer for this film made it seem a lot more interesting than it actually was. Most of the "evidence" shown in the trailer was not even shot while the team in the documentary were visiting the house.

I'm not a skeptic of the paranormal, but man I am tired of these ghost hunting paranormal shows and docs that do a whole lot of "I can feel an energy here" or "Oh someone just whispered to me/blew on my neck/touched my back" with shocked faces in night vision shots, yet nothing is ever shown to the viewer that might be interesting to watch. They just want you to trust and believe what they're saying is happening and frankly, it makes for a really boring viewing experience.

And I'm sorry, the whole scene in the upstairs room where the guy "sees something astounding" and calls all the other guys in, and it's a freaking block with a 7 on it just sitting on a shelf? That's supposed to be amazing or astounding to any of the viewers? I honestly had no idea why they were all so impressed by it, until a little snippet of explanation referenced their other hunts (which I assume are on their YouTube channels? They aren't in this movie) and why this number has significance to them. Pretty lame.

The only interesting thing to me was the history of the home that they got into a little bit at the start with the interviews. I had to turn it off shortly after the rocking chair "moving on its own." I couldn't sit through another 40 minutes.

First off, before I even clicked on "play" - I knew what I was going to get; the same old shoddy, fake, over acted footage that I've seen the last 50 yrs in these types of "investigations". I already knew that nothing ground breaking was going to be shown otherwise it'd be on every legit source of news, not crappy YouTube channels.

But when the guy asked the question with the recorder I was expecting a (fake) voice to respond. However, I started laughing when he had to record his question & play it back (which made me lol because if there is any chance of the voice being legit he wouldn't have to "record" himself). But once he "played back" his "recorded" question you can obviously hear that the question he asks is in a difference cadence then what he said in front of the camera which makes it obvious that his question was pre-recorded along with the fake "FY" response. BTW - I like how his response was to casually laugh and just sit there. Yeah, ok. You already gave it away that it was staged because of the cadence being off but if it were real, like you'd just casually laugh & keep sitting there - after an undead voice told you to "FY".

I also like how backward hat guy w/ glasses has to ask "how do you work this thing" regarding a walkie talkie when they're in the basement. Yeah, real professional when your giggling like a girl and have to ask how a piece of basic equipment works that I had when I was 5 yrs old. Nice observation that the air is cooler & crisper.....while in a basement. Yeah, no kidding Sherlock.

I like how in this investigation (and most others) stories of unreal things are reported like levitation, tables & chairs hovering, people being thrown etc (like it used to be an everyday occurance) - but now that we live in the era where we can have 100 cams in the farmhouse none of this incredible things happen. No levitating tables? Right. Because that never happened in the first place so it's not surprising that it doesn't happen in front of a camera. Just easy things are faked like books coming off shelfs, doors that are ajar a few inches suddenly close, etc. - easily fakable things.

I did have to also LOL when there was all the hoopla (when the guy came sprinting outside to grab the other guy to let him know that they "finally got it - clear as day!") about the rocking chair. At least if you're going to fake it, do it when there is nobody in the room. But you did it when the guy was walking right up to it and you can't see his feet or the bottom of the chair. People that are lying usually preemptively say things "Oh and if anyone thinks that was fake his foot would have to be at another angle etc." rather then not saying anything.

However much $$$ was spent on this production including time, gas money, equipment etc. Was a waste. You might has well just taken that pile of cash and put it outside, soak it with gasoline & set a match to it. It accomplished the same thing; nothing.

I am a paranormal junkie, but I'm neither gullible or ignorant. Synopsis: A few guys, two of which are obviously fan boys of Zac B, go to the conjuring house and find absolutely nothing. What little they say was evidence is so easily explainable even a caveman could do it. For instance, the rocking chair is so obvious. Funny how the chair rocks with the guy shifting his weight while he steps forward and backward. Give me a 16" piece of window trim with a bed to block the entire thing and I'll get the same visual. The one evp they captured sounds exactly like one of the guys that's in the room. Oh yeah, it's mimicking. Give us a break.

Just a bunch of hipsters in a cabin in the woods, trying to scare one another and creating "loopholes" for the most gullible of viewers..."ghosts" mimicking the appearances and voices of the investigators...uh, okay...i mean, the dude who looks like the lead singer of Weezer couldn't even remember that they HAD JUST discussed this a couple of minutes later after supposedly having the "creepiest moment of his life"

"that ghost looked and sounded just like you. It must be mimicking us!"

and pretty much 95% of everything they say they experienced in the house...voices...happens when no one's filming or cameras happen to be "turned off"...and all that is "captured" on camera is a rocking chair moving and a supposed "possession" where the demon haunting the place seems to be "confused" about the place it's been inhabiting for the last hundred years...seriously, what the f---

supposedly, this is the actual location that the movie "The Conjuring" is based on...if you saw that movie, you know those ghosts f'ed up a lot of people and made everyone in the house's lives a literal living hell...WELL...not here...here, you get "demons" and "ghosts" who do the VERY BARE MINIMUM of anything "paranormal"...in the movie, you see people getting possessed and thrown across the room and entities coming in and out of closets and clapping right next to people in the dark...HERE...oh, we're just going to rock this chair a little and repeatedly tell you to leave (in the investigators' voices because, well, mimicking)

basically, this is the type of movie that REALLY, REALLY, REALLY wants you to "oh" and "ah" and get chills at everything they're presenting...but, all you end up feeling is bored and putting on your "Conjuring" blu-rays instead.

I tried and wanted to like this documentary I'm a real paranormal junkie and this was poorly shot, Clearly the guy wants to be like Zac from the talking, acting hell even the glasses it's not authentic at all I bet Zac is LHAO it's ok to be a fan of the great Zac B but don't mimic everything he does that's a copycat. There's even a guy name Aron, And the extra added noises and sounds are just horrible it's just not what I expected!!! I've seen tonsssss of paranormal documentaries and shows and this is by far the absolute worst I've ever seen!!! So yeah it's a huge no for me go back to the drawing board because this wasn't it.